Speaker A
[music] You made a point which I've not heard anyone else make, which is that we're seeing this World War III narrative that's playing out right now in front of our eyes across the world stage. And your point is that this is all optics.
Ex-banker Simon Dixon explains his 'follow the money' framework, arguing governments and media serve financial capital structures and that the US, GCC and China are aligned beyond the optics of World
Key Takeaways
- Following monetary flows and capital structures is a more reliable analytical method than trusting official statements.
- Media and politicians should be assessed by their funding sources and financial alignments.
- Major global power dynamics are shaped by financial institutions, debt structures and central banking rather than public-facing conflicts.
- Digital money and surveillance infrastructure may expand state and financial control over populations.
What the video covers
- Simon Dixon, a former banker, says he analyzes geopolitics by tracing monetary flows rather than believing politicians' or media statements.
- He evaluates media by business model, sponsorship and capital structure, assuming all media pushes someone's agenda.
- He views countries as capital structures, asking who governments are subordinate to, and frames the US as financially governed.
- He distinguishes Biden as neocon (military-industrial complex funded) and Trump as transactional, aligned with the financial and technical industrial complexes.
- He defines the financial industrial complex as banks, asset managers, investment banks, bondholders and the central bank, and the technical industrial complex as data, AI and social platforms.
- He argues the World War III narrative is optics, with the US, GCC and China coordinating behind the scenes, contrary to popular belief that Israel drives global chaos.
- He condemns Israel's alleged crimes while arguing that Israel's role should be analyzed separately from popular narratives about its power.
- He discusses the Epstein case, saying sealed bank records would reveal financial flows and noting banks settled before mainstream attention.
- He discusses fiat money, debt creation, bond markets, interest rates and the Japanese yen carry trade as drivers of the system.
- He warns that central bank digital currencies, stablecoins and surveillance could enable control, possibly via universal basic income.
Chapters
- 00:00Introduction: World War III Narrative as Optics
- 00:10Following the Money: Dixon's Analytical Method
- 00:30Media, Politicians and Capital Structures
- 01:00The Financial, Military and Technical Industrial Complexes
- 01:30Israel, Geopolitics and Historical Context
- 02:00Debt, Bonds and the Dollar System
- 02:30Central Banks, CBDCs and Control
- 03:00Closing Remarks
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
And what's really happening is the United States, the G the GCC and China are all aligned behind the scenes in coordination.
Speaker A
And this is opposed to the popular belief that Israel is this almighty superpower behind the scenes that is conducting all this worldwide chaos. So, how did you come to this conclusion?
Speaker A
Well, I follow the money. [laughter] Um, so look, I've I've done nothing but for the last 26 years follow monetary flows. You know, I used to work in banking. I understand how these wars are financed, what they mean for the whole
Speaker A
flow. Um, and uh, so the I have a very simple methodology. It's not perfect, but it helps me try and see through the noise.
Speaker A
Um, and that is I ignore everything that a politician says in terms of analyzing whether it's real or not. Um, I look at who they're funded by and what their interests are and what financially they benefit from. I also in terms of media
Speaker A
look at who's the what's the primary business model behind that outlet and who's sponsoring them and financially how is their capital structured in order to determine whether they're whose propaganda they're pushing.
Speaker A
So by default I say all media is pushing somebody's agenda. [snorts] Um, and so I always look at in order to try and objectively analyze something, I look at the business model, the sponsorship, the funding flows, the capital structure,
Speaker A
and then I kind of put be put that media outlet into a box that will kind of help me analyze. So I don't look at it from is the media telling me the truth. I'm saying why do they want me to believe
Speaker A
that? Um, now how do I determine whether it's true or not? Right? It's when you get an alignment between the financial structures, capital structures, and what they're saying in the media, then I'll say that's true. Or if a politician is
Speaker A
funded by the same sources, um is uh the media is, you know, alignment with what's actually happening with the largest flows of capital in the world.
Speaker A
Mh. Um and so that's kind of my my framework of applying somewhat of a forensic financial approach which is you know how most of the feds and most of the crimes are actually resolved is by looking at the
Speaker A
monetary flow. So right now you know a lot of people are talking about Epstein.
Speaker A
Mhm. uh until we get the bank records, everything is not going to tell us the full truth. And those bank records are protected and all of the banks that want to protect those records have settled um with the Epstein network already and
Speaker A
he's gone. So why are those bank records protected? Because they'll tell you the truth, you know, they'll tell you the financial flows. Um and so we did get an account name of one of his accounts and it was called Ball.
Speaker A
Yeah. Yeah. Um, and so you know, JP Morgan settled and Deutsche Banks settled. I I didn't know this. No.
Speaker A
Oh, yeah. Way before Epstein was like on the mainstream like kind of narrative. Oh, really?
Speaker A
So, before he went to prison. Um, when were the settlement I I I probably need to check the the time flows, but you know, before any of this, you know, recent kind of drops and everyone talking about it, right?
Speaker A
You know, the settlements were there. Um so you know that's uh that's kind of my method and then what I do is I I try and break down a country into how is it actually governed? Uh because most
Speaker A
people think of countries as countries. I look at them as where do their financial flows come from? And so therefore who is the government subordinate to and so when you say to me the United States I don't think of the United
Speaker A
States as a country. Mhm. I think of the United States as a capital structure and I think of who the politicians and who the government is funded by and who is on top of that capital structure.
Speaker A
Mhm. Um and often you know I talk about this concept of if you look at like the last few politicians. So most people when I look at Biden people would put him in the neocon type of category. Mhm.
Speaker A
And a neocon means that predominantly they're funded by the military-industrial complex and the financial interests that profits from war and rebuild.
Speaker A
Mhm. Now, when I look at Trump, I see him as much more of a transactional guy.
Speaker A
And so, I could look through and and he's more aligned with what I call the financial industrial complex and also the third major force that I look at, the technical industrial complex.
Speaker A
So, most people have heard of this military-industrial complex. you know that's the Loheed Martin, General Dynamic Rathium underneath it you have the deep state intelligence networks um and so you can look at like many of these wars and and look at like the
Speaker A
different funding flows. Um the financial industrial complex is is a network of financial institutions that uh significantly are able to subordinate governments.
Speaker A
Mh. Uh they're able to dictate flows through lobby power. uh they're able to set up go you know NGO government um non-governmental organizations think tanks and policies uh in order to you know sponsor politicians to implement their policies
Speaker A
um they get to create money the banks uh they get to allocate all of our pension money the asset managers uh they get to turn every single business into a financial product by making it public through securitization at the investment
Speaker A
bank. Uh they have all of the governments dependent upon their bonds and their debt structures. Um which is the bond holders that are currently playing playing cav havoc with uh uh bonds and interest rates right now.
Speaker A
Mhm. Uh and then you have the guarantor of the whole system which is the central bank, the Federal Reserve. Put that all together and you get this financial industrial complex. Um today data uh artificial intelligence um algorithms uh where those datas are hosted you know
Speaker A
um technology that is able to manipulate human behavior and social networks that's the technical industrial complex.
Speaker A
So going back to what you were saying earlier about the media you look at the media and seeing if it's aligned with the politicians with the financial instruments or the financial institutions.
Speaker A
How do you define the media? And and how do you separate social media from like Fox and CNN, those types of media?
Speaker A
Because you see there's two different n there's two different things happening. There's there's Fox and CNN which are are seem to be in lock step for the most part when it comes to the war stuff and then you have social media which is just
Speaker A
like you know the wild wild west. free. It seems like free speech is more open than ever, especially on platforms like X and you seem to see more of a an agreement among mostly younger people that Israel is behind most of this
Speaker A
stuff. And when it comes to like the lobbying in the United States and and the corruption and all these wars, these are mainly or Israel is the the primary driver behind all of this stuff.
Speaker A
Yeah. So where I think firstly I don't want to excuse Israel for their crimes like you know they they're committing crimes against humanity but they're what I call I need to separate two things and this is where people get confused.
Speaker A
Um forget so so most people pick a team and they advocate for what they want in the world. Um I too am a human and I have what you know my humanitarian beliefs what I advocate for but I have
Speaker A
to drop all of that when I'm analyzing and so my analytical hat is not what I want to happen it's what I think is happening and vote almost all the time what I want to happen is not what is happening okay
Speaker A
so when I talk about Israel you have to separate like the crimes against humanity um you know what what what is actually happening here uh from the practical business model of what is Israel. And so when when I analyze Israel, I look at
Speaker A
okay, what what is Israel? So it was created at a time when the British Empire was transitioning over to the American Empire. The key institutions are like the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve around about that time.
Speaker A
You had World War I, you had the Great Depression, you had World War II, and then after World War II, the current monetary order was set up at Breton Woods. So that's like the historical and then in 1948 you had Israel. Uh then you
Speaker A
had several wars 1967 which led to setting some borders. Um and you had the slow um ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians from their land. you had media trickery to radicalize uh both Christians, Muslims, and Jews into a a narrative that's very useful
Speaker A
for war and military power. And so if you look at that era, we've come out of the industrial revolution. We had a world war, we had a depression, we had World War II. Europe had blown each other up. Europe were bankrupt in debt.
Speaker A
The UK government was in debt. you know, the British East India Company was dissolved. You know, that's the era. Um, gold was the most important commodity.
Speaker A
The British pound was backed by gold. Um, and all of that gold after the war ended up essentially through financial contracts in Fort Knox and then America.
Speaker A
M um the round about if you look at that time 1917 World War I you know you had the World War I 14 to 18 and in 1917 you had some of the most important events that kind of shaped the
Speaker A
order. Uh one of those was uh the Bolevik revolution which was the overthrow of the Russians saw and the installation of the Soviet Union and the communism. Um that was a western ideology. People think of communism as like eastern,
Speaker A
Chinese, Russian or something like that. Uh you know Marx was trained in British universities. Uh communism is a western ideology and it was installed into Russia. Um at the same time um you had uh you know fascism that was implemented
Speaker A
into Germany. You had a massive war across Europe. You had the French, the Brits, the the Germans. um you know the eastern and western Europe that were just destroying each other in indebting themselves.
Speaker A
Same types of financiers that are funding the Bolevik revolution both sides of European wars and also installed the Federal Reserve in America uh which was the third attempt at a central bank. Um you put all of that together and in 1917 you had
Speaker A
a bankrupt British government um led by you know in this case uh Lord Balffor that declared Palestine to Russia, France and the Zionists.
Speaker A
Um and so you know that all happened in 1917 the bow for declaration and that was declared to Walt Rothschild who was representing you know Zionist interest at that time.
Speaker A
Mhm. Now the Rothschild family uh infamous for um you know their wartime financing. Many people think they own the central banks. A little bit of truth to that.
Speaker A
They owned a shareholding in the Bank of France from the Napoleonic wars. Mhm. um they own significant government debt to the British government but they didn't own the bank of England um and the Federal Reserve is owned by a bunch
Speaker A
of private banks all all at that time. Um so this whole concept of like the Rothschilds owning the central bank. It was more that they were merchant banking interest, investment banking interest and they funded many of the governments
Speaker A
and they would often fund both sides of wars in those capital structures. Um because when you can subordinate governments and you can pit them against each other, right?
Speaker A
Then you can fund the war, you can fund the rebuild, and you can vaselize a government to your capital structure, to your your debt structure, and those that issue the loan are the ones that end up controlling, you know, subordinating um
Speaker A
the government. M the other thing that happened in um 1917 is you had the Balffor declaration which was the creation of Israel.
Speaker A
Uh then you had the the Bolevik revolution which was the Marxist communist ideology. Um and in 1913 you had the formation of the Federal Reserve which immediately followed by World War I. Um now if you look across those
Speaker A
structures uh to the governor of the Federal Reserve, one of the Woolahberg brothers um was also his brother was also one of the main governors of the Rice Bank which is the German central bank. And so you had two brothers across the Federal
Speaker A
Reserve and the German central bank. Now this is when America was really building its industrial revolution, its military base. Um and the pro the the concept of building these weapons and selling these weapons but not being caught up in the
Speaker A
war became the baseline of transfer of wealth from the British Empire to the American Empire um around that time. And so when you had the overthrow of the Russians saw, you ended up with a bunch of Russia's gold in America, a bunch of
Speaker A
Germans gold in America, a bunch of the colonial gold from bankrupting the British government over into Fort Nox under the Federal Reserve system.
Speaker A
And if you remember as well, there was a great depression between World War I and World War II.
Speaker A
Um, and FDR, um, his policy was to make gold ownership illegal for Americans. So he confiscated all the gold where everyone had to hand their gold um into uh the you know the Federal Reserve and received $20 a Federal Reserve note. So
Speaker A
you gave them a $20 Federal Reserve note, they handed in the gold and America effectively ended up with about 8,000 tons of gold which represented approximately 75% of you know the world's gold supply outside of the private interest of those
Speaker A
merchant banks and financiers. Oh wow. Yeah. And this is so this is like everything that happened from that World War I, Great Depression, World War II.
Speaker A
Have you ever opened up your refrigerator, stared aimlessly into it for 5 minutes, and suddenly convinced yourself there's nothing to eat? That hasn't happened to me since I started using ButcherBox. ButcherBox delivers 100% grass-fed beef, organic chicken, wild caught seafood, and more. All
Speaker A
sourced to standards they can actually tell you about. They've already done the research and made the sourcing decisions, so all you have to do is decide what's for dinner. It's honestly made the healthy choice the easier choice because I always know I got fresh
Speaker A
cut meats in my freezer ready to go. I always keep their seafood and chicken stocked if I ever get in a bind. So, if you're looking for an easier way to get great meals on the table, give ButcherBox a try. Go to
Speaker A
butcherbox.com/danny to get $20 off your first box, plus chicken breast in every box for life or filt or New York strips for a year with free shipping always.
Speaker A
That's butcherbox.com/danny. It's spelled bc h e r b ox.comdan ny. Be sure to use our link below so they know we sent you. Are you familiar with the story of the gold that was transferred from the Soviet Union when
Speaker A
it fell to Israel? Uh, no. Tell me. So, I had this guy on the podcast a couple months ago who was a a former MSAD assassin, and he was one of the guys that was a part of the
Speaker A
operation uh Wrath of God, the retaliation um operation against the the Black September terrorists that killed the people at the Munich Olympics.
Speaker A
and um he was telling me a story about Robert Maxwell, how he was tasked to or not t he he basically helped a bunch of the the Russians or the bunch of the people like the leaders of the
Speaker A
Soviet Union transfer a bunch of the gold out of the Soviet Union before it collapsed and they they needed a safe place to keep it. And what Robert Maxwell did is he brokered this deal where he could they could all keep it
Speaker A
all inside of Israel. And their guarantee to be able to get that gold back was that Russia had a lot of the Israeli diaspora inside their country. So they had some sort of like a leverage like if they if
Speaker A
they wanted to get it back or whatever, they knew that they had uh those Jewish people there inside of Russia. And um allegedly this took like months and they were they had they were trafficking they were they were bringing it over in ships
Speaker A
like like through the port of Crimea and all that stuff and and this was allegedly according to this guy how Robert Maxwell died. He was at some birthday party for um one of the founders of Forbes magazine uh and he
Speaker A
was bragging to somebody about how he made Israel the richest country in on earth. and he told the story about how he um enabled this transaction or this uh transfer of all this gold from Russia to Israel and um Israel caught wind of
Speaker A
it or the MSAD caught wind of it or whatever and and got rid of him.
Speaker A
[clears throat] That's fascinating. I was wondering if you if you knew anything about that transfer of gold.
Speaker A
No, that's a that's a new rabbit hole for me. But um you know what what's fascinating?
Speaker A
See if you can find out anything about see if there's any corroboration of that story online. I'd be curious to find out.
Speaker A
Yeah. Um now what's what I think is really interesting for the for the purpose of understanding like general power dynamics is you have a state and then you have what the state owns which makes it sovereign.
Speaker A
Mhm. And then you have a state which is subordinate to financial interest or lobby interest. And so when I think of America um America, Europe, UK, the collective west, Australia, Canada, you know, they're subordinate to this financial industrial complex in general.
Speaker A
Mhm. So like let's just bring bring it exactly where we are now. Trump. Okay.
Speaker A
So if you look at Trump's financing, yeah, let's let's let's first define the power structure of the United States.
Speaker A
Like if if we wanted to structure it as a pyramid, right? Okay. So um everything every company in America that's meaningful is a public company. Um and so those public companies means you can buy and sell their shares. Those shares are
Speaker A
predominantly owned by the same asset managers where everyone is contributing their pension to and everybody is. So for example, if you want to buy you can either pick 500 stocks and say I want to pick this stock um or you can buy an
Speaker A
index of 500 stocks, right? Those indexes called exchange traded funds are managed by asset managers and they kind of make sure that when you're buying some of those, you know, you can buy a little piece of 500 stocks, but they hold all those stocks.
Speaker A
Who are these asset manager people? The largest one is Black Rockck. The second largest is State Street, Vanguard Fidelity.
Speaker A
Um, and these are on the capital structure of pretty much every single company across the United States. Black Rockck in itself has 20,000 board seats.
Speaker A
And so when you think of a company, most people think of the CEO. So when I see a company like Tesla, I see a team of executives led by Elon Musk.
Speaker A
Mhm. And those executives in a in a company in a public company work for the board.
Speaker A
So they answer to the board. The board, the executives, the CEO, the chief in you know or the the COO, uh they answer to the board. The board answer to shareholders. Uh the shareholders are those that control the capital and are
Speaker A
pulling together all this money. Black Rockck, State Street, Vanguard in general. Um if you want to get, you know, if you want to raise more money or you Black Rockck owns the most of the shares, uh Black Rockck controls most of the
Speaker A
shares. So it will only So when you when you go along and you say, "I'd like to buy some S&P 500. I'll buy some stocks, right?" Uh they end up the actual material owner of those stocks. So they put their name,
Speaker A
it's owned in Black Rockck's name. Uh but you actually have a right to the economic interest of those. So if if the shares go up, they look like your shares. You log into your Fidelity account. It looks like you own them, but
Speaker A
your name's not on those shares. Uh Fidelity's name is on those shares. So Fidelity owns them and then gives you the right to the, you know, if they go up or down the economic interest.
Speaker A
Wow. Okay. And so there's a few brokers that own that. Now, what comes with those shares?
Speaker A
You know, a share by definition is a share in the profit paid through dividends, any price that that share goes up or down. Um, plus voting rights.
Speaker A
So, remember I said you got executives, which is the the people that do all the work.
Speaker A
Mhm. You got management underneath them. Then you got the board. The board is installed by the shareholders. And the shareholders, the largest shareholder in every single public company in the United States is Black Rockck, State Street and Vanguard. And so they
Speaker A
actually have 15. So Black Rockck in itself has 15.3 trillion of stock market and economic value and assets.
Speaker A
53 15.3 15.3 Yeah. 15.3. Yeah. Um and so you know at the top of the capital structure is these asset managers.
Speaker A
Now then you and the asset managers Black Rockck, State Street and Vanguard, they choose the the board.
Speaker A
Uh so they can the more econom the more shares you have the more right you have to install your board member.
Speaker A
So it's a payto-play system. Got the more capital the [clears throat] more capital you put up um the more uh influence you have over board seats.
Speaker A
Got it. So right [clears throat] in the beginning you were talking about the Gulf countries, China and stuff like that. So remember what the Gulf countries are. What what is a country?
Speaker A
So a sovereign country is one that is not controlled by this financial industrial complex by Black Rockck State Street and Vanguard.
Speaker A
Yeah. By Black Rockck State Street and Vanguard as the main asset managers. and simplifying in the world or in the just the US.
Speaker A
Um well these are global by nature by definition. So you could look at all the previous empires and they've consolidated you know really this model was invented in the you know in the you know about 1600 by the Dutch uh with the
Speaker A
creation of the Dutch central bank the Dutch East India Company um and the bond market where you take those three structures this is important if you can get your head around this then you can understand Britain then you
Speaker A
can understand America so there's um there's three structures that the Dutch invented here. They invented the stock market. Now the stock market is where you pull all this value.
Speaker A
Okay? So if you want to share in the economic interest and the value that's created by these companies, then you own their stocks. On the other side, you have the bond market. The bond market is where you can load up these companies
Speaker A
with debt. And so by the more debt they have, the more leverage you have over that company. What do you what do you mean when you say load them up with debt? Are you saying basically loan you're it's the same thing as buying a
Speaker A
stock? It's similar to buying a stock, but instead you're loaning them money and you're getting like an IOU to get interest in return.
Speaker A
Yeah. So, you have debt which is effectively somebody lends you money. Yeah. Um and they they agree to repay you on set terms. You agree to pay a set interest and then eventually you pay down that debt. The bond market is that,
Speaker A
but they turn these loans into tradable products that you can buy and sell on a market. And so if you, for example, Okay.
Speaker A
So, God, why do they make this [ __ ] so complicated? [laughter] All right. So, imagine you've got you've got you you understand a bank loan, you got a you get a mortgage.
Speaker A
Yes. Um, you go to the bank. Again, let's let's get into a little bit of this cuz once we can understand these concepts, we can build up. Um I went to public school.
Speaker A
Yeah. No no [laughter] look look um these are the it is complex by design.
Speaker A
Yeah. Um because you know once you once you can understand the hidden nature you can really get these things. Um and so the the answer to that question so when you take your when you borrow money from a
Speaker A
bank let's start there. Where does that money come from? You got any idea? Well, I mean, it's really only a bunch of digital ones and zeros transferred from one bank account to another. So, there's not like like first of all, they're not relying on
Speaker A
actual cash, right? There's no need for the actual cash. I'm assuming that I don't know I don't know where the bank where the money comes from.
Speaker A
Okay. So, you you kind of go through three I'd say a three-step journey in trying to understand how money is actually created.
Speaker A
Okay. So, you're first like understanding that everyone that's never looked into it just thinks, "Okay, grandma puts some money cuz she's got loads of savings and then the bank holds that money for grandma." And then someone comes along that's younger and
Speaker A
wants to borrow to buy a house cuz they haven't got enough money yet. Okay. I know where the money comes from.
Speaker A
All the people that have their bank, their savings accounts, you're taking it from them.
Speaker A
Yes. So, that's like the level one understanding of where the money comes from. Okay.
Speaker A
Okay. So people think you pull together everyone's money and then you lend it out. Okay.
Speaker A
Level two is you come across this concept of fractional reserve banking which is not real but more real.
Speaker A
[laughter] Okay. So have you heard of fractional reserve banking and it's not real but more real.
Speaker A
Yeah. [laughter] Okay. So fractional reserve banking is the concept of and it it kind of came from the goldsmith era when a bunch of people they considered gold their money and so they would go to a goldsmith uh and they would say can you store this
Speaker A
gold for me like can you look after it? I think someone's going to steal my gold. I don't feel safe about it. Uh can you just store it for me?
Speaker A
And they would give them a receipt for that gold. So you you take your gold, they give you a receipt. that receipt started trading as money. So you said because it's way easier than just going and getting your, you know, truck full
Speaker A
of gold and driving it all around. Just use a piece of paper. Exactly. So then people said, "Well, I'll accept that paper as long as I can exchange that paper for gold." And people said, "Okay, I'll I'll take that
Speaker A
paper and I'll go to the goldsmith and see if they give me my gold." And so that was like the formation of banking as we, you know, kind of understand it.
Speaker A
Now what happened as more and more people grew trust for that paper uh they said you know do I really need to test whether I can convert it into gold? It's almost as good as gold now like everyone's accepting it. And so the
Speaker A
goldsmith started to realize well I'm just sat on all this gold and no one wants it and every time someone's give like putting some gold here we're ending up with more and more gold and uh we're issuing more and more receipts and
Speaker A
everyone's using those receipts. why don't we do something with that gold? Um, and so they just took client gold that they were meant to safeguard and they issued additional paper against it.
Speaker A
So they issued more paper than the gold exists. So how can they do that?
Speaker A
Uh, they just issued they just said, "Right, we've got this gold. No one knows how much gold we got. They're committing fraud." Okay.
Speaker A
So they took people's gold and just said, "Right, I'll give two pieces of paper against the same gold bar." Okay.
Speaker A
Um, and so they would start issuing these loans. And so someone would come to them and say, "Hey, can I borrow some money?" And they say, "Yeah, let's create some brand new print a bunch of fake receipts. Yeah,
Speaker A
and here's your loan and you owe me 6%." Yeah. And you you owe me 6% and as long as both of you don't come and try and ask for your gold, we're fine.
Speaker A
Yeah. [laughter] So that was the invention of what's called fractional reserve banking. Football season is already heating up and prize picks is my favorite way to stay locked in on the players I'm already watching. It's daily fantasy and
Speaker A
the app makes it really simple. You build your lineup around the players you like, choose more or less on their player projection, and then follow everything right inside the app. Right now, I'm locking in Jaden Daniels for more than 38 and a half rushing yards on
Speaker A
the main leg of my entry, which is way under his average. I'm picking more before they bump it up. Prize Picks also invented the injury reboot. So, if a player in your lineup gets injured in the first half and doesn't return, your
Speaker A
lineup can still cash. This has helped users win over $31 million in the 2025 season alone. So, if you're already watching football or baseball, Prize Pix gives you another reason to pay even closer attention to every possession.
Speaker A
And Prize Pix is available nationwide. Download the app today and use the promo code Danny to get 150 bucks instantly in lineups when you win your first $5 lineup. Again, download the app and use the code DNY to get 150 bucks in lineups
Speaker A
if you win your first $5 lineup. Now, originally a bunch of people would start to see how rich the goldsmith is getting and realize that the goldsmith is buying politicians and the goldsmith seems to have more disproportionate power than
Speaker A
everybody else. And so like, well, maybe I should test whether he's actually still got my gold and he's good for his promise cuz he looking pretty elaborate.
Speaker A
Um, so everyone would come at the same time and there would be a rumor, hey, I'm not sure if you can if we can all get our gold. So they'd all come and there'd be a run on the bank and it
Speaker A
would go bankrupt and you'd realize this piece of paper ain't worth [ __ ] You know, I can't get my gold anymore. And then they would close down and whoever got the gold first would get the gold and at a certain point you close the
Speaker A
bank. And then what happens to all those receipts? Uh they'd be worthless. They're worthless.
Speaker A
They're worthless because they can no longer be converted into gold, which is what everyone wanted in the first place.
Speaker A
So at that point, [clears throat] what happens to an economy at that point? Well, uh yeah, effectively, you know, is the money supply. If this is the money, everyone says, "Screw that paper." Um, anyone that's got gold, you can trade. If you
Speaker A
don't have gold, no one can trade. Got it? And so, everyone there's a race for the gold, you know.
Speaker A
Um, and, uh, and you know, that was that was the model. Now, the problem was is that because you can never audit the gold, um, this just happened time and time again, and it just kept happening.
Speaker A
As you gain more access to gold and the ability to print these receipts for gold, you recognize that you could just buy politicians [laughter] and so politicians needed, you know, money and politicians had power. And so money and power have all been always
Speaker A
been symbiotic. You know, if you have money, then you can buy power. If you have power, then you rent you use your power to sell it to someone that's got money and you try and enrich yourself.
Speaker A
You know, that's a simple relationship, right? Um, so they'd buy the politicians and the politicians would then be able to set the policy. And when these banks, when everyone wanted their gold, they basically just said, "Well, why don't we
Speaker A
guarantee the system?" Uh, why don't we just say you can create more receipts than you have gold. Uh, but we'll guarantee the system and governments, you know, would make it legalize this this practice.
Speaker A
What do you mean? What does that mean and we'll guarantee the system? Well, the government would say, "We've got a bunch of gold. We can tax you and uh if you pay your taxes and we hold it in
Speaker A
gold, um we have a system of, you know, collecting issuing these fiat currencies and making it convertible into gold. And if the if the if the financial system breaks, um then we've got a bunch of the gold and rather than going to the bank
Speaker A
to get your gold, just come to us and we'll give you the gold." And so they guarantee it and say, "You can convert those notes into gold.
Speaker A
either with the bank or with us. Um, and they would guarantee the system. And with government fiat, which is just legal protection, people got more faith in in those notes. Um, and that really is the story of paper money. And what
Speaker A
they did is they legalized the practice, but they said, you know, how much money can you actually create?
Speaker A
Um, maybe you should keep 10% of the money you create as gold reserves and you can create 90% of all this money out of thin air, but keep about 10%. And if we guarantee the system, then there's a bit of a moral hazard there we call in
Speaker A
economics, which means you could get riskier and riskier with your loans because now that's exchangeable with the government, not just you. And so the government's on the line.
Speaker A
So you're like, why don't I just issue more and more of these notes? Why don't I just take more and more risk?
Speaker A
Mhm. Um and more and more money would circulate and that is the money of the economy. When you look at the economy today, there's approximately 97% of every dollar in existence is somebody else's debt. There's only 3% of what you would
Speaker A
call, you know, cash money that's issued by a government. The rest of it is issued by a bank.
Speaker A
And so now fast forward to where we are today. Um if you want to if you how is money created? Where does it come from?
Speaker A
Well, they they said fractional reserve. And what that means is you have to keep some of it on reserve and then you can many many times fractions 10 times over that money.
Speaker A
And over time lots of banks went bust and then they would legalize the system.
Speaker A
Um and uh you know it would it would go through this these different legislative changes um as it as it passed by. Now there's one interesting concept which is what do they do? They don't just give you a loan
Speaker A
and say you know pay me back $100. They say here's a receipt for $100 worth of gold. Uh you got to give me back $100 but you've also got to pay interest on that if they start issuing loans. So now
Speaker A
they say, you know, this $100 note that I give you, it's worth $110 to me. You got to pay 10% interest on whatever the terms of the loan is.
Speaker A
Where's the money to pay the interest? So it was originally backed by gold. Then they started reser, you know, creating more and more uh paper notes against that gold. And then they say, but you've also got to pay us the
Speaker A
interest on the fake stuff. On the fake stuff. On the fake paper. On all the fake paper. But that that doesn't exist because no one's issuing that loan. And so then you're like, well, how does this work?
Speaker A
It doesn't exist because no one's issuing that loan. Yep. The So you've you've you've put this piece of paper is the $100 in the economy.
Speaker A
Yeah. But you got to give me back $110. You know who who creates that $10 for you to repay me, right?
Speaker A
Well, you have to go out and you have to perform economic activity. You have to earn it, right?
Speaker A
But how did they get the money to pay you? Well, they had to borrow it in the first place and so money became debt.
Speaker A
All money is debt where there's not enough interest to pay down the debt. So if you look at the economy today, the government has $40 trillion of debt, right?
Speaker A
And it has to pay a trillion dollars of interest or the US government, sorry, uh the US government has $40 trillion of debt and it has to pay approximately$1.2 trillion by the end of uh this year a year in 1.2 trillion.
Speaker A
Yeah. That yield doesn't exist a year. Yes, that y that money does not exist.
Speaker A
That money does not exist. So, it has to be borrowed by either an individual that takes out a mortgage, a business that maybe takes out some bonds or borrows against their their stock and their company or the government takes it on.
Speaker A
But someone has to borrow because it is by definition a Ponzi scheme. So the government has to borrow the trillion dollars that they owe in interest.
Speaker A
They have to roll over the debt. Uh they're not collecting that through taxes. Like taxes is just a a mechanism for trying to control prices. It the the the budget the government is not funded by taxes. The government is funded by
Speaker A
debt. And so the government then has to repay more and more. Now you understand the history of empires. Remember we talked about this three- tiered structure.
Speaker A
Yeah. You have a central bank that guarantees the system. You have a stock market that effectively privatizes all gains from these economic activities. You know, when they go out and they create activities, they create new value and it comes to the stock
Speaker A
market. But who borrows the money? Well, initially people. So in order to create money, you need to take on a mortgage, student loan, credit card, debt.
Speaker A
So you max out individuals as far as you can with debt. Uh then you start to look at businesses. So businesses can take their stock and they can borrow against it.
Speaker A
They can have these corporate bonds. They can have large massive loans. Uh but if the whole thing collapses, you have to dump the debt on the government.
Speaker A
Mhm. And so what the central bank does is it its mechanism is to be the guarantor of all of these banks.
Speaker A
And what what does a guarantor of all of these banks mean? It means that you socialize the losses.
Speaker A
Any losses are socialized across the population through government debt. You every American has your share of the national debt. That's so we all have all the people have to pay it back.
Speaker A
They all have to pay it. And because what are you doing every time these loans happen? It creates new money. When it creates new money, it means the price of everything goes up which is commonly known as inflation.
Speaker A
Right? So everybody pays it through higher prices. So we are providing the social welfare for the government.
Speaker A
You are Yes. And now when you ask is America a capitalist country? Mhm. The answer is if it had a hard monetary system and by a hard monetary system there is you know it's hard money it's all gold or whatever it may be as
Speaker A
it was historically. Mhm. But if it's a debt based Ponzi scheme where there's not enough money to pay the interest and you have to roll over the debt to continue. Um then what happens is you have a central bank and
Speaker A
what does that central bank do? It socializes losses, burdens the government with all the debt, rolls it over for as long as the government can do it and it privatizes all the gains into the stock market.
Speaker A
Um, and that is the system of central banking. The banks create the money, the central banks guarantee the system, they rinse as much debt on the government as they can and then that money is spent into stocks and it goes the stock market
Speaker A
goes up and up and up. That is and so does and so does inflation and so do interest rates.
Speaker A
More and more money you pump and what is money? Money is debt. The more and more money you pump into the economy and the only way to pump money into the economy is for you to take on more credit cards,
Speaker A
more mortgages, more student loans, more debt, businesses to take on more or to take on more. The more they take on, the higher prices get. Um and so the prices of things go up and the prices of assets
Speaker A
go up. And your job in running an empire is to play that merrygoround for as long as you can.
Speaker A
And so what did the Bank of England do? The Bank of England created Well, we had the Dutch, but the D the the Brits copied it from the Dutch. The Dutch were the inventors.
Speaker A
Mhm. The Dutch said, "Let's create a stock called the Dutch East India Company." The Dutch East India Company was the way of privatizing all the profits from colonialism and war for the Dutch. They invented the largest naval fleet in the
Speaker A
world. Uh they were able to go and invade other countries. Uh they had superior ship technology.
Speaker A
Um and they were able to just go steal people's gold resources. A private company. Um and they were able to just steal everyone's gold, all their resources, engage in the transatlantic slave trade, whatever they needed to do.
Speaker A
Um you know, under this structure and then but where do you get the money from? Obviously the banks get to create it. But once the banks once those loans once everyone wants their money, you just dump it on the government.
Speaker A
Wow. And so the the government debt goes up and up and up. And so the the the Dutch government's debt went up and up and up.
Speaker A
Mhm. The stock market goes up and up and up. Um, those that can print the money, the banks, they're able to get these assets with money they create out of thin air.
Speaker A
Everybody else and then and then inflation and interest rates also rise with it. Yeah. Now, look at this wealth transfer.
Speaker A
This really helps us hopefully understand today. What's the wealth transfer? If you own the assets, what historically happens is the value of your assets go up faster than the price of goods. So everyone else is paying higher higher higher higher prices.
Speaker A
But these people are protected because let's say prices of um you know just general goods are going up 4%. And prices of stocks are going up 8%.
Speaker A
They're getting 4% wealthier every year. These people don't own any assets but they're paying 4% more.
Speaker A
And so slowly they're getting the prices is going up. They're supplementing more and more of it with debt. they don't own any assets to and we also get tax on that little margin as well, right?
Speaker A
Oh, and then you need to pay the tax. Um, and let's not also forget that um we'll get into again Larry Frink created a a product which is very very interesting which is basically the banks were creating all these
Speaker A
mortgages and then the banks said but we don't want to take the risk on.
Speaker A
What are we going to do? We're going to package all those mortgages up and then we're going to sell them to your pension.
Speaker A
So, Black Rockck, Larry Fink, created what's called a mortgage back security that says, "You go create as many mortgages as you as you can and then give them over to me and then I'll take pensioners money and we'll buy
Speaker A
them." And so, the pensioner was on the hook for all the mortgages, right? And uh and so not only are you paying the tax to cover some of the interest, um you're also taking on the debt, so you are the product, and you're
Speaker A
contributing every month to your pension, which gives Black Rockck more power, and then they're dumping all the risk on you.
Speaker A
And if you play that game well, then hopefully your assets go up more than the general prices of goods. And so that right now there's a lot of controversy around boomers versus the younger generation.
Speaker A
Right. Right. You know, boomers were in that time when they could kind of work. Their wages were they bought their house for $30,000.
Speaker A
They refused to sell it for a penny less than a million because they were they were around at the postw World War II era. So what what happened? Well, the Dutch bankrupted the Dutch government, socialized all the money into the Dutch
Speaker A
stock market, received all the the yield on the debt. So the government has to keep paying to the bond holders uh and then the the central bank would guarantee the system. Now eventually what happens here is the wealthy and the
Speaker A
average person just go further and further apart. So those that own the assets go further up the ladder. Those that own the debt are the product and they go further down the ladder. Uh and they just get worse and worse and worse.
Speaker A
That's called the K-shaped economy. That's where we are today. The K-shaped economy. Yeah. So, think of like just a K and you've got the asset owner going up and up and up with their wealth and the average person that doesn't own the
Speaker A
assets going down and down with their real wealth. Everything's getting more expensive. They're taking on more debt. Their wages aren't going up at the same rate as the assets.
Speaker A
And so, if you can print the money, if you're the bank, you get all the assets.
Speaker A
Think of imagine [clears throat] Yeah. So people who earn money from manual labor, people who do bluecollar jobs, people who have to work with their hands to earn income, they're the ones that are going down. And the people who use
Speaker A
money to make more money are the ones that are going up. You got it. Yeah. And that is the process of the stock market, the bond market, and the central banking system.
Speaker A
It's not capitalism. Capitalism requires a a monetary system that works. Mhm. That's not a Ponzi scheme.
Speaker A
So then you ask me what is America today and what is Britain? What is that? Well, that same thing that happened to the Dutch happened to the Brits.
Speaker A
Mhm. And in order to transfer from one empire to another, you normally need wars and you need to manufacture crisis because what happens with every crisis?
Speaker A
With every crisis, you price people out of all of their assets. These people that can access the money end up buying those assets on the cheap.
Speaker A
Think COVID, think global financial crisis, um, think all of these like different disasters we've seen over time.
Speaker A
Yeah. Um, you end up, why? Because the central bank guarantees the system. The government's on the hook for the debt.
Speaker A
The banks receive all of the interest on the debt. Mhm. The financial industrial complex and the value is all pushed into the stock market. So, you subordinate a government the further this goes and the government works for you at that stage. you know,
Speaker A
whoever whoever is and at the moment the bond holders, you know, um are the ones that control the US government, the financial industrial complex.
Speaker A
You're talking about Black Rock State Street and Vanguard. Um yes, but they they also have a bit of a keep keep oursel in check because they all have different superpowers in this financial industrial complex.
Speaker A
Okay. The the commercial bank, their superpower is the ability to create money every time they issue a loan. An asset manager can't do that. An asset manager's superpower is to take all the voting rights and board seats and
Speaker A
allocate all the capital for everybody that's contributing um all their money. Okay. An investment bank superpower is to take a company, turn it into a product and subordinate it to their own interest. Um so if you're again, let's go through
Speaker A
Elon Musk. Yeah. Elon Musk, most people think, okay, richest man in the world, trillionaire, but who does he answer to? where he answers to his shareholders and most of his net worth is based upon the share price of Tesla stock. So Elon Musk has a
Speaker A
special trick. He's not like a worker, a blueco collar worker that's contributing to his pension every month and once he retires he gets the stock market value.
Speaker A
Mhm. He's got money outside the pension system. He's got his stock and his stock is Tesla. So a bank will go when I worked in investment banking you try and find these people that have significant liquid stocks stocks that are easy to
Speaker A
buy and sell and then you say to them hey do you know what rather than sell your stocks and paying any tax I'll issue a loan against your stock give me your stock and uh you know and use that
Speaker A
as collateral i.e. you give me your stock, then I'll give you a loan. So, the banks get to create more money. They get to issue these big loans and it's guaranteed by their stock. And if for any reason they stop repaying that loan,
Speaker A
then you can just sell the stock and uh just like if anyone stops paying their mortgage, you can uh just take take their house, right?
Speaker A
And so this mechanism is how you subordinate all the world's entrepreneurs. And then as you create crashes, their wealth is dependent upon stock options, which means that shares have to go to a certain price.
Speaker A
How did Elon pay for X? Uh, he borrowed against his stock. Borrowed against his Tesla stock.
Speaker A
Yes, he borrowed against his Tesla stock. Okay. And then the bank then said, "And you have to co and and you have to co, you know, when you purchase it, you have to do it with these guys." And these guys
Speaker A
were the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, the Saudi sovereign wealth fund. And so these are the big pools of capital that own most of the stocks and Tesla stocks uh well they they invested in Tesla but most of the AI if you look at who are
Speaker A
the largest holders is Black Rockck, it's State Street, it's Vanguard. Mhm. Then you go further down the line and you've got the Gulf sovereign wealth fund, the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, the Singapore sovereign wealth fund, the Chinese sovereign wealth fund,
Speaker A
the Norwegian sovereign. Now, are these all are these wealth funds are these equivalent to Vanguard State Street and Black Rockck in other countries?
Speaker A
No, they're a slightly different player. Okay. Okay. So, what do they got? And then and then also um don't the a lot of the Gulf States don't they do something with the oil?
Speaker A
Mhm. They they they they sell the oil in exchange for the US dollar and then they take the US dollars and invest it. Is that right? In the US economy. [clears throat] Yeah. So that's the pro dollar. We can
Speaker A
get into that. Okay. Okay. Um so what do the Gulf what do the sovereign wealth funds do? Well, they are the countries that manage to keep their resources.
Speaker A
And so if you look at America, America doesn't own any oil. Okay? So when Trump saying, you know, we're protecting the oil, you own some oil just to be accurate.
Speaker A
It's called a strategic petroleum reserve. And so you buy your oil. You don't own the oil.
Speaker A
You have to buy it from a company that's extracting oil. So America owns whatever it buys. Uh and that's called a strategic petroleum reserve. And whenever you want to kind of influence the price of oil, America can say we'll release a bunch of oil on
Speaker A
the market from our reserves. Okay? And that will kind of push the price down a bit. That's what America's been doing throughout the closure of the straight of moose. The two countries that have released the most of their
Speaker A
reserves were Japan and America to try and get the price down. Mhm. Okay. So, a sovereign wealth fund says, well, we own our oil. So, Saudi Arabia um owns its oil. It's owned by the nation state. Okay. So when you we were
Speaker A
we were originally talking about Israel. Israel doesn't own hardly anything. Is Israel owns its defense companies, its military companies. It's got a tiny sovereign wealth fund about $2 billion.
Speaker A
Like insignificant, but it's got a bunch of wealthy billionaires all around it that own all the value. And so you can use Israel to extract a shitload of value for yourself. Um but the actual country doesn't own its resources or its assets
Speaker A
because it's structured very similar to America, to UK, to Europe. The value is concentrated in private ownership, you know, in stocks.
Speaker A
And so the Israeli stock market can do very well while the economy gets absolutely crucified.
Speaker A
Okay? Um and those are two different things. So the average person in America could be doing really, really badly, but stocks can be at new all-time highs.
Speaker A
example, the British right now. I couldn't think of a worse economy that's being asset stripped more than the United Kingdom right now in terms of uh you know what what it is. But stocks are at new still at all-time highs. So
Speaker A
throughout the whole fall of the British Empire, stocks just kept going up, but the but the burden on the government debt just kept going up and the average person was their standard of living was getting worse and worse unless they own
Speaker A
their property and they own the stocks. Um, and so you know what the what the difference with the Gulf countries with Singapore, with Norway, with China.
Speaker A
China's their own one, and we'll get into that. Then once we put all this together, it kind of helps us answer your original question.
Speaker A
Okay. [laughter] Long way around, but I I hope this is like this makes this is a very very uh good.
Speaker A
Saudi owns its oil. So Saudi as an entity, a government, a nation, state is able to negotiate with this financial industrial complex because it's got its own money. It's not a fully, you know, it's not all private interest. It's
Speaker A
actually a nation state. Okay. Okay. So [clears throat] Saudi extracts oil. Uh there's a company called Saudi Aramco and Saudi Aramco is fully owned by the government and the government owns it and the government gets the money.
Speaker A
Okay. What does it do with that money? Well, it invests that money and that's called a sovereign wealth fund.
Speaker A
Got it. Yeah, I understand. Yeah, makes sense. Yeah, we don't have any of those in the US.
Speaker A
No, you don't have any because you privatized it all. You gave it away, right?
Speaker A
So, when when America, you know, um when America effectively, sorry to say this, look, this was the British model, so I can say this, right? You know, you're not going to hurt my feelings.
Speaker A
But when you genocided the natives and you you expanded through settler colonialism which was Europeans and Brits and Italians and uh various other people right um you privatized all the oil and handed over you know as as this later became
Speaker A
important in the industrial revolution you know [clears throat] so um the way Israel expanded is exactly the model of how America was created um you know settler colonialism ethnic cleansing of the locals right?
Speaker A
Uh control of media, then propagate a story, um you know, weaponized religious um narratives in order to make people want to join an army. Think what Israel is.
Speaker A
Israel is uh make people think that the Jews are they're not safe anywhere in the world.
Speaker A
Mhm. Um create false flag terrorist attacks all around the world to make Jews feel like they should come to Israel.
Speaker A
uh when they come to Israel, you grow the population. So, you get a population of Jews. Um and then you radicalize them into thinking that they're saving the Jews by engaging in ethnic cleansing and genocide and all.
Speaker A
And then the Messiah returns, you you have a story, the Messiah, whatever whatever your ender time philosophy is, if they're religious.
Speaker A
Um but population growth is the model. you're trying to get a population and then when they become a member they have to join the IDF for 3 years and so once you're in the IDF you've built an army
Speaker A
then you can use that army to destabilize the region and when you destabilize the region you're able to negotiate with countries that actually have oil Saudi Iran Lebanon you know when you destabilize the re region that enables you to negotiate
Speaker A
yeah that allows you to follow a few models and that's kind of the British model, the British East India Company.
Speaker A
We'd go to countries, we'd destroy their currencies, we'd steal their actual resources that we wanted, gold, oil, silver, poppy.
Speaker A
Yeah. Um, we'd install, we' we'd try and destabilize the country by doing color revolutions. Um, and we put dictators in that would have massive financial incentives to serve themsel but serve us.
Speaker A
You know, that's the color revolution, the quote unquote dictator. They're all installed. they work for us, you know.
Speaker A
Um, and so your their job is to make sure their people don't get the resources and we get the resources. And that's that's the the British model, you know, that was the the British East India Company. Um, we can go into
Speaker A
extreme examples. As I get older, I keep finding myself feeling more and more exhausted. My motivation drops and my workouts take longer for me to recover from. I was drinking way too much coffee and I just didn't feel like me anymore. My
Speaker A
testosterone levels were normal, but normal doesn't always mean optimal. And the old me started to come back after I found Marsmen. Marsmen is designed to support your body's natural testosterone function without synthetics or expensive doctor visits. Just ingredients like
Speaker A
tonad Ali, Sheila, zinc, and boron. I've noticed steadier energy, better recovery, more stable moods, and I have a way easier time winding down at the end of the day. And all without any stimulants or synthetic hormones. It's made in the USA. is third party tested
Speaker A
and it's backed by a 90-day money back guarantee. For a limited time, our listeners get 50% off for life, plus free shipping and three free gifts at mengo tomars.com. That's mg o t o m a rs.com for 50% off and three free gifts
Speaker A
when you check out. After you purchase, they're going to ask where you heard about them. Please support our show and let them know we sent you. That reminds me. Um, it was probably a year and a I don't know how many it was maybe a year
Speaker A
ago, maybe a year and a half ago when uh Lindsey Graham, God rest his soul, said something about Ukraine and he made a comment publicly about like we can't let China get their hands on Ukraine.
Speaker A
There's trillions of dollars in natural resources and minerals in Ukraine. Yeah. So Lindsey Graham is a politician was that serves was a politician, correct?
Speaker A
Um that served the interest of the military-industrial complex. He was fully sponsored by military companies.
Speaker A
Loheed Martin, General Dynamic, Raium, Boeing, Palanteer. Um, now what there is is there's a very elaborate money laundering scheme between America and Israel and this and this this different type of thing. So remember the the job is bankrupt the
Speaker A
government, socialize the losses, privatize the gains into the stock market, right? So what do you do? You get the government to using religious narratives. We have to protect the Jews.
Speaker A
You know, we um are defending democracy. It's the only democracy. You know, this um what whatever narrative you need to to be acceptable to the people, right?
Speaker A
You send billions of dollars over to Israel. Mhm. And then Israel has a tide contract with that aid where it has to be spent back on Yeah. So, so, so this just came, this was a big thing that came out recently.
Speaker A
I I saw Tucker did this huge huge post about this where uh we did this new thing where we were giving Israel like thousands of dollars or thousands of these missiles or something or these bombs, these two ton $2 million bombs or
Speaker A
something like this. It was basically like billions of dollars worth of bombs that we're giving them. But or but the real the real way it worked is we gave them like billions of dollars in cash and then they used that cash to buy the
Speaker A
bombs from us. You got it. Okay. Think about it right. So you have to roll over the Ponzi.
Speaker A
Can you find the actual the actual tweet that he did? So it explains what it was.
Speaker A
Yeah. So you have to roll over the Ponzi. That means government needs to keep going.
Speaker A
Um sorry. Debt needs to keep going by hook or by crook. Create war. Do whatever you need to do. create more debt. Okay. That money then goes as aid over to Israel and then Israel gets to spend some of it on Israeli military
Speaker A
companies. Um in the case of Israel, those companies used to be they they're currently owned by the state of Israel.
Speaker A
So it is actually a state asset sovereign the the main the main um the main but uh they're currently being privatized. So they're about to do their public offering. Okay.
Speaker A
So the investment banks has got to the military companies. There's a bit of a dispute there because there's, you know, confidentially of information that's being negotiated that's delaying those public offerings. But the investment bank says, I want those state assets and
Speaker A
I want you to be public because then they get to own those shares through this mechanism of creating money.
Speaker A
And so their job is to subordinate governments as much as they can. Okay? So when people think about Israel, they they get the whole APAC funding. Um, they get this whole mechanism from the American side, but they never ask the
Speaker A
question of who lobbies Israel, you know, is Netanyahu the boss? Exactly. Of course, he's not the boss, right? Trump's not the boss. Which Trump's not the boss.
Speaker A
How is Netanyahu the boss? Like, who who was pulling Netanyahu strings? Yeah, exactly. And he works for the main the military companies and technical companies. The technical industrial complex and the military-industrial complex. his job is to manufacture who what technical what what company
Speaker A
specifically um so in the Israeli side you've got Albert Systems you got uh IA I think that's the right one um you got different companies on the Israeli stock market which are controlled by in general who are those shareholders
Speaker A
um the Israeli pension fund managed by Western Finance um the Israeli ETF managed by Black Rockck um and so at the top of Here you've got a whole similar structure above Israel.
Speaker A
You know, now they're trying to keep some of their state assets, which is military, and they've managed to keep some of those.
Speaker A
And they're trying to take over Lebanon, get some of the natural gas, see if they can get some of that energy. Um, and just you know that their job is to make sure that there's always war because the more war there is the more
Speaker A
they can funnel the money back to the military stock market stocks, Palunteer, you know, all those different companies and their billionaire class are also massive shareholders in all those companies. So then you have this confusing things. A lot of them are
Speaker A
American. They're American Jews, you know, but they've got an allegiance to Israel. And yet when you look behind them, have they got an allegiance to Israel or do they make a [ __ ] ton of money because they're invested in
Speaker A
settlements in the West Bank, a bunch of palenteer stock, a bunch of So they're extracting value using their magic power of, you know, being connected and affiliated to Israel.
Speaker A
Um, but they're just extracting all of this because it's convenient for them. It's convenient. It's financially. they care about is their own profits and their own finances and and and publicly they're using Israel because it's convenient for the narrative
Speaker A
in in general. But there is also an element of radicalization like you know like do these people really believe the Messiah is coming and like the this whole Pax Judeica thing that um do I believe that Peter thinks that? No,
Speaker A
I don't. I don't I don't think he believes it. But what like like do do does Netanyahu believe it? Absolutely not.
Speaker A
Ben Gavir and Netanyahu and all these people that that they I probably think do believe it. Um, now they can either be so you can, you know, politicians are useful if they're radicalized in this way because then you
Speaker A
can use them as tools and weapons like real power that they don't believe half this [ __ ] but if they can find those radicalized ones then they're useful to serve certain interests. They're useful tools.
Speaker A
What'd you find, Steve? I think I found the post that you were talking about the post 40,000 tons of bombs uh that we are selling to Israel.
Speaker A
Mark 84 and blue here. here. What's the price? What's the What's the ticket on this? Congress appropriates money to the executive branch which transfers the cash to Israel to buy Americanmade weapons. And um it's 3 billion.
Speaker A
3 billion. The bill in this case is 3 billion. And that add that to the 352 billion that the US Treasury has transferred to Israel since 1951. Okay?
Speaker A
It's a stock market stimulus, right? All of that money goes right back into our stock.
Speaker A
Dump it on the government. Everyone pays through inflation and those that own the assets, they do well.
Speaker A
It's a magic trick. It's it's a magic trick. And so the fall of the British Empire was once all the value had been extracted. You know, you you asset strip as much as you can from the Dutch, you then asset strip as much
Speaker A
as you can from the Brits, and then you just create the same structure in America, which was the formation of the Federal Reserve. And uh then all the value of the military-industrial complex from World War I, Great Depression,
Speaker A
World War II concentrates wealth upwards and then you're just left in post World War II this very elaborate structure. Um three more institutions which I think are worth understanding and you can put the whole picture together and we can
Speaker A
try and make it more current. How are we doing? Are you okay with this?
Speaker A
We're great. Yeah, I'm tracking. I'm tracking. I'm not in outer space yet. All right, [clears throat] cool. So after World War I, um the Germans had to take on all the debt from the entire world of World War I. Okay.
Speaker A
Okay. Um in order to manage that debt, no one wanted their currency uh because if you want to if you say you've got to pay me, you know, a trillion dollars uh for all of this debt from the war, then they're
Speaker A
going to say, "Well, I can pay you in my own currency because we can print it." And then they're going to say, "But if you print it, it's going to be worth nothing." Right?
Speaker A
Okay. So they said, "We don't want your currency. We want your gold." Okay. So the Bank for International Settlements was set up in order to at the Treaty of Versailles, which was an agreement in France um to dump all of
Speaker A
the war debt from World War I on the German nation state. And the German nation state had nowhere near it had a big economic, you know, it had a big um base in terms of manufacturing.
Speaker A
Um you know, companies like Volksvaren were created like during World War II and the Hitler regime and all of that fascism and all that stuff. Um but the problem was is that we had this great depression between the World Wars and
Speaker A
Germany ended up with all the debt and they had to pay in gold. Um, so the Bank for International Settlements was set up to manage those reparation payments and those repayments. Uh, and the Bank for International Settlements didn't
Speaker A
actually store any of the gold. It had an agreement with three central banks. The Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, and the Swiss Central Bank.
Speaker A
They had the actual gold. So, the Bank of England would store the gold. Now what's interesting if you look during World War II uh when Hitler would go and invade a new country like he invaded Czechoslovakia um then uh the Rice Bank which is the
Speaker A
central bank do you remember we're talking about the German central bank that also had his brother on the Federal Reserve as governor right uh they would contact the bank for international settlements and say hey you know that gold that used to belong
Speaker A
to Czechoslovakia how much is there and they'd be like well there's uh you x amount of tons, they'd be like, "Right, can you make that Germany's now?" And so every time Hitler invaded a country, um, the Bank for International Settlements
Speaker A
would transfer the gold over to Germany. But it wasn't a transfer. It was just literally call the Bank of England, call the Federal Reserve, call the Swiss Central Bank, and change the label on those gold bars. That's now Germany's.
Speaker A
It's no longer Czechoslovakia's. Okay. So while allegedly America and Britain as nation states were fighting against the Nazi regime, the bank for international settlements every time Hitler invaded a new country was making gold to back the currency theirs. And so what what did Hitler do
Speaker A
between that you know that what was the rise of Hitler effectively after the treaty of Versailles after the bank for international settlements was created after managing bankrupting the government with all this gold debt um they started printing their currency
Speaker A
their currency became worthless there was the Valmar republic uh we had massive degeneracy we had the worst economic circumstances any German that had savings lost all their savings you um we're we we were at that rampant wealth extraction, currency destruction,
Speaker A
which means that you get to buy all their assets on the cheap, right? And so Hitler came along with a nationalist uprising to all the Germans and said, "Hey, we're going to we're going to print our own currency and
Speaker A
we're not going to do it as debt. We're just going to print currency and invest in building [ __ ] in Germany." And that's exactly what he did. you just print currency and then employ people.
Speaker A
And so they got rid of their inflation. Uh they ended up in full employment.
Speaker A
Everyone was put to productive use and they build factory after factory um to build a nationalist uh vision in Germany.
Speaker A
Now printing all of that money eventually you have to you know eventually that's where we enter into World War II. he needed to back it by gold. So he started invading countries in order to try and back it by gold.
Speaker A
And then he took that productive building that was building Germany and turned it into military companies. And so then they started manu rather than manufacturing cars, they started manufacturing bonds.
Speaker A
Mhm. And what happens is when you manufacture for war, you just get wealth extraction to the the elite class and the debt is left on the people. And so that's that's what happened throughout World War II.
Speaker A
Um, and then you had the whole um, you know, reforming of banking, arresting of Rothschilds, and then you had the Holocaust. Um, and the rest is history.
Speaker A
Oh, wow. Now, at the end of World War II, Germany's destroyed. You split it up into East and West Germany, right?
Speaker A
Um, the Soviet Union is, you know, pushing forward with communism. uh the government's getting more and more powerful ex getting more and more resources uh because that that leads into the third type of country. So we had sovereign wealth funds the Gulf
Speaker A
countries and them you have America fully subordinate to fick mkantic subordinate to capital. Then you have the final type of country um which is I'd classify as China today.
Speaker A
So China has the most sovereign government in the world. What that means is that the government's in similar to the Soviet Union, similar to Soviet Union, but it's not communism. It's radical capitalism at the bottom.
Speaker A
Okay. Um like literally no intellectual property. Anyone can create business. Anyone can copy each other. Like you, you know, no protections, all that. Cutthroat capitalism for everybody. But if you become bigger than the government, so if you create the
Speaker A
next Google, if you create Alibaba, if you create Huawei, then align with the government or you'll be taken out.
Speaker A
No company is allowed to become more important than the government. So you can't have a Mick, Fick, and Tick in China that's above the government.
Speaker A
So in China, in America, you have the government, then you have Mick, Tick, and then you have Fick at the top because they got all the capital. They get to create all the money. They own the bonds, they pull all the pension,
Speaker A
they can access the capital, they got all the board seats. Um, they can subordinate all the entrepreneurs, they got Silicon Valley, they can put people through the sausage factory of becoming a public company um and put them through the structure,
Speaker A
right? And and then you can pay lobbies, you can, you know, do all that to capture a government. You can groom politicians.
Speaker A
They're in charge. Yeah. But in China, that's not how it works. The government stays in charge. Yeah.
Speaker A
Off with your head if you're not going to. Exactly. Yeah. So you you you do what you do you need to do. But we're in charge, you know. Uh the reason for that is because China was the victim of the
Speaker A
British Empire, right? The century of humiliation, opium wars, like we would go, you know, and this is kind of like the crown.
Speaker A
There's a great Adam Curtis documentary about this. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. So the bank HSBC in Hong Kong was created to facilitate the drug trade where um the crown the British East India Company you know it looked like we
Speaker A
were in India to put facilitate tea trades but under all the tea was all the opium um and then the opium needed a bank HSBC and then it would try and get it wanted India's gold and China's silver and so
Speaker A
we created this trade where we would facilitate opium trade from India um get the Chinese ex addict addicted to opium.
Speaker A
Um and then we would use our military might in order to try and subordinate the country, take it over.
Speaker A
Um and then that led to Hong Kong and the settlement with Hong Kong. Okay.
Speaker A
Um uh now in reaction to that and the Japan, the Korean side, all the different atrocities that happened, they said never again. We're going to build a 100redyear plan. You know, they said we're going to have a century. Yeah.
Speaker A
China. So China said after a century of humiliation, we're going to do a century of building. And so they expelled all the bankers. They implemented their own nationalized central bank called the PBOC, the People's Bank of China.
Speaker A
Um they implemented and they don't allow Chinese people to um invest in the US more than $50,000 a year.
Speaker A
Yeah. They had capital controls so that so that the country doesn't become foreign owned. So if you look at America, $70 trillion of value is foreignowned. So America is not sovereign as a country because the FIK owns it. The sovereign the foreign
Speaker A
sovereign wealth funds and even China the largest sovereign wealth funds they can they own mo a massive chunk of the value.
Speaker A
So $70 trillion of US assets, real estate. What percent of our assets is that again?
Speaker A
About 20 30% is 30% of American assets is owned by foreign Yeah. foreign people or companies or so about yeah foreign institutions right and people and various other things then you have about what about the Cayman Islands bank
Speaker A
Cayman Island is the remnants of the British Empire so I live on one of those islands but when when you live in the Cayman I don't live in the Cayman our company I live in one of the channel islands
Speaker A
right okay um but when the British Empire started to really fall so post World War II We're talking about these institutions.
Speaker A
The the final moment of the British Empire was when they could no longer colonize and we had this decolonization movement and a lot of the African leaders would take back control of their country. The Asian countries would rebel
Speaker A
and the system got so complicated that the British Empire could just no longer manage it. The debt was exploding for the government. The British East India Company had dissolved. We transferred all the value over to the American system. We installed the Federal
Speaker A
Reserve. We had World War I, Great Depression, World War II. Uh but the remnants of it, the final nail in the coffin was 1954 uh when Egypt was a nationalist uprising to take control of their oil and take
Speaker A
control of the Sueis Canal. Sound like Iran today. [laughter] So the British Empire said, "No, no, no, no. The the Sewish Canal is ours. We want to control those that strategic." Can you pull up a Sewish Canal?
Speaker A
My geography is about as good as Trump's. Yeah. Okay. So, you got Egypt in Africa, you got the Mediterranean Sea, and then you got the [snorts] Suez.
Speaker A
Zoom out a little bit. Okay. A little more. Okay. So, is the Suez Canal just that top area or is the is it the whole straight? It's the whole It's the whole straight that Egypt controls there.
Speaker A
Okay, got it. And Brit Britain wanted to control this. Britain controlled it. They did control it and Egypt said, "We want it back." And they took it back.
Speaker A
There was a nationalist uprising led by Nasir, who's like an Egypt nationalist, right? And he said that that canal that's ours.
Speaker A
And he said that, you know, any energy, any oil, that's ours, you know. Um and then it rightfully so. I mean, it's in their country. Yes. And the Brits came along and said, "Hell no." Uh, you ain't having it. Um, and the naval fleet came
Speaker A
over and, uh, there was exactly what's happening in the straight of Amuse. Wow. Uh, they tried to import a blockade. Uh, they tried to choke the energy markets.
Speaker A
Um, and in the end, the Egyptians, the British just had to retreat. This This was in 54.
Speaker A
1954. Yeah. Wow. Why did they claim ownership? Did they help build it? Uh well it was part of our colonial expeditions was to control Africa like the French the French and the Brits um you know had we needed all
Speaker A
of the resources. Now the thing that the British Empire wanted to and that was that you were saying that was the the straw that broke the camel's back. That that was the final moment where the Brit the world started to
Speaker A
realize those British naval fleets, they ain't so powerful and the world was empowered and um and they said, you know, let's work with the Americans.
Speaker A
And so the American was the net beneficiary of that. Okay. This is when America was going through it, you know, real growth phase on the military-industrial complex. Um it was producing all the weapons around the world.
Speaker A
This was the Cold War, right? Yeah. Then you only had one force left. Europe was gone. You know, Europe was destroyed. Um, and in postw World War II, you said we the there was a meeting called Bretton Woods in 1944.
Speaker A
This was just around the end of the war. And this is when the Brits and the Americans met up in order to say what's the new world order? What does the world look like now today? So you had Treaty
Speaker A
of Versailles was the bank for international settlements. And there were two forces. One was a gentleman called John Maynard Keynes who's like the cornerstone of economics.
Speaker A
If you study economics, you learn about Keynesian economics. It justifies socialism and the government taking on debt. Funded by the financial industrial complex, of course, as all colleges and universities are to control the education system to build the labor that
Speaker A
they need. Um, but John Maynard Kees wanted a global currency at this time. It was like the the last thing that they could do and it was called Bangor and the Americans led by Hoover said uh no we're not having it.
Speaker A
Um what we're going to do is we're going to create two organizations. One's called the World Bank and the other's called the International Monetary Fund, the IMF.
Speaker A
The IMF um was an organization that was set up to take the role from the Bank for International Settlements. Um because what they said is look, everyone's on gold. Um everyone can convert their currency into gold, but all of this gold is being drained and we
Speaker A
got all the gold. Why don't you come off the gold standard, stop allowing people to convert their currencies into gold and instead um trade your currency against our currency, the dollar. And they said, "Look, we promise you do
Speaker A
that. You come off the gold standard. You trade your currency for our currency. The pound is fully convertible into dollars." Mh.
Speaker A
And then when you got your dollars, you can convert it into gold. And that was [clears throat] the international monetary fund system. So America said, "We will we will allow dollars to always be convertible into gold and you come off the gold standard
Speaker A
and you trade your currencies against ours." Okay, if you do that, you can firstly you need to install a central bank that creates a debt based Ponzi scheme as we described in the beginning of this podcast, which is a
Speaker A
wealth extracting mechanism, socialized losses, privatized gains. So any country that comes into this system, they need a central bank that's a member of the bank for international settlements. They need a currency that's not convertible to gold and they need to make their
Speaker A
currency convertible into dollars. Mhm. That was the agreement. If you do that, then we'll issue you a dollar loan.
Speaker A
What year was this again? Uh 44. 44. Oh, so it was before It was before the Suez Canal thing.
Speaker A
Before the Sewish Canal. Yeah. That was like the last nail as it were. Okay.
Speaker A
So you take away the gold standard. Um you asset strip the entire British government.
Speaker A
Mhm. You social, you know, you privatize all the gains, you socialize all the losses, right? Um, and then you [clears throat] um hand over power to the new empire, which was the American Empire effectively, and that was represented by
Speaker A
the same interest, which is the Fed. Got it. Yeah. Um, so now, so now you're you're you're saying that you see the same pattern happening with the United States in the Iran war.
Speaker A
Absolutely. No doubt about it. World Bank was set up to get everyone into debt and that was like the final. Now you have World Bank, IMF, Bank for International Settlements, right? These are the cornerstone of the financial industrial complex and all of the
Speaker A
companies that represent the financial industrial complex, whether it be JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, um, Black Rockck, State Street, Vanguard, they're all public companies, uh, and they all own each other and they all have the board seats. And so there's
Speaker A
this one structure a bit more decentralized than the than the the British East India Company, but similar.
Speaker A
Okay. And they um they're kissing cousins. Yeah. Um they're all co-owned. It's all value in the same stock market, the same board seats.
Speaker A
Um it's a it's a way more decentralized version of that one company model, but it's more covert just like the Federal Reserve. They they made it look a bit more decentralized than a central bank. Mhm.
Speaker A
So like the Fed is owned by 12 state uh central banks and then they're owned by whoever has a bank account with the Fed which is the banks.
Speaker A
Got it. So the Fed is owned by the banks. And so you have this structure.
Speaker A
Okay. Um but what is what is this structure? It's global. It's not nationalistic. It doesn't say we want to any in any country.
Speaker A
Wherever the profit is to be made and this is when we entered into this this era of globalization. So if China has the cheaper factories, if China has the rare earth minerals, if we can make more money by China doing all that, then
Speaker A
fine. If we have all the capital, we can securitize, financialize, so you know, um we'll just we'll we'll do that.
Speaker A
Um and if the Gulf money has all the sovereign wealth and Singapore does and Norway does, then we'll partner with them and they get to negotiate in this structure. Now, China is the most sovereign country. It has the most
Speaker A
negotiation power against the financial industrial complex in the world. That's why you have capital controls because it is a fully sovereign government.
Speaker A
Mhm. Now, let me try and make a correction because you might think I'm like a Chinese propaganda saying this system's great, America's [ __ ] There is a there is a bit of a s a strange tension here.
Speaker A
A sovereign country tends to subordinate its people, right? So if the government has full control, it has full control over his people, his businesses.
Speaker A
And so they tend to be more authoritarian. Mhm. You know, by nature. Now, a non-s sovereign, a subordinate country to Mick, fick and tick, has a very covert shallow leadership structure that people can't understand. They think the government's in
Speaker A
Can you I'm sorry, you're throwing me off. What What is the Mick, Fick, and Tick?
Speaker A
Uh, so the the Mick is the military-industrial complex. Oh, okay. Gotcha. financial industrial complex. Tick is technical industrial complex.
Speaker A
I'm glad you keep just ask these questions because you know this I've lost the ability to distinguish between normal language and jargon you're in your own universe.
Speaker A
Yeah. [laughter] Yeah. Um so it really helps. Um and so yeah m you know fick mick tick US government China government mickfict tick okay state controlled. uh these are, you know authoritarian don't really engage in politics. You're not going to see people in China talking
Speaker A
about left and right politics. Uh they know who's in charge. You know, you live in Saudi Arabia, you know who's in charge. You know, you live in America, you think the government's in charge, you think you're voting left and
Speaker A
right, but they're owned by the same fick maktick structure on both sides. Mhm. And so their job is to make people always think that something else is happening, that it's a democracy, that your vote matters. And what the what
Speaker A
Mickfick and Tick do is that they they groom politicians where they work for lobbies.
Speaker A
And if they want to become more and more power, they've got to an also the last kind of thing which I think you would discuss a lot is we always talk about this concept of the deep state. M
Speaker A
you know MI6, MSAD, CIA, Five Eyes. In general, where do they sit in the structure? Well, they have a complete um hidden covert structure. In general, they came from being contractors to the military-industrial complex.
Speaker A
They have a narrative called we work for national security. They don't have to disclose any of their finances other than directly to the president.
Speaker A
Well, it's interesting because the way you've laid this all out. If the president works for the financial and the military and the technological, well, the CIA works for the president.
Speaker A
So, yeah, but let's look a little bit deeper into that. Where does the budget to pay the CIA come from? It comes from military budgets. So, what's the what's the four largest line items on the the national debt?
Speaker A
It's um where does all this CIA budget comes from? uh military contractors. So you got no the mil the federal military budget.
Speaker A
Yeah. So you got you got the Pentagon, right? Exactly. And they able to fund the CIA, right?
Speaker A
That's kind of like But who who where does the government get that money from?
Speaker A
Bond holders. Bond holders. They're the fick. And then people leave the CIA and get giant government contracts to work for private private military-industrial complex comp private companies.
Speaker A
You got it. So I I couldn't prove this. I don't know the the but in my mind I'm thinking probably 5% of what the CIA does is national security government. I think the vast majority of it is two
Speaker A
other activities. Uh one is private contracting. So when they do private contracting to Loheed Martin, General Dynamic, Rathium, you know, if you need to order a genocide, you need to order a war. Um, then you have the ability to do that as
Speaker A
some of these privileged military companies, you know, but who controls the military companies? Capital.
Speaker A
Mhm. So if you're, you know, JP Morgan in the structure and you're Black Rockck, then you're like, I can give capital to these military companies.
Speaker A
Mhm. I can put board seats. I can subordinate the executives. Mhm. Their wealth and their incentives are all aligned around get their share price up. What's profitable? The optimum amount of forever wars.
Speaker A
Um some defense contracts that's less profitable. and then wars that go on for as long as possible. Um, and then some really aggressive action. So, they always need that. Always need that because military companies don't give up on revenue. They need constant revenue,
Speaker A
right? So, if they're ever negotiating peace in one region, let's say the Middle East is about to move to peace, they need another war. They need to make up for their revenue somewhere else. So, they need to escalate through the CIA, Putin
Speaker A
invading Ukraine, covert operations. There's another trillion dollars to be made in my estimates from escalating the Russia European war. America's making all the money. Russia's going to end up with all the land. You get to use all the Ukrainians as your your radicalized
Speaker A
fighting force. And until there's no Ukrainians, eventually Black Rockck will own the assets. Uh the CIA can stop and then they enter into a negotiation. And there's a very convenient thing that comes from the Russian war. The full
Speaker A
subordination and destruction of Europe. That means they get to rebuild [ __ ] right?
Speaker A
They get to rebuild all that [ __ ] again, which is what they did after World War II when they did the rebuild contract, the Marshall Plan, get the World Bank loan. So Europe, Black Rockck already get contracts to
Speaker A
rebuild Ukraine. Oh, absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. AB. I mean, in its portfolio. Remember, Black Rockck owns everything. [laughter] It owns everything. So, it's fully diversified. And remember, so one of the companies in its portfolio got the contract to do it.
Speaker A
Yeah. So I mean if you want to make money through renewable energy, you've got all the renewable energy companies, you got big oil, you've got big farmer, you got the banks, you got everything, you got complete diversification. You
Speaker A
got Google, you got Facebook, you got everything. You got Meta, you know, you got Palunteer, you whatever happens. And what does the financial industrial complex do? They also have derivatives, right? So you could derivatives means that you can you know
Speaker A
this whole debt mechanism there's trillions hundreds of trillions in the derivatives market which means that effectively you issue these debt contracts against assets how Elon effectively got it gets to borrow and use collateral right so the derivatives means that you have
Speaker A
this network of hedge funds and these hedge funds are the ones that are able to make money when markets go down, right?
Speaker A
So, you can you can man imagine you're managing your spreadsheet. You're like, "Right, we got war here. We try and push this covert operation through there. If it doesn't work, we go short the markets. We got all the assets and
Speaker A
resources. If it works, then we get this." And you can just model the whole thing out. You know, you've got these consulting companies that will provide all the research for you. They'll tell you peace is 100 times more profitable
Speaker A
than war. you know, we can you can manage this whole portfolio of the world order.
Speaker A
Um, Russia and Ukraine, you know, so so when I look at Europe right now, I I know that I'm my my analysis says that while it looks like chaos and World War II, this is actually the Middle East
Speaker A
becoming West Asia again. So, they're all aligned with China. Um, Iran's aligned with China, the Gulf countries are align aligned with China. Um, you know, you've got and and you need a theatrical I I don't want to use the word theater
Speaker A
because then people think fake. This is all real. Like the deaths are real. The killing's real. But capital doesn't care about that.
Speaker A
You know, if you think if you think Gaza is bad, Gaza is a reflection of how our systems always worked. We just get to see it on camera.
Speaker A
Mhm. You know, uh, this is how the systems always worked. It's just you just didn't know it. You didn't get to see it. You didn't see it on Gamble and the GCC the Gulf countries and Europe. You're saying the Gulf
Speaker A
countries and Europe are being more aligned with China. Well, let's look at let's look at this.
Speaker A
So, you talked about the petro dollar. Let's go to petro dollar and today those are the two last components.
Speaker A
Okay. So, we set up the World Bank, we set up the IMF, we set up the bank for international settlements, we set up the fick, make and tick.
Speaker A
Okay. Um, when you were trying to make profits from war, what did the military-industrial complex do? Will it use the strategic tension between communism and capitalism which is a fake narrative?
Speaker A
Yes. Cuz they profit from both, [laughter] you know. Um NATO. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Uh so then you have like Operation Gladadio, Operation Mockingbird, if you're familiar with all these things.
Speaker A
Control media narrative through Mockingbird. Gladadio is where the terrorism industry came from, which the first terrorists were really the Israelis after that 1917 Balffor declaration. You know, when you had like Loot and Hagenar, which later became the IDF, you know, those were the
Speaker A
ones where you would do false flag operations, you would blame it on someone else.
Speaker A
Operation Northwoods were the plan to fly the jet liner over Cuba and shoot it down.
Speaker A
Yeah. So, you know, this is really MI6 CIA MSAD 5 like classic. So, whenever you see terrorism, like here's how it really works.
Speaker A
Mhm. Think of ISIS and al-Qaeda. Even in the Department of Government Efficiency, um, one of the AI actually released that there was $695 thou um million dollars of funding via USAD to ISIS and al-Qaeda training camps. Um so these people their
Speaker A
job is to create a radicalized group an army a militia group and at the higher levels they're paid by intelligence assets and they auction themsel off. That's their business.
Speaker A
Their business is if the French are willing to pay, if the the Gulf are willing to pay, if the Turks are willing to pay, if the Americans are willing to pay these militant groups in the Middle East.
Speaker A
Yes. Now what their job is to do is make it look like it's religion.
Speaker A
um and also recruit people through radicalizing and and and all that type of stuff. But really at the higher level, it's destabilizing countries so that you can access their resources and then you can enter into a fick negotiation around their resources.
Speaker A
So the the terrorism industry is a factory. Wow. It's a factory of negotiation with Fick.
Speaker A
That's [ __ ] wild. Yeah. I've never heard it explained this way before. And so if Fick controls the US military, think of the US military as a for rent militia group like ISIS and al-Qaeda, right?
Speaker A
When Fick wants Venezuelan oil, go get it. Trump, you get to make a [ __ ] ton of money out of it. Do some insider trading.
Speaker A
Now, what [clears throat] what is your view on the reason that we did that Venezuelan operation right before Iran?
Speaker A
So what I think Fic is doing um is using energy crisis and manufactured crisis in order to split the world into regions.
Speaker A
Uh because the era of US hegemonic power is being hedged against. It's not we're ending it because the British Empire to the American Empire was like it was like a 10 20 year transition to go from the Bank of England being important to the
Speaker A
Federal Reserve being the most important. So I I think they're splitting the world up into regions right now. There's no The Dutch was a natural handover to the British, the British was a natural handover to the Americans. It's all the same kind of
Speaker A
structure, but now we got China. China defended, you know, um, and so you got to deal with China. You you can't co-opt China, you know, they expelled all the banksters. They created their own central bank. They have their own
Speaker A
nationalized banking system. They have capital controls. You can't launch currency wars. They've got a manufacturing base. They got a currency that they want to keep cheap, you know, so that their exports. The whole world needs their product. The Mick, Fick, and
Speaker A
Tick cannot function without China. That's the important part. There's not an American weapon that can be produced without China.
Speaker A
And why is that? Wait. Uh because they built an infrastructure and it it comes down to this petro dollar globalization and then today.
Speaker A
Let's go through those three. The petro dollar um was the thing that was meant to bankrupt the American government after the Korean War was the Vietnamese war. So that was that did bankrupt the American government.
Speaker A
Um, and at that stage, this is when France tested whether they could get their gold. And so France like showed up with a big naval ship um and said, "Hey, I want my gold. Give me my gold. I don't
Speaker A
want these Federal Reserve notes anymore. I don't want any money in the dollar system." Um, and America said, "Okay." And other countries were all trying to get their gold. Um, and the gold supply was about to be drained.
Speaker A
Now, there's a problem. If you look at America's gold, remember they had 8,000 tons from all these different wars. The British colonial, the Germans, the Russians, all that stuff.
Speaker A
That gold sits on two two companies balance sheets. The US government treasury and the Federal Reserve. That gold is double bookkeep.
Speaker A
It is it is booked twice. It's owned by the Fed and it's owned by the government.
Speaker A
Okay, that's the collateral. Now, since the 50s, I think we've had like one audit or something. Um, and Trump said, "We'll we'll audit Fort Knox pre, but that hasn't happened yet." Um, but the basically that's the collateral that if everyone wanted their gold, it
Speaker A
doesn't exist because it's levered up through these derivatives markets, these paper contracts against gold. All right.
Speaker A
Okay. China has all its gold. It doesn't have paper contracts. China has all its silver. It doesn't have paper contracts.
Speaker A
It doesn't have this hyper financialized market. Okay. Um so the pro dollar um so France tried to get its gold and then we had regime change with JFK.
Speaker A
I'd summarize. Yeah. Didn't he I heard I heard I've heard a theory that he wanted to do something with the uh with the Federal Reserve. There's a theory that why he died is because he wanted to do something to the Federal Reserve.
Speaker A
Yeah. I mean, my personal theory is that you can look at the MSAD connections and the Apac stuff and I think that's the most likely. But who were they connected to? Military-industrial complex. So JFK did three things which um were
Speaker A
unforgivable. Um, one of them is he wanted to classify Apac foreign financing and take the ability to close that loophole.
Speaker A
Yeah. Between this money laundering, he wanted them to maybe foreign agent. Yeah. And so they'd have to, you know, you couldn't lobby as a foreign agent.
Speaker A
Mhm. Uh, the second thing he did is he introduced a silverbacked dollar issued by the government.
Speaker A
Not the Fed, but the government. Okay? which is what Abraham Lincoln did. Abraham Lincoln, if you've seen the Civil War was funded because Abraham Lincoln was against the banks as Andrew Jackson was. Andrew Jackson, if you look at those three, Andrew Jackson, Abraham
Speaker A
Lincoln JFK. Um, Andrew Jackson wanted to pay down the debt and not have the a central bank and he closed the central bank and paid down the debt. Then he had to be eliminated.
Speaker A
How did he die? I don't know. I mean, there's stories around there that poison and all sorts.
Speaker A
I I don't know. I can speculate, but what's the official narrative? Um, can you find out?
Speaker A
What's the official narative? Google how Andrew Jackson died. We know how JFK and Lincoln died.
Speaker A
[laughter] Um, then yeah, Lincoln um issued his own currency, the green back, and it was issued by Treasury.
Speaker A
Mhm. Rather than created as debt. heart failure, severe fluid retention, allegedly heart failure. Yeah.
Speaker A
Okay. Yeah. Um, so you know, those were the big, you remember, again, I don't want to go too deep, we'll carry on, but there's there was three parts of American history.
Speaker A
Three central banks and the last one was the Fed. Those there were battles between those central banks and the government and who issues currency.
Speaker A
Okay. Is is basically the battle. and Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, and then JFK um did actually implement law that allowed the Treasury to issue currencies fully convertible into silver.
Speaker A
Um that's the same thing that effectively Hitler did. Really? Yes. So Hitler printed his own currency by the Treasury, not backed by debt, with no Ponzi scheme. And that was called national socialism. and then you know the the you call it Nazism or
Speaker A
whatever. Um that's that that that part of history and then he had to invade the countries to get the gold.
Speaker A
Um now JFK um he issued a currency um I think it was fully settled. I can't remember exactly what happened there.
Speaker A
Mhm. And you he's got his infamous speeches where he was talking about the military-industrial complex and the shadow government. He wanted to pull everyone out of Vietnam within a couple months.
Speaker A
Correct. He wanted to he stopped there was a big uh nuclear war plan with the joint chiefs of staff where they wanted to nuke Russia and China and they he said no to that.
Speaker A
Yeah. So he was regime changed and replaced with a pro-Israeli pro-Mick neoon LBJ you know went back to business as usual. Then we had Nixon and uh Nixon after the you know the Vietnamese war effectively fully bankrupted the US
Speaker A
government um at that [snorts] stage uh Nixon came off the gold standard and reset rules. So this is 1971.
Speaker A
Um Nixon woke up one day and said hey you know that Breton Woods agreement Mhm. uh you know we said if you want to have gold like hand in your dollars and we'll give you some gold. Yeah. You
Speaker A
can't do that anymore. And so now the dollar was backed by nothing. And it was a full fiat currency debt based Ponzi scheme that was simply a function of how much debt the banks could get the world into. And this was
Speaker A
the first time in history we had that 1971. So then what followed um Israel uh started doing more and more military action across the Middle East. Um there was a resistance against it um which was the the the uh Saudi Arabia and various
Speaker A
other countries did an oil embargo. Mhm. Uh they spiked the price of oil. But this was unacceptable for America because America at that time was completely dependent upon the Middle East for its oil. It obviously had its own supplies but it still needed to
Speaker A
supplement it through u middle eastern partnerships. Right. Um Saudi who had a partnership with US because it didn't want to work with the Brits. Iran worked with the Brits to build its oil. Um Saudi worked with the Americans to build its oil. um its oil
Speaker A
extraction and various other things. Okay. Um Saudi slowly started removing itself from its partnership to build its sovereign wealth fund and tried to you know maintain its own resources.
Speaker A
Iran was only able to keep about 5 10% of the revenue from its oil. The rest went to British petroleum um from the colonial days. And so we regime changed both the CIA and MI6 regime changed the democracy in Iran
Speaker A
because they wanted to nationalize their oil in 195 53 53 right just before the Egypt side.
Speaker A
So British Petroleum needed is losing its oil now. You know it had to go. And how did it persuade Carter at the time?
Speaker A
Well, it said uh Iran's a communist. It's working with the Russians of course. And so then the CIA and MI6 regime changed the democracy um replaced it with the sha a dictator effectively um and uh and managed to keep as much of
Speaker A
its oil. And it wasn't until um you know 79 with the Iranian revolution that it wanted to nationalize its oil and keep its own oil. Hence why Iran is enemy number one to big oil. Now Saudi complied. Saudi said, "We'll share
Speaker A
50/50." And then over time, it set up a relationship and it negotiated with the FIK. Um, wait, wait. Saudi went 50/50 with who?
Speaker A
Um, uh, well, American private big oil, the big seven oil companies, Chevron, Exxon, Shell, British Petroleum, you know, the big Western.
Speaker A
Again, yeah, none of that's owned by the country. It's not British. It's not [laughter] American. It's just um companies that are hosted in Britain and America.
Speaker A
Got it. You know, they don't have the oil. Um Saudi was receiving 50% of its revenue building up wealth be able to negotiate with um and when Israel uh you know did this um invasion uh they did a oil embargo and this sent
Speaker A
the inflation like crazy. Exactly what's happening now. Oil prices went up like nuts. M but there's a major difference today.
Speaker A
America has its own energy you know that's a very important thing but at that time it was fully dependent upon um this but does big oil care doesn't care uh because disasters manufacturing disasters is just concentration of power upwards to
Speaker A
privatizing gains and losses. Mhm. Um round about this time there was a covert network of the intelligence network that was set up by the Bush family who were oil eastern oil tycoons um and uh George Bush Senior um set up a
Speaker A
covert network called Safari Club, right? Safari Club was an intelligence sharing network between Saudis, the Bush families, uh various others. One of the first people they groomed in terms of a CIA asset in this network in Safari Club
Speaker A
was Osama bin Laden. And so Osama groomed him as a CIA ass. Yes. What do you mean when you say groomed him?
Speaker A
Osama bin Laden um was a safari club. Remember we talked about these militias. He had an ideology that allowed him to recruit an army. and our ideology could be weaponized in order to destabilize countries and get leverage against the Saudi government as
Speaker A
well. So when you think of these when you think of like the Middle East in in case of Saudi, you have like kind of like what you would call the Islamists.
Speaker A
Mhm. Then you have the Saudi like royal monarchy. Mhm. And these two forces are kind of um competing forces within the country's power structure. M uh but they've partnered over time and they figured out ways but you know there
Speaker A
was a whole friction like the whole divide and conquer operation is always if you could fund the quote unquote Islamists then the fit can get leverage in negotiating with the royal monarchs.
Speaker A
Okay. And so what happens with the oil embargo by you fund the Islamists to create chaos create chaos against the nationalist government, the nationalist elements, the ones that control their oil.
Speaker A
Yeah. You get them to create chaos so that if you can pit them against each other, destroy the country, then you might be able to regime change, put in your own dictator and extract all the wealth and extract all the wealth, which is
Speaker A
what they did in Lebanon, in Syria, in uh you know, and in all the way down to Gaza, you know, as a as a laboratory for testing military and technical genocide technology. Right. [clears throat] Um um but yeah and uh the resistance was
Speaker A
done by the leader at the time was King Fisizel. King Fisel was assassinated in 74. Um and this was around the time of the creation of the petro dollar. And so the new set of family there was a
Speaker A
negotiation around that time like 71 72 73 74 75 around about that time. This was the oil embargo. This was the massive inflation price increase, energy prices through the roof. It was a disaster that led to a really bad like
Speaker A
um decade ahead um leading through the 80s and everything that we saw from that. Uh but the petro dollar was a negotiation that said right we're going to form all of the countries that kept its oil. We're going to form OPEC and
Speaker A
we're gonna negotiate against Western oil interests and we're going to say we're going to unify rather than me just being Saudi and me just being Iran and me just being Venezuela, me just being Argentina, we're all going to get together
Speaker A
and we're going to pull all of our vast oil resources together and we're going to negotiate with FIK and we're going to try and persuade them to stop sending our, you know, destroying our country so that they can
Speaker A
do the forever war and rebuild and all of that stuff. M so OPEC was formed as a resistance and who who was all involved in OPEC?
Speaker A
Um all of the big like Gulf countries today like the Q80s, the Saudis, Emiratis.
Speaker A
Um today you've got Iran, Venezuela, they're all in OPEC. Oh, okay. And what they do is they they're a cartel of oil producing countries that kept their oil and they all agree how much oil to put out in the market. So they have quotas.
Speaker A
So they say Iraq, you can produce this much oil. UAE produce this much oil, Venezuela, you produce that much oil.
Speaker A
And if we act together in unison, then we can negotiate against the private Exxons and Chevrons and Shells and BPs.
Speaker A
[clears throat] Wow. Now what? Okay. So, so they're ne when you say that OPEC these countries getting together extracting their quota of oil every year to negotiate against Shell and BP and Chevron. What do you mean when you say
Speaker A
negotiate against them? Well, Mick Fick tick fit can create a war. It can create a forever war. It can destroy your country. It can rent the US steal the resources.
Speaker A
Steal your resources. And if you um and then once you're optimally destroyed and weak uh then fit comes in and says let's do some rebuild contracts um and they negotiate all the different contracts. So after a war which is in
Speaker A
the case of Iran right now it's the memorandum of understanding. It said we need they use different language to make you think something else is happening. So they said 300 billion reparations. So Iran can give a narrative. We're going
Speaker A
to get 300 billion which you've got to make up for. But who's going to pay that 300 billion?
Speaker A
Well, is it going to be the Gulf countries? Is it going to be the Fick?
Speaker A
Where's the capital going to come from? That determines what the negotiation was. And they're using the US nation state to say remove sanctions and we'll get 300 billion rebuild. You price some of your oil in yen and some of it in
Speaker A
dollars and then you're going to release this amount. And that's what they're negotiating. That's what the Iranian government will be negotiating. And right now when I was in New York, they were at the United Nations um meeting and you know Abaserachi and Peskian
Speaker A
that represent kind of the reformist elements of the Iranian government and then you have the IRGC which is the militarized part of the country.
Speaker A
They own the banking system. They own the oil. they own. So when when you imagine Iran split in two, so this is where you have to have a bit of nuance, right? You got the reformist government, then you got the banking, the military,
Speaker A
the IRGC, um which is the Iranian Guard, you know, that um wanted to nationalize it oil and dared to try and keep his oil and give it and use it, you know, for its own country's interest.
Speaker A
Mhm. Um [clears throat] those two different factions make up Iran. One goes militarily and the other goes down diplomacy and now we're just getting all these different negotiations that are happening. Trump represents the FK.
Speaker A
Um you know you can see if you want to understand what Trump is look at the recent meeting in Beijing. So you had Xi Xi Jinping just came to New York right prior to that Trump went to Beijing
Speaker A
right? But Trump didn't come, you know, like Xi Jinping came representing the country. He came with the Mick, Fick, and Tick.
Speaker A
He brought everybody. Yeah. So, he brought Tim Cook and Tim Cook from Apple said, "Hey, China, Xiing, you know, CCP, um, you know, those factories that uh, we kind of depend upon cuz otherwise our iPhones would be like $10,000.
Speaker A
Um, are we going to be able to continue producing them in China?" And Xi Jinping maybe would have said yes. And Elon would have said, "Hey, you know those um components I need for those batteries and those electric vehicles? You going
Speaker A
to still give them to us?" And Xi Jinping might have said, "Yeah, yeah, don't worry. We'll uh we'll give you some of those." And um Goldman Sachs and Visa and Mastercard would have said, "Look, we can't control your SIP system.
Speaker A
We can't control that you negoti you provide the financial rails to UAE, Saudi, and Iran. We have no control over that. But can we in a multi-olar world like get some cut between um getting access to your financial system and so
Speaker A
Deutsche Bank announced integration into the SIP's Chinese payment network into the through the dollar swift system. UAE and the bank for international settlements set up a network of central bank digital currencies that clear outside the swift and dollar system. And
Speaker A
so you know there Trump is there to enrich himself while he provides the leverage for Mick Fick and Tick and Mick Fick and Tick will negotiate um with CCP via the government.
Speaker A
And what is his leverage? Um well with China China the leverage with China is that China wants to export more goods.
Speaker A
Uh China wants to sell uh China wants to sell to America. So Trump is making concessions on what China can export to the United States in exchange for China doing more business with our big corporations like Apple and
Speaker A
Tesla and all that. Yeah. So there's there's big deals. So he represents Mick Fick Dick, right? I got you.
Speaker A
And Trump owns the stocks in Mick Fick Dick and he has the information to insider trade it as well, right? And so and throughout this whole selling private access to his truth social so people can get if you're like
Speaker A
on the left you're like you know Trump's the most corrupt person ever. If you're on the right you're like MAGA he's taking on China. Uh but neither of those are true. You know some people would say like on the left they'll start thinking
Speaker A
Trump's like the dumbest and he's being absolutely you know crucified by Iran. No he's doing a fantastic job for Vic.
Speaker A
He's doing an amazing job for Tick. He's just being a middleman. Yeah, he's a middleman and he gets to get rich from the process, right?
Speaker A
And as long when you get to be when you get to sit on that throne, you have to be compromised.
Speaker A
You know, you're not going to be president without being compromised. That doesn't happen. Mhm.
Speaker A
You know, if you want to climb those ladders, like the way this [ __ ] this works is you groom politicians. You say, "I'll give you $10,000 and this is the policy I want to happen." You know, I'll It's not our
Speaker A
policy. It's a think tank. So, they're telling Trump like, "You're going to be able you're going to make billions of dollars, but you're going to If you look at Trump, then you go down his table." So, who was his primary
Speaker A
funer? Uh Elon Musk this time around. Uh he's a thick node, right? You go down and you got the Bank of New York Melon Dynasty Banking Family.
Speaker A
That's a fick node. He was the second largest funer. Third largest funer was Mariam Maidston. That's a MC node.
Speaker A
That's a military-industrial complex. What was the second one? Second one was the Melon banking family.
Speaker A
The Melon Banking family. Yeah. So like they're like the a hugely important custodian of the Fick. Um holding you know trillions of dollars of assets and Bank of New York Melon is like huge in terms of um part of that plumbing.
Speaker A
Um and so you can see right tick let's look through his policies. What's the first thing he did? Department of government efficiency. Let's pretend we're going to pay off the national debt.
Speaker A
Everyone's like, "Yes, we're going to pay down the national debt. We're going to make the government more efficient.
Speaker A
We're going to stamp out corruption." What did he do? Well, you can't pay down the debt. The dollar is debt. There's no paying down the debt. The debt is there forever. Look at the British debt. Has that gone down? It can't go down. It is
Speaker A
the pound, you know. Um, so the dollar is debt. So, you can't pay down the debt. you can only roll over the debt. So what were they really doing? Well, they were pulling all the data into Palunteer and
Speaker A
Nex and and uh and they were also releasing Yeah. He was doing an audit of the HHS, the IRS, um Social Security, right? Like they were they were taking all that stuff and integrating it all with the AI into one
Speaker A
database. Yes. This is Katherine Austin Fitz talks about this. So immediately that was the first thing he did, right? Collect all the data.
Speaker A
Mhm. Then he said, "Operation Stargate, was it? I can't remember what it's called. I think it was Stargate. Here's half a trillion dollars to build out data centers and we're going to lead AI." Okay, thank you very much. So that
Speaker A
provides the foundation for the AI bubble. Anthropic about to IPO for $2 trillion. SpaceX did $1.75 trillion.
Speaker A
um immediately gets loaded up there that they're that the reason that the government's paying so high interest rate right now is because they're competing with the AI companies because the banks are issuing debt like crazy.
Speaker A
Like you know they're issuing $800 billion of debt uh for these AI companies. The US government needs to roll over $10 trillion of debt in the next year or so. Um, and the price, the interest that it's paying is blowing out
Speaker A
as it is all around the western world at the moment, as it is in France, as it is in UK, as it is in America. Um, so the FIC owns all those bonds.
Speaker A
Yeah. You know, um, and they're allocating capital globally into multipolarity. So what was the next thing, right, Trump did? He he raged a tariff war.
Speaker A
It was so predictable what the tariff war would do when you follow the money.
Speaker A
It's firstly um it would be small businesses that pay the tariffs because America runs a deficit which means that it imports more than it exports.
Speaker A
It's the importer that pays the tariff. So that was a tax on American small business.
Speaker A
The large multinational that works with China, they just get to offset this and negotiate a deal for themsel. So Apple and the Magnificent 7 and Elon and everyone, they don't pay it.
Speaker A
Um, and with that you drive the entire world through these tariffs over to China, over to bricks, over to multi-polarity. That is what I believe the FIC wants right now. The FIC is hedging into a multi-olar world. [sighs]
Speaker A
Yeah. What else do you do? You take all the export dependent countries and they bankrupt their small businesses and the big companies get to buy them all up.
Speaker A
Mergers and acquisitions activity went through the roof. The financial industrial complex did so many deals, scooped up so many businesses, a bit like they did in COVID, a bit like they did in the Russia Ukraine situation, a bit like they did in the 2008 global
Speaker A
financial crisis, a bit like they did in the dotcom boom and bust, long-term capital management, whatever you want to, every crisis concentrates wealth upwards.
Speaker A
Mhm. Um, and everything comes into the stock market. What are you doing? There was a conspiracy theory that people around here believed when uh we got smashed with those hurricanes a couple years ago that flooded like pretty much every
Speaker A
coastal house in Florida that was Black Rockck engineered the hurricane so they could buy up all the houses after uh people moved out.
Speaker A
Yeah. Once you figure out how the world actually works, you know, you can go down these conspiracies and I think there's, you know, like they have the abilities to do these things. Can we prove it? Well, I don't
Speaker A
know. Maybe you don't need to necessarily prove it. We know that they can weaponize it anyway, whether it's real or not. They know that they know how they know how to weaponize it.
Speaker A
Um, and it always leads to the same result. Um, so he did tariffs that reset the world order into multipolarity.
Speaker A
I mean, that was the most radical shift in the world since co um because that helped other countries and really hurt the United States.
Speaker A
Yes. Every country. Well, it didn't. It hurt the United States nation state small business.
Speaker A
It hurt. Yeah. It helped Mick Fick and Tick crushed it. Mick, Fick, and Tick did incredibly well out of it, just like they did out of co um u the a the you know, but all the countries then started to lean into
Speaker A
different negotiations with China and so the whole world renegotiated with China while it was being completely stung its relationship with America. M now some of the countries were subordinate to Mickfick and but Mickfick and Tick can use that to get as much as
Speaker A
they can. Um even the export dependent countries like Indonesia various other countries they had the same effect. The small export exporters got concentrated upwards and then that puts more concentration of power up to up to thick. The next thing he did is he kind
Speaker A
of, you know, we had a little taste of it during Department of Government efficiency where people were like revealing, wow, there's some covert operations that happen in this country.
Speaker A
Remember, the covert operations prop up this system. So, I was talking about IMF, covert warfare, all that stuff.
Speaker A
USAD funding. I forgot to say one thing. The third element of how the intelligence networks are funded. Um, and you I don't know, you probably know this, but we said Pentagon budgets, which is the actual thing that people think they do. Then we
Speaker A
said private contracting with the companies. Um, and that crosses over. But the third way is through offbalance sheet activity. Black budgets.
Speaker A
Black budgets. Black ops. Missing trillions of dollars from the Pentagon. Missing trillions, but mainly human trafficking, weapons trafficking, sex trafficking, drugs trafficking, partnership with the cartels and criminal networks, right?
Speaker A
Yeah. So, if you need money outside the system, remember the Pentagon has to be disclosed. That's that's US, you know, public disclosure.
Speaker A
Mhm. The private contractors, they're all public companies. They have to disclose that. But the black ops you can't foyer the private contractors though.
Speaker A
Yeah. And this is where you understand things like we just talked about the petro dollar. Um so anyway I wanted to get back to there. Now the petro dollar what the way that worked is when OPEC got leverage and they were negotiating
Speaker A
against big oil. Mhm. Um and Israel catalyzed it you know to get to the negotiation point. Um the end negotiation was that they said, "All right, Saudi, you um price your oil in dollars." But remember, you can't like hold a
Speaker A
trillion dollars at a bank. Mean you mean when you say that, you're saying you can only exchange your oil for US dollars?
Speaker A
Yeah. You can only exchange your your your your oil for US dollars and you have to price everything in US dollars.
Speaker A
So everyone thinks in terms of one barrel equals this amount of dollars. Okay. then you have to settle in US dollars. Now, once you settle in US dollars, that means that you have to hold those funds with the Fed, the
Speaker A
Federal Reserve system. And you don't just hold money in a bank because if you're a company, only like, you know, half a half a $500,000 is guaranteed. Remember, it's a Ponzi scheme. So, rich people don't store their money in the bank.
Speaker A
Wait, what did you say about $500,000 is guaranteed? You know, like FDIC, if you have a bank account, 250,000 of it is guaranteed by deposit insurance. The rest of it is subject to bailins that happened in Cyprus. So, if you have more
Speaker A
than $250,000 at a bank and the bank goes bust, you lose that money. Is this for individuals or corporations or individuals and corporations? I think it's about 500,000. They can fact check me in the comments, but it's a number.
Speaker A
I look this up. I had no idea about this. That's another Ponzi scheme, by the way.
Speaker A
uh FDIC, the insurance that insures all the banks and says in case the bank goes bust, we'll pay out your insurance for that deposit. It's only got 1% of the value it's insuring. 99% is uninsured.
Speaker A
Jesus. So, this is an incentive for people to invest. Well, this is why pe rich people don't leave money at the bank. Uh because the bank, you can have your money taken.
Speaker A
It's not yours. When you deposit your money at the bank, the bank is the legal owner of your money. safeguards up to $250,000 per depositor per bank.
Speaker A
Okay. Yeah. So, if you're rich, don't keep more than $250,000 in your bank account.
Speaker A
Absolutely not. No. Um, so what do you do? Well, you got your dollars. Well, you lend it to the government. You buy bonds.
Speaker A
So, we've they came off the gold standard. The government was bankrupt and they said, "Pric it your oil in dollars and then you have to take those dollars and buy bonds and lend it back to me. roll over the Ponzi.
Speaker A
Now, when you own bonds, it would clear through the the Federal Reserve system and you receive the interest off the debt. So, you're lending to the government.
Speaker A
Hold on, hold on, hold on. All right. So, you're selling your oil. I'm selling my oil in exchange for US dollars and I can only keep $250,000 mega account. So, I'm taking all this US dollars and I'm investing them. I'm buying US
Speaker A
bonds. Correct. And do do we have to buy US bonds if we're Saudi Arabia?
Speaker A
Uh yeah, in the petro dollar agreement, you have to buy bonds. We have to buy bonds. So we're buying US debt.
Speaker A
Yes. So effectively, you're lending your dollars back to the US government and the US government is funding a military that is raging war against your country to negotiate [laughter] for the F.
Speaker A
What the? Yeah, it gets worse. It gets worse. What do you get when you have a bond?
Speaker A
you receive interest right on the debt. There's a trillion dollars of interest. What is the interest?
Speaker A
What's the I mean, you know, it's uh it's it's variable. So, it's in the market. So, at the moment, yields are blowing out at 5.3%.
Speaker A
Okay. Um [clears throat] and uh that's very expensive. That means mortgages are going to be about 8%.
Speaker A
Which means that the companies that need to refinance their debt can't afford to refinance at 8%. So, you know, it it it impacts the mortgage market, it impacts the credit card market, it impacts the auto loan market, it impacts the market
Speaker A
for debt um based upon these rates. And so then they say, "Right, we'll pay you yield. We'll pay you the interest, but think about how it was done with Israel. You got to buy it back from our military companies."
Speaker A
So, you got to lend it to us. We'll pay you the interest, but you got to spend the interest on our military equipment.
Speaker A
And then we're going to build a base, a US base in your country. Oh my god.
Speaker A
Yeah. And then we're going to use that for the CIA to do intelligence operations in order to manufacture wars around the Middle East. And so we got Israel as our node and we gradually find as many bases across the region as we
Speaker A
can. And you're paying for it. And the petro dollar agreement was if you do that um you can also have agreements with US contractors and it's a protection racket. We won't bomb you. We won't kill you. We won't destroy your
Speaker A
country and you can maintain your leadership and we won't regime change you. Guess what? We don't care about democracy when it comes to you. We don't care about women's rights when it comes to you. Uh because we've got the deal,
Speaker A
you know. So all the narrative on the front is all BS. All BS. Complete BS.
Speaker A
Okay. And what have you got to do? You've got to manufacture the terrorists. You've got to create ISIS and al-Qaeda.
Speaker A
And when we need them, we use them. Mhm. And if we want to destroy Nigeria, we send in Boo Haram.
Speaker A
Do do people like [clears throat] the leaders of Iran, the GCC states, and Trump, do they all understand this?
Speaker A
Yes. to the level that you do. Well, absolutely. I'm not I'm not in their rooms. [laughter] They know this.
Speaker A
I'm just able I'm I'm an outside spectator trying to figure out how this all works. Uh they've got intelligence assets. They know how the system works.
Speaker A
Iran's kind of sharing how the system. Do you think Trump understood this before he became president?
Speaker A
Um I think Trump only cares about one thing, making money. Do you think he understood though the complexity of the system and and how it worked with with international capital and the the financial industrial complex and how there's this just layer above
Speaker A
governments? I think Trump was groomed for the role because if you look back at his history, you know, so he made re he made money with real estate in New York. What's the power structure in New York? Well, you
Speaker A
got the real estate tycoons. You got the Jewish mafia. You got the legacy Italian mob.
Speaker A
If you get to build Trump Tower in New York, these are protected circles. [laughter] You know, you have to hang around with some pretty Doesn't he have one in in Russia, too?
Speaker A
Um, I know that the bank he borrows from most is ICBC, which is the largest bank in China.
Speaker A
Okay. Um, I know that most of his wealth, a massive chunk of his wealth, he really made money through the crypto markets doing crypto scams in this in this side and that laundered a bunch of golf money through UAE. Um, and there
Speaker A
was a lot of corrupt structures that happened via the stable coins and indust like the different crypto scams that his family created. That was a lot of there was a lot of laundering there.
Speaker A
But his big one of his biggest asset is Oh, there's a crazy video I got to send you, Steve. Go ahead.
Speaker A
one of his biggest asset is um now this is where it becomes interesting. You got the lobby money of Elon.
Speaker A
Mhm. You've got the you've got the fake money, you know, the tick money, the fick money and the mick money with Mariam Maidson in Israel.
Speaker A
Mhm. But the big chunk of money is actually affinity partners which is his fund managed that he married into managed by Jared Kushner.
Speaker A
Jared Kushner is the fund manager. But the capital comes from the Gulf sovereign wealth funds and that's about $5 billion.
Speaker A
It makes money from um this is where I think a lot of his covert influence comes from.
Speaker A
Um it's invested in the Israeli pension fund which owns a bit of all the military companies in Israel.
Speaker A
It's also got um some exposure to West Bank settlements. Um, it's also got a uh a bunch of so that that's kind of, you know, it will be it's a lot of the deals I guess in the rebuild of everything that's being
Speaker A
destroyed right now will likely have some investment agreements that go to Affinity Capital Partners. So, he's going to profit significantly from the rebuild at the other side of this war.
Speaker A
And that's where I think Gulf countries have significant influence. There's something very interesting that happened as well. Saudi Aramco, you know, the the oil that I said was the nation state. It took about 1% of the company and went
Speaker A
public. Um, and as a result of that, the CEO of Saudi Aramco joined the board of Black Rockck. So now Saudi Golf Money is on the board, which you know the executives subordinate to board.
Speaker A
And so this is kind of influence. You can see that fick and sovereign wealth funds are working together in transnational capital. Now, where does the Gulf get its money from? This is where we get round to where we are
Speaker A
today. What happened in Trump one? Um, Trump won um released big oil released fracking.
Speaker A
And so, uh, America became an energy exporter. Big oil became, not America. Big companies hosted in America became energy exporters.
Speaker A
So now you're the Saudis and you're thinking, "So I'm pricing my oil in dollars. I'm buying your debt and you're not buying any of our oil anymore. And now you're competing with us. Now you want to start exporting your energy."
Speaker A
Where's all my money coming from? It's coming from China. So China's buying all the energy in US dollars.
Speaker A
Uh so China has a No. So the petro dollar around about this time became 70% petro dollar. 70% petro yuan.
Speaker A
Oh sorry 30% petro yuan. So still majority dollars but they allowed countries to settle in their own currencies and they stopped buying bonds and what did they do rather than lending to the US government they started buying equities. M
Speaker A
so they started owing the largest tech companies world the MCF and tick so they became the most significant investor in mcfick and tick with Chinese money was buying the oil the oil was being sold in local currency it was fueling their sovereign wealth
Speaker A
funds and those sovereign wealth funds were then we're using Chinese yen Chinese UN buys the energy from the Gulf countries and the Gulf countries now have the Chinese money.
Speaker A
They have the Chinese money but also China trades in dollars. Okay? You know they have that dollar. I mean as I said Mickfick and Tick are dependent upon China.
Speaker A
So that whole dollar corridor is very important to China. They're not trying to kill the dollar.
Speaker A
They want the dollar to be as strong as possible and they want their currency to be as weak as possible because that privatizes all the power upwards the stronger the dollar gets.
Speaker A
Mhm. And the weaker the yen gets, the more they can export. And so their economy grows the weaker the yen gets, the stronger the dollar gets.
Speaker A
You're talking about the the Saudi economy. Uh I'm talking about the Chinese economy. Sorry.
Speaker A
The Chinese economy. Now China is then So who is Saudi selling it oil to? Cuz America doesn't need it anymore.
Speaker A
China. They're selling it to China. Right. So China now fuels the sovereign wealth fund of all the Gulf countries. the Gulf are then taking that money and buying US equities.
Speaker A
And why are they not forced to do that though? Are they're choosing to do that?
Speaker A
They're choosing to do it because they're making a [ __ ] ton of money out of the US stock market because they partnered with FIC.
Speaker A
So they're becoming the financial industrial complex. Exactly. So now the sovereign wealth funds are partners with the FIC, right? funded by China and all of the Mickfick and Tick need China for their global empires because China is funding it.
Speaker A
Yes, that's the power structure of the world and America the nation state, UK the nation state, Europe the nation state is subordinate to that power structure and wow that's so crazy. [laughter] So, so what does that look like from our
Speaker A
perspective in the next 15 to 20 [clears throat] years? Okay. In your view, well, I again I could be wrong about this. This is my speculation as an outsider following the money that seems to be obsessed with that.
Speaker A
Mhm. What do I think Mick Fick and Tick want, right? And what do I think they're going to get?
Speaker A
So, do you think China wants Israel to continue to be a US asset that destabilize access to all the oil?
Speaker A
They definitely don't. So, if they know that American hegemonic dominance comes from destabilizing the region, because what's the what's the thing that the Dutch, the British, and the Americans knew could never happen? You can't allow African resources uh Middle Eastern energy to be unified
Speaker A
with Russian and Chinese power. Okay, that can't happen because because the balance is too offset.
Speaker A
There's too much there's too much power. Well, that's what they need to prevent. That's why they created Mick Fick and Tick. That's why they destabilized the countries. That's why they regime changed because they said, "We want the resources. We want the money." Um and
Speaker A
you can't have China, Russia, the African country and the Middle Eastern countries that have 40% of all the world's resources that we need unifying in building China and Russian power which could which could theoretically if that happened that could destroy the
Speaker A
Mick Fick and Tick. Uh no the Mickfick and Tick don't have leverage over China so they'd have to negotiate into that power dynamic. Got it. They own the US government. They own Europe. They It's all about It's all about It's all
Speaker A
about leverage. And Africa just has never been able to use their resources because they've always been regime changed. And the dictators are personally enriched. And anytime they try and do something different, you just assassinate them.
Speaker A
So when Gaddafi wanted to price oil and in uh you know, and create a trans transaffrican goldbacked currency, you assassinate him. Mhm.
Speaker A
Uh when Iran, you know, wants to is is fully dependent upon China for this trade and this corridor, you know, and China wants to nationalize its own, sorry, and Iran wants to nationalize its own oil. You create a narrative. They're
Speaker A
head of the snake. They're the world exporters of terrorism. And who created the terrorism?
Speaker A
They're building a nuke. They're building a nuke, you know. Um and uh and [clears throat] think about that.
Speaker A
So, ever since 1979 with the Iranian revolution, you've had Iran and you've had Israel that allegedly, you know, the Muslims want to kill the Jews, um, and, you know, Iran's trying to expand around it and, you know, all this
Speaker A
stuff and they confuse the narrative. So someone like in the west would not understand the nuance between the difference between ISIS, Alqaaida, Hezbollah Hamas you know, but they they're starting to understand it now, which is interesting.
Speaker A
Yeah, it is very interesting. But Iran has always been the biggest enemies of ISIS and al-Qaeda because they were manufactured via Saudi money for Western intelligence.
Speaker A
You know, these were the destabilizing forces. So these are the the assets. So, but in the West, you get to say, "Guess what?
Speaker A
We're taking on terrorism and defending democracy." So, then you get to go bomb those countries and say you're taking on ISIS.
Speaker A
Mhm. Right. People don't understand the difference. No. People don't understand. Muslims bad. Yeah. And so, of course, Osama bin Laden, Safari Club, 911, you know, do your do the math.
Speaker A
You know, dancing Israelis. What do you think 911 was? I think it was a partnership between is is way too overstated to say it was the CIA, it was MSAD, it was Israel.
Speaker A
I think there were factions of MSAD that were involved in ops. Uh there were factions of the CIA related to the Bush Safari Club networks and the money was all laundered via Saudi and UAE banking system.
Speaker A
Mhm. And so if you look at just what we know, you've got the declassified documents later. We saw all the the Saudi banking system, money laundering networks that connected to the to there.
Speaker A
Saudi intelligence was also involved. Saudi intelligence definitely um documented, right? You could prove that through documents.
Speaker A
CIA, you know, there was this whole rigma around what does the FBI know? What does the CIA know? you know, it's it's on a need to- know basis. So, there were factions that were involved in that op, I believe. Um, they were connected to
Speaker A
pro war profitering. You know, it it it led to 10 trillion dollars of profits that were extracted from, you know, the American people through increasing the national debt over to the stock market. Um and um you know we've got what we know about
Speaker A
dancing Israelis and the decl the the names that were covered up and the different What about the airline stocks that were that were uh sold right before?
Speaker A
Yeah. So we still haven't had the declassification of which the broker was that was you know issuing all the options that profited from um some speculate that it was Caner Fitzgerald um others Jane Street um but we still don't have the full
Speaker A
confirmation. Now the SEC requested that but that just disappeared. Um so higher levels of power in these games you know um definitely knew about that. But if you think that at this stage you still believe that that was like you know
Speaker A
Alqaeda acting on their own in order to take away American freedom. Um, but do you think it was possibly a plot by Osama bin Laden that that they just saw happening and they let it happen because they thought it would be to
Speaker A
their advantage potentially. Um, but I think um I think there were higher levels of intelligence networks across Saudi, across US and across Israel uh that were involved in parts of that.
Speaker A
Mhm. the extent to which the whole story is we we won't we haven't got right you know but there there there's no way that was organic and let's say it was it was very convenient because the Patriot Act was already written
Speaker A
right the surveillance state was already written um the ability to carve out the constitution through terrorist laws was already written the bank secrecy act was already written and the clean break memo of which countries to target and invade
Speaker A
was already written and there were fake anthrax operations in order to connect Osama bin Laden to Iraq which had zero to do with each other um so that you could lead to the invasion of Iraq like um who were the two countries that were
Speaker A
resisting mostly you had Gaddafi uh you had Iraq and you had Iran these were the countries Iraq was going to price its oil in euros is um they needed to use Iraq. Iraq like Saddam Hussein, you know, was
Speaker A
cooperating with the CIA for a significant um period of time. You know, he he was considered an asset when they wanted to use Iraq in order to destroy Iran.
Speaker A
And so at the same time, the CIA and the military-industrial complex were providing chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein in Iraq to fight Iran. Right.
Speaker A
Yes. while invading Iran with ISIS and al-Qaeda and these different groups um on the militia side and if you look back and some people believe that when the Ayatollah came from exile in France that the strategic think of the British
Speaker A
techniques of operation gladadio which is you create strategic tension to divide and conquer so now you've got a perfect enemy for Israel between Israel and Iran and they all say suddenly they're always going to blow each other up. There's
Speaker A
nukes around the corner for about 40 years. But it wasn't until 2 years ago that for the first time Iran and Israel actually traded blows, right?
Speaker A
So for 40 years apparently they're the biggest enemy. But how much money did the military-industrial complex make out of that, you know? Uh you know, so this is you know the enemy of my enemy is my friend. um massive deception,
Speaker A
massive deceit. But to believe that there is a fight for democracy and women's rights and the expulsion of terrorism, and there's a war on drugs is the SCOP, right?
Speaker A
Yeah. America, the dollar is propped up by drug trafficking, human trafficking, weapons trafficking, sex trafficking, terrorism.
Speaker A
And if for some reason those are being exposed, which comes back to Trump, if they're being exposed, they're not drained in the swamp, they're draining the backing of the dollar. So the release of the Epste files massively destabilized
Speaker A
the thought of what Israel is, of what America is, of it took out all of the pretense in the American dream, right? It was like a peak behind the veil. Yes.
Speaker A
of what's really happening. And you know, especially when you can read emails with Epstein talking to Aud Barack about how they can profit off providing arms and surveillance to, you know, countries fighting civil wars in Africa and Sierra Leone or whatever it
Speaker A
was. Yeah. And Trump has this perfect role, right? He works for Fick. He's enriching himself and he's got a cult following.
Speaker A
And so what happens this in this quote unquote democracy? Every two years you need to get back to getting your lobby financing. Trump ain't going to pay for his campaign. He's going to go back to the lobbies and they're going to say,
Speaker A
"Well, did you perform your role?" Every two years midterm elections. Mhm. Now, you're still useful to us cuz you still got your cult following, but you know, you've you've kind of taken a lot of your following away, a lot of
Speaker A
your hardcore followers, right? So, you're not really a very useful asset. like you're you're you're you're diminishing your utility to power.
Speaker A
Extract as much as you can. Enrich yourself personally. Um and if you perform this, then we'll give you some more financing.
Speaker A
Mhm. Um and Trump's job is to say, "I'm working to make America great again while Fick is extracting an asset strip in the country." One of the biggest moments for me when I started to notice something was going haywire was with
Speaker A
this whole Israel stuff and the Epstein stuff and all of that stuff, you know, because he was campaigning on all this to release the files and to end all the wars and all this. And you know, then he
Speaker A
suddenly does the opposite and he's historically one of the most pollare presidents in the history. Like there's no one who's ever talked about polls as much as that guy. And then suddenly you see all this losing all this support for you
Speaker A
know the Israeli lobby Apac and all this stuff and and all this wararm mongering and starting all these wars and he's seems to be oblivious to it and going in the opposite direction of of what the polls are telling him. So there and all
Speaker A
of that seemed to happen between the time around when he was campaigning to get the second presidency and like right when he took office, you know, and right around then was when that Butler assassination attempt happened.
Speaker A
Yeah. Um but this is the video I wanted to show you earlier. This is this I I think this happened just like two days ago where um it was Marco Rubio being questioned about Tw throw those headphones on real so you can hear it.
Speaker A
Yep. I thought this was a crazy clip that really like sums it up pretty well for all the money that Trump's making.
Speaker A
Is it fair to say that you agree that it's wrong for elected officials and their families to profit from positions of power to use government service to make money?
Speaker A
Yeah, of course. Great. I I appreciate that and I share that sentiment with you, sir. Uh I want to revisit some of the details that were brought up earlier and put into the record about the president's own uh
Speaker A
stock transactions uh a form which he filed um that shows he completed more than 3,700 stock transactions in just the first three months of this year alone. The president bought hundreds of thousands of dollars in Palunteer stock shortly before he publicly praised the
Speaker A
company on his social media site. As if the name drop enough wasn't enough. As if the name drop itself wasn't enough, he included the company's ticker symbol for good measure hardly subtle to me. On March 23rd, after nearly a month of war
Speaker A
with Iran, the president said talks were quote very good and productive and extended his deadline for a deal by 5 days. Oil prices dropped and energy stocks fell while Trump bought shares in companies like Exxon Mobile, Chevron, and other firms positioned to benefit if
Speaker A
the war continued, which it did at the president's direction. He bought a dip that he created. Then there's Nvidia.
Speaker A
The president bought as much as a million dollars in stock just one week before the Commerce Department formally approved the sale of Nvidia chips to China. One week. He bought up to $5 million more in Nvidia stock in
Speaker A
February, right before the company announced a major chip deal with Meta. It's pretty good luck if you ask me.
Speaker A
If that's not bad enough, the president's son struck a multi-billion dollar crypto deal with a UAE statebacked firm. After the deal, the administration reversed AI chip restrictions, approving transfers of sensitive technology to another UAE related entity chaired by the very same
Speaker A
royal family figure involved with the deal with his son. That seems like hardly a coincidence to me. And indeed, it is self-enrichment tied directly to the president's foreign policy agenda.
Speaker A
And it's how the president's net worth has grown by over $4 billion since he started this term. As the president gets rich, his wars and tariffs are crushing hardworking American families. And I think the American people see through the BS. This
Speaker A
is the most corrupt administration in American history. Are I tell you where I disagree slightly.
Speaker A
Um I think Trump's one of the most transparent in history and they've all been doing this.
Speaker A
Trump's just sharing what everyone has always been doing. So, you know, people think I've got Trump derangement syndrome. I'm just talking about Trump because Trump's in, you know, the guy in the seat at the moment.
Speaker A
If it was Biden, we could go through all of Biden [ __ ] If we want to go through Obama, if we want to go through Clinton, like this is how the system works. Um, interestingly, they were talking about
Speaker A
their UAE side. Uh the way that that transaction happened um is the largest crypto exchange in the world is a company called Binance and they came after Binance because they were providing rails to Iran and various other um countries and um the US under
Speaker A
the Biden administration uh the SEC and the DOJ shot basically came after Binance and said you've got to installed the US government into your compliance team. Um, and CZ, the founder of Binance, got 4 months in prison when the
Speaker A
others that were involved in similar networks like SBF, got like 20 years, I think it was, and Majinsky got 12 years or something, but he got 4 months. Now, Binance didn't have to shut down.
Speaker A
Um, and he had to he was launching a digital dollar. It's called a stable coin. It's like a privatized central bank digital currency. He had to take that one out and instead he integrated with a stable coin that the Trump family
Speaker A
created and it was called the the Trump family created a coin called, you know, a company called World Liberty Financial. And the shareholders were Steve Wickoff who was the envoy to the Middle East and his family um and the Trump family.
Speaker A
And um Binance integrated the stable coin. Now the way that a stable coin works is it's a programmable blockchain dollar issued by a company and it has to buy US treasuries. It has to be backed by bonds.
Speaker A
So if I give you a digital dollar on a blockchain, it has to be backed one by one by government debt. And so this is a new mechanism for profiting from the US debt. [snorts] And so what he did is he got the UAE Abu
Speaker A
Dhabi sovereign wealth fund and said, why don't you invest $2 billion in Binance and give it a license?
Speaker A
And so Binance then reincorporated in UAE and the UAE sovereign wealth fund became the one of the investors in Binance and the shareholder in world liberty financial and then Trump took the $2 billion issued his own stable coin and
Speaker A
then it buys government debt. So the higher the interest on the debt the more money the Trump family makes of their stable coins.
Speaker A
Wow. So, if you can get interest rates up, um, then you're making more and more and more in this network. The Abu Dhabi guys issued a license to Binance to operate the exchange. CZ was p uh pardoned by the Trump administration.
Speaker A
Um, and he received a presidential pardon. uh and uh then he talked about the approval to receive build out the data center in UAE and receive the Nvidia chips. And so remember whoever receives the chips, whoever builds the data
Speaker A
centers is an important node in this technocratic control grid that's being built, right? Yeah. And programmable money is an essential part of that. Which is why what was the other thing that Trump did?
Speaker A
He did Genius Act and Right. Yeah, Genius Act was the regulations that helped both the Fick and Tick build programmable money.
Speaker A
Mhm. It did a few things. Firstly, it said any company that wants to issue these stable coins needs to become a bank.
Speaker A
Needs to apply to be a bank. So, they join Fick and then all the money that's held at the back of the Federal Reserve can be used as collateral to issue these stable coins. Um so you become a bank. Um the
Speaker A
programmable money has to be held at the Federal Reserve and it has to buy government debt.
Speaker A
And so the Fick are able to as interest rates go up just receive all this free money by creating digital dollars. Um and Scott Bent when he was announcing um who used to work for the Rothschilds, right?
Speaker A
Uh yeah, Scott Percent was um a Soros guy. So he was Soros. That's what I meant.
Speaker A
Yeah. He was involved in um the infamous Bank of England euro trade. Um so when the European Central Bank and the single currency was coming along um the great British pound and the bank of England, George Soros made a trade which
Speaker A
infamously made $3 billion which seems like a small number now but in terms of numbers but it was Scott Bent who was um the chief investment officer and the trader. Now, he made his career in the city of
Speaker A
London. And the city of London still to this day is a separate jurisdiction. It's not London. It's a separate jurisdiction that consists of the 700 banks and other financial institutions in the square mile. Uh, and all of the currency wars
Speaker A
and covert wars, uh, they're done via the city of London. And Scott Bent came from, you know, the city of London currency war. And so when he was basically brought in to destroy the Iranian currency um you know with through operation
Speaker A
economic fury. Yes. You know he he's very experienced at uh being able to to do that.
Speaker A
And interestingly they they they confiscated some of the stable coins. This is the important part to understand. So if you look at Iran you got the IRGC we said and then you got the government.
Speaker A
Mhm. two different entities, different power structure and you have the ayatollah on top um that provides the religious theocracy part of it.
Speaker A
Um now the um when you destroy a currency, it is a civilian target. Just think what it means to destroy a currency. You're an ordinary person. You got your money in a bank. You log into your online banking and your savings are worth
Speaker A
nothing overnight. You know, I think it went from now it's like 2.5 million Iranian currency for uh a dollar at the moment.
Speaker A
I have a I have a hundred trillion dollar Zimbabwe bill. [laughter] But currency wars are civilian targets by definition. The IRGC is fine. The IRGC is integrated into the Chinese banking system, SIPs. It's got that oil trade. It second largest trading partner
Speaker A
is UAE. It's got its networks via Egypt, Hong Kong, um, and, uh, and, uh, Turkey.
Speaker A
Um, so the IRGC is going to be fine. And what is the IRGC? What is the role that they're performing right now? Well, if you look at 2023, there was a really important agreement that was um, signed that people forget about. Uh, China
Speaker A
normalized between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023, about 6 months prior to October the 7th.
Speaker A
and um the they normalized and what is Iran doing today? It's taking out the US bases that the Gulf countries no want no longer want in their country while simultaneously partnering with FIC to buy all of the American assets the most important
Speaker A
assets which is the AI companies the most important investor in all of those companies and it's no longer purchasing US bonds.
Speaker A
Now, one of the things, this gets a bit geeky, but let's see if we can Why Why don't the UAE countries want the US bases there anymore?
Speaker A
They no longer need the What is the What are the two components of the petro dollar?
Speaker A
It's OPEC. So, what did UAE did? Left OPEC. Okay. And the other part of it um is the purchase of US treasuries. That's the petro dollar.
Speaker A
Got it. So, what is happening really? Let's take a massive zoom out. Right now, Iran is destroying the pro dollar and the US bases are no longer going to be in America while America simultaneously leaving Iraq and Syria. Um, the Middle
Speaker A
East is becoming West Asia again. That America's leaving. America's leaving. Um, the forever war I believe is coming to an end, but it needs a very symbolic big moment like the British Empire and the Sue Canal in order to manage that
Speaker A
transition. But if you're renting the US military to to get as much leverage as you can into a multipolar world order that I think we're moving into, which in fact we are because America used to have 60% of global GDP, it's now got 25%.
Speaker A
Um then you want um uh you need the US bases out and China wants the US bases out and what do you do with Israel? You privatize it. And so more and more of Netanyahu is making more and more of
Speaker A
Israeli companies public. Um, the defense companies are going public and the war burdened the Israeli people with significant debt. While they're being radicalized into thinking that something else is happening here.
Speaker A
So, Israel is being privatized. Uh, the US bases are being destroyed. Mhm. Um, and Netanyahu is obviously just protecting his own ass because he's about to go to prison if he can't create more war. Um, so we're in this very
Speaker A
interesting situation where the Gulf countries are dependent upon China, Iran is dependent upon China, Israel is trying to create war to be more useful to the military, and the financial industrial complex has partnered with the Gulf countries and wants to invest
Speaker A
in rebuilding Iran. And so, how do you set the the order? Well, whatever happens in the straight of Hormise sets the new order.
Speaker A
And so if Iran is able to charge a toll and they got a partnership with Aman and Aman is a covert mechanism to the Gulf countries.
Speaker A
Amanhu Aman is like a Aman's a very very interesting country that no one really talks about. It's it's allied with all sides and it's done an incredible job in terms of its diplomatic relations with both Western interest, Chinese interest,
Speaker A
Gulf interest, Iran. Okay. Like um so it's it's a very important like neutral ground in uh in terms of its role. Um, and so what I believe is happening right now is the US military is trying to get as much leverage for
Speaker A
fick so that it can get a piece of the tolls in these port in these strategic choke points.
Speaker A
Mhm. And whatever happens in the straight off moose will happen in all of the strategic choke points. And if the US military is no longer needed to protect the free passage of trade, then the world order has completely changed. And
Speaker A
so we're living through, I believe, what does what does Mick want right now? It wants to leverage as much as it can because it knows it's got to end the forever war in the Middle East, which was its most profitable trade. And
Speaker A
instead, it needs to be compensated through war in Europe and war in the mid um in Central and South America. So the new stomping grounds for military are Central, South America, Europe, and the tick wants a surveillance state. It
Speaker A
wants a global surveillance state with Chinese components and American subscription models and an indebted nation. So what does it want to do? It wants to manufacture civil unrest so that it can have the force flags that it need.
Speaker A
So it can have more surveillance. Yes, it beta tested in UK. And what what is the main benefit that [clears throat] the technological industrial complex gets from having full-blown surveillance on everybody?
Speaker A
Well, I mean, you get to Is it just money? There's a couple of there's a couple of things there. Um, firstly, it could be the new blackmail operation. So, if we're all giving all of our data to AI,
Speaker A
and we all have to, right? That's the new blackmail. You don't need Jeffrey Epstein anymore, [laughter] right? you know, uh, you you you've got that side. Um, American AI companies are severely overvalued right now because China's going open source and China's
Speaker A
doing the whole model open source and free. Uh, because it's using AI to build its manufacturing base and automate all parts of that structure.
Speaker A
um it's displaced the IMF in terms of its significant in in in this belt and road initiative investing across Africa, across Asia, across the Middle East.
Speaker A
Um and Mickfick and Tick are dependent upon it. So they get to do their subscription model. Uh the government, what is the government doing in its final stage of what I believe the US empire is doing a strategy what's called
Speaker A
it's called fiscal dominance. What that means is that when you're at the end of Empire, you get the government to spend as much as possible and all of that money needs to go back into the stock market. You accelerate
Speaker A
the debt as much as possible. Um that then creates inflation in terms of asset prices and um and then obviously everyone on the right side that owns the assets benefits from that. That concentrates wealth upwards.
Speaker A
Um but it also devalues the dollar, right? And so once you devalue the dollar, the world reserve currency slowly loses its status.
Speaker A
And Black Rockck say and and the pro dollar says, hold on, our currency is pegged to the dollar. What that means is that Saudi had to back their currency with dollars. All right. Now, as the dollar weakens, you have to sell assets in order to try
Speaker A
and strengthen it and keep protecting the peg. So, they have to sell gold in order to protect this. Eventually, they'll say, "I'm not selling gold in order to protect this." So, you break the pro dollar, you break two really
Speaker A
important relationships. One is Japan. Um, there's something called the Japan carry trade. I'm sorry.
Speaker A
Yeah, Jen was explaining this to me. Okay. A little bit. I still don't fully get it. Okay. So, Japan after World War II, you had Germany, bank of the the German central bank regime changed and you had Japan and you had Italy. Okay. So, those
Speaker A
were the the losing forces. The Bank of Japan just essentially became a piggies back for the Federal Reserve system. And so, they pumped a massive stock market bubble to build like technology and stuff in Japan. [snorts] Uh, and then
Speaker A
the Bank of Japan just basically puts its interest rates to zero, even negative. They were paying people to borrow money from you.
Speaker A
Wow. So, if you're a central bank and you have access to the Bank of Japan or you're a hedge fund manager or you're in the right side of the money printer, then you can borrow for free from Japan.
Speaker A
They print the currency. The Japanese end up with the debt. They get massive inflation.
Speaker A
Um, and then you get to buy US assets. Mhm. So they were basically just borrowing money for free from Japan uh taking out the currency risk and then using that money to get more and more stocks. And even right now if you look
Speaker A
at the US government debt the largest if you look at the largest foreign holders of US government debt right now number one is Cayman Island that's not Cayman Island the nation state that's Black Rockck State Street Vanguard Banks in
Speaker A
the Cayman Island State Street. Yeah, that's that's all the you know that's all the that money they get to borrow from the Bank of Japan.
Speaker A
They get to um use those bonds as collateral. They get to lever it up a 100 to one. They get to lend it back to the US government and they just are scraping all of the money out of the
Speaker A
interest on the national debt over to the financial industrial complex. The next in line is Japan. Japan's providing all the free money.
Speaker A
Next in line is UK. UK city of London. There's a construct. Don't want to get too complicated, but it's called Euro dollars.
Speaker A
There's dollars. When the city of London fell and the Fick wanted to remain in charge, they created the Federal Reserve system and they created the Euro dollar market. It meant the banks could create dollars. Um, and there's 15 trillion
Speaker A
dollars of Euro dollars. It's got nothing to do with Europe. It's just a bank that can create dollars every time they issue a loan outside of the Fed system.
Speaker A
So there is more than double the money supply out there in euro dollars. There's like 15 trillion of these things.
Speaker A
Um so the number one country holding US that is Japan. Yeah. Cayman Highlands ahead of that is you got what have you got there in the chart?
Speaker A
Well Cayman oh yeah Cayman Islands is down low as of 2025. This is the is 418 billion and uh Japan's 1.2 trillion. It says, yeah, I think there's um a better um the Fed recently did a study that said how
Speaker A
it was understated because it was doing it through Oh, really? the nation state rather than the actual financial industrial complex basically.
Speaker A
Um but yeah, so you got Japan now. What's Japan doing now? Amidst all of this chaos, for the first time in decades, they're saying, the Bank of Japan says, "Let's put our interest rates up." [clears throat] So, the free money is being faded out.
Speaker A
So, the financial industrial complex that has significant influence over the Bank of Japan and owns the Fed is saying, "Put your interest rates up." uh they're breaking the Japan carry trade which is the backbone of all of this
Speaker A
liquidity into the markets slowly. So the Iran war is breaking the petro dollar. Mhm.
Speaker A
The Japan carry trade is breaking and the euro dollars is we're having more and more again. So you notice UAE becomes a very important node in this structure when when UAE said we're going to sell our bonds or sell our equities
Speaker A
because they were having you know Scott Bent came along and said no don't do that give us some of your currency and we'll give you a loan because now that was painted as UAE going bankrupt UAE has got billions of dollars you know
Speaker A
significant assets trade surplus of course they're impacted by this um but they use this opportunity to have their own dollar printing press. So, anyone that gets an FX swap line is basically the Fick is handing over power to these different countries to
Speaker A
create their own dollars. That's how you create multipolarity. So, what does it look like when the US dollar collapses? When when do you think that happens and and what does that look like?
Speaker A
It I don't think it will collapse. Um it will be a slow weakening. collapse is really bad in terms of like the actual dollar because the dollar is a source of all this um power, right?
Speaker A
So the banks as long as they want they still want to use US treasuries as their collateral for extracting.
Speaker A
Okay. So they want to continue to weaken the dollar. Uh they want to basically uh accelerate the K-shaped economy for as long as they can.
Speaker A
They want interest rates will continue to rise. Uh interest rates continue to rise. They can back down if the Fed wants to. the Fed can just take, you know, they can decide when they want to do that.
Speaker A
Um, the bond vigilantes are saying, "We want more money to lend to the US government." They're saying the same to the British government, the French government, and everywhere.
Speaker A
U, but fiscal dominance just means the government, you spend as much as you can. I I'll give you the key matrix that helps you understand how long this can go on for.
Speaker A
Um if you just want in simple terms take the growth rate of the US GDP and remember the US GDP is it can be come from government spending into the stock market um which is fiscal dominance.
Speaker A
they keep just spending it into stocks. Roll over, roll over, you know, take on the debt, spend it into stocks.
Speaker A
Um, if the government, if the GDP grows at a faster rate than the average cost on the US debt, I'll repeat that. The average cost on the US debt is currently 3.3%.
Speaker A
If you want to lend to the if you want to lend to the US government right now, then you can get 5.3% for 30 years today.
Speaker A
So that interest is only going up. But the Ponzi continues as long as the economy grows at a faster rate than the average cost on the debt. So if the economy can grow greater than 3.3% the K-shaped economy continues.
Speaker A
Wow. Yeah. Now if suddenly that debt goes up and up and up every year 3.3 every year.
Speaker A
Yeah. At the moment. But that's going up because the interest rates are going up, right? you know, and so while that as long as they can grow the economy, which extracts more wealth from the average person over to the stockholder, then you
Speaker A
just keep the K-shaped economy and eventually you end up with where we are now. 10% 90 sorry 90% of the US stock market is owned by 10% of US households. M you know at the at the household level
Speaker A
50% of Americans don't have any and the rest have got it in a 401k so they'll work their whole life until they can access it.
Speaker A
Wow. Yeah. So this is the the wealth extraction. You just keep going. You don't you don't need anything dramatic and then if you get it wrong you you get the Fed to bail out. So those that are closest to the money printer,
Speaker A
they they write the rules. It's like imagine a game of Monopoly where you're the bank and the bank gets to create money and buy real estate. That's the game.
Speaker A
Now, is there any point where the whole system breaks and you have to throw the Monopoly board away and restart?
Speaker A
Um, that can happen if you get things wrong. Um, you can there's several rugps that I think are kind of built into the system.
Speaker A
I talked about the commodity market. China's got the gold and the silver. America and London have the derivative contracts. They don't have the gold and silver. So whenever there's weakness there, a central bank has to lend the gold and silver because it doesn't
Speaker A
exist. And that kind of is transferring lots and lots of commodities over to Shanghai um and Singapore and various other things. The stock market is all the growth in the US economy today is because of AI data centers. The entire
Speaker A
economy is AI data centers now. So the AI trade and all the energy behind it and these higher energy prices is the entire stock market. 40% of the entire S&P is the you know the seven largest tech companies and now you've got
Speaker A
Anthropic to add there and SpaceX and uh then you have Open AI and uh and various things. So the end game of this I think is that you accelerate wealth inequality for as long as you can. You concentrate wealth upwards. You
Speaker A
you accelerate the police and surveillance state because you know that eventually um probably the only way to control this is a universal basic income. And so you you implement stable coins, you enter central bank digital currencies, and you
Speaker A
end up with a more socialistic way of um allocating wealth, universal basic income that is handed out to everybody by the government. And if you misbehave, we can turn your money off.
Speaker A
Yes. And it will be programmable money. It will be in. This is where um you notice um we went from during COVID and you probably noticed this, you're a content creator. We went from you say the wrong thing about co you're canled
Speaker A
to um Elon buys X and it's wide open free speech. Yeah. Now it's freedom of speech but not freedom of reach.
Speaker A
Um so they he says to you say whatever you want, right? Uh let it rip. You know, if you want to say anything about hating Muslims, hating Jews, I talk about I've been talking about this a lot lately, how it's it just
Speaker A
seems like all bet like it seems like they've taken off all of the clamps on free speech across all of social media where you can get away with anything now when two years ago you would get demonetized, deplatformed for silly things.
Speaker A
Yeah. Yeah. Now, what are they doing? They're basically saying, "Well, but if you want reach, you got to be within the acceptable narrative." You know, if you want reach.
Speaker A
So, here's an interesting thing. 5 years ago, if I would put Epstein in a YouTube title, that video would get throttled significantly, likely demonetized.
Speaker A
Now, YouTube content around Epstein just goes nuclear 24/7. Yeah. Yeah. What I what I think is happening and I don't know what your feed looks like is I think they're manufacturing the most extreme version of yourself.
Speaker A
So they're feeding you content based upon your ideology. So they're boxing you. You know, they're saying you think all the problems in the world are because of the Jews. You think all the problems in the world are because of the
Speaker A
Muslims. You think it's the radical left. You think it's the right. You think it's feminism. Whatever it may be.
Speaker A
So they're building you say whatever you want and then we'll keep feeding you content that makes you more and more angry, more and more radicalized, more and more into your ideology.
Speaker A
And that's creating an environment where people can't speak to each other. People are getting more aggressive with each other.
Speaker A
Um people are just getting, you know, more and more radicalized into their ideology to the point where, you know, it's just getting crazy. you know, women hate men, men hate women, birth rates are down, like, you know, like people can't have children anymore.
Speaker A
They don't know what gender they are. Like, so why are they doing this? Well, I I think they I think firstly they need the most radical version of you.
Speaker A
Okay. Uh then they're building your social credit score. Then they're feeding you more and more content. And then they're trying to engineer, I'll give you more reach if you're more radical.
Speaker A
If you speak like this, I'll give you more reach. Right? So now you're being more and more sensationalized, more and more clickbait, trying to get the thumbnail that's more and more crazy, you know, um, and they're engineering you into an
Speaker A
acceptable form of narrative for your box until eventually um, this artificial intelligence, all this data you're giving, um, is basically going to be the surveillance state. is going to be when you get your universal basic income, we've got all
Speaker A
the information on you. Uh we can control your interest rate. We can control your expenditure. And once we manufacture that civil unrest, if we get enough data centers built, if we get enough of the data, and they can put the clamps back on down
Speaker A
the road is what you're saying. There's a there's a theoretical situation where the tick could become more important than the fit here.
Speaker A
Like the tick, whoever controls the data runs the game. The previous game, the game we're in right now is whoever prints the money controls the game, right?
Speaker A
But if you [clears throat] control the data, can you imagine the tick blackmailing the fick?
Speaker A
Uh can you imagine a shift in power as a result of it? And then what's happening now? The tick companies are issuing their own dollars, stable coins.
Speaker A
The central banks are fighting back with central bank digital currencies. Now they're releasing agents. Agents are becoming the program.
Speaker A
Become the fick. Yeah. So, I think that there's a global centralized control grid that the tick want. The Mick want to split their forever war into regional acceptable and the T and the FIC uh they want a multipolar world uh because they
Speaker A
can make more money through transaction fees in multiple financial centers. I sent you a clip with uh Beck Lover.
Speaker A
Yeah. Earlier where he's laying out this Project Meridian thing and he's been saying this forever. He's been he's had this take that he's about to say right here for years and I think he's a [ __ ] deadon with this. Listen
Speaker A
to this. This is Beck Lover. Well, they announced their next move. Project Meridian. At my direction, I'm announcing Project Meridian.
Speaker A
Study what that word means. They are uh building Skynet at light speed. all these same people who censored us and this and that and now you guys say like, you know, they're they've loosened up on free speech. Do you know why they've
Speaker A
loosened up on free speech? It's because the AI needs to understand the human mind, the threats of the human mind, the way we speak, the way we think to try to forecast our next moves and how to control populations. That's the only
Speaker A
reason why you have free speech temporarily on platforms like X and even here. I promise you an effort led by I think that makes a lot of sense.
Speaker A
Yeah, absolutely. So, let it rip. You can also muddy the water, confuse people, overwhelm them with information.
Speaker A
Like, I think nobody knows what's up and down. Nobody knows what's left and right anymore.
Speaker A
It's just there's an overwhelming amount of slop flooding the zone. And what what is a a weak controllable person now, right now? Somebody that um lost all their sense of values. They don't know what the truth is. they're
Speaker A
mentally like really psychologically destroyed by all of this information. Uh they're weak, you know, they're not healthy. Um you know, and and I can see that all around me right now. I can see the Yeah, me too.
Speaker A
the impact like it of people. And so yeah, that's what a controllable person looks like. And also I think a really important part of this, so I don't know how long we've been talking for.
Speaker A
Yeah, we're 3 hours in. three hours in. Um, we can wrap it up. Yeah.
Speaker A
Doomer, you know, this whole doomerism. I want to end on something positive because we've just spent three hours talking about some crazy ass [ __ ] right?
Speaker A
Mhm. Um, I think one of the things they're trying to do is make you believe that there's no future. There's no sense of a bright future in the world. Like the youth are being driven into short-term behavior, gambling, women are choosing
Speaker A
Only Fans as a career. Like, you know, they got no future. Bonnie Blue. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker A
She's your lady. She's your country, right? [laughter] Is she? I think so. Is she British?
Speaker A
All right. Doesn't she have a British accent? I don't even know who that is.
Speaker A
I don't even know who that is. You know who Bonnie Blue is? Who's Bonnie Blue?
Speaker A
She's the lady who uh had the She slept with like a hundred dudes in one day.
Speaker A
Thousand people, wasn't Yeah. And now she's pregnant. Is that Bonnie Blue? That's Bonnie Blue. Yeah.
Speaker A
Wasn't there someone that did a thousand? Like a No, that was her. I think she she holds the world record.
Speaker A
Okay. Okay, where look look right there. Uh in June announcing her after her cancellation of an event uh that she would be tied up naked inside of a glass box and the goal was to have sex with a
Speaker A
thousand 2,000 men. Um right. And now she's pregnant. Yeah. Yeah. She's from the UK.
Speaker A
You know, this is how you get freedom of reach now, right? This is how you go viral.
Speaker A
Um but look, um to me it's the it's it's the mental game. Like I we are in psychological warfare. like I I believe that there's an optimum business model of how subordinate you can make someone.
Speaker A
Now, um I think that the mental game is really important. I think to me when I when I look at my device and I look at the content that I'm being fed, um the world looks really really scary and like
Speaker A
really messed up. Um but then I go outside and I go and meet people and I travel around and it just doesn't look that bad. It really doesn't look that bad. You go out in the garden and you tr
Speaker A
you touch grass. Um, actually the world's not as bad as we are being portrayed it to be.
Speaker A
We we are but a speck in the I I just we just talked about what 3 400 years of history.
Speaker A
Mhm. I mean in the grand civilization of the world that is but a speck in history.
Speaker A
Um, you have to see how to function in the world as it is today rather than the world that you think you're missing out on. So, I talked about this boomer thing. You know, they got a job, their
Speaker A
their income was enough to save. They got their 401k. They got real estate at a price where they were able to live off their real estate. They're now just desperately trying to retire and make sure that their house doesn't go down in
Speaker A
value and their stocks don't go down in value. And people are saying, "Well, I want to crash this whole system down, man. I just want real estate to crash. I want my, you know, I want my opportunity or if we can't have it, you can't have
Speaker A
it." You know, that that type of thing. That type of destructive behavior is look, here's how the world works today.
Speaker A
Um we are in this technocratic control grid. Uh there is digital resistance you know like I was part of Bitcoin early.
Speaker A
We um tried to create a system outside the banks where you can own your own money you know self-custody your own money spend without a government um a fixed supply that allows you to outperform um this impact that exists
Speaker A
with you running your own LLM environments protecting your own data. So here's the real battle. It's not left and right. It's not labor conservatives.
Speaker A
It's not Republican, Democrat. It's not Muslim, Jew, Christian, whatever it may be. It's not black, white, Asian, whatever it may be. Um, it is centralization versus decentralization.
Speaker A
The technology is centralizing. The finance and central banking is centralizing and military is centralizing into technology through companies like Palunteer. You know, your job is to digitally resist and understand that owning your own data, owning your own LLMs, owning your own
Speaker A
AI, creating your own environment is actually the skill that people need into the future.
Speaker A
And so, your job is not to get real estate, get a job. You're going to lose.
Speaker A
The only way you can win in this game today is you need to own more assets every month, which means you need to spend less than you earn and invest the difference. Most people say, "No chance.
Speaker A
It doesn't work. My my numbers just don't work." Well, I was that person. I was um at one stage in the most like severe debt. Um and all of my money was going on um servicing debt and servicing interest.
Speaker A
And one day I had to face it head on. Realize how bad my situation was. Um, and realize that actually there's no substitute for this. I've got to stop paying some of my debt and I got to pay
Speaker A
myself and invest in some assets and I need to own more assets every single month. That happened in 2011. The asset that I chose was Bitcoin when it was about $3. I'm not here to pitch Bitcoin.
Speaker A
I'm just saying you have to own some gold, some assets, whatever it is for you. If you don't, you're going to be on the wrong side of this control grid, even if it's owned some of the AI infrastructure, whatever it may be. You
Speaker A
have to generate more income than you spend. You have to invest the difference in assets. If you do that every month for the rest of your life, you'll be fine. You'll be completely fine. But they don't want you to know that. They
Speaker A
want you thinking you got to get a 1,000x on a crypto scam tomorrow cuz the world's over.
Speaker A
You know, everything's about short- termism. So what you the way you defeat this system is by actually believing that there is a bright future for yourself. Have confidence in yourself to get through this. Recognize that the rules are actually quite simple. Spend
Speaker A
less than you earn. Invest the difference in assets. Own more assets every single month. And then how are you going to earn your income? Well, earn your income with the gift that you've got today. The gift that the boomers had
Speaker A
was buy property, get a job, get, you know, all that stuff. that doesn't that doesn't exist anymore. The world today is that you were born and with a phone in your hand if you're young. Um and there are a bunch of boomers that do not
Speaker A
understand the world that we're entering into next. In fact, they're severely unprotected from hacking everything that's going to happen next.
Speaker A
So, you need to see the world as it is today. and your opportunity as somebody that was born with a phone in your hand.
Speaker A
That phone was both a weapon that did some severe psychological operations to you, but it also gave you now the opportunity.
Speaker A
I don't I I've got the best assistant with AI that I've ever had. Like I I'm able to do things with my business that was never possible before. Um and you know, this is both the worst and best
Speaker A
time for people that are harnessing it. You're not gonna defeat this by blowing up data centers, right?
Speaker A
You're gonna defeat this by leaning into the productivity, building something, using the tools that are available to you today, digitally resisting, investing in decentralized stuff, building your own stuff, and helping other people do that. Because the world, the world is going to be
Speaker A
split up into those people that know how to own their data and those that just give all their data to the control grid.
Speaker A
And your job is to lean into that. Recognize that there is a bright future.
Speaker A
Um, and if you do that, if you do that well, you'll probably end up buying your house. I ended up just buying my house outright after doing that, you know.
Speaker A
That's amazing. And and that's what that's the world as it is today. And there ain't [ __ ] that's going to you're not going to change any of it.
Speaker A
You vote with your money. Um, I personally believe reject the left and right bollocks. like in terms of geopolitics and macro, I want to understand how they work, but I'm not going to change them.
Speaker A
I'm not going to influence any I'm not going to stop the control grid. I'm not going to stop the FIC from building multipolarity. I'm not going to stop them from changing the and and and the longer you realize that actually in the
Speaker A
end, what do you control? You control yourself. You control your mind, what you consume. You control your spiritual connection, your soul. You control your health. You control your relationships with your family. You control your home.
Speaker A
You control your community. And the further out you get into your city, your country, whatever, it gets harder and harder to control.
Speaker A
So just become geopolitics and macro to me is about understanding the world as it is. And then on the micro level, you you need to become, you know, if that's how don't see the world better than it is or worse than it is. Just see it as
Speaker A
it is to the best of your ability. Try and deprogram yourself. Do the opposite of what they want you to do. Whatever they're trying to algorithmically get you to do is probably the opposite. You know, right now there was a terrorist
Speaker A
attack with an airplane. We know whatever we're seeing, whatever we're seeing is what isn't happening. So you can know whatever they're telling you is is exactly what's not happening. Mhm.
Speaker A
So start with that. You can get the truth by just knowing whatever they're trying to tell you is not the truth, you know, and then work your way backwards, you know, consume content, understand the world as it is today. Um,
Speaker A
become radically optimistic about what you as an individual can achieve. Become realistic about the world as it is, accept the world as it is, and lean into it and own more assets every single month. and believe intergenerational that you're building something and there
Speaker A
is a bright future because we're moving into so much uncertainty, but it's kind of exciting at the same time. It's petrifying.
Speaker A
Very well said, man. That was a [ __ ] incredible podcast, dude. Thank you.
Speaker A
Thank you again. I learned a lot. Uh tell people where they can find you online, uh social media, anything else.
Speaker A
Yeah, so I I give real-time updates on XSimon Dixon Twitter. Um, every week I can talk as you can tell for a long time. Every week for myself. I follow the money and everything that happens every week and I publish it on Fridays
Speaker A
on my YouTube channel, Simon Dixon. Mhm. Um, and I mainly do that for myself. So, if you want to listen to all the me following money every week, I do that as a as a discipline. Um, and in case I get
Speaker A
cancelled, I've got simonix.com where I back up everything in a more decentralized environment. Awesome. Um, so it can continue even if I get cancelled.
Speaker A
Awesome, man. Well, thank you again, man. That was super super educational and informative and uh I'm sure a lot of people are going to feel the same way.
Speaker A
And we'll link all of your stuff below so they can find it. And that's it.
Speaker A
Thanks for having me. Good night, folks.
Topics:Simon Dixonfinancial industrial complexfollow the moneycentral bankingWorld War IIIgeopoliticsEpsteinCBDCmilitary-industrial complexdebt markets
