ZAPROGRAMOWANI na zawał. Przyszły lekarz ujawnia ratunek.

Regarding vaccinations, I analyzed the results in my vaccination package, which I've now managed to develop. I managed to reduce aluminum exposure by half, and mercury exposure to zero. I know of a case where a newborn died from tetanus. First, the child grimaced, and then it just went away because the parents said, "No, we don't want it." A person's agitation, arguments, and toxic relationships within two hours of an argument lead to a 500% increase in cardiovascular risk. Blindly resorting to supplementation is deceptive in most cases and may not be effective. We are the only mammals who die of a heart attack due to a ruptured male plaque. And my guest today is Tomek Trawiński, a future doctor. Good morning, Tomek. Good morning. Hello again. I'm very happy to be in the studio and finally be able to share more knowledge, another batch of knowledge, which we will add to soon. Exactly. The first episode, a huge success, over 140,000 views, a very positive reception, tons of comments, and we know you need it. So today's episode, which I've kind of called a compendium, a compendium of knowledge for a healthy Pole. And remember, Tomek and I will try, we will try very hard, to ensure that this episode features solutions that are accessible to everyone, without requiring you to buy new equipment or tools, or pay for additional sessions, supplements, and so on. Tomek, how about we go in this direction today and collect, I don't know, seven, maybe 10 such points that will make Poles healthier, able to live their lives, maintain their health for many years, and without having to spend an additional thousand złoty. Mhm. Yes, absolutely. This makes it even more important to note a certain correlation we see in the 20th century, particularly in the field of health. Because in so many areas we're seeing tons of supplements, tons of techniques, strange, various improvements to our health at the cellular level, some bioavailable food, and yet we're actually forgetting the basics. In all of this, I've noticed that many people are increasingly wondering what form of magnesium to take, rather than considering their diet and, in fact, what direction I'm heading. Is this form of nutrition I'm currently glorifying really good for me in the long run? Because I listened to someone, someone online, and then I'm ultimately left to deal with it all alone, because I have a family to support, I have shopping to do, I often have a business to run, I have to pay double my health insurance premiums, and things like that—well, as an individual, for someone living in Poland—are burdensome. Exactly. So let's move on to the first question. The first question will be a tough one, because it will be related to statistics, statistics, death statistics, which are alarming. Attention, Tomek, you know them, but some of our viewers may not. Cardiovascular diseases account for 36% of deaths in Poland. Cancers account for almost 24%, so that's a total of 7.60%. The system treats symptoms when it's too late. That's usually the case. The question is, what are you doing? How do you take care of yourself as a future doctor, knowing that you don't want to be included in these statistics? What can our viewers do, so that in the future, their families don't say that our family member is also included in these statistics, which are very alarming. Yes, absolutely. The statistics on cardiovascular diseases are absolutely abysmal when it comes to mortality rates in our country. And it's worth focusing on the basics here. Before we delve into the topic of macronutrients, micronutrients, and what we actually need, I'd like to mention one issue: noise. We very rarely talk about noise as a factor that can precipitate a cardiovascular event. And as it turns out, in the area we're in now, around houses, around apartments, right? The acceptable decibel threshold is 56 decibels. For example, what's making the sound of our conversation? That's already 50 decibels, right? 50-60 decibels. Now, let's note that noise is an independent factor that influences cardiovascular events in the following way. Every 10 decibels of constant noise—i.e., noise pollution, roadworks, and so on—increases the risk of a cardiovascular event by 3%. Imagine a situation: we live with a toxic partner. Yes, an argument, raising our voices—that's about 80-90 decibels. So, let's note that from a conversation at 50-60 decibels, we jump to 80-90, where the risk can increase by as much as 12-9%. Another issue is that if we live in a built-up area, we create constant noise, but also the electronics surrounding us also contribute to the risk of heart disease, right? Because of the noise. The data is clear. 48,000 hearts could be saved annually in the European Union if we eliminated this noise, the noise people live with. And of that 12,000 lives, in 10 years, 120,000 people could be alive today if it weren't for the noise of the 20th century. I'm talking about sounds, excess sounds, construction work, excess noise generated by cars, loud exhausts, loud music, and all that. So how do you eliminate it then? Well, well, I agree that it's very rarely discussed. This may be the first time I've heard it stated so bluntly that it's so destructive to our hearts. How do you eliminate it? What, did you escape to the countryside? Yes, I did. As for my life, I grew up in the countryside, but I study in the city, and what do I do? To reduce my exposure to this noise by half. First of all, I live in a family-friendly area, so I've tried. I prefer quieter places, but even if I'm in a city, I wear earplugs at night because it reduces the impact of noise on my health. But at night, right? Yes, at night, when it's quiet, it's necessary. Night. Yes, because sometimes, very often, even subconsciously, noise outside the window can affect us. Even if someone revs their motorcycle, we feel it, and the motorcycle continues to run, but for our brain, for our hypothalamus, and the hormones that are secreted, the auditory cortex, amygdala, hypothalamus, hormones, and the cardiovascular system are interconnected. It's worst to do this at night, because it disrupts our body's natural rhythm and thus leads to stress. And stress generally causes cardiovascular incidents in the morning. We see the highest number of cardiovascular incidents on Monday mornings, when after a long weekend of partying, sitting for extended periods, or loud noise, parties, and so on, along with pro-inflammatory molecules, we have a heart attack when people wake up on Monday. Interesting, interesting. This even surprised and intrigued me, because I had no idea I was so particular about hygiene. I think many of you are too, but we tend to associate earplugs with someone who snores or with someone in some very noisy environment, but in the normal conditions you're talking about. Using earplugs is probably a new experience for many. It's new to many, and I especially recommend the silicone, foam ones. You can buy them at any medical supply store, any health and safety store. They'll tell you they're disposable, not disposable at all. I've been using them for two years now, and I haven't had any problems. So if we want, we simply roll down the curtains, cover our ears, and isolate ourselves for the night. Regarding the second issue, well, I'm trying to figure it out, yes, I'm doing what I can. I often close the blinds to somewhat muffle the sound. Additionally, regarding the alarm clock itself, many people don't know about it, but it's such a powerful stimulus that sometimes our blood pressure can spike dramatically, thus leading to a potential cardiovascular incident. That's why you might even notice on my profile, there's a roll down the curtains. It lists specific alarm clocks worth setting, which are neutral to cardiovascular health. I've included them for Android and iPhone. Neutral. Neutral. When they wake us up, they operate at a rhythm and frequency that doesn't adversely affect the hea

, and then it just went away because the parents said, "No, we don't want it." A person's agitation, arguments, and toxic relationships within two hours of an argument lead to a 500%increase in cardiovascular risk.

Blindly resorting to supplementation is deceptive in most cases and may not be effective. We are the only mammals who die of a heart attack due to a ruptured male plaque. And my guest today is Tomek Trawiński, a future doctor. Good

morning, Tomek. Good morning. Hello again. I'm very happy to be in the studio and finally be able to share more knowledge, another batch of knowledge, which we will add to soon.

Exactly. The first episode, a huge success, over 140,000 views, a very positive reception, tons of comments, and we know you need it. So today's episode, which I've kind of called a compendium, a compendium of knowledge for a healthy Pole. And remember, Tomek

and I will try, we will try very hard, to ensure that this episode features solutions that are accessible to everyone, without requiring you to buy new equipment or tools, or pay for additional sessions, supplements, and so on. Tomek, how about we go in this

direction today and collect, I don't know, seven, maybe 10 such points that will make Poles healthier, able to live their lives, maintain their health for many years, and without having to spend an additional thousand złoty.

Mhm. Yes, absolutely. This makes it even more important to note a certain correlation we see in the 20th century, particularly in the field of health.

Because in so many areas we're seeing tons of supplements, tons of techniques , strange, various improvements to our health at the cellular level, some bioavailable food, and yet we're actually forgetting the basics. In all of this, I've noticed that many people

are increasingly wondering what form of magnesium to take, rather than considering their diet and, in fact, what direction I'm heading. Is this form of nutrition I'm currently glorifying really good for me in the long run? Because I listened to someone

, someone online, and then I'm ultimately left to deal with it all alone, because I have a family to support, I have shopping to do, I often have a business to run, I have to pay double my health insurance premiums,

and things like that—well, as an individual, for someone living in Poland—are burdensome. Exactly. So let's move on to the first question. The first question will be a tough one, because it will be related to statistics, statistics, death statistics, which are alarming.

Attention, Tomek, you know them, but some of our viewers may not. Cardiovascular diseases account for 36% of deaths in Poland. Cancers account for almost 24%, so that's a total of 7.60%. The system treats symptoms when it's too late. That's usually the case.

The question is, what are you doing? How do you take care of yourself as a future doctor, knowing that you don't want to be included in these statistics ? What can our viewers do, so that in the future, their families don't say

that our family member is also included in these statistics, which are very alarming. Yes, absolutely. The statistics on cardiovascular diseases are absolutely abysmal when it comes to mortality rates in our country. And it's worth focusing on the basics here. Before we

delve into the topic of macronutrients, micronutrients, and what we actually need, I'd like to mention one issue: noise. We very rarely talk about noise as a factor that can precipitate a cardiovascular event. And as it turns out, in the area we're in now, around

houses, around apartments, right? The acceptable decibel threshold is 56 decibels. For example, what's making the sound of our conversation? That's already 50 decibels, right? 50-60 decibels. Now, let's note that noise is an independent factor that influences cardiovascular events

in the following way. Every 10 decibels of constant noise—i.e. , noise pollution, roadworks, and so on— increases the risk of a cardiovascular event by 3%. Imagine a situation: we live with a toxic partner. Yes, an argument, raising our voices—that's

about 80-90 decibels. So, let's note that from a conversation at 50-60 decibels, we jump to 80-90, where the risk can increase by as much as 12-9%.

Another issue is that if we live in a built-up area, we create constant noise , but also the electronics surrounding us also contribute to the risk of heart disease, right? Because of the noise.

The data is clear. 48,000 hearts could be saved annually in the European Union if we eliminated this noise, the noise people live with. And of that 12,000 lives, in 10 years, 120,000 people could be alive today if it weren't for

the noise of the 20th century. I'm talking about sounds, excess sounds, construction work, excess noise generated by cars, loud exhausts, loud music, and all that. So how do you eliminate it then? Well, well, I agree that it's very rarely discussed. This

may be the first time I've heard it stated so bluntly that it's so destructive to our hearts. How do you eliminate it? What, did you escape to the countryside? Yes, I did. As for my life, I grew up in the

countryside, but I study in the city, and what do I do? To reduce my exposure to this noise by half. First of all, I live in a family-friendly area, so I've tried. I prefer quieter places, but even if I'm in a city, I wear earplugs

at night because it reduces the impact of noise on my health. But at night, right?

Yes, at night, when it's quiet, it's necessary. Night. Yes, because sometimes, very often, even subconsciously, noise outside the window can affect us. Even if someone revs their motorcycle, we feel it, and the motorcycle continues to run, but for our brain, for our

hypothalamus, and the hormones that are secreted, the auditory cortex, amygdala , hypothalamus, hormones, and the cardiovascular system are interconnected. It's worst to do this at night, because it disrupts our body's natural rhythm and thus leads to stress. And stress generally causes

cardiovascular incidents in the morning . We see the highest number of cardiovascular incidents on Monday mornings, when after a long weekend of partying, sitting for extended periods, or loud noise, parties, and so on, along with pro-inflammatory molecules, we have a heart attack when people wake

up on Monday. Interesting, interesting. This even surprised and intrigued me, because I had no idea I was so particular about hygiene. I think many of you are too, but we tend to associate earplugs with someone who snores or with someone in some very

noisy environment, but in the normal conditions you're talking about. Using earplugs is probably a new experience for many. It's new to many, and I especially recommend the silicone, foam ones. You can buy them at any medical supply store, any

health and safety store. They'll tell you they're disposable, not disposable at all. I've been using them for two years now, and I haven't had any problems. So if we want, we simply roll down the curtains, cover our ears, and

isolate ourselves for the night. Regarding the second issue, well, I'm trying to figure it out, yes, I'm doing what I can. I often close the blinds to somewhat muffle the sound. Additionally , regarding the alarm clock itself, many people don't know about it, but

it's such a powerful stimulus that sometimes our blood pressure can spike dramatically, thus leading to a potential cardiovascular incident.

That's why you might even notice on my profile, there's a roll down the curtains. It lists specific alarm clocks worth setting, which are neutral to cardiovascular health. I've included them for Android and iPhone.

Neutral. Neutral. When they wake us up, they operate at a rhythm and frequency that doesn't adversely affect the heart . But I remember that roll down. It was actually there, and it's not true that all the roll downs are about drama and

various things online. You can find useful ones. I also immediately changed my alarm clock to one of these. I found it, and it wasn't easy because I thought I'd have to click on something else somewhere, but it's doable, so I

encourage you to change it. Yes, of course. This is one of the changes we can make. As I said, heart attacks most often occur in the morning . We have the commute to work, we have issues that wake us up. And the worst

thing is interfering with our sleep because it puts the most strain on our system, the cardiovascular system via the nervous system. We'll also talk about sleep in a moment, about chronic fatigue, because I have some very interesting research from September of

this year, also very recent. But is that all there is to it? Maybe not everything, because we won't cover everything today, but the circulatory system, these cardiovascular diseases, are one of the most important elements that unfortunately take away Poles and

people around the world. What else? What's your hygiene like in this regard ? We often hear the phrase, "Don't annoy me, or I'll have a heart attack." And this is absolutely true, as a person's nervousness, arguments, and toxic relationships increase

cardiovascular risk by 500%within two hours of an argument. We have a fivefold increased risk of a heart attack within two hours. Therefore, stressful situations are absolutely essential. This is where the saying comes from, as it interferes with health and puts strain on the

cardiovascular system. Another point: this has been studied on several million people. The last collective analysis I read covered 5.6 million people. It showed that we have significant heterogeneity in influences because everyone has different relationships. Some people have a toxic

relationship, others feel more alone in it. But relationships that are called bad, bad relationships—everyone feels this subjectively—contribute from 16 to 31%to our future cardiovascular risk . Now I'd like to address one point, because I've noticed on your channel,

and on many other channels, that many people use statistics where we say, " You have a 20%higher risk, you have a 10%higher risk." But no one says these are relative values. Now, let's make sure everyone understands this, because

it's simple. A relative value is a 20% increase in risk. Right? You have a 20% increased risk of dying from a heart condition. But we need to recalculate this by the absolute value, meaning what my personal genetic and

environmental risk is. For example, it's 10%. We add the relative value to that, so we calculate 20%from 10%, and we get an overall risk of 10%plus 2%, or 12%. That's how it works. That's why many studies say it's worth considering

dyslipidemia, smoking, stress, and genetic predisposition as factors that can even exponentially increase cardiovascular risk.

We'll be moving on to the next questions in a moment, including this report I have prepared here. It's very, very interesting, but I have a surprise for you, my dears. There's a lot of knowledge in this episode, and we've

only just started, and there was a lot in the first one, so you can download a summary of this episode in the form of a mind map. In the file below the episode, just leave your email address and you can download it. It will be

sent to you by email. It's also a gift to make it easier to incorporate this knowledge into your life. One more surprise for me.

Yes, Tomek didn't know this, but the second piece of information is that Tomek will know, because Tomek will be appearing at our conference, which we're organizing on October 9th and 10th in Chorzów. We'll see each other like every year. And Tomek will be on

stage, maybe not even in a debate, but in a conversation. Justyna Borska and Jakub Mauricz will also be on stage. In one sentence, tell us why it's worth going to the conference, meeting new people, and being open to it?

Because the first time I went to a conference, I felt sorry for the 500 złoty. I really felt it in my wallet, because I was like, well, I'm giving you 500 złoty, I don't know what it's going to be, I don't know if I'll even

benefit from it. Like with any investment, there's this element of uncertainty, but it usually always— when I was at a conference, and I've been many times—it always pays off and pays off exponentially because you don't know who you'll meet, who you

might meet in the future, in the context of your future work, in the context of your skills. Plus, I always jot down information, and because I have a notebook with me, I jot it down, and then I can expand my knowledge. And

a lot of the information you're hearing now comes from me being around people and absorbing information. And now, some people are interested in health, some are interested in running a business, and others in finance. It all adds up, and that's why this conference

is a great option for each of these people. It's worth noting that the knowledge we'll share face-to-face won't always be possible to share in a live broadcast, on YouTube, or on other platforms. That's why I think it's worth meeting up, and I've already

prepared questions for a few people, which I'll ask them face-to-face, because, well, you have to be resourceful these days. And our 20 th-century pressures are forcing us to do so.

We know exactly that. If you want to buy a ticket, and there are still tickets available, at some point they won't be available. As usual, they'll sell out, and then you'll be able to ask if you can buy one, but it won't be available

anymore. So, we invite everyone who wants to join us, who has a free date.

Details are in the comments below this video. Okay, let's go. There will be an opportunity to chat live, of course, and ask Tomek a question, so that's it.

We'll get to our report. The report, my dears, is an epidemic of fatigue. Poles don't have time for health, prepared by PZU Zdrowie. In September 2016, it was based on a survey of 1,000 Poles. And what do we have here, my dears? That

very first sentence is shocking. As we learn, in the three months preceding the survey, 80%of respondents experienced chronic fatigue at least occasionally, and nearly 30%frequently.

Why, Tomek, don't you know the details of this study? Well, it's 1,000 Poles, randomly selected. If it shows that as many as 8 out of 10 feel chronically tired occasionally, why is this so, and how can we change it? Why? Because it's

imposed on us by the 20th century's pace and the fact that we work. Because we work in so many areas, it evokes certain emotions in us, which are related to work. I have to get up in the morning, but at the same time, I

want to be refreshed at work. I'm mentally burdened, so I have to detach. All of this combines into one simple relationship. Someone comes home from work, has certain relationships, yes, certain responsibilities, and then they want to, so to speak, unwind. When

someone wants to decompress, they watch Netflix, go to bed, and enjoy the evening. In many ways, this desire for rest, blissful relaxation, turns into a kind of imprisonment in the sphere of relaxation, which unfortunately—but Tomek, look, we can't blame people for

coming in after hard work and wanting to relax, even to put it colloquially, to unwind. How can we do it? It's done wisely, so that it doesn't harm our health. It's exactly like that.

And now I'd like to move on, because many people unfortunately become addicted to these relaxing factors, right? Phone addiction, late-night scrolling, dinner, which we eat late because we've noticed something has made us crave more snacks. Yes, all of

this has a detrimental effect on sleep, and then we observe it. Furthermore, when we want to fall asleep, we can't.

Why? Because our brains are likely flooded with various thoughts related to the 20th century and the lives that shape it. Therefore, in addition to magical sleep capsules, it's usually worth paying attention to evening care so that it doesn't turn into a kind of

imprisonment from consumerism, which drives us into TV shows and Tiktok. You don't have to spend it that way. It's best for anyone who can. Two hours before bed, we air out the bedroom to maintain a temperature between 16 and

20 degrees Celsius. There's a reason for these temperature ranges, as some people can control cold temperatures much better, while others prefer slightly warmer temperatures. Therefore , we choose this temperature based on our personal tolerance. Why? Because metabolism slows down, we don't expend

energy, and we regenerate better. Another thing to consider before bed is a hot shower an hour before bed. You can also buy a lamp that will imitate soft light. Turn on the lamp and take a hot shower, which relaxes our muscles.

Then, before bed, we don't push ourselves to engage in stimulating activities. Even listening to a podcast like that before bed will negatively impact our minds. Studies have shown that films that are drastic and affect us emotionally—and they often do—

can increase brain activity by up to 800 times, by 800%, sorry, 800%. Eight times.

Therefore, it's crucial to choose activities that relax us and allow us to rejuvenate, but responsibly. Another point: if we eat a meal, dinner three hours before bed is best for analysis, for analyzing vital signs. As for our last meal, if we're tempted to, you

know, have a little something, it's usually best to do it at least two hours before bed. And then there's hygiene itself, meaning no—uh, no— overstimulation of our brain, those alpha waves I'd like to talk about today, and beta waves, which stimulate

us and suppress alpha and theta waves. And thus, to make us not give in, not be victims of this rush, but rather find a way, which is often said, what is best in this situation, that I can do now, because so often people say, "

Why me? Why is this happening to me? Why am I sleep-deprived? Why do they all have energy? Why do I have no energy?" This often reminds me of the scene from The Godfather, where Don Carleonet shook his rag and said, "Come

on, get a grip, you have to ask: 'What are you doing now? What can I do now? I can do it tomorrow, because it's too late today. I'll go to bed and start tomorrow with another simple habit that

will improve my life." So I understand what you said, Tomek, as a sort of evening ritual or relaxation ritual, that we—of course, many of us—often treat this phone, or this TV, or this projector, or this podcast, whatever—we often treat it

as a kind of relaxation: I'll listen to something now, I'll watch something, because that's my time. Maybe I'll pour myself a glass of wine. But until 10:00 or 11:00 p.m. Why not watch a podcast or a movie that triggers something

inside us that we probably don't know about, some alcohol, maybe some food afterward, well, I deserve something from life. After all, I was at work for 10 hours, so now I'm on my couch or in bed, because it's even more comfortable

, so I'll scroll later. But we probably don't connect the dots, because what would we consciously do wrong? Tomek, I sometimes analyze whether we would consciously fuel this health-related, uh, problem if we knew that the combination of these things makes these

statistics possible. Maybe we simply don't connect the dots, that these statistics are about people. They're not about numbers; they're about real people, our neighbors, our uncles, our friends in their 30s and 40s. We'll talk about that soon, too, that we

don't connect the dots, that it's about us in the future if we don't change it.

Yes, definitely. And here's where we need to analyze these habits. In the 20th century, we connect areas of our home, our own house, with activities that should never have occurred in our body's biology. Namely, we often observe the phenomenon of someone lying

on the bedroom floor. After all, I have that moment in the bedroom, I can go blank for an hour, but in many cases, unfortunately, we forget what we were actually watching. That's why I phrased it so drastically, but it's worth

noting that we're not just resting, we're traveling. One moment we're in Kenya, the next we're in Asia, then we see a scandal and dramatic images from Syria. Then we get news because the prime minister has announced something, because a politician is talking about

something, we're emotionally aroused, and then we want to fall asleep. There's no chance. Because of what?

Because we've connected our minds to the bed as a form of exploration, as a form of rushing thoughts. And what is the bedroom for? The bedroom is for sleep, just as the table is for shared meals, not for surfing the internet,

watching another podcast, watching another movie, but for consumption. We, as humans, were created to celebrate meals because even during a meal, we experience the so-called "orgasm" associated with this incredible, sensory experience. And now we're introducing it to the next activity in

our lives: Breakfast, lunch, dinner, scrolling. Phone in one hand. It's best if it's convenient food that doesn't require two hands; there's no scraping or nibbling involved. Ideally, it should be a tortilla, convenient, ground food, preferably soups, and so

on. Because it has a positive effect, because we feel good, but our brains don't, and we fall into a cycle of stagnation. But it all ties in with how society is so consumerist, and with the products we receive. After all, today,

my latest article on society's teeth, when teeth are too weak, they recede, because, as you said, food is becoming increasingly fashionable. Ground food, purees, soft food, all kinds of cream soups. And food that's easy to eat.

Even as you said, you can eat with one fork or one spoon because the other is busy, after all. There's something important on your phone, and we can do two things because we have so little time. So I'll do some other tasks while

eating, or maybe even reply to an email while eating. So it's absurd. Should we actually return to the pattern, to those basics, to those foundations?

When we're so far away today from sleeping in bed, from regenerating in bed, from eating at the table, preferably while looking into the eyes of another person and talking and celebrating, and having that half hour for that meal—okay, let's say it's 20

minutes for that meal, but we have that time. We, as people, generally stray far from that, we don't even notice it, justifying it like, well, what? I'm eating. I'm eating this soup, and the fact that I'm holding my phone, or it's

sitting there, watching something, it's no big deal. But again, we don't connect this with the fact that later there's a problem in the bedroom and people have trouble sleeping. So I'll move on to the next question, because unfortunately,

it shows us something, um, what I'm going to read this data. The statistics are disturbing, I just wrote it. Among young people, and attention, here's a range, from 15 to 44 years of age, the most common cause of death is what?

Right after traffic accidents. Guess what, ladies and gentlemen, those are suicides, and I'll give you that range again: 15 to 44 years. In this range, the most common cause of death right after traffic accidents is suicide. So attention, I'll say this because we

know that this word, we know the meaning, but it means that we take our own lives.

Yes. The life we received from our parents. The life our parents could have given us because our grandparents fought to make this life possible in Poland, for this independence, for this country to exist . After all, we know history, and yet

we, as people, take our own lives by killing ourselves. Yes. Why? What makes people go in this direction and take their own lives? And how can we ensure that our viewers, who watch us, perhaps unconsciously don't know that something will lead them,

their health, to kill themselves? Yes. What can we do, Tomek, to avoid killing ourselves?

The symptoms of self-destruction are very heterogeneous. It's sometimes difficult to pinpoint, because it can start with abdominal pain, which intensifies, for example, in interpersonal contact. We have a stomach ache. We don't know where it's coming from. It's not peritonitis or

other related issues. It's simply discomfort. We feel tension. How can we check it? Tension in the jaw, tension in the neck, tension in matters concerning our hands and limbs. All of these things can give you signs. Muscle tension, specifically the upper

trapezius. All of this is tension. Is it natural for a person to constantly walk tense, to walk in fear? No. Is it normal for a person to feel abandoned, left out, misunderstood? No. Therefore, we must pay attention to whether people

in our society are stigmatized, because in many respects, unfortunately, this old-fashioned upbringing persists, in which children are taught many things that contradict the realities of today's world. Among other things, many boys are taught to be polite, not to

make excessive noise, not to express themselves. And this unfortunately shows long-term consequences through a clash with reality: my mother treated me well, and then people at work—we have mobbing. We have issues that affect those who, in patterns that were

safe, kind, and cozy, completely misunderstand the people around them, and then their self-esteem and self-worth plummet. Such people, unfortunately, are left to their own devices in many respects. And here's another issue. Unfortunately, this personally upsets me greatly. The

medications used are demonized. Don't take this, don't take this, because they want to pick your brain. In many cases, these medications can even be taken for a few months without noticing significant changes in the central nervous system. And they can open up

new patterns in our brain. So, if someone was choleric and felt really bad, let's not demonize this pharmacotherapy as a form of claiming there's a natural remedy for everything . Many people on estitalopram and citalopram have a new lease on life,

and in some cases, they deliberately don't seek help because they'll feel stigmatized again. You take some pills, you take some drugs because you're depressed. Come on, how can such a person feel stigmatized again? That's why I strongly encourage it. We have

natural issues, we have pharmacological issues, and there's a huge debate about these issues, but in some cases, there's simply no other way. We live in a world that's still developing, which I regret, because we invest in incredible things. And human issues,

typically human, are stigmatized and relegated to the background. So if you feel like this is about you, it's time to seek help and not be left to your own devices, because that's not a natural state. You can stimulate

aspects within yourself that I'm not enough, that others have so much, that he achieved this, I achieved that.

Don't dwell on the question of why, because the question "why me" is a retrospective question. We begin to search for further situations that are negatively related to this situation.

If Grzegorz were to be yelled at right now because you can talk so much, I would feel, I would feel, why am I talking so much? I would retrospectively go back to another situation where someone treated me this

way and I would think that I was the problem, and I need to reevaluate and ask myself, "What can I do now in this situation?" What is my next step? When I ask a question, it's a prospective question; it gives me a broader vision

into the future, because I'm creating now—I'm not considering, I'm creating and. Based on these experiences, I'm building another self, who may go through these different stages...I happen to be closer to men, I know that these different stages are difficult

and still lie ahead, so I'm already preparing for them. I'm already developing habits that allow me to move forward prospectively, not retrospectively, and not close my mind.

What are these habits? Because you're a young man. And among these statistics and these suicides—well, young people , very young people, 1,544, I repeat, because this is, of course, 2020, with lockdowns, confinement, isolation, masks that prevented children from

seeing facial expressions, unable to read emotions today, unable to distinguish between them. Many teachers mention this as a truly significant social problem for the youngest age group, which has been cut off not only from each other. Well, 2020-22, those

two years were a major problem, we know that, so we see it today too, but suicides are most common among men. We are men. Tomek, what can we do? What are the habits that each of us can develop as viewers, or women are also

in these statistics, of course, but men are the most numerous. That's 90%? What habits can we adopt? What can we do after this episode to distance ourselves from this sameness? Well, some of these people may not have wanted to kill themselves at first, as

if the situation, somehow, simply led them to this final solution, which unfortunately happened in thousands of cases.

Unfortunately, the response is unpleasant because it is stigmatized. Unfortunately, I really like conservative views because I love tradition. I love what Poland looks like and our values, but I don't like it when we attach additional values to all of this. You have to be a man, you

can't cry, you can't do this, you can't do that. We have to name it. When you don't name it, you keep it inside. And if you don't name it and get it out, you're overloaded. And when you're overloaded, you can't hold it all. You

can't hold it all. When you are, you can work, achieve incredible results in sports, finances, health, build a career. But if you're not present at home, you're not present in relationships, and you get lost in a certain account, you won't do it. You

have to name emotions. You don't see that you have authority, because authority is just an illusory concept.

You can be an authority in finances, but you can be the complete opposite in domestic relationships. You're absent, you come home from work, you're absent.

You have to name it, you have to notice it, you have to pay attention to it, because in so many of these issues, I'm not just talking about being insufficient, but in certain situations , you can even be abandoned. And name

it: I am abandoned. What can I do? What kind of environment will I find myself in? Maybe it's time to meet new people who are bringing you down. Statistics related to cardiovascular disease. A bad environment increases the risk of

death from cardiovascular disease by 16 to 31%. This is an issue that absolutely needs to be talked about, because I'm publicizing it for a reason . I feel the power of agency, because that's how I felt during 2022, but

since then, you have to analyze and lead yourself to a situation where you find that exit and light. So name it.

Um, if we have men, I haven't analyzed it in depth, but if we have men in their 40s and 50s, the best concept for knowing yourself and analyzing your own body from a psychological perspective, so as not to bring yourself and your

family down, is the strategy of three knights on horseback. The first is the white knight, the second is the red knight, and the last is the black knight. I won't elaborate on this.

Every man should familiarize themselves with it now. That's still ahead of me. I don't have enough experience to talk about this, but pay attention. So I understand it to mean that the world today stigmatizes us a bit, as you

mentioned regarding our emotions, the fact that we talk about some weakness. That's why most people, a large group, don't talk about their problems at all.

Social media also only promotes what's great, what's successful, what works. So today I encourage all of you, because I've been through this myself, and I haven't cried for many, many years. I honestly haven't cried for decades. I remember when I started

working on myself and my first tears were like, no, I didn't know it could be like this. They just poured out of me like a bucket, out of my eyes, like it was just pouring out, like it was

possible, that it was possible, that these weren't just single tears, they just poured out so much that my face was wet , my shirt was wet. It's simply amazing , and it's so emotionally cleansing. If you need a hug, you go for a hug. If

you need to eat, you have a need, you go for a hug. If you need to go to the bathroom, you go to the bathroom. The needs of another, I would say, higher order, are also emotions associated with some kind of energy. So something

is annoying you, something is pissing you off–you need to vent it, you need to talk about it, you need to have a difficult conversation and say: "Listen to me, you're pissing me off, you've let me down, or: I broke something, or:

I stole something, or: I made a bad decision, or: I went bankrupt, or you know, bad emotions that are unpopular today, or you can just say:" This relationship isn't good for me, I want to change it. "It doesn't matter how,

but I want to change, because this relationship is good for me, this job isn't good for me, this company isn't good for me, this environment, these holidays aren't good for me. Maybe family holidays aren't good for someone and someone has simply been forcing

themselves to do it for years. And I'm not encouraging people to change their family, but to change the way they celebrate. Because if something isn't good for us, and as you said, it has a huge impact of several to several dozen

percent on our health, then what is more valuable than that? To be in front of your uncle or in front of Auntie, smiling fakely versus our health. Well, I think there's only one answer. So I think today this is one element that we

could expand on in many, many threads, but I think it's worth facing the truth this year.

Be brave and capable, you have to be able to name it and actually talk about it. If you need to scream, just run to the forest. Kick a tree, throw a big beam. Well, we don't talk about that. Swear in the

forest. No one will hear it. If you're driving, swear. You can just let off some steam, because people are incredibly worked up. That too, I see it too. I've been through it myself, I'll talk about it. I'll make a full stop here and move

on to the next clear topic, because there are so many. Before the next question, I'm grabbing a book that's on our table. A book that's not just any book, because it's a health guide 2.0. And today we're talking about health, so I encourage

everyone, Who likes to read? And we're also talking about the conference meeting being live. And the book is also, you could say, live, because it exists, because it's real, because it's printed, and we're promoting what you can hold in your hand. So what? Health

Guide 2.0. We invited many guests who were guests on our episodes. And each of them was asked a simple question about how, cheaply or freely, they can improve their health. And each of these guests wrote a short chapter. There's

also a lot of our editorial introduction, so I encourage you to give yourself or your loved ones a gift and buy this book. Of course, the link is below. Tomek, and to you, to you, to you. Well, it will be a gift for you

too when you leave our studio today. Tomek will take Health Guide 2.0 home with him.

Thank you. And I have another question. Last time we talked, you told me you were… attention, this may be a controversial question, but that's good, because the topic of health isn't so popular these days either. It's easy to understand

that you're in the process of developing a risk assessment for individual vaccinations, which are, after all, common in our health. And, well, how would you describe what you analyzed, and did any conclusions emerge that made you wonder as a future

doctor? A doctor who is studying, who will soon be working in the system, and you see all sorts of irregularities, sometimes question marks, sometimes a lack of knowledge among some of the people who are speaking out. What did

you and your friends notice in these studies? Actually, when it comes to vaccinations , I'm doing it myself because I feel a certain power is often spoken about, the will of Christ, the power of the Savior, and other issues. I simply felt

I had to be active in this. When it comes to vaccinations, everyone should verify this topic, because it's not like we'll hear something in the media.

I can hear in the media that something is a remedy for my health, and I'll verify it anyway. It doesn't matter who tells me something. As I said, if I read something in a book, in college, in I review the manual at home, and

there's no information that won't make it through, because, well, we're having fun, we're having fun, we're impacting people's health, and there's no room for fun here. That's why I analyzed it in my package, which I've now managed to develop. It's 100%legal, legally

verified, we managed to reduce aluminum exposure by half, and mercury exposure to zero. So it's possible to do something to provide additional support . I'll be happy to talk about this support at the conference. For every conference participant, I'll be happy

to share it. I'll give you a free manual. And regarding this issue, well, I think it's not fully disclosed yet, but I've outlined to you that I'm definitely not abandoning this topic and I'm not passive about it, because I

know we have two camps, we have different camps, we have people who can't decide. You should know everything, and you decide. It's my responsibility as a future doctor to educate you, and I don't want to instill this in you, because that's

freedom. We live in a free country, and the point is that you decide, not me, what I can do. I won't tell you, I won't be an official who tells you, you can't put a tree here, or you can't put

a jacuzzi there. If you want a jacuzzi, then get one. I mean, you know, your, your, your assessment of this is—it seems to me—glaringly different from what we often hear in the media when asked why, for example, such a number

of vaccinations are proposed in a short period to children who are being born, that we are the only or one of the few countries that offers so much of this, this way, that this calendar is very long, that during the pandemic there

were also various oversights, to put it mildly. And we see that today, six years later, they are coming out. And you say that it would be possible to reduce and reduce exposure to aluminum and eliminate mercury, so it's still there to zero,

which is a factor, one of the factors potentially causing autism. These are Adjuvants that support the immune response. So it's like, for example, if we started marking something and then we know we're marking a tree, and we know that this

tree is the right one compared to others. There are also heavy metals, and they're technologically great because they work really well, but from a health perspective, well, we do have them. And aluminum isn't a heavy metal, because mercury is often overused,

right? Aluminum, right? And now mercury , as we said, can have an effect. It can have an effect, and there's scientific evidence for it. I'm not saying it does, I'm saying it might.

And regarding aluminum, well, the issue is this: aluminum is bound to transferrin, the protein that carries iron in our bodies. In my opinion, a baby should be iron-supplemented so that it doesn't have iron deficiencies, as transferrin will be much more

saturated, and therefore there will be less space. Another issue: if we eliminate aluminum through the blood and then through urine, because that's the best way to remove it, we do It's through citrate. And now, how best to increase citrate? The best way to

increase citrate is MCT oil. And there are supplements for children, Nimowlon, that contain MCT oil. Of course, every macronutrient in the diet— carbohydrate protein fat—increases our citrate levels due to the Krebs cycle and other metabolic interactions, but in this context, we'll increase

them most quickly with MCT oil. Mhm. But how would you assess the... maybe not the struggle, but at least the struggle in some circles, because there's a large group of people who are great advocates of all kinds and

amounts of these supplements. And there's a group that completely eliminates everything, right? And they say absolutely nothing, that please avoid, try to manipulate, run away from it, and so on. Where are you with your knowledge? How would you assess these

two, maybe even more, groups, camps today, that seem to be unable to get along. Each of these groups, if you look at it, It has its arguments, true or not. But they're a bit at odds with each other. There are various articles,

various conferences, various analyses, but I don't think I've ever seen a conference or a debate between the two sides of this, or rather, this dispute, or this business, or this business.

What's your opinion on this topic? Because people are a bit confused, I have the impression.

Yes, they are confused, and I don't have a clear opinion, but I'm very understanding when it comes to issues related to this, because there's no playing, there's no toying with people's emotions in the 20th century.

Once you're offended, they won't trust you. So if many people do this, if they hear in the media that the Earth is round, they'll say it's flat because they've completely lost trust.

Okay. My opinion is that I won't speak in the context of a parent as if I had my own child, because I don't.

I'll definitely understand this only when I have my own child and face this responsibility, because there are risks . We have side effects, we have issues related to it. No. I'd like to decide for someone; I'm an educator.

Consequently, I can help improve things . But I'm also very safe in all of this , because I know of a case where a newborn nearly died of tetanus. It twisted, first the child twisted, and then it left

because the parents said no, we didn't want it. But unfortunately, this is too controversial a topic for me to comment clearly without having my own child.

Mmhm. Okay, let's leave it at that. I think it's a very important topic, and perhaps one day we'll record such a conversation, a debate. These arguments are still missing. My goal is for education to be so conscious, so real.

Um, of course, these cases happen on both sides. You give the example of an unvaccinated child who dies of tetanus.

On the other hand, we have cases, examples of parents who say," Okay, but here we decided to use some medication.

"And the child, for example, even a few days after taking this medication. They immediately had some problems. And today, for example, this child is disabled, and now where do we put the equals sign? Does it even exist? It's

very difficult to define, and it's very difficult because, excuse me for getting into a word, but when it comes to this, because the etiology and causes of autism are really broad, very broad. Scientists don't really know how to define it themselves. We've both

encountered this, but for example, one of the causes could be an autoimmune disease in the mother, which increases the risk of autism. So, let's see the rash of autoimmune diseases among young women. We have a ton of them. There

really are quite a few. And now it's hard to tell if it's because of this or that. In any case, something's not right. Something's not right. I definitely won't let it slide. I'm holding on to it all the time. Even

with one hand, even with one finger, but I won't let go, because we will eventually find a clear answer. That's what I think many people are waiting for.

I'm also curious about your discussion on stage, at the conference, where Where you'll have plenty of time to discuss. I'm even certain these difficult topics will also be controversial. So let's move on to another topic, one that I think

everyone knows about these days: supplements. Are supplements a scam, or are they a solution to people's health problems? Because we know how people comment. Some claim they're a scam, that it's massive marketing, and that they're making huge amounts of money

from it, and it's another pharmacy, another pharmaceutical business, only from the other side, the better side.

And there are those who claim it's a solution to what they've been missing to finally achieve full health. What's your opinion, and how do you think we should live to maintain this health?

With or without supplements? Let's imagine the situation. We have option A. Option A says this:" Improve your sleep, improve your diet, increase your physical activity. Look at your body, see if you see any changes, for example, weakened microcirculation. ""

How to check for weakened microcirculation? When we press on the nail plate, release it, and within two seconds the red should return. If it takes longer, we may have microcirculation problems or our hands are cold, so let's warm them up first

and only then check. It's a simple way to self-diagnose. If we're talking about this, let's first check the parameters, i.e., what I see, is my diet okay, is my sleep okay, is my physical activity okay, is my microcirculation okay, and only then

should we choose something for a health reason. But we also have option B. I'm obese, it's a supplement for obesity. I have no energy, so I have to add B vitamins, even though I'm saturated with B vitamins, and an excess of

vitamins can have serious health effects, including, for example, peeling of the skin on the axillary, er , intestines, including the inflammatory processes that follow, and many other issues. For example, excess vitamin A, even damaged skin. And when it comes to this, you have to be very

careful. prudent. And it's not that I don't have energy, and B vitamins are involved in energy production, so I have to add these B vitamins. We were talking about children. If we're going to supplement, we think about what's

the best way to gain. In a child during the developmental period, vitamin B12 is important because it will be involved in DNA synthesis, cellular stabilization, and also the development of the central nervous system. Another issue is iron. It's rare to hear that

iron, how can a child not be iron-deficient because iron will be a fundamental factor in creating the dopaminergic system in the brain, enabling controlled movements, proper motor coordination, and so on, because it's iron for us. Additionally, iron is

essential for oxygenating the brain, and every energy metabolism that involves aerobic energy requires oxygen , meaning it relies on oxidative phosphorylation, which leads to energy production. And if we have more energy, we can build more. We can build a

better brain, a more efficient brain, a more Better synaptically connected. Another issue, iodine. Without iodine, there is no health, in the context of a child's nervous system development.

Iodine is an incredibly powerful neuroplastic factor in a child's central nervous system. For what reason ? Because a child's requirement in the second six months of life is 130 micrograms. For comparison, mine or yours is 150. A child in the second six

months is almost the same. Now, Iodine. How does such a child receive Iodine? Well, with the mother's milk. And how does iodine end up in breast milk? 1/4 of the iodine consumed by the mother ends up in the milk. So, as we know,

the baby should have 130 micrograms. Well, we can calculate 1/4 of that, multiplying by 4, gives us the potential intake of the mother. However , something doesn't add up in the context of the World Health Organization, because as it says 250

micrograms there, in Poland it's 290, and if we calculate 130 x 4, we get over 500 micrograms. So, something, something, biochemically. I'm putting a question mark here, and I'd love to hear the reasoning behind it, because I haven't found any. So, as I say, I'm

asking a question, I want an answer. You're supposed to be educators, not imposing. But what does it look like for you in your daily activities regarding supplementation? Because you answered somewhat by saying that it's more important to observe yourself, educate

yourself, and not go with the flow that if I'm in pain, I take another pill called a supplement and it must be better immediately. We can find thousands of these supplements for basically everything. How can we assess whether it's time for a supplement and

whether it's a good solution? What kind of supplement is another matter, I think. But how can we check whether we can help ourselves and not buy supplements? How do you, how do you do it?

I understand, I understand the question . Yes, absolutely. And when, yea, when I can't sleep, personally—my first question is: can I switch from alpha waves to alpha waves? Theta waves, and then to delta waves, which will plunge me into deep sleep in my brain? So I

don't want high amplitudes that stimulate my central nervous system. What am I talking about? I want to calm down. I want to calm down. And what do I do? I put on headphones and play theta waves. By the way, I created a

T-shirt that says "relax" and has a QR code on the back that takes me to theta waves, which lead to the relaxation of our nervous system. And now, this is the first free issue. For example, Brian Johnson, a popular figure in the

health world, uses it and says it has great effects, even though it's free and on YouTube. Mhm. And everyone will find such green ones. This is already a free issue. Another issue, if I want to sleep well, as I said, I let cold air

in. I also put on socks because they support thermoregulation during sleep, which is very interesting. Another issue, if I sleep and spend so much time in bed, I'll invest in a good pillow. I'm thinking about it. It's not

like I have to have a remedy right away . Sometimes, for example, adaptogens are prescribed, and the person takes them on an ad hoc basis, but they don't need to take them on an ad hoc basis, because they have to take them

gradually, then gradually come down and take breaks. And some people simply spend money that could be better spent, and it goes down the drain. And this is observed in virtually most areas of health, because sometimes, someone checks their vitamin B12 level, and

it's at 1,000. So what the hell does this person need a B complex for? For example, B vitamins, when properly saturated with this vitamin, it can lead to hypervitaminosis, and A vitamin deficiency and hypervitaminosis can wreak havoc on the body, just like some

strong medications. So we need to think about that. So we can unknowingly damage our health , even more so by wanting to improve it , when we buy supplements because someone or a coworker advertised them.

says: "I eat these and I feel better." And we say: "Well, I'll buy these too, having a completely different health base than our colleague from the desk." Yes.

Yes. And always before buying a supplement, let's ask ourselves if I have 100, 150 to 300 minutes of physical activity per week, because 80% of the time, this physical activity is simply not there. And here we say there

is not at all. And here's the question, which even covers simple walks. But let's calculate how much it is. We have to move, because without moving, a supplement that will provide energy, a supplement that will be responsible for

adding, for example, NAD plus, right? It will raise its level in the blood, but how we use it is a matter that depends on us. That's why we don't go for supplements, but look at how we can increase magnesium in our diet. We, as

Poles, consume about 50%of our magnesium requirement daily. Only 50%is available. That's why a magnesium supplement makes perfect sense, because we, as men, should consume about 420 mg per day. But we can also, for example, increase the proportion of pumpkin

seeds or increase the proportion of other nuts and achieve A natural increase. If we need selenium, two Brazil nuts will be fine, as that's the entire selenium requirement. People with hypothyroidism should be very interested in selenium because it

participates in peripheral tissue conversion at the level of T4 to T3 conversion. Only T3 will enter the nucleus, be captured by the chaperones, and then enter the nucleus, producing its effect. This is an issue that should be understood and consulted with

someone, because blindly jumping into supplementation in most cases is deceptive and may not produce results.

M, that's interesting. I think many might not have expected this, but some of our listeners might have already, when I asked this question, thought to themselves, "Well, Tomek will probably criticize the massive promotion of supplementation." It's a word, and I

think it's a bit like that, that there's so much of it today that it doesn't help at all: huge amounts of advertising, creators, producers, and this manufacturer, on top of that, has hundreds of different solutions.

Honestly, you're left alone in the end. And it seems to me that just as we, as part of a financial transformation, provide someone who walks with you through this world of finances, intricacies, and solutions, because that's how we do it, that's how it

works for us, so in the world of health supplementation, there should also be such a person, but most often there isn't. We're alone, we only get advertising, we go to a website, and there's no solution, just a hundred solutions, all sorts of

different doses, and we don't really know what it should look like. Let's leave it here for now, because there's no perfect solution for that either, but here's a solution: if someone knows what's wrong, then sure, then we can

act, because I personally know how to properly adapt it to specific needs. For example, right now, a heart attack.

I know how to approach it, yes, but we need to know, and preferably before we start taking preventative and preventative measures, because only prevention will lead us to health. Well , we've been talking about prevention, solutions, and brain waves, among other

things. There are so many free solutions, tools, habits, and processes . I heard, for example, about sleeping socks—I didn't know they were so important. It's worth drawing from what Tomek says various things that might apply to you, because maybe you're

already doing a lot, or maybe you're not doing much. It depends on how you take care of your health, whether you blame yourself for what you've done in the past, or whether you're just getting started. I'd love to talk about brain waves because

it ties in perfectly with the topic of sleep, which we've touched on. Blocking blue light and high melatonin levels won't help if our bodies can't transition from alpha waves to theta waves. Why? Because we have a rush of

thoughts, which I mentioned earlier. Why don't people get enough sleep? It all ties in, right? Yes, right?

Yes. Even if I put on blue-light blocking glasses, greetings Sebastian, they may be useless if I can't regulate the waves and amplitude in my brain.

The amplitude of the catch-up waves, which is high and in the beta wave range, leads to the body becoming chronically overstimulated and stressed . We see this, for example, when we're under pressure at work, when we have a

task to complete. For example, your teacher says: "You have to do this, and now you come to the board and do this." The stress level increases. This causes high-amplitude beta waves. They vibrate and lead to a certain state of

confusion, right? Which isn't natural, because now when I speak, I use beta waves with a low average amplitude, which allows me to create sentences, search for information, and express myself in a way that will be beneficial to someone. But now we have information

that leads us to what? We're lying in bed, I have to fall asleep. Tomorrow, 6:00 a.m. Wake-up call. I have 10:00, 11:00 p.m. Time passes, I have to fall asleep. We have sleep pressure. The worst habit that doesn't allow us to

regenerate, because the more we try to sleep, the more we can't fall asleep. And this is due to the fact that we have higher-amplitude beta waves, which block the transition from alpha waves to theta waves. Then there are theta

waves, which enter sleep, descending to delta waves and delta waves. There's a state of the brain in which it becomes neuroplastic. Neuronal connections interlock. Additionally, the brain regenerates, the body regenerates, and there's a signal to wake up rested

tomorrow. Without the proper sleep architecture, the NR waves interspersed with REM. Now, interestingly, as we enter the rapid eye movement phase, what do we observe? A return to the alpha-beta boundary, meaning we're semi-conscious.

Mhm. Um, what can we achieve during the day? As we're talking now, you've already experienced gamma waves in your brain several times. I don't know about it.

You know about it, but you're not aware of it, because gamma waves are that flash. Yes, yes, flash. I learned something, and it lasts a second. I learned something.

Socks on your feet work. This moment. And now let's imagine that the most widely recorded gamma waves were recorded in a Buddhist monk who was subjected to meditation, deep meditation, and he was enlightened. It lasted for 4 pi minutes. Imagine that

we humans have existential crises. Yes, we learn that we will leave this world and have this moment of death, right?

We have a moment of realization, of awareness, and imagine that we experience it for 4 pi minutes. Total derealization. That's why when I hear about frequencies, vibrations, and other such issues, I say, "I won't shut up about it. I'm not saying it's

nonsense, it's not true, I just want to investigate it and say after testing it myself, because I tried it myself. But those are years of practice, right?

Controlling your own mind. How can you bring the amplitude of vibrations and slow waves to the visualization of new things? The fact that we have ideas, the fact that we are inventive, results from the way our brain waves work. And

therefore, the waves are triggered by the functioning of our brain. Now, when I speak, and when I recall and when I think rationally, I can retrospectively look into the back of my brain and say, " Oh, I'll tell you about that. "This

is the effect of acetylholine, a neurotransmitter that is lacking when? In Alzheimer's disease. There's no acetylholine there. We have acetylholine deficiencies in our central nervous system. And what causes this? We have memory lapses, they occur , and it deepens. That's the problem.

And now some scientists, studying Alzheimer's disease, attribute one of its causes to holin deficiency.

Interestingly, where can we find holin? In eggs. A diet rich in eggs is often attributed to postponing Alzheimer's disease. Why? Because it's a source of holin, which forms the so-called holin cap on top of phospholipids. It forms membrane phospholipids, forms our brain

, and is also a component of acetylholine. Acetylholine. Now we obtain this neurotransmitter after eating an egg, a regular egg. Even if we scald them, they'll be hard and dry, and even if we overcook them, they'll be so hard, so dry, and there's still

holin in them because it's a quaternary ammonium salt, which is extremely heat-resistant. So even if we see these terribly hard, hard, dry eggs, we still eat them because we'd lose holin. And holin can do an awful lot, because in

addition to what I've said, it enters the liver, supports liver health, and has a number of health benefits. I could go on and on about it. It's beautiful to watch how you use this, this, this brain, and even while

answering a question, you say what you use, you name it—these are difficult words that most of us don't understand, I don't remember anymore. We also talked about this, that the biomachine that we are is so difficult to describe

, that we, as people who don't care about health at the level Tomek does, don't understand it, and it's a bit like, whether it's fair or unfair, it's different. That's fair. And now I'll say it's fair, because we don't have much access

to it yet. It's written in Latin in most textbooks, and people want to get into college and study it. We talked about that too. So why is it fair that it's so complicated? Because I, for example, try to understand finance, but

I can't. I read books and still can't reach the level I'd like to achieve in terms of how I use the biology of the organism.

And that's a different brain structure, and other areas are developed in my case, less developed in yours, for example, or more in yours, less developed in mine. Well, some people say that, you know, finance and medicine are specifically written in

textbooks so that I think in a way that puts it somewhere beyond the reach of the average Joe, and you have to sit there for a while. But the question is: are we today—it seems to me that we're

trying to demystify this a bit and use simpler language to explain how to conduct ourselves, how to avoid illness and maintain health for as long as possible, our bodies in good health for as long as possible—I'd like to focus

on, well, food, because you mentioned eggs; I wanted to ask about how to reverse Alzheimer's disease. You got to the egg, and maybe we can start another thread with that egg. It's one of the best things to introduce into your

daily diet. And now, if, because we have different issues, there are people who, for various reasons—repulsion, self-perception—don't want to eat eggs, right? Then supplementation would be advisable to prevent the body from reaching a state where it has a problem

with acetylcholine. Yes, we need to provide it. And then, if we want to support the liver, phosphatidylcholine, CDPholin is definitely a good option.

If we want to increase acetylcholine levels in the brain, Alfa GPC will be most beneficial. So if you don't eat eggs, now Google other sources of holin that you might not be consuming anymore , analyze it, and then come to the

conclusion: do I need such a supplement ? And you see, we may have found a supplement that's a solution to your problem, one that has a physiological and biochemical basis, and therefore makes sense, and isn't just some marketing gimmick someone pushed on you

because you just have to search. I think you explained it rationally, but what's your opinion on this...hmm, how do you call it? I'm looking for a suitable word. Hmm, could this be called dietary terror? Oh, that's probably what I wanted to use: dietary

terror, or a kind of forced acceptance that my diet, my nutritional philosophy ...Because I'm dietitian X, and I'm Y, and I no longer agree with this dietitian X, because mine is" Mojsza, " as you could hear in our cult film. So,

what's so important about our diet? It has to be this exact diet, that we only have to eat meat, period, or only have to eat greens, period, or only have to eat something else. And, for example, only everything Mediterranean, period,

and mine is the best. Does it really have that big of an impact on our health? Is it again some kind of disconnection—I'll use that word—uh , and closing ourselves off in our bubble and unwillingness to listen to

other people? That people are simply stuck in their diet, and some audience, viewers, or readers buy into this truth and say," I'll only eat meat because' this lady 'or' that gentleman 'said so.

" Nothing else matters. Because that's what they say, and everyone agrees in the comments, and everyone comments positively. How would you describe it?

Well, you can also see these bubbles, right, related only to diet, and that's also a problem...You could say that even these people disagree, arguing again in the comments sometimes, that I'm right because the person who recorded the video says so, and he's

definitely right because he showed some documents. But in another video, the other one showed different documents, and according to him, they're also true , and he says something completely different, the opposite. How do we rationalize this, and do we even need

to do it? Now I'm taking over the word" detachment. "Because of what, let's look at it. We have it great, because you only illustrated meat, only plants.

And now what's the issue? We have homocysteine. We often hear about a new indicator that allows us to monitor the inflammation of the artery walls, among other things. If we have high homocysteine, we need to lower it. How

do we lower it? B9 and B12. Now, if we have a person who only eats meat, we have a lot of methionine and other compounds that can increase homocystine . We need B9. So what if we have B12 in

meat, since we need B9, and B9 is a source of dark green leafy vegetables?

Therefore, if we observe someone who is on a carnivore diet and eats foods rich in dark green leafy vegetables because they know," I need B9 to lower this homocystine to prevent atherosclerosis in the future, "they are doing the

right thing. But let's look at the other side. We have a person who is vegan, eats only plants, has a lot of B9, but doesn't get B12 from meat. And what happens? We have a folate trap, meaning they lack the cobalamin to

demethylate the 5-MTHF molecule and thus lower homocysteine. In both cases, homocysteine increases. So what's the remedy for health? A combination.

Well, in simpler terms, Tomek, so what do you do in the kitchen, with all this knowledge, king? What do you eat, and what's your diet like? Well, regarding my diet, for a while, when I wasn't moving as much, I followed a low-carb

eating format, meaning a small portion of carbohydrates and an additional carp loading, which I increase in the evening. So I start with breakfast, which has a small portion of carbohydrates. For me, it was usually half a slice of sourdough rye bread. I

simply cut it in half and put it on a plate. Do you have many meals? No, no, no. Half-slices. You have many meals at my place, and I share them regularly because I consider them my calling card . Well, yes, I have to show what I eat,

because I can talk about health, and I can be like that when it comes to food.

And quite a few, quite a few doctors, and if you want to add something like that, I think it's important. Look at how many hospitals or clinics where a doctor who's supposed to take care of your health or guide you towards health

doesn't look his best. To put it mildly , that's how it is in many respects. I don't want to stigmatize, because he may have incredible knowledge, but I believe we are our own calling card.

But I'm talking about that calling card . So what good is it if he has knowledge? The question is, isn't he applying that knowledge to himself, since he's gotten himself into this situation?

Yes, yes. And now, speaking of which, for example, we consume a steak. Mmm. We know to top that steak with dark green leafy vegetables. We can skip the carbohydrates, we don't argue about blood sugar levels and so on, but

we do add them because we need folate to convert homocysteine into methionine , and everything is fine. It can be done, it can be done. Another issue: If we consume carbohydrates, we can consume them, but it's important that

they aren't in their simplest form. What are we seeing? High-fructose corn syrups, processed carbohydrates, refined sugar, and so on. It's not just glucose; there's also fructose. That's why fructose is attributed to such destructive properties for the liver.

It's now been renamed FLD for metabolic fatty liver disease, because of the several factors involved. But as our liver absorbs fructose from food, the fructose hits the enzyme fructokinase, and fructokine acts like a V8 engine, which has no limits and pulls ATP, the

basic energy, from cells like a wild animal. It absorbs it, meaning it takes cellular energy from hepatocytes, from the cells that make up the liver.

Another issue is that it has no feedback loops, meaning there's no one saying," Hey, turn off the tape, turn off the tape. "There's no tape running, or someone gassing," Hey, turn off the tape. "No, it doesn't work that way. It

absorbs all the fructose, and the fructose, via Aldolysis B, is channeled directly into fat. I like, like, like your look and facial expression when you explain difficult things, use very difficult words, and nod, hoping I understand it all. This is this is

this is this is great. But of course, fructose, through these pathways, is channeled directly into fat and can contribute to liver disease, and that's beyond dispute, because it's a fact. So now we don't demonize fruit because fructose, fruit, fruit.

Mmm. We don't eat fruit, no, because fruit is naturally protected against this, to protect against an oversupply of fructose. Of course, if we eat a banana and do it regularly, we'll burden the liver, but if we eat fruit in good

proportions, where we eat the peel, which is free of pesticides, of course, I hope, we're taking care to support our health. Regarding peels and fruit, we'll soon be recording an episode on how to clean vegetables and fruit, because washing, unfortunately, isn't

enough. But getting back to the question, about this diet terror. Is there a diet that's...Well, everyone, or most of us listening and watching us today, remembers how we cooked in the' 90s, how in, well, when our parents cooked, our mom would cook peels, some

kind of meat, potatoes, some kind of salad. You know, it varied in those homes. In most homes, not so it wouldn't overflow, but there was always soup. We always had soup. Sometimes there was some meat several times a

week, sometimes twice a week, sometimes only on Sundays. But generally, these meals were different every day. Is there a diet that you follow in this flood of different solutions? Because there are so many. Plus, there are companies that produce for us, saying

it's always safe and healthy, but here they've become food factories. So, ladies and gentlemen, never in history has there been anything like this, where factories cooked for tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands , of people, and then delivered it

ready-made to their homes, so people have stopped cooking. I don't know if it's good or bad. But is there a diet, Tomek, in your experience, that's good for most Poles?

It's good and it's called Mediterranean . Mediterranean is the first one you can achieve.

What is it? What is it then? There's a diet that oscillates between good and proper, provided a good and proper supply of fatty acids. Now someone will say," He's coming in now, so what? Pork chops. " Oh, right. And pork chops are fine. But

I'm already talking about what it should look like. If anyone hears this now, they'll talk about limiting saturated fats because it's a medical device, a medical school, and they want to screw us all over because they have ties to a corporation. No, I've simply

noticed it myself. My family has a history of cardiovascular disease, and I've seen that this diet isn't good for my family, and saturated fats don't fully meet the energy needs that fats meet, but they're there for me, and I'm

not giving them up. But what about me? For three servings of olive oil, I have two servings of butter, one serving of omega-3 fatty acids, and one serving of omega-6 fatty acids. Now how do you calculate that? If three servings of

olive oil, 30 ml of olive oil, that's three tablespoons. If two servings of saturated fat, two tablespoons of butter. If one serving of omega-3 fatty acids, that's one tablespoon of omega-3 fatty acids. If one serving of omega-6 fatty acids, one serving of omega-6

fatty acids in a tablespoon. We've solved the problem. It's not the ideal ratio of fatty acids that will support health, but it makes perfect sense.

Many people now say that saturated fats , that refined oils in general, are a problem. They are a problem. But when is it a problem? Let's see. When someone says it's rapeseed oil, it's pro-inflammatory. Pro-inflammatory rapeseed oil. We hear that, right? It's

all over the place. But who said it now ? Explain to me why it's pro-inflammatory. Please tell me. I want to know. And they'll say, because of the malinoleic acid. I say, okay, it has 25%there. I'm not that familiar

with the technology of clinging, but it's around 20%. Hmm. Because it converts to arachidonate, and arachidonate promotes pro-inflammatory eiosanoids, and you're pro-inflammatory . Okay, I am pro-inflammatory. When I want to hit myself with my elbow, blood runs out, it scabs, and then I get red

here. When I have redness, it's arachidonate that helps it heal because it says," Hey, guys, get to work. "But over time, we have a problem when we have too much arachidonate and too many pro-inflammatory eriophyoids from omega -6, or even omega-6, which come from

animals—I'll talk about that in a moment. They get together, say," Hey guys, let's get to work! "and by accident, a situation can arise where the guys from Górnik Zabrze are fighting Ruch Chorzów, and then Omega- 3 has to step in and act as the police

and say," Okay, we're splitting up. " And then after a while, when we hit each other, we have red, right? And after a while, it goes away, it's not red anymore, because the anti-inflammatory EO-cosanoids have intervened, and that's the remedy.

That's why I said one serving of Omega- 6 and one serving of Omega-3, because we have a balance. We have as many bad guys as good guys. But now another issue. The Western diet is sometimes 50 to 1. So how are Omega-6 supposed to be

pro-inflammatory? How are they supposed to be pro-inflammatory when all the breading, all the sauces, everything fried is made with Omega-6? In fact, the worst source of Omega-6, most often around 60 70%is sunflower and corn oil, for example, which is used. And now,

yes, we have refined oils. And refined oils are made to be technologically good. And again, the technological approach is fine, but is it really that healthy? No, I'm a proponent. If anything, cold, great. I'm not a proponent of frying because during

frying, fat oxidizes, and the meat we fry undergoes an advanced glycation process, which we observe twice.

Oxidized fat is bad for your health. Advanced glycated meat is bad for your intestines. Colon cancer is on the rise . When we combine this with nitrites, nitrites, and nitrates, we create a situation where nitro compounds are created. They again attack the

intestines. That's why it's said that red meat is destructive. Now let's consider whether red meat is perhaps treated too restrictively and too often . We have the answer. Is vegetable oil?

It's too common in our diet because they're pushing it, like we said, these boxes, everything was being pushed on us with oil. Yes. And that's a problem, because we're not getting enough omega- 3s, and we're getting too much omega-6s

. Another issue, if we look at the people of Okinawa, the blue zones, they have a 1: 1 ratio. Our Western colleagues have 1:47. Meat consumption compared to fish. What's our problem?

Well, we have a problem that there's an excess of all of this. In the context of meat, it's worth noting that meat is rich in sialic acid. It's a sugar that's y, well, it's there, it has a name, and I won't go into too much

detail, but it's the Cmach gene. And we , as humans, as Saki, have lost this Cmach gene. And because humans have lost this gene in the course of evolution, we are the only Saki that dies of a heart attack due to

atherosclerotic plaque rupture. No other animal, except for exceptions that have Genetic predispositions, there's no such phenomenon. And as we said, 36%— let's think about it for a moment.

Since we don't have that, excess meat —glycated pro-inflammatory over-fried—builds this sugar, which doesn't naturally occur in our bodies, into the walls of the colon and arteries, contributing to the fact that , instead of protecting ourselves, we are more atherogenic, meaning we create

health problems there. Colon cancer doesn't result from atherogenicity, but it does influence it, and then we can lead to colon cancer and atherosclerosis. That's why it's worth thinking, thinking about what we're doing.

Well, today, I think many will be thinking after this episode. We're not done yet, because I'll say one more thing so someone understands, because we've already learned why such a simple demonization doesn't make sense. It's like I was saying now, I talked about

arachidonate, the primary factor that increases our risk of pro-inflammatory eosinophils. True, I said it. And now the largest source of arachidonate is meat. Animal. Now someone would have to create a narrative. Animal meat contains the largest proportion of

arachidonate, and it's pro-inflammatory . How does that sound? It sounds bad, but you have to know. And now who's going to talk about it? Because some people have their interests on the left , others on the right, and the truth

actually lies somewhere in the middle, but no one touches it. So, in simple language and in one sentence, if you said that the Mediterranean diet, which may be so natural and truly health-promoting for many of our viewers, or for the majority of the

Polish population, what is it and in what proportion? In short. We have our national treasure: we eat sauerkraut every day. We have our own treasure: we have eggs, which don't drastically raise cholesterol levels because we have other mechanisms

responsible for it. We eat products that are pickled. I said that about sauerkraut, but we also have other methods. Pickled cucumbers, plain yogurt. When the microbiome of a person who lived for over a hundred years was examined, her name was Maria, It was

checked that bifidobacteria, which are found in products like natural yogurt and so on, had multiplied in her intestines. So this is a way to supplement them. Of course, therapeutically, it makes no sense, because it's much better to swallow

concentrated capsules that are standardized for the number of bacteria , but as a preventative measure, let's see: daily, daily pickled food, daily natural yogurt, something like that.

Long-term, it settles in. Another issue is when we eat a meal, the simplest way to balance saturated fatty acids, because I eat them myself. I'm not saying there's no meat, I eat meat, I eat dairy, but I control it through

omega-9, which is one unsaturated fatty acid, oleic acid, which we have in olive oil. So, after breakfast, after lunch, after dinner, maybe a spoonful of olive oil. For what reason? Because, in addition to affecting It's great for the lipid profile, and it also affects

the stomach wall coating, thus influencing peristalsis and the digestive functions of our digestive system, which is great and desirable.

Just three changes will be truly fundamental. Now another issue. If someone frys and eats charred parts of meat or other foods, we throw them away . We know, there are advanced combustion processes there, which are harmful to us. Speaking of combustion,

someone smokes. Smoking is smoldering, which means carbon monoxide is produced because it's incomplete combustion, and the result of incomplete combustion, carbon monoxide blocks the lungs, blocks hemoglobin, and thus the person experiences shortness of breath. So smoking and other issues related to it

are drastically harmful to our health. Hmm. Another issue, since we're talking about alcohol, for example, it's attributed properties that are amazing in the context of resveratrol, a compound that's supposed to de-age us and is used in Mediterranean countries

as a remedy for youth. Unfortunately, not. Because to drink and get A nice therapeutic dose of resferatrol, we'd have to drink 30 liters of wine. So, again, you can't attribute amazing properties to it just because, well, wine is cool. I like wine myself, I

treat it more like a ritual, and it really happened to me on vacation because I suggested a romantic dinner, and we're kind of postponing it, right?

Another issue. I try to eat red meat twice a week because, considering broad data, twice a week is the most beneficial for health. Another issue: omega-3 fatty acids. Who eats fish at least three times a week? Well, hardly

anyone. That's why we supplement them this way. Of course, there's a certain cost, but I hope that with this podcast , I've made it a little clearer now, regarding the fat aspect, that it's important. Mmm.

So, these are changes. Well, a whole lot of topics. I think it's worth listening to this material a second time calmly and coming back to it, because it is, because it's such a dose of knowledge about our health. Therefore,

I'll remind you of what I said at the beginning: underneath the video in the description, you have a link, and you can download a summary of this material for free, just by providing your email address, so you can print it out and

review it again in a very simple format . You can work with it just like you did in college. There will simply be a summary of both this episode and the first episode, because some of you may not have gotten to it. We'll see you at

the conference with Tomek. I hope there will be plenty of time to talk with you , to ask questions that are already on your minds. But how do you do that, Mr.

Tomek, Mr. future doctor? That's where the opportunity will be. There will be plenty of time to talk over coffee, a snack, lunch, or just a simple break, to approach Tomek and say," Tomek, I have this problem, explain it to me, because I don't

understand it. "And why is that? And why these pickles? And yet someone says that dairy products aren't, and you're talking about yogurt. There will be questions.

100. Now this urge has arisen. I'll grab this young man by the ear, give him a good tug, and question him. That's why we're having this conference. If you'd like to ask a question here in the comments, that's also possible. Leave a

comment, let me know if this is the right direction. I won't deny that today it was a very energetic conversation for my brain, one where I had to climb to new heights, and at times I even said to myself," Oh, I

have to watch this again, because a wise man is sitting across from me and is very quick to throw in difficult words. It's not easy, my dears, to understand health. Ugh, but it's worth it. But Tue.

I also apologize for that, because I certainly made things complicated at times. Um, but you can take a given sentence and even ask artificial intelligence, which is a great tool for explaining difficult issues in a simple way. But I also wanted to, uh, because

I know that specialists can watch it, so they can also understand it at the level of our everyday lives; not everyone has the chance to see something new. Well, someone just learned this and maybe they can use it

in therapies. Yes. Yes. We want, we want to open this channel even more to, to, to, to health —not only from the recipients, meaning you, the recipients of knowledge who need some information, but also from those, I would say, the

creators of health, as I would call it: doctors, future doctors, retired doctors, people who deal with health, who today wonder why the National Health Fund and the entire system are in this situation, how to change it, how to improve the situation, leaving

aside the fact that it's big business, that everyone wants to make money from it. No, that's not the case.

In many respects, yes, many...Many doctors, after all, go into business to make a good living. This is one foundation, and it can be separated from the fact that they don't want to harm people, but simply want to help

people while earning good money. Because, in my opinion, the two can be combined. Let's leave it at that. My dears, I wish you all the best, take care of yourselves, make good choices.

And see you in Chorzów soon. Cheers. Cheers. See you soon. Bye. It's not over yet.

Choose one of the recommended films on the screen and stay with us for a while . Ah.