Speaker A
Hello there, and welcome to Life Beyond Scene, where we sit quietly with the parts of the world that most people never think to look for.
A narrated dive into Factorian Deep, a near-unexplored trench in the Southern Ocean, exploring why this remote place remains almost entirely unknown to science.
Key Takeaways
- Factorian Deep is very deep but almost entirely unexplored, known mainly through measurements rather than direct observation.
- Only one human visit has occurred, which highlights the extreme difficulty and cost of deep-sea exploration.
- Multiple overlapping obstacles, including weather, engineering, cost, and remoteness, explain the lack of research.
- Continued study of the region depends on future decisions by funders, institutions, and governments.
What the video covers
- The video introduces Factorian Deep, a trench in the Southern Ocean east of Antarctica, reaching about 7,434 meters depth, at the bottom of the South Sandwich Trench.
- The narrator emphasizes that the place has never received sunlight and is known mostly through a depth measurement, some footage, and sample organisms.
- The site was officially named in 2019 and has been visited by a human only once, by a single submersible pilot for a few hours about five years earlier.
- The Five Deeps expedition, funded by one private individual rather than a government or international program, is discussed as the context of the visit.
- Engineering challenges such as near-freezing temperatures affecting lubricants, seals, and thrusters are described.
- Remoteness, storm-prone seas, lack of nearby ports or research bases, and reliance on ships in position are presented as logistical barriers.
- Seismic activity from ongoing subduction in the region is noted as a factor shaping the trench.
- Communication with deep-sea vehicles relies on acoustic modems, and mapping relies on satellite gravity measurements.
- The deep-sea biology of the zone is presented as evidence of life's adaptability.
- The narrator concludes that the trench remains largely unexplored and that future study depends on funding, will, and logistics.
Chapters
- 00:00Introduction to unexplored places
- 00:13The Southern Ocean and its climate role
- 00:28Sonar mapping and the dive preparations
- 00:56Engineering challenges of deep-sea vehicles
- 01:25Human visits and the hostility of the deep
- 01:53Geology and seismic activity of the trench
- 02:21Mapping, communication, and remote observation
- 02:49The Five Deeps expedition and its legacy
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
not a memory, not a name that anyone says out loud at dinner. just a coordinating in a scientific paper, a faint shadow on a sonar image that someone printed once and filed away. These places are real.
Speaker A
There is a certain kind of place that exists almost entirely as a number. Not a photograph, not a memory, not a name that anyone says out loud at dinner. Just a coordinate in a scientific paper, a faint shadow on a sonar image that someone printed once and filed away. These places are real. They are as real as anything you could touch, but they live in a kind of darkness that is not just physical. It is also the darkness of being genuinely unknown, genuinely unreached, genuinely outside the edge of what human beings have managed to see with their own eyes.
Speaker A
have managed to see with their own eyes. Tonight, we're going to spend some time with one of those places. Before we get into it, I want to ask you something simple. Where are you right now? Is it dark outside where you are? Are you in
Speaker A
Tonight, we're going to spend some time with one of those places. Before we get into it, I want to ask you something simple. Where are you right now? Is it dark outside where you are? Are you in bed, or on a couch, or somewhere in between? I always find it interesting to think about the people listening to these things, all in different rooms, different time zones, different kinds of quiet. And tonight's topic is one that I think pairs well with darkness, with the kind of stillness that comes late at night when the world outside your window feels a little farther away than usual.
Speaker A
think pairs well with darkness, with the kind of stillness that comes late at night when the world outside your window feels a little farther away than usual.
Speaker A
If you enjoy this kind of calm, careful storytelling, it would mean a lot if you hit the like button and subscribe to the channel. It genuinely helps more people find their way here, and it lets us keep making these. Okay, that's the only time I'll mention it.
Speaker A
I'll mention it. Now, let's go somewhere very few people have ever been. There is a place in the southern ocean, far south of Argentina and far east of Antarctica, where the seafloor drops away to a depth of approximately 7,434
Speaker A
Now, let's go somewhere very few people have ever been. There is a place in the Southern Ocean, far south of Argentina and far east of Antarctica, where the seafloor drops away to a depth of approximately 7,434 meters. That is about 24,000 feet, if you prefer. It is deeper than most mountains are tall. It is a place where the pressure of the water above would be enough to crush almost anything we could build. Where the temperature hovers just above freezing. Where no light from the sun has ever reached. Not once, not even a photon, not in the entire history of the Earth. It sits at the bottom of a geological feature called the South Sandwich Trench, and its deepest confirmed point has a name: Factorian Deep. You've probably never heard of it.
Speaker A
Where the temperature hovers just above freezing. Where no light from the sun has ever reached. Not once, not even a photon, not in the entire history of the Earth. It sits at the bottom of a geological feature called the South
Speaker A
That is not a criticism. Most people haven't, including most people who are genuinely interested in science and geography and the strange edges of the world. Factorian Deep is not famous the way the Mariana Trench is famous. It does not appear in textbooks very often. It is not the subject of documentaries narrated by famous voices. It was only officially named in 2019, which is recently enough that many maps still don't include it. And in the entire history of human exploration, it has been visited exactly once, by one person in one submersible, for a few hours on the seafloor, five years ago. That is the whole story of human presence at Factorian Deep. One visit, a few hours, and then nothing.
Speaker A
That is not a criticism. Most people haven't, including most people who are genuinely interested in science and geography and the strange edges of the world. Factorian Deep is not famous the way the Mariana Trench is famous. It does not appear in textbooks very often.
Speaker A
What I find quietly remarkable about that is not just the rarity of the visit, but everything that had to go right to make even that single visit possible. The engineering, the funding, the weather, the timing, the years of preparation. And then, even after all of that, even after a human being sat at the bottom of the Southern Ocean and looked out through a thick acrylic viewport at the sediment and the darkness, we still don't really know the place. We have a depth measurement. We have some footage. We have a few organisms in sample jars. We have a name on a chart. And that is almost everything we have.
Speaker A
in one submersible for a few hours on the seafloor 5 years ago. That is the whole story of human presence at Factorian Deep. One visit, a few hours, and then nothing. What I find quietly remarkable about that is not just the
Speaker A
The question of why that is, why a place this significant, this deep, this scientifically interesting remains so thoroughly unexplored, is not a simple one. It is not one problem. It is many problems stacked on top of each other, each one serious on its own and together forming something close to an impenetrable barrier. Geography, weather, engineering, cost, communication, mapping, funding, the biology of the deep sea itself. Every one of these things is a genuine obstacle. And tonight, we're going to work through them carefully, one at a time, because I think the full picture is actually more interesting than any single dramatic explanation.
Speaker A
being sat at the bottom of the southern ocean and looked out through a thick acrylic viewport at the sediment and the darkness, we still don't really know the place. We have a depth measurement. We have some footage. We have a few
Speaker A
But before we get into the specifics, I want to stay here for just a moment longer in this opening feeling. There is something philosophically interesting about a place that exists as a number: 7,434 meters. We say that number and it feels precise. It feels known. And in one sense, it is. That measurement was made carefully, verified with multiple instruments, and confirmed by scientists. It is a real number. But knowing the depth of a place is not the same as knowing the place. It is like knowing the address of a house you've never been inside. You can find it on a map. You can point to it. You can tell someone how far it is from where you're standing. But you do not know what it smells like, what sounds it makes, what is living in the corners, or what the light looks like at different times of day.
Speaker A
not one problem. It is many problems stacked on top of each other. Each one serious on its own and together forming something close to an impenetrable barrier. Geography, weather engineering cost communication, mapping, funding, the biology of the deep sea itself. Every one of these
Speaker A
Factorian Deep is a place we know the address of. That is roughly where we are. The trench it sits in, the South Sandwich Trench, is itself not a well-known feature, which is part of the larger story. It is not the kind of place that ends up in geography lessons. It sits in one of the most remote and inhospitable stretches of ocean on the planet, far from shipping lanes, far from research stations, far from almost everything. The Southern Ocean surrounding it is one of the stormiest bodies of water on Earth, and the region around the South Sandwich Islands is particularly isolated. There are no nearby ports of refuge. There are no research bases within practical range. There is just water and wind and depth.
Speaker A
But before we get into the specifics, I want to stay here for just a moment longer in this opening feeling.
Speaker A
And yet something is down there. Something is living at 7,434 meters, in the cold and the dark and the pressure. We know that much. The samples from the 2019 dive confirmed it: small crustaceans, sea cucumbers, worms, life doing what life does in a place that seems designed to make life impossible.
Speaker A
instruments confirmed by scientists. It is a real number. But knowing the depth of a place is not the same as knowing the place. It is like knowing the address of a house you've never been inside. You can find it on a map. You
Speaker A
That detail has stayed with me since I first came across this story. The fact that even in a place this extreme, this remote, this thoroughly hostile to almost everything we know, there are organisms going about their lives. And we have no idea how many there are, or what most of them are, or how they got there, or how long they have been there, because we have only looked once, for a few hours, through a small viewport.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep is a place we know the address of. That is roughly where we are. The trench it sits in, the South Sandwich Trench, is itself not a well-known feature, which is part of the larger story. It is not the kind of
Speaker A
The naming of the place is worth mentioning here, because it tells you something about how recently all of this happened. Factorian Deep was named after the submersible that reached it, the DSV Limiting Factor, which was also nicknamed the Factorian. The expedition that made the dive was called the Five Deeps Expedition, and it was completed in 2019. The goal of that expedition was to reach the deepest point of each of the world's five oceans, and the Southern Ocean dive was one of those five. The name Factorian Deep was assigned after the dive was completed and the depth was confirmed. Before 2019, the deepest point of the Southern Ocean did not have a name that most people agreed on. It barely had a confirmed measurement. So in a very real sense, this is a young discovery. Not young in geological terms, since the trench has been there for millions of years, formed by the slow grinding of tectonic plates, but young in human terms: named five years ago, visited once, largely unstudied since.
Speaker A
bodies of water on Earth. And the region around the South Sandwich Islands is particularly isolated. There are no nearby ports of refuge. There are no research bases within practical range.
Speaker A
I think that is worth sitting with for a moment, because it is easy to assume that the major features of our planet have been cataloged and understood. We live in an era of satellite imagery and GPS and global databases. It can feel like the age of discovery is over, like everything has been found and measured and filed away somewhere. And then you come across something like Factorian Deep and you realize that the ocean, particularly the deep ocean and particularly the deep Southern Ocean, is still genuinely, practically almo
Speaker A
crustations, sea cucumbers, worms, life doing what life does in a place that seems designed to make life impossible.
Speaker A
That detail has stayed with me since I first came across this story. The fact that even in a place this extreme, this remote, this thoroughly hostile to almost everything we know, there are organisms going about their lives. And
Speaker A
we have no idea how many there are or what most of them are or how they got there or how long they have been there because we have only looked once for a few hours through a small viewport. The
Speaker A
naming of the place is worth mentioning here because it tells you something about how recently all of this happened.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep was named after the submersible that reached it, the DSV limiting factor, which was also nicknamed the Factorian.
Speaker A
The expedition that made the dive was called the Five Deeps Expedition and it was completed in 2019.
Speaker A
The goal of that expedition was to reach the deepest point of each of the world's five oceans and the Southern Ocean dive was one of those five. The name Factorian Deep was assigned after the dive was completed and the depth was
Speaker A
confirmed. Before 2019, the deepest point of the Southern Ocean did not have a name that most people agreed on. It barely had a confirmed measurement. So in a very real sense, this is a young discovery.
Speaker A
Not young in geological terms, the trench has been there for millions of years, formed by the slow grinding of tectonic plates, but young in human terms, named 5 years ago, visited once, largely unstudied since. I think that is
Speaker A
worth sitting with for a moment because it is easy to assume that the major features of our planet have been cataloged and understood. We live in an era of satellite imagery and GPS and global databases. It can feel like the
Speaker A
age of discovery is over, like everything has been found and measured and filed away somewhere. And then you come across something like Factorian Deep and you realize that the ocean, particularly the deep ocean and particularly the deep southern ocean, is
Speaker A
still genuinely practically almost completely unknown. Less than a quarter of the global ocean floor has been mapped at a resolution that scientists would consider useful. That statistic comes up later in this story in more detail, but I want to plant it here now
Speaker A
because it is the kind of number that changes how you think about the world.
Speaker A
Less than a quarter of the floor of the ocean that covers most of our planet. We have better maps of the surface of Mars than we do of the bottom of our own ocean. That is not a rhetorical
Speaker A
flourish. It is literally true and it is directly relevant to why places like Factorian Deep remain so poorly understood. Tonight we're going to try to understand why. Not in a frustrated way, not in a blaming way, just carefully and honestly and with the kind
Speaker A
of patience that a place like this deserves. We're going to look at where Factorian Deep sits and how it was found and what the environment down there is actually like. We're going to look at what the one visit in 2019 revealed and
Speaker A
what it couldn't possibly have answered. We're going to look at the engineering of deep sea exploration and the weather of the southern ocean and the geology of the trench and the communication blackout that every submersible pilot faces at that depth. We're going to look
Speaker A
at what science most wants to know about this place and why the money and the will to find out have not arrived yet.
Speaker A
And at the end, I think the answer to the question in the title will feel less like a single dramatic explanation and more like something quieter and more honest, a picture of how many different kinds of difficulty can accumulate
Speaker A
around a single point on a map until that point becomes, for all practical purposes unreachable.
Speaker A
But we're getting ahead of ourselves. Let's start at the beginning, which means starting with geography with where this place actually is and what the ground beneath it is doing and why this particular corner of the southern ocean produces depths like this at all. The
Speaker A
South Sandwich Trench sits in a part of the world that most maps treat as empty space. If you pull up a standard globe and look at the bottom of the Atlantic, where it begins to curve toward Antarctica, you will find a scattering
Speaker A
of small islands east of the tip of South America, the South Sandwich Islands, a volcanic chain belonging to the British overseas territory of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands.
Speaker A
They're among the most remote inhabited or rather uninhabited territories on Earth. No permanent human population lives there. The islands themselves are bleak, wind battered, and covered in ice and guano, with the occasional active volcano steaming quietly into the cold
Speaker A
air. East of those islands, roughly a thousand km out into open ocean, the seafloor drops away into the trench that bears their name. The South Sandwich Trench runs roughly north to south, stretching approximately 956 km in length. That is longer than the distance
Speaker A
from London to Rome. It is not a small feature. But because it sits in the Southern Ocean, far from any major shipping route or research hub, it has received a fraction of the scientific attention given to trenches in the
Speaker A
Pacific or even the Indian Ocean. The deepest part of it, Factorian deep, lies at the southern end of the trench at coordinates that place it squarely in one of the most isolated stretches of water on the planet. The Southern Ocean
Speaker A
itself is worth pausing on for a moment because it has an interesting history even as a named body of water. For most of the 20th century, the ocean surrounding Antarctica was considered an extension of the Atlantic, Pacific, and
Speaker A
Indian oceans. It was not officially recognized as a separate ocean by the International Hydrographic Organization until the year 2000. In that sense, it is the world's newest named ocean, which is a slightly strange thing to say about a body of
Speaker A
water that has existed for tens of millions of years and that plays an enormous role in global climate. The naming was partly administrative, partly scientific, a recognition that the Southern Ocean has distinct characteristics that set it apart from
Speaker A
the oceans that border it. Its circulation patterns are unique, its ecology is unique, and its behavior, particularly its weather, is unlike anything else on Earth. The reason the Southern Ocean is so extreme, comes down to one simple geographical fact. There
Speaker A
is no land mass to interrupt it. The ocean encircles Antarctica in an unbroken ring. And because there is no continent in the way, the westerly winds that blow across it can build for thousands of kilome without anything stopping them. The result is a body of
Speaker A
water that is on average rougher and stormier than any other ocean on Earth. The zones of latitude within it have been given names that tell you everything you need to know about what sailors have experienced there. The roaring 40s, the furious 50s, the
Speaker A
screaming 60s. The South Sandwich Trench sits within the screaming 60s. That should give you a sense of the neighborhood. Now, the geology, the trench exists because of what is happening beneath the seafloor in this region. And understanding that helps
Speaker A
explain why the depths here are so extreme. The South American plate, the tectonic plate that underlies the South American continent and extends out into the ocean, is moving eastward relative to the Scotia plate, a smaller plate that underlies the Scotia Sea and the
Speaker A
surrounding region. Where these two plates meet, the South American plate is being forced downward beneath the Scotia plate in a process called subduction.
Speaker A
As one plate dives beneath the other, it drags the seafloor down with it, creating the long narrow depression that we call a trench. This is the same basic mechanism that creates the Mariana Trench in the Pacific and the Tonga
Speaker A
trench and most of the other deep trenches on Earth. Subduction zones are the places where the ocean floor reaches its greatest depths because they are the places where that floor is actively being pulled downward into the mantle.
Speaker A
The South Sandwich subduction zone is tectonically active, which means it is not a quiet or stable environment. The same forces that created the trench also drive the volcanic activity of the South Sandwich Islands to the west. Several of
Speaker A
those islands have active volcanoes, Zavadovski Island, Saunders Island, Montigue Island, and they have erupted within living memory. Satellite images of the region sometimes show thermal anomalies and ash plumes drifting from these peaks. The subduction also generates regular seismic activity,
Speaker A
including earthquakes that can reach significant magnitudes. In August 2021, a magnitude 8.1 earthquake struck near the South Sandwich Islands, one of the largest recorded in the region in decades and large enough to trigger tsunami warnings across parts of the
Speaker A
South Atlantic. This is not a geologically calm corner of the world. It is active and shifting and in geological terms relatively young. What this means for the trench itself is that the seafloor in this region is not simply a static basin sitting quietly in
Speaker A
the dark. It is part of a dynamic system. Plates moving, volcanoes erupting, earthquakes reshaping the sediment layers, ash falling from the islands and settling slowly through the water column to coat the bottom in pale layers that record each eruption like
Speaker A
pages in a book. The sediment at the bottom of Factorian Deep is likely a mixture of fine organic material. the shells of tiny marine organisms called foraminifera that have rained down from the surface for millions of years and
Speaker A
layers of volcanic ash from the nearby islands. Reading the sediment carefully could tell scientists an enormous amount about the geological and ecological history of this region. But doing that requires taking sediment cause which requires being there which is the
Speaker A
problem we keep returning to. The isolation of this place is not just a matter of distance on a map. It is a combination of factors that stack on top of each other in ways that make the region genuinely difficult to operate
Speaker A
in. The nearest port of any practical use is Ushua in Argentina, the southernmost city in the world, which still sits roughly 2,000 km from the trench. Stanley in the Falkland Islands is somewhat closer, but still remote by any normal standard. There are no
Speaker A
research stations on the South Sandwich Islands themselves. There are no weather boys in the immediate vicinity providing real-time data. There are no rescue services within any reasonable range. A research vessel operating near the South Sandwich Trench is in a very practical
Speaker A
sense on its own. If something goes wrong, a mechanical failure, an injury, a submersible that does not return to the surface, the options are limited and the response times are long. The weather window during which it is even possible
Speaker A
to attempt operations in this region is narrow. The oustral summer roughly November through March offers the best conditions, but even then the Southern Ocean can produce severe storms with very little warning. Wave heights of 10 to 15 m are not unusual during bad
Speaker A
weather, and wind speeds can exceed 60 knots. A ship trying to maintain position over a dive site while a submersible is operating below needs relatively calm conditions, not flat calm, but calm enough to hold station, manage the umbilical or tracking
Speaker A
systems, and safely recover the vehicle when it surfaces. In the southern ocean near the South Sandwich Trench, those conditions exist for windows that can close suddenly and without much notice.
Speaker A
This is part of what makes the region so different from say the western Pacific where the Mariana Trench sits in comparatively sheltered waters accessible from Guam. Guam has a port, a runway, fuel, and infrastructure.
Speaker A
The nearest equivalent for the South Sandwich Trench is Ushaya, which is a small city at the end of the world at the other end of the Drake Passage, one of the most notoriously rough stretches of ocean on Earth.
Speaker A
Just getting to the trench is an expedition in itself. The Drake Passage, crossing alone, which takes roughly 2 days by ship, is the kind of sailing that many experienced mariners find genuinely difficult. After that crossing, you are still hundreds of
Speaker A
kilome from the trench in seas that remain hostile. There is also the question of what lies around the trench that we simply do not know about. The seafloor in this region is poorly mapped. Satellite derived baimemetry which uses measurements of the ocean
Speaker A
surfaces slight gravitational variations to infer the shape of the seafloor below gives a rough picture but it has a resolution of several kilome at best.
Speaker A
Features smaller than that are invisible to it. Shipbased multi-beam sonar which is far more accurate requires a vessel to physically pass over every area it maps and very few vessels have done that in this region. There may be ridges,
Speaker A
secondary basins, underwater volcanic structures or other features near Factorian Deep that no one has yet seen or measured. We are in a sense working with a sketch of the place rather than a map. The Five Deeps expedition, which we
Speaker A
will get to in a moment, did conduct multi-beam sonar surveys before the dive using a Kongsburg EM124 system, one of the most capable deep water multi-beam systems available at the time. That survey produced genuinely useful data and helped confirm the
Speaker A
location and depth of Factorian Deep. But the survey coverage was limited by time and operational constraints. A research vessel can only cover so much ground in a finite number of days, particularly when weather is a constant variable. The result is that even the
Speaker A
best available map of the area around Factorian Deep has gaps, significant ones. It is worth stepping back for a moment and just sitting with the scale of this remoteness.
Speaker A
We're talking about a place that is roughly equidistant from the southern tip of South America and the coast of Antarctica.
Speaker A
A place where the nearest human beings on any given day are probably on a research vessel somewhere in the southern ocean themselves days from land. A place where the weather can go from manageable to dangerous in a matter
Speaker A
of hours. Where there are no nearby ports, no rescue services, no infrastructure of any kind. A place that sits at the bottom of a tectonic scar in the seafloor. Where the earth is still actively moving and volcanoes are still
Speaker A
erupting on the islands nearby. And a place that despite all of this harbors life, small, persistent, adapted life going about its business in total darkness under pressure that would instantly destroy almost anything we could build. That combination, the
Speaker A
extreme remoteness, the geological activity, the hostile weather, the practical isolation is what makes the South Sandwich Trench and Factorian Deep so different from other deep ocean sites. It is not just that the depth is extreme. Extreme depths exist in other
Speaker A
oceans, too, in places that are at least somewhat more accessible. What makes this place particularly resistant to study is the way the geography and the geology and the climate all converge to create a location that is genuinely stubbornly difficult to reach and
Speaker A
operate in. Every factor that makes deep ocean exploration hard in general is amplified here by the specific conditions of the Southern Ocean and the South Sandwich region. And yet, despite all of that, someone did reach it. In 2019, a team of people with a converted
Speaker A
research vessel, a purpose-built submersible, and a very specific goal managed to locate the deepest point of the Southern Ocean, measure it, and send a person down to see it. That story, how it happened, what it took, and what was
Speaker A
found is where the picture really starts to come into focus. Because understanding how we got there once is essential to understanding why getting there again. And doing real science there has proven so much harder than it might seem. The five deeps expedition
Speaker A
began as something that sounds almost implausible when you first hear it described. A private individual, not a government, not a research institution, not a naval agency, decided he wanted to reach the deepest point of every ocean on Earth, all five of them. And then he
Speaker A
actually did it. Victor Vesco is not a name that most people recognize, which is interesting given what he accomplished. He is an American private equity investor, a mountaineer who had already climbed the highest peak on each of the seven continents, and by most
Speaker A
accounts, someone who treats extreme physical and logistical challenges as a kind of personal calling.
Speaker A
After finishing the seven summits, the natural question for someone like that is apparently, "What next?" The answer for Vesco was the ocean, specifically the very bottom of it in five different places.
Speaker A
The five deeps expedition was the result. A multi-year privately funded mission to reach the deepest confirmed point of the Arctic Ocean, the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean, the Pacific, and the Southern Ocean in that order. The total cost of the expedition has been reported
Speaker A
at approximately $48 million. That number is worth sitting with for a moment. $48 million to reach places that in most cases no human being had ever visited before or had visited only once or twice in all of recorded history. For
Speaker A
context, that is roughly the budget of a midsized Hollywood film. It is also, as we will get to later, more than many national science agencies spend on deep ocean research in an entire year. To do this, Visco needed a ship and a
Speaker A
submersible capable of handling the deepest water on Earth. The ship was the DSSV pressure drop. DSSV standing for deep submergent support vessel. It had originally been built for the United States Navy as a cable laying and support ship, and it was acquired and
Speaker A
refitted specifically for this mission. It is not a glamorous looking vessel. It is a working ship, functional and serious with the kind of nononsense appearance that suggests it was designed to do a job rather than impress anyone.
Speaker A
The submersible it carried was another matter. The limiting factor, officially designated DSV450, though no one seemed to call it that, was purpose-built by Triton Submarines, a Florida-based company that specializes in high-end submersible design. The name limiting factor comes from the concept
Speaker A
in ecology and engineering of the one variable that constrains everything else. The bottleneck, the ceiling, the thing that determines how far you can go. It was a fitting name for a vehicle designed specifically to push past every previous limit of human occupied deep
Speaker A
ocean descent. The limiting factor was built around a titanium pressure hull approximately 90 mm thick. That is about 3 and 1/2 in of solid titanium forming a sphere around the two occupants inside.
Speaker A
The viewport through which the pilot and any observer could see the exterior was made of acrylic approximately 15 cm thick, shaped and engineered to distribute the enormous pressure evenly across its surface rather than concentrating it at any one point.
Speaker A
The vehicle was rated to full ocean depth, meaning it was designed to withstand the pressure at the deepest point of any ocean on Earth, slightly over 11,000 m at Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench. At 7,434 m, the depth of Factorian deep, the
Speaker A
limiting factor was operating well within its rated capacity, which is not to say the conditions were anything other than extreme. Before the dive itself, the expedition team conducted a multi-beam sonar survey of the South Sandwich trench using a Kongsberg EM124
Speaker A
system mounted on the pressure drop. The EM124 is one of the most capable deep water multi-beam sonar systems available. It sends out a fan of acoustic pulses across a wide swath of the seafloor and receives the returning echoes, building
Speaker A
up a detailed three-dimensional picture of the bottom topography. This survey was essential. You cannot simply point a submersible at the ocean and tell the pilot to go find the deepest spot. You need to know at least approximately where to go. And the sonar survey was
Speaker A
what identified the deepest candidate location in the trench. The survey data was processed and analyzed to find the lowest point and that became the target for the dive.
Speaker A
It is a methodical process, more like preparing a surgical site than like exploration in the old romantic sense.
Speaker A
You map first, then you go. The survey did not cover the entire trench. The trench is roughly 956 km long, and a single research vessel cannot map all of that in the time available, but it covered enough to identify Factorian
Speaker A
Deep with confidence. The dive itself took place in February 2019. February in the southern ocean is the height of the ostral summer which is the best time operationally. Though as anyone familiar with that region knows the best time is a relative term. Vesco
Speaker A
descended alone in the limiting factor. The vehicle can carry two people but this particular dive was a solo descent.
Speaker A
The trip down to 7,434 m takes time. At a typical descent rate for a vehicle like this, reaching that depth takes somewhere in the range of 2 to 3 hours, depending on conditions and the specific descent profile. So, by the
Speaker A
time Visco reached the bottom, a significant portion of the day's operational window was already spent just getting there. He spent approximately 4 hours on the seafloor before beginning the ascent. 4 hours.
Speaker A
That is the entire observational window for a place that had never been visited before and has not been visited since.
Speaker A
In those 4 hours, he moved the limiting factor across the seafloor, observed the sediment, watched the cameras, and collected whatever data the vehicle systems could gather. The ascent back to the surface takes a similar amount of time to the descent. The whole operation
Speaker A
from launch to recovery is an allday affair. And the ship has to hold station throughout, maintaining its position over the dive site in southern ocean conditions, tracking the submersible acoustically and waiting. The depth was verified through multiple methods. The
Speaker A
limiting factors onboard pressure sensors provided one measurement. The expedition also deployed lander systems, freef falling instrument platforms that descended to the seafloor independently of the submersible, carrying their own sensors and sampling equipment. These landers provided independent pressure readings and depth calculations that
Speaker A
corroborated the submersible measurements. The confirmed depth of 7,434 m was the result of this crossverification process, not just a single reading from a single instrument.
Speaker A
that matters scientifically. A depth measurement that is confirmed by independent systems is much more reliable than one that depends on a single sensor. And the Five Deeps expedition took the verification seriously. The figure of 7,434 m has since been accepted as the
Speaker A
confirmed deepest point of the Southern Ocean. The naming came naturally from the submersible that made the dive factorian deep after the limiting factor. It is a relatively recent convention in deep ocean geography that newly confirmed deep points can be named
Speaker A
often after the vessels or expeditions that discovered them. Challenger Deep takes its name from HMS Challenger, the British survey ship whose crew first measured the Mariana Trench in the 1870s.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep follows the same logic, though the time scale is compressed. The name was formally proposed and recognized in 2019 within the same year as the dive. There is something pleasingly direct about it. You built the vehicle that reached the place. So,
Speaker A
the place carries the vehicle's name. It is not poetry, but it is honest. What is worth emphasizing is that this was not a lucky accident or a chance discovery.
Speaker A
The five deeps expedition was a carefully planned, heavily resourced, multi-year project with a specific scientific and exploratory agenda. The team included not just Vesco as the pilot, but a full complement of scientists, engineers, sonar operators, and support staff. The expedition had
Speaker A
scientific advisers and partnerships with institutions including the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. The sonar mapping, the lander deployments, the depth verification protocols, all of it was designed to produce results that would hold up to scientific scrutiny, not just adventure
Speaker A
stories. In that sense, the discovery of Factorian Deep was as rigorous as a government funded research expedition, even though it was paid for by one person's personal resources.
Speaker A
The data gathered during the five deeps expedition has been published and used by researchers and the sonar maps produced during the mission represent some of the best available data on the south sandwich trench. The landers deserve a little more attention here
Speaker A
because they are an underappreciated part of the story. Before Vesco descended in the limiting factor, lander systems were deployed to the seafloor independently. They simply fall, waited down until they hit the bottom, then sit there collecting data and samples.
Speaker A
These particular landers carried baited traps designed to attract and capture organisms living in the hadal zone. The idea is simple. You put food in a trap, you lower it to the seafloor, you wait, and you see what comes to eat it. What
Speaker A
came at Factorian Deep included amphopods, small crustation-like animals that are ubiquitous in deep ocean trenches around the world, along with other organisms, including holyans, which are sea cucumbers and polyet worms. Some of the specimens collected were sent for taxonomic analysis to
Speaker A
determine whether they represented known species or potentially new ones. That analysis takes time and the results feed into the broader scientific literature on Hadal biology. The landers also collected sediment samples from the seafloor and those samples contain something unexpected and frankly
Speaker A
dispiriting. Microlastics. Tiny fragments of plastic in the sediment of the deepest point of the Southern Ocean. A place that no human being had ever visited and that is as remote from human activity as anywhere on the planet's surface.
Speaker A
The microplastics finding at Factorian Deep was consistent with similar findings at other deep trenches, including the Mariana, and it said something uncomfortable about the reach of human pollution, that it arrives at places before we do, carried by currents
Speaker A
and time. The seafloor itself, as observed through the limiting factors cameras, was described as relatively flat and covered in fine sediment. The kind of soft, silty bottom that accumulates over millions of years as organic material and mineral particles
Speaker A
drift down from the water column above. There were no confirmed hydrothermal vents at this location, which is notable given the tectonic activity of the region. Hydrothermal vents where superheated water rich in minerals vents from the seafloor and supports entire
Speaker A
ecosystems independent of sunlight have been found at other subduction related trenches and in volcanically active areas. The South Sandwich region with its active volcanoes and ongoing subduction seemed like a reasonable candidate for vent activity at depth, but the 2019 dive did not find any, at
Speaker A
least within the area covered. That absence is itself a data point, though it is not conclusive. The observational window was too brief and the area covered too small to rule out vent activity elsewhere in the trench. The geological texture of the area, the
Speaker A
sediment composition, the organisms in the traps, all of it was gathered in those few hours. And then the vehicle came back up and the ship turned toward calmer waters. and Factorian Deep returned to what it had been before, a
Speaker A
location on a map, a number, a depth. The expedition moved on to its next target. The Five Deeps mission had five oceans to cover, and the Southern Ocean was one stop among several, not a dedicated research program. That is not
Speaker A
a criticism. The expedition accomplished something remarkable, and the data it produced was genuinely valuable. But it means that what we have from Factorian Deep is in the end a first contact. A brief, careful, expensive first contact, but a first contact nonetheless. The
Speaker A
question that follows naturally from all of this is the one the previous section was already moving toward. If we manage to get there once with the right ship, the right submersible, the right team, and a favorable weather window, why is
Speaker A
it so difficult to go back? Why has no dedicated scientific expedition followed up on what the five deeps mission found?
Speaker A
The answer is not a single obstacle. It is a stack of them. Each one significant on its own and together forming something that functions almost like a wall. The pressure at that depth, the darkness, the temperature, the geological instability of the
Speaker A
surrounding region. These are the physical conditions that any expedition must contend with and they are worth understanding in detail because they shape everything else about what it means to try to explore Factorian Deep.
Speaker A
So let's start with pressure because pressure is the first thing and in some ways the only thing that defines what Factorian Deep actually is as a physical environment. At 7,434 meters below the surface of the Southern Ocean, the pressure is approximately 744
Speaker A
bars. That number is worth sitting with for a moment. One bar is roughly equal to the atmospheric pressure at sea level. The weight of the air above you right now pressing down on every square cime of your body. You don't feel it
Speaker A
because you've lived inside it your entire life and your body is built to exist within it. At 744 bar, the pressure is 744 times that. In more intuitive terms, that translates to somewhere around 10,800 lb per square in. Every square in of any
Speaker A
surface at that depth is bearing a force of nearly 5 1/2 tons, not the whole surface. Each individual square in of it. What that means for a human body unprotected is not something that happens slowly. It is not the gradual
Speaker A
experience of pressure building up the way it does when you dive too deep in a swimming pool. At Hadal depths, the physics are simply incompatible with biological tissue that has not evolved to exist there. The air spaces in a
Speaker A
human body, the lungs, the sinuses, the middle ear would collapse almost instantly. The body itself would be compressed and crushed in a way that leaves very little to describe afterward. This is not meant to be graphic, just accurate. The environment
Speaker A
at 7,434 m does not permit human presence without a very specific kind of engineered protection. And even with that protection, the margin for error is extremely small. The limiting factors pressure hull, the titanium sphere that kept Victor Vesco alive during his
Speaker A
descent was 90 mm thick. Nearly 4 in of titanium surrounding the twoperson crew compartment. The viewport through which the pilot and any observer could see the seafloor was made of acrylic and was 15 cm thick, machined to extremely precise
Speaker A
tolerances. The engineering behind that hole represents decades of material science and deep ocean vehicle design.
Speaker A
And it was built specifically to withstand full ocean depth, meaning it was rated to pressures even beyond what factorian deep demands.
Speaker A
Even so, the occupants of that sphere were separated from an instantly lethal environment by a shell you could measure in centime.
Speaker A
That is not a comfortable thought and it is probably not a thought that experienced deep ocean pilots dwell on during a dive. But it is the reality of the situation. Temperature at the bottom is a different kind of extreme. Near the
Speaker A
seafloor at factorian deep, the water temperature is close to 0° C, just above freezing in most estimates. There is a slight complication here, which is that extreme pressure affects the physical properties of water in ways that not always intuitive. The freezing point of
Speaker A
seawater decreases slightly under very high pressure, which means that water atal depths can remain liquid at temperatures that would freeze it at the surface. The practical effect is that the bottom of Factorian Deep is extraordinarily cold. Not quite at the
Speaker A
threshold of freezing, but close enough that cold is a constant factor in every piece of equipment operating there.
Speaker A
Electronics behave differently at near freezing temperatures. Lubricants thicken. Seals and gaskets made of rubber or synthetic materials contract and can become brittle. A thruster that works perfectly in a test tank at room temperature may perform differently after hours at near zero temperatures
Speaker A
and 744 bar of pressure simultaneously. Cold and pressure together are a more difficult engineering problem than either one alone. And then there is the darkness. This one is perhaps the easiest to understand and also the hardest to truly picture if you have not
Speaker A
experienced deep water. Sunlight in even the clearest ocean water penetrates to a depth of roughly 200 m under ideal conditions. Calm water, direct sunlight, minimal particulate matter in the water column. Below 200 m, the light fades quickly. By 1,000 m, you're in what
Speaker A
oceanographers call the midnight zone, where no photons from the surface reach at all. Factorian Deep sits at 7,434 m. The surface is more than 7 km above the seafloor. The sunlight that exists up there in whatever weather the
Speaker A
Southern Ocean is producing on any given day has absolutely no connection to the environment at the bottom of the trench.
Speaker A
It is not dim down there. It is not twilight. It is a darkness that has existed unbroken for as long as the trench has been deep enough to block all light, which is millions of years. The only light at Factorian Deep during the
Speaker A
2019 dive came from the limiting factor's own lights mounted externally on the vehicle. Those lights illuminated a small circle of seafloor around the submersible, enough to see what was directly in front of the cameras and nothing beyond that. The rest of the
Speaker A
trench in every direction was completely dark. This has a practical consequence beyond the obvious. Without external light, there is nothing to navigate by visually. The pilot cannot look out the viewport and see where the trench walls are or how far the seafloor extends or
Speaker A
what is approaching from the side. Navigation at that depth relies on acoustic positioning systems and preloaded maps which at Factorian Deep were themselves relatively limited in resolution. You're essentially driving in a very small bubble of light surrounded by total blackness using
Speaker A
instruments rather than sight to understand where you are. The sediment on the seafloor at Factorian Deep is worth a few words because it is not simply mud in the way you might picture the bottom of a river or a lake. What
Speaker A
accumulates at Hadal depths over millions of years is a specific kind of material. A slow constant rain of particles from the water column above.
Speaker A
Some of it is organic. The remains of tiny organisms that lived and died in the upper ocean, drifting down through thousands of meters of water before settling on the bottom. Forominifera, which are microscopic single-sellled organisms with hard shells, contribute
Speaker A
significantly to deep sea sediment in many parts of the ocean. Their shells accumulate over geological time into thick layers that record the history of the ocean above them in their chemistry.
Speaker A
In the South Sandwich Trench specifically, there is an additional ingredient, volcanic ash. The South Sandwich Islands, which sit relatively close to the trench, are among the most volcanically active island chains on Earth, and eruptions there have deposited layers of ash into the
Speaker A
surrounding ocean over thousands of years. Some of that ash has settled into the trench and become part of the sediment record. It is a mix then biological material, mineral particles, volcanic ash, and as the 2019 landers confirmed microlastics
Speaker A
all compressed into a fine soft layer on the seafloor. One thing that is somewhat counterintuitive about the deep trench environment is the near absence of current. In the upper ocean, currents are constant and powerful. The Southern Ocean in particular is famous for the
Speaker A
Antarctic circumpolar current, the strongest ocean current on Earth driven by uninterrupted wind circling the continent. But at Hadal depths, the water is essentially still. There is almost no horizontal movement. Particles that settle into the trench stay there.
Speaker A
Organisms that live there cannot rely on currents to bring food to them in the way that filter feeders in shallower water can. The stillness is almost complete. It is a strange contrast. One of the most turbulent ocean surfaces on
Speaker A
the planet, sitting above one of the calst seafloor environments imaginable. That stillness has engineering implications, too. Though they are less obvious than the pressure and temperature problems. A submersible operating in still water at Hadal depth generates its own disturbance as it
Speaker A
moves. The thrusters that allow the vehicle to maneuver stir up the fine sediment on the seafloor, creating clouds of particulate matter that can obscure the cameras and contaminate samples.
Speaker A
Experienced pilots learn to move slowly and carefully, hovering rather than driving aggressively to minimize sediment disturbance. But the sediment at Factorian Deep is so fine and so undisturbed by natural currents that even gentle thruster activity can create visibility problems. It is a bit like
Speaker A
trying to examine a dusty surface with a haird dryer. The examination itself disrupts what you're trying to see. All of these physical conditions, the pressure, the cold, the darkness, the sediment, the stillness, combined to create an environment that is not just
Speaker A
dangerous to humans, but actively hostile to most technology. The word hostile is used carefully here, not dramatically. It simply means that equipment designed for normal operating conditions fails faster or fails in ways that are harder to predict when exposed
Speaker A
to this particular combination of stresses. Seals fail, electronics malfunction. Syntactic foam, which is the material used to provide buoyancy in deep submersibles, compresses slightly under extreme pressure, altering the vehicle's buoyancy characteristics in ways that must be accounted for in the design.
Speaker A
Every component of a deep ocean vehicle operating at 7,434 m is being tested simultaneously by pressure, cold, and time. and any one of those components failing can end a mission or in a worst case scenario end it in a way that is not recoverable.
Speaker A
This is not hypothetical. The history of deep ocean exploration includes vehicles lost to equipment failures, missions cut short by mechanical problems, and instruments that simply stopped working at depth for reasons that were only understood after the fact, if they were understood at
Speaker A
all, since in some cases the vehicle did not return. The Oceangate Titan implosion in 2023 is the most recent and most visible reminder of what can go wrong when the engineering is not adequate to the environment. The Titan was not
Speaker A
attempting to reach Factorian Deep. It was diving to the Titanic recite at approximately 3,800 m, less than half the depth of Factorian Deep, and it failed catastrophically.
Speaker A
The lesson is not that deep ocean exploration is impossible. It is that the environment at these depths is genuinely unforgiving. And the margin between a successful dive and a fatal one is defined entirely by the quality of the engineering and the rigor of the
Speaker A
testing. At 7,434 m, that margin is narrower than almost anywhere else on Earth. There is a quality to this environment that is worth naming simply. It is not hostile to life in the way that outer space is.
Speaker A
Life exists at factorian deep. Organisms have adapted over evolutionary time to the pressure, the cold, and the darkness in ways that are genuinely remarkable.
Speaker A
Amphipods at Hadal depths have body chemistry that compensates for the pressure that would destroy most cells.
Speaker A
Their cell membranes have different lipid compositions than their shallow water relatives, maintaining flexibility under conditions that would make ordinary membranes rigid and nonfunctional.
Speaker A
Microbial communities in the sediment metabolize organic material in near freezing high pressure conditions that would kill most surface bacteria almost immediately.
Speaker A
The deep ocean is not empty. It is full in its own quiet and sparse way of organisms that have found ways to exist in conditions that seem from a human perspective entirely incompatible with existence.
Speaker A
But the fact that life has adapted to this environment does not make the environment any more hospitable to the machines we send to observe it.
Speaker A
Evolution had millions of years to solve the problem of surviving atal depths. Engineering has had a few decades with limited funding and limited opportunities to test solutions in the actual environment. The result is that our technology for exploring places like
Speaker A
Factorian Deep is genuinely impressive. The limiting factor is a remarkable piece of engineering, but it is also expensive, rare, and fragile in ways that make sustained exploration extremely difficult. What all of this means practically is that every expedition to Factorian Deep is a
Speaker A
significant undertaking just to survive the physical environment. Before you even begin to think about the distance, the weather, the logistics of getting a ship to the South Sandwich Trench, the communication limitations, or the cost, before any of that, you are already
Speaker A
dealing with an environment that requires specialized, expensive, carefully maintained equipment just to enter safely. The physical conditions at 7,434 m are not a detail. They are the foundation of every other difficulty that follows. And yet, as the 2019 dive
Speaker A
demonstrated, those conditions are not insurmountable. The limiting factor descended, reached the bottom, spent hours on the seafloor, and returned. The landers collected samples. The cameras recorded footage.
Speaker A
Life was found. Microlastics were found. Data was gathered. The environment, as hostile as it is, was briefly, carefully, expensively penetrated, which makes it all the more striking that what was found down there, even in that single brief visit, included things
Speaker A
that surprised the scientists involved. Organisms in the sediment, chemistry in the water column, biological material in the traps. All of it pointing toward a community of life that has been sitting in the dark at the bottom of the
Speaker A
southern ocean entirely undisturbed for longer than our species has existed. And that is before you consider what else might be living there in the parts of the trench that the limiting factors lights never reached. Because 4 hours on
Speaker A
the bottom of a 956 km long trench is not exploration in any meaningful sense of the word. It is a glimpse and what that glimpse revealed makes the question of what the rest of the trench contains genuinely interesting. Interesting
Speaker A
enough that the scientific community has real specific questions it would very much like to answer. If only it could find a way back. So let us talk about what was actually found. Victor Vesco's descent on the 24th of February 2019
Speaker A
lasted several hours in total from the moment the limiting factor slipped beneath the surface to the moment it returned. But the time spent on the seafloor itself at the confirmed deepest point of the southern ocean was approximately 4 hours. 4 hours. That
Speaker A
number is worth sitting with for a moment because it gives you a sense of the scale of the challenge.
Speaker A
The South Sandwich Trench is roughly 956 km long. The limiting factors lights illuminated a small circle of seafloor, a few meters across in any useful detail. 4 hours at the bottom of a trench that long at a single location is
Speaker A
less like an exploration and more like pressing your eye to a keyhole and trying to describe the room on the other side. And yet, even through that keyhole, there was quite a lot to see.
Speaker A
The seafloor at Factorian Deep appeared from the submersible cameras to be relatively flat and covered in fine pale sediment. This is consistent with what scientists expected. At extreme depths, far from any continental shelf, the bottom tends to accumulate a slow rain
Speaker A
of material from above. The tiny shells of forominifera, microscopic organisms that live in the upper ocean and sink when they die, along with organic particles, dust, and in this particular location, volcanic ash from the South Sandwich Islands chain nearby. The
Speaker A
result is a soft, undisturbed layer of material that has been accumulating for a very long time. Vesco described the bottom as quiet and still. No visible currents disturbing the sediment, no obvious geological drama, just the pale floor stretching out into the darkness
Speaker A
beyond the reach of the lights. But the biological picture was considerably more interesting than the geological one.
Speaker A
Before the submersible descended, the expeditioner deployed landers, freef falling instrument platforms that carry bait, cameras, and collection traps designed to sink to the seafloor ahead of the dive. These landers are essentially automated traps. They fall to the bottom, sit there for a
Speaker A
predetermined period, attracting whatever organisms are present in the area, collect samples, and then release a ballast weight to float back to the surface. They are one of the most practical tools available for sampling adal biology precisely because they do
Speaker A
not require a human pilot and can be left in place far longer than a crude submersible can remain on the bottom.
Speaker A
What the landers collected at Factorian Deep included amphipods. This was not entirely surprising. Amphipods, small crustations that resemble shrimp in a very general way, are among the most successful hadal organisms on Earth, found at depth in virtually every trench that has been
Speaker A
sampled. They are remarkably well adapted to the Hadal environment with body chemistry that compensates for the extreme pressure in ways that are still being studied. But the amphipods collected from the South Sandwich Trench were not necessarily the same species as
Speaker A
those found in better known trenches. The South Sandwich Trench is geographically isolated, sitting in the southern ocean, far from the Pacific trenches, where most Hadal research has been conducted, and there was genuine scientific interest in whether the amphipod community here had evolved
Speaker A
independently, producing species distinct from those found elsewhere. Some of the specimens collected were flagged for taxonomic analysis and the question of whether any represented new species was not immediately resolved.
Speaker A
Deep ocean taxonomy is slow work. Identifying a new species from a small crustation collected at extreme depth requires careful morphological examination and increasingly genetic analysis. The specimens from the 2019 dive were sent for study. But the results of that analysis have not been
Speaker A
widely publicized, which is itself a reflection of how slowly this kind of science moves when the initial collection was a single expedition rather than a sustained research program. The landers also captured footage of holtherans, sea cucumbers, moving slowly across the sediment.
Speaker A
Holyans are another group that has adapted successfully to Hadal conditions and their presence at Factorian Deep confirmed that the trench supports at least some of the broader community of organisms found at comparable depths elsewhere. Polyiti worms, segmented marine worms that are among the most
Speaker A
diverse groups of animals in the deep ocean, were also represented in the samples. None of these findings were shocking in the sense of being completely unexpected, but each one added a data point to an almost entirely blank picture. What was more striking
Speaker A
and more troubling was something else entirely. Microplastics were detected in sediment samples collected from Factorian Deep.
Speaker A
This finding, when it was reported, attracted attention precisely because of what it implied about the reach of human contamination.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep is not a convenient location. It is not near any shipping lane, not adjacent to any coastline, not downstream in any obvious sense from a major source of plastic pollution. It sits in one of the most remote and least
Speaker A
visited bodies of water on Earth at the bottom of a trench that had never been reached by a human being until February 2019.
Speaker A
And yet microlastics were there in the sediment. At 7,434 m. This was consistent with findings from other deep trenches. Microlastics had already been detected in the Mariana Trench, in the Kerdc Trench in the South Pacific, and in various other Hadal
Speaker A
environments. The pattern that was emerging from these scattered findings was uncomfortable. The deep ocean, including its most remote and inaccessible parts, was already contaminated.
Speaker A
The plastics arrive through a variety of pathways carried by ocean currents ingested by organisms that then sink when they die, transported downward through the water column by a range of physical and biological processes.
Speaker A
By the time they reach the sediment at Hadal depths, they have traveled enormous distances and taken years or decades to arrive. But arrive they do.
Speaker A
The presence of microplastics at Factorian Deep was not the primary scientific focus of the 2019 dive. That was the depth measurement and the biological sampling.
Speaker A
But it became one of the more widely reported findings partly because it was legible to a general audience in a way that amphopod taxonomy is not. It told a simple and slightly grim story. We have not visited this place, but we have
Speaker A
already changed it. The geological observations made during the dive were more limited, partly because 4 hours on the bottom does not allow for extensive survey work and partly because the submersible cameras, while capable, were illuminating a relatively small area at
Speaker A
any given time. The sediment surface showed no obvious signs of hydrothermal activity, no visible venting, no bacterial mats of the kind associated with hydrothermal fields. This does not mean there is no hydrothermal activity anywhere in the South Sandwich Trench.
Speaker A
The tectonic setting with active subduction and nearby volcanic islands makes it plausible that vents exist somewhere along the trenches 956 km length. But at the specific location of Factorian Deep, the bottom appeared geologically quiet, at least to the
Speaker A
cameras of the limiting factor during those 4 hours. The texture of the sediment, as observed through the cameras, was consistent with the slow accumulation of fine material over a very long period. There were no obvious large geological features
Speaker A
visible in the immediate area of the dive site. No boulders, no exposed rock, no dramatic topography.
Speaker A
The trench floor at this location appeared to be a place where things arrive slowly from above and do not move much once they settle. That kind of environment is in its own way scientifically interesting. The sediment at Factorian Deep is essentially a
Speaker A
record layers of forinifera shells, volcanic ash from different eruption events, organic material from different periods that could, if properly sampled and analyzed, reveal millions of years of geological and biological history.
Speaker A
But reading that record requires sediment cores, not camera footage. And no sediment cores have been taken from Factorian deep. It is worth pausing on that point. Sediment cing is one of the most powerful tools available to deep ocean scientists. A core sample, a long
Speaker A
cylinder of sediment extracted from the seafloor, can be analyzed in a laboratory to determine the age of different layers, the chemical composition of the material at each depth, the types of organisms present at different periods, and the temperature
Speaker A
and chemistry of the ocean at the time each layer was deposited. A single well-col from factorian deep could potentially answer questions about the geological history of the South Sandwich subduction zone. the history of volcanic activity in the region, the evolution of the
Speaker A
Southern Ocean's biological communities, and the carbon cycling dynamics of one of the ocean's most important regions.
Speaker A
None of that has happened. The tools exist, the scientific interest exists, the core does not.
Speaker A
What the 2019 expedition left behind in the scientific sense was a confirmed depth, some biological specimens, a brief visual record of the seafloor and set of microplastic measurements. That is genuinely valuable. It is more than existed before February 2019 when
Speaker A
Factorian Deep was a sonar shadow with a number attached to it. But it is also in the context of what science would actually like to know about this place.
Speaker A
A beginning so early that it barely qualifies as a beginning. It is more accurate to say it is a proof of concept, a demonstration that the place is reachable, that life is present, that the environment is as extreme as the
Speaker A
physics predicted, and that the biology is worth studying. One of the things that makes the 2019 findings genuinely interesting beyond their specific content is what they suggest about the broader community of organisms living in the south sandwich trench. The
Speaker A
amphopods, the holyans, the polycape worms. These organisms were not gathered from a single point. The landers were deployed across a small area. But even so, their presence implies a functioning biological community. Organisms at Hadal depths are not there by accident. They
Speaker A
are there because there is food. Organic material raining down from the surface. Bacterial communities in the sediment.
Speaker A
Perhaps other organisms serving as prey. A functioning hadal community requires a food web, however sparse and slowm moving by surface standards. And the presence of multiple types of organisms at Factorian deep suggests that such a web exists.
Speaker A
What is not known is how extensive that community is, how it varies along the length of the trench, whether it includes species found nowhere else and how it relates to the had communities of other trenches.
Speaker A
The South Sandwich Witch Trench's geographic isolation is one of the most scientifically interesting things about it. The nearest major deep trench is the South Georgia trough to the northwest.
Speaker A
And beyond that, the deep trenches of the Atlantic and Pacific are thousands of kilome away. If hadal organisms cannot travel easily between trenches, and the evidence from other isolated trenches suggests that many cannot, then the biological community at Factorian
Speaker A
Deep may have been evolving in isolation for a very long time, potentially producing adaptations and species found nowhere else on Earth. That is a genuinely compelling scientific question. It is also entirely unanswered. 4 hours of observation, a few land deployments, and a handful of
Speaker A
specimens. That is the sum total of direct biological knowledge from Factorian Deep. Everything else is inference, extrapolation, and comparison to other Hadal environments that may or may not be representative. The trench is 956 km long. The vast majority of it has
Speaker A
never been sampled, never been imaged, never been visited by any instrument or vehicle of any kind. The sonar mapping conducted by the DSSV pressure drop gave a picture of the trenches broad topography. But sonar at that resolution cannot tell you what lives on the
Speaker A
seafloor or what the sediment contains. For that, you need to go back. And going back, as it turns out, is where the real difficulty begins. Because the 2019 dive demonstrated something important and slightly paradoxical. The place can be
Speaker A
reached. The technology exists, at least in principle. The limiting factor went there and came back. The landers worked.
Speaker A
The samples were collected. And yet, in the years since that expedition, no one has returned. No follow-up cruise has been mounted specifically to study Factorian Deep. No sediment cores have been taken. No long duration landers have been deployed to monitor the
Speaker A
biological community over weeks or months. The single dive in 2019 remains the only direct human observation of the deepest point of the southern ocean.
Speaker A
Which raises the obvious question. If we know it is there and we know it is interesting and we know the technology can reach it, then why is it so much harder to go back than it was to go the
Speaker A
first time? The answer has less to do with the depth itself than with everything surrounding it, the geography, the weather, the engineering cost, and the logistical gap between a well-unded private expedition and the kind of sustained scientific program that would be needed to actually
Speaker A
understand what is down there. Challenger Deep by comparison has been visited dozens of times by multiple different vehicles from multiple different countries and it is still considered poorly understood. Vactorian Deep has been visited once. The comparison is instructive and it is
Speaker A
worth spending some time on what makes these two places so different in terms of accessibility because the contrast reveals a great deal about why Factorian Deep sits in a category of its own. Challenger Deep sits in the Mariana Trench in the
Speaker A
western Pacific Ocean, roughly 300 km southwest of Guam. That last detail matters more than it might seem. Guam is a United States territory with a functioning port, an airport, fuel infrastructure, and a military presence.
Speaker A
A research vessel heading to Challenger Deep can depart from Apore or Guam, reach the site in a matter of days, and return to port without ever crossing one of the world's most hostile stretches of open ocean. The Western Pacific, while
Speaker A
not always calm, is not the Southern Ocean. It does not have the same uninterrupted fetch, the distance over which wind can build waves without hitting land. That makes the Southern Ocean so consistently violent. It does not have the roaring 40s or the furious
Speaker A
50s. It does not have the Drake Passage sitting nearby like a permanent geological argument against human presence. And so Challenger Deep has become in relative terms the accessible deep. That is a strange sentence to write about a place nearly 11 km below
Speaker A
the surface of the sea. But accessibility is always comparative. James Cameron descended to Challenger Deep in March 2012 in his submersible deep sea Challenger, a solo dive that lasted about 3 hours on the bottom.
Speaker A
Before him, Don Walsh and Jack Bear reached the bottom in the Biscar Triest in January 1960.
Speaker A
In the years since Cameron's dive, multiple expeditions have returned. The five deeps expedition visited Challenger Deep in 2019 as well with Vesco setting a new depth record of 10,928 m later revised to 10,935 m. The ocean floor at Challenger Deep
Speaker A
has been photographed, sampled, mapped at high resolution, visited by landers, and studied by teams from the United States, Japan, China, and several other nations. It has a secondary deepest point called Serena Deep located about 200 km to the east which has also been
Speaker A
visited. Multiple documentary films have been made about dives there. It has in the context of Hadal science a relatively rich body of literature. None of this means Challenger Deep is well understood. Scientists who study it would be the first to point out how much
Speaker A
remains unknown. But it is at minimum a place that has been returned to. A place where the scientific community has been able to build on previous work, refine measurements, compare samples from different visits, and develop a picture that while still incomplete, has some
Speaker A
depth to it. Factorian Deep has one visit, one set of land deployments, one submersible descent.
Speaker A
The comparison is not really between two deep places. It is between a place that has been visited many times and a place that has been visited once.
Speaker A
Horizon Deep in the Tonga Trench in the southwestern Pacific offers a slightly different comparison. It sits at approximately 10,823 m, making it the second deepest point in the world's oceans. The Five Deeps expedition visited it in 2019 as well.
Speaker A
The same expedition, the same ship, the same submersible. Vesavo descended there in late January of that year, weeks before the Southern Ocean dive. The Tonga Trench is remote by most standards, but it sits in the Pacific, accessible from Samoa or Fiji
Speaker A
in waters that are challenging, but not Southern Ocean challenging. Even Horizon Deep, which is not a famous place and has received relatively little scientific attention, has had more structured follow-up interest than Factorian Deep. Partly because the Pacific, however vast, is navigable in a
Speaker A
way the Southern Ocean simply is not for most of the year. The difference between Factorian Deep and these other sites is not primarily a matter of depth.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep is shallower than both Challenger Deep and Horizon Deep. A vehicle rated to full ocean depth, 11,000 m, can reach Factorian Deep with margin to spare. The engineering challenge of getting a submersible to 7,434 m is real, but it is not the limiting
Speaker A
factor in the way that geography and weather are. The depth is almost the least of the problems. What makes Factorian Deep so much harder to study is where it sits. The South Sandwich Trench is located roughly 1,000 km east
Speaker A
of the South Sandwich Islands in the Southern Ocean in a part of the world that has no nearby ports, no permanent research infrastructure, no sheltered anchorages, and weather that operates on its own schedule with very little concern for human plans.
Speaker A
To reach Factorian Deep, a research vessel typically departs from Ushua, Argentina, the southernmost city of any size in the world, and travels approximately 2,000 km across some of the roughest water on Earth before arriving at a site where it must then
Speaker A
hold position in open ocean while conducting deep sea operations. There's no harbor to duck into if a storm develops. There is no port within a comfortable day sailing. The Falkland Islands are somewhat closer, but Stanley, the capital, is a small
Speaker A
settlement, and the infrastructure for supporting a major research vessel is limited. Once you leave port for Factorian Deep, you are committed to an extended open ocean operation with no easy exit.
Speaker A
The Southern Ocean earns its reputation. It is the only ocean that encircles the globe without interruption by any land mass. Which means the wind can travel all the way around the planet without anything to slow it down or redirect it.
Speaker A
This produces a persistent westerly wind system that drives the Antarctic circumpolar current, the largest ocean current on Earth, and generates wave conditions that are on average among the most severe of any ocean. The names given to the latitude bands crossing the
Speaker A
southern ocean reflect this. The roaring 40s for the latitudes between 40 and 50° south where strong winds are almost constant. The furious 50s between 50 and 60° south where conditions become more severe. The screaming 60s approaching Antarctica where the wind and seastate
Speaker A
can reach genuinely extreme levels. The South Sandwich Trench sits roughly between 55 and 60° south latitude. That is the furious 50s. That is not a comfortable neighborhood for a ship trying to lower a submersible into the water. During the five deeps expedition,
Speaker A
the team aboard the DSSV pressure drop experienced this directly. The southern ocean leg of the mission required careful timing, weather monitoring, and patience.
Speaker A
Launching and recovering a submersible in open ocean requires a relatively calm seaate. Wave heights that allow the ship to hold position and the submersible to be handled safely on deck. In the southern ocean, those windows exist, but they are
Speaker A
narrower and less predictable than in other ocean basins. The oustral summer running roughly from November through March offers the best conditions, but even then storms can develop quickly and conditions can deteriorate from manageable to dangerous within a few
Speaker A
hours. The expedition worked within those constraints, and the dive was completed successfully, but it required a level of logistical discipline and weather awareness that goes well beyond what is needed for a similar operation in the calmer parts of the Pacific.
Speaker A
The operational window for working near the South Sandwich Trench is genuinely narrow. A research expedition planning to conduct multiple dives, deploy long duration landers, collect sediment cores, and conduct biological sampling would need weeks at the site. Securing weeks of acceptable weather in the
Speaker A
furious 50s during the few months when conditions are even theoretically manageable is not a straightforward planning exercise. It is a gamble with expensive equipment and in the case of a crude submersible, human lives. The weather does not negotiate. If
Speaker A
conditions turn bad while a submersible is on the bottom, the surface crew waits. If conditions turn very bad, the submersible must ascend and be recovered in whatever seastate exists, which introduces its own risks. The margin for error in the Southern Ocean is smaller
Speaker A
than in almost any other operating environment on Earth. There is also the matter of what happens if something goes wrong with the ship itself. A research vessel operating near the South Sandwich Trench with a mechanical problem, a medical emergency, or a serious
Speaker A
equipment failure faces a very different situation than a vessel in the Western Pacific. The nearest Coast Guard or rescue capability is thousands of kilometers away. The nearest port capable of handling a major repair is even farther. Ships operating in these
Speaker A
waters carry their own emergency resources and are expected to be largely self-sufficient. But self-sufficiency has limits. A serious problem at sea in the Southern Ocean is a serious problem in a way that the same problem in the North Atlantic
Speaker A
or the Western Pacific simply is not. All of this adds cost. Fuel for a 2,000 km transit each way. that the fuel consumption rates of a large research vessel is not trivial. Provisioning for an extended cruise with no resupply
Speaker A
option means loading everything you might need before you leave port. Equipment that breaks cannot easily be replaced. Personnel who become ill or injured cannot easily be evacuated.
Speaker A
Every day at sea in the Southern Ocean costs money, and the perday operating cost of a vessel like the DSSV Pressure Drop, which is one of the few ships in the world equipped to support full ocean depth submersible operations, runs into
Speaker A
tens of thousands of dollars. A multi-week expedition to Factorian Deep, even before considering the cost of the submersible itself, represents a very significant financial commitment.
Speaker A
Compare this to a research cruise to Challenger Deep. A vessel departing from Guam can reach the Mariana Trench in roughly 2 to 3 days. The transit costs are lower, the weather risk is lower, the proximity to port reduces the
Speaker A
operational risk significantly, and the established pattern of expeditions to the area means that logistical knowledge has accumulated over decades.
Speaker A
Researchers know what to expect. They have data from previous cruises to build on. There are relationships with local port authorities, familiarity with the sea conditions in the area, and a body of experience that makes planning more efficient. None of that exists for
Speaker A
Factorian Deep. Every expedition there would essentially be starting from scratch, at least in terms of local operational knowledge and doing so in one of the most demanding maritime environments on the planet.
Speaker A
It is worth pausing on the Serena Deep comparison for a moment because it illustrates something specific. Serena Deep, the second deepest point in the Mariana Trench at approximately 10,89 m, has been visited and is the subject of ongoing scientific interest. It is
Speaker A
deeper than Factorian Deep by more than 3 kilometers. And yet it is in practical terms more accessible because it is in the Pacific, because it is near Guam, because ships can reach it without crossing the Southern Ocean. Depth alone
Speaker A
does not determine how difficult a place is to study. Location, weather, and the surrounding infrastructure matter enormously.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep is shallower than Serena Deep and harder to reach. That is the nature of the Southern Ocean. The Drake Passage, which lies between the southern tip of South America and the Antarctic Peninsula, sits to the west of the South
Speaker A
Sandwich Trench. Any vessel approaching from Ushua must transit through or near the Drake, which is itself one of the most notoriously rough stretches of water in the world. Sailors have been navigating the Drake for centuries and have developed a healthy respect for it.
Speaker A
On a good day, what sailors sometimes call a drake lake, the crossing is uncomfortable but manageable. On a bad day, wave heights of 10 to 15 m are not unusual, and the ship's motion becomes severe enough to make any kind of
Speaker A
precision work essentially impossible. Deploying scientific equipment, maintaining instruments, or conducting any operation that requires stability becomes very difficult. The Drake does not care about research schedules. The cumulative effect of all these factors, the distance, the weather, the narrow
Speaker A
operational windows, the lack of nearby infrastructure, the high daily operating cost, the transit risk is that mounting an expedition to Factorian Deep is not just difficult. It is a different category of difficult than mounting an expedition to most other deep ocean
Speaker A
sites. It requires more money, more planning, more tolerance for weather delays, more self-sufficiency, and more willingness to accept the conditions may prevent you from accomplishing everything you planned. The Five Deeps expedition managed it once. With a well-unded private backer, a
Speaker A
purpose-built ship, and a team with the specific goal of reaching the Southern Ocean's deepest point, regardless of difficulty, that kind of expedition is rare. The kind of sustained repeated scientific program that would be needed to actually understand Factorian Deep is
Speaker A
rarer still and the Southern Ocean's conditions are a significant reason why. Weather and distance are the most visible obstacles. They are the ones that make the most immediate sense. You can picture a storm. You can look at a
Speaker A
map and see how far Ushaya is from the trench. But the difficulty of exploring Factorian Deep does not stop with geography. The weather is one layer. The engineering is another. And the engineering challenge of building and operating a vehicle capable of surviving
Speaker A
what the trench itself demands, not just reaching it, but functioning there, collecting data there, keeping a human being alive there is a problem that exists entirely apart from the Southern Ocean's weather. And it is in its own way just as formidable.
Speaker A
So let us talk about the vehicle itself. Cuz the engineering problem is not abstract. It is very specific, very physical and in some ways more quietly astonishing than anything else about this story. To reach Factorian Deep, a vehicle, crude or uncrrewed, must
Speaker A
descend 7,434 m through water that becomes progressively colder, darker, and more crushing with every meter of depth. At the seafloor, the pressure is approximately 744 bars. That number is worth sitting with for a moment. One bar is roughly equal to the atmospheric
Speaker A
pressure at sea level. The pressure you're living under right now, wherever you are tonight, at 744 bar, the water is pressing inward from every direction with a force of roughly 10,800 lb per square in. That is not a hostile
Speaker A
environment in the way that a storm is hostile or a desert is hostile. It is hostile in a quieter, more total way.
Speaker A
There is no violence to it. The pressure simply exists everywhere. all at once. And anything that enters that environment must either be built to withstand it perfectly or be destroyed by it. There is no middle ground at that
Speaker A
depth. A small floor in a seal, a crack in a viewport, a weld that is not quite right. Any of these things at 744 bar becomes a catastrophic failure almost instantly.
Speaker A
The submersible that Victor Visco used to reach Factorian Deep in 2019, the DSV limiting factor was built specifically for this kind of environment. Triton submarines designed and constructed it with full ocean depth capability, meaning it was rated to survive the
Speaker A
pressure at the deepest point of any ocean on Earth, which is Challenger Deep at approximately 10,935 m. The pressure hole, the sphere that actually contains the pilots, was made from titanium, 90 mm thick. To put that in perspective, that is roughly the
Speaker A
thickness of 3 1/2 in of solid titanium machined to extremely tight tolerances formed into a sphere because the sphere is the geometric shape that distributes pressure most evenly across its surface.
Speaker A
The viewport, which allowed Vesco to actually see the seafloor, was made from acrylic and was 150 mm thick, about 6 in. Acrylic, somewhat counterintuitively, handles compressive pressure better than glass at these depths, because it deforms very slightly and distributes
Speaker A
the load rather than fracturing. The viewport was conicle in shape, wider on the outside and narrowing inward so that the pressure itself helps seat it more firmly in its housing. Every single design decision in a vehicle like the
Speaker A
limiting factor is made with the pressure environment in mind. Nothing is incidental. the total cost of the five deeps expedition across all five dives and the operational cost of the DSSV pressure drop and its crew over the course of roughly a year was
Speaker A
approximately $48 million. That figure covers the vessel operations, the submersible, the engineering team, the scientific personnel, the sonar surveys, the lander systems, the fuel, the provisions, and all the logistical overhead of a year-long global expedition.
Speaker A
$48 million is a significant amount of money by any ordinary measure. In the context of deep ocean exploration, it is actually not that surprising. This kind of work is genuinely expensive and the limiting factor was a purpose-built vehicle, not an adapted existing design.
Speaker A
But it does tell you something about the barrier to entry. You cannot explore Factorian Deep casually. You cannot put together a modest research grant and a rented ship and go have a look. The infrastructure required is substantial and the cost reflects that. As of 2024,
Speaker A
the number of humanrated submersibles in the world capable of reaching full ocean depth, meaning the absolute deepest points of any ocean is fewer than five.
Speaker A
That is a striking number. The global fleet of vehicles capable of taking a human being to the bottom of the deepest trenches on Earth could fit in a very small garage. Compare this to the number of crude spacecraft that have reached
Speaker A
orbit or the number of aircraft capable of flying at high altitude and the disparity becomes clear. We have invested enormously in the infrastructure for moving through air and through space and almost nothing in the infrastructure for moving through
Speaker A
the deepest parts of the ocean. The limiting factor is one of the most capable deep ocean vehicles ever built.
Speaker A
There are only a handful of others even approaching its capability. This is partly a reflection of funding priorities which is a subject we will come back to. But it is also a reflection of genuine engineering difficulty. Building a vehicle for the
Speaker A
deep ocean is not simply a matter of scaling up existing technology. Almost every system on a deep submersible has to be redesigned from the ground up for the pressure environment. Thrusters that work fine at the surface behave differently at extreme depth. Cameras
Speaker A
and lights must be housed in pressurated enclosures. The batteries that power the vehicle, lithium ion systems typically, must be managed carefully because a battery failure at depth is not a minor inconvenience.
Speaker A
The manipulator arms used to collect samples must be hydraulically or electrically driven in ways that function at 744 bar. Navigation systems cannot use GPS because GPS signals do not penetrate water. So, the vehicle relies on acoustic positioning and
Speaker A
inertial navigation, both of which accumulate error over time and must be carefully managed. Communication with the surface ship relies on acoustic modems, a technology we'll spend more time on later, which are slow and limited in ways that radio communication
Speaker A
is not. Every single system is harder to build, harder to test, harder to maintain, and harder to repair than its surface equivalent. There is also the problem of buoyancy. A submersible that descends to 7,434 m able to return to the surface, and
Speaker A
doing so requires the vehicle to be positively buoyant, meaning it naturally wants to rise when it releases its ballast weight. The material used to provide this lift at extreme depth is called syntactic foam. It is a composite material made from glass microspheres
Speaker A
embedded in a resin matrix. And it works because the glass spheres are hollow, giving the foam a low density that provides lift while being strong enough to resist compression at extreme pressure. At shallower depths, ordinary closed cell foam would work. At 7,000
Speaker A
meters, ordinary foam would be compressed until it was nearly as dense as water and provide almost no lift at all. Syntactic foam is engineered to maintain its buoyancy under pressure, but it must be precisely specified for the target depth. Too little foam and
Speaker A
the vehicle cannot ascend. Too much and the vehicle is too light to descend without additional ballast. The engineering tolerances are tight and the consequences of getting them wrong are serious.
Speaker A
The failure modes for a deep submersible are worth thinking about, not to be alarming, but because they illustrate why this kind of engineering demands such care. Implosion is the most dramatic. A catastrophic failure of the pressure hull under compressive load,
Speaker A
which releases enormous energy almost instantaneously. This is not a slow leak or a gradual failure. It is instantaneous and total seal failure that are any of the penetrations through the pressure hull for cables, connectors or other systems can allow water ingress that at these
Speaker A
pressures would be equally catastrophic. Thruster loss could leave the vehicle unable to maneuver, potentially unable to ascend if the emergency ballast drop system also failed.
Speaker A
Navigation error in zero visibility in a location where acoustic positioning has limited accuracy could leave the vehicle unable to find its way back to the ascent point. None of these outcomes are likely in a well-designed, well-maintained vehicle with a competent
Speaker A
crew, but none of them are impossible either, and the environment at 7,434 m offers no margin for error and no opportunity for rescue from the outside.
Speaker A
The implosion of the Oceangate Titan in June 2023 brought some of this into public focus in a way it rarely had been before.
Speaker A
The Titan was a privately operated submersible attempting to reach the wreck of the Titanic at approximately 3,800 m, less than half the depth of Factorian Deep. The vehicle suffered a catastrophic failure that killed all five people aboard. The investigation
Speaker A
revealed significant concerns about the design and construction of the vehicle, including the use of a carbon fiber cylinder for the main pressure hole, a material that, unlike titanium or steel, does not fail in a gradual detectable way under cyclic pressure loading. It
Speaker A
fails suddenly without warning after accumulated damage that may not be visible during inspection. The Titan's implosion was not a failure of deep oceanering in general. It was a failure of a specific vehicle that did not meet the engineering standards that the depth
Speaker A
required. But it was a reminder that those standards exist for a reason and that the consequences of not meeting them at depth are absolute. The limiting factor, by contrast, was built to the higher standards certified by DMV, an
Speaker A
independent maritime classification society and operated by a team with extensive deep water experience. The difference in approach was significant, but the Titan tragedy illustrated in a very direct way what the environment demands of any vehicle that enters it.
Speaker A
All of this engineering complexity exists before you even consider the specific challenges of Factorian Deep's location. A vehicle capable of reaching full ocean depth must still be transported to the South Sandwich Trench, deployed from a surface ship in
Speaker A
southern ocean sea conditions, operated in an environment where communication with the surface is limited, recovered in conditions that may have changed significantly since the dive began, and maintained and repaired with whatever tools and spare parts the support ship
Speaker A
is carrying. The limiting factor was designed to be deployed and recovered from the DSSV pressure drop using a specialized A-frame and crane system. This works well in calm conditions. In heavy swells, the operation becomes significantly more difficult and
Speaker A
dangerous. The submersible and the ship are moving independently in the water and the window during which the vehicle can be safely attached to the recovery crane is narrow.
Speaker A
miss that window and you wait for conditions to improve or you improvise, neither of which is ideal when a human being is inside the vehicle. The support ship itself is a critical piece of infrastructure.
Speaker A
The DSSV pressure drop is a former US Navy ocean surveillance vessel converted specifically for deep ocean submersible operations. It is a capable and well equipped ship, but it is one ship. There is no redundant support vessel standing by at Factorian deep. If the pressure
Speaker A
drop has a mechanical problem, the entire operation stops. The ship carries a dynamic positioning system that allows it to hold station above the dive site without anchoring. At 7,434 m, anchoring is not practical, but dynamic positioning requires fuel, and
Speaker A
fuel is finite. Every hour the ship spends holding station is an hour of fuel consumed and the nearest refueling point is thousands of kilometers away.
Speaker A
When you add all of this up, the cost of building a capable vehicle, the small global fleet of such vehicles, the complexity of every system aboard them, the engineering tolerances required for the pressure environment, the logistical demands of the support ship, the
Speaker A
recovery challenge in southern ocean conditions. The picture that emerges is one of extraordinary difficulty stacked on top of extraordinary difficulty. It is not that any single one of these challenges is insurmountable. The Five Deeps expedition proved that the
Speaker A
engineering challenge is solvable, at least for a single dive, by a well-funded and highly motivated team.
Speaker A
But solving it once under optimal conditions with a private investor willing to spend $48 million and a team that spent years preparing is very different from establishing the kind of sustained research presence that would allow scientists to actually study
Speaker A
Factorian deep in any meaningful depth. One dive tells you the trench is there. It tells you the depth. It gives you a few hours of footage and some samples in jars. It does not tell you what the trench is doing over time, how its
Speaker A
biological communities are structured, how its sediment record reads across geological history, or what its role in the broader ocean system might be. For that you need to go back many times with different equipment, different instruments, different scientific objectives. And going back to this
Speaker A
specific place in this specific ocean is a problem that the engineering challenge alone does not solve. Which is why even with a vehicle capable of making the dive, getting it to Factorian deep and keeping it operational once it arrives
Speaker A
remains a separate and formidable problem. one that the Southern Ocean itself seems almost designed to make as difficult as possible.
Speaker A
The Southern Ocean is not like other oceans. That sounds like a simple statement, but it carries a weight that is easy to underestimate until you start looking at the numbers. Every other ocean on Earth is bordered by land on
Speaker A
multiple sides. The Atlantic has the Americas to the west and Europe and Africa to the east. The Pacific is ringed by continents and island chains.
Speaker A
Even the Arctic Ocean is enclosed, surrounded by land masses that break the wind and limit how far a storm can build before it runs out of open water. The Southern Ocean has none of that. It encircles Antarctica in an unbroken
Speaker A
ring. And there is nothing, no continent, no significant island chain, no land mass of any kind to interrupt it as it goes all the way around the planet.
Speaker A
Wind builds across thousands of kilometers of open water and arrives at the South Sandwich Trench, having gathered energy from a fetch that in some directions is essentially unlimited.
Speaker A
Sailors have known this for centuries, and they name the latitude bands accordingly. The roaring 40s begin around 40° south latitude, where the westerly winds pick up and the swells start to build. move further south into the furious 50s and
Speaker A
the conditions become more severe. Winds that routinely exceed 50 knots, waves that stack up into walls of gray green water. The screaming 60s closer to the Antarctic Circle are where the weather becomes genuinely dangerous for almost any surface vessel that isn't
Speaker A
purpose-built for it. The South Sandwich Trench sits between roughly 55 and 60° south latitude. that places it squarely in the furious 50s with the screaming 60s not far to the south. This is not the edge of difficult weather. It is the
Speaker A
middle of it. Average wave heights in the Southern Ocean are among the highest recorded anywhere on Earth.
Speaker A
Studies using satellite altimemetry have measured significant wave heights, the average of the highest third of waves, regularly exceeding 4 to 5 m across large areas of the Southern Ocean, with storm conditions producing waves of 10 to 15 m or more. These are not rare
Speaker A
events. They are the normal operating environment. A wave of 10 m is roughly the height of a three-story building.
Speaker A
And when these waves arrive in sets with swells from multiple directions crossing and reinforcing each other, the resulting seaate is chaotic in a way that is difficult to convey without experiencing it. The surface of the water does not look like rolling hills.
Speaker A
It looks like a landscape that cannot decide what shape it wants to be. For a surface ship, this is dangerous and uncomfortable, but manageable, provided the ship is designed for it and the crew is experienced.
Speaker A
The DSSV pressure drop was built for difficult sea conditions, and its crew had extensive experience in remote ocean operations. But for deep ocean submersible work, the Seastate matters in ways that go beyond crew comfort.
Speaker A
Every phase of a deep dive operation, deploying the submersible, holding station above the dive site, recovering the vehicle when it surfaces, requires a surface that is calm enough to work on safely. The submersible is a precision instrument. The crane and A-frame system
Speaker A
used to lift it in and out of the water is operating at the edge of its design envelope in heavy swells, and the window during which conditions are good enough to operate is not something you can schedule in advance with confidence.
Speaker A
You plan around weather forecasts. You wait for the right window and then you move quickly when it opens, knowing it may close again before the dive is complete. During the five deeps expedition, the team working in the southern ocean encountered exactly this
Speaker A
kind of operational reality. The planning for the Forean Deep dive required careful attention to weather forecasts, and even with favorable predictions, the team had to be ready to adapt. Weather in the Southern Ocean can change within hours. A forecast that
Speaker A
shows a workable window can shift as a low pressure system moves faster or slower than expected or as a secondary system develops that wasn't clearly visible in the models. The expedition had the advantage of a dedicated meteorological support team providing
Speaker A
regular updated forecasts. But even with that support, the decision of when to dive involved judgment calls made under uncertainty. This is not a criticism of how the expedition was run. It is simply the reality of operating in that
Speaker A
environment. You work with the weather you have, not the weather you planned for. The distance from the nearest port adds another layer of difficulty that compounds everything else. Ushwire at the southern tip of Argentina is the closest city with meaningful port
Speaker A
facilities, and it sits approximately 2,000 km from the South Sandwich Trench. Stanley in the Falkland Islands is somewhat closer, but its port facilities are limited and its own weather is often challenging. At a transit speed of around 10 to 12 knots, which is a
Speaker A
reasonable cruising speed for a research vessel of the pressure drops type, the journey from Ushwire to the trench takes roughly 7 to 8 days. That is 7 to 8 days of fuel each way in seas that are rarely
Speaker A
calm before any actual research work begins. The ship must carry enough fuel, food, fresh water, spare parts, and equipment to sustain the entire operation without the option of a quick return to port if something goes wrong.
Speaker A
If a critical piece of equipment fails, the dynamic positioning system, the A-frame, a key component of the submersible, the team either fixes it with what they have aboard, or the mission ends. There is no supply run.
Speaker A
There is no nearby shipyard. This is what oceanographers sometimes call the tyranny of distance, and it applies to the southern ocean more severely than almost anywhere else on Earth. Research cruises to remote locations are always logistically demanding, but most of them
Speaker A
have at least a notional fallback, a port that is far but reachable, a coast guard or naval asset that could theoretically respond to an emergency.
Speaker A
In the southern ocean near the South Sandwich Trench, the realistic response time for any outside assistance in a serious emergency is measured in days, not hours. The nearest search and rescue coordination center is in Puna Arena's Chile. The nearest vessel capable of
Speaker A
providing meaningful assistance could be hundreds of kilometers away, and getting to the trench in deteriorating southern ocean conditions is itself a significant undertaking. An expedition operating in this region is in a very practical sense on its own. The operational weather
Speaker A
window for working near the South Sandwich Trench is roughly the Astral summer months, November through March, when sea ice is at its minimum extent and the most severe winter storms are less frequent. But even this window is not clean. Within those five months,
Speaker A
there are periods of sustained bad weather that can halt operations for days at a time. A ship that arrives at the trench with a planned 3we research program may find that only 10 or 12 days of that period offer conditions suitable
Speaker A
for submersible operations. The rest of the time is spent waiting, maintaining equipment, and watching the weather. For a privately funded expedition with a fixed schedule, this is a manageable inconvenience.
Speaker A
For a government-f funed research cruise with a tight budget and a return date that cannot easily be shifted, it can mean the difference between a successful expedition and one that comes home with incomplete data. The five deeps team
Speaker A
dealt with all of this and still managed to complete the dive. That is genuinely impressive and it reflects the quality of the planning, the ship, the vehicle and the people involved. But the five deeps expedition had something that most
Speaker A
research programs do not. A single clearly defined objective for each ocean and a budget that while large was committed to achieving that objective regardless of how long it took. Victor Visco was not trying to run a multi-year research program at Factorian Deep. He
Speaker A
was trying to reach the bottom once, confirm the depth, and move on to the next ocean. That kind of mission can be planned around weather windows and logistical constraints in a way that a sustained scientific program cannot. A
Speaker A
scientist who wants to study the biological communities of Factorian Deep over multiple seasons or to collect sediment cores from different locations along the trench floor or to deploy and recover long duration landers at several sites needs not one good weather window
Speaker A
but many. And securing many good weather windows at the South Sandwich Trench across multiple years with the funding to support each expedition is a challenge of an entirely different order. There is also the question of what happens to equipment in this
Speaker A
environment over time. The submersible and its support systems are precision instruments that require regular maintenance. Salt air, extreme cold, and the physical stress of repeated deployments and recoveries in rough seas all take a toll on mechanical and electronic systems. A research program
Speaker A
that involves multiple expeditions to the southern ocean needs either a vessel and submersible that can be maintained at sea between deployments or a base of operations close enough to the trench that the equipment can be serviced between trips. Neither of those options
Speaker A
is straightforward for this location. The DSSV pressure drop has workshop facilities aboard, but a ship's workshop has real limits. And the nearest port with the kind of specialized facilities that a deep submersible might need for major maintenance is not.
Speaker A
It is somewhere in North America or Europe, which means a journey of weeks just to service the vehicle before bringing it back. None of this means that future expeditions to Factorian Deep are impossible. The Five Deeps expedition demonstrated that the
Speaker A
Southern Ocean can be navigated, that the trench can be reached, and that a dive to 7,434 m can be completed safely and successfully.
Speaker A
The barriers are real, but not absolute. What they are is layered and cumulative. Each one manageable in isolation, but together forming a picture of operational difficulty that explains why. In the years since that February 2019 dive, no one has gone back. The
Speaker A
weather window is narrow. The distance is enormous. The logistical demands are severe. The cost of maintaining a capable support ship and a full ocean depth submersible in a state of readiness for southern ocean operations is substantial even before the ship
Speaker A
leaves port. And the scientific return, while genuinely significant, has to compete for funding against many other priorities in a research landscape where deep ocean science is chronically underfunded relative to its importance.
Speaker A
What the Southern Ocean does in effect is act as a filter. It allows access to Factorian Deep, but only to those with the resources, the equipment, the experience, and the patience to meet its terms. Those terms are not negotiable.
Speaker A
You cannot ask the Southern Ocean to be calmer, or the trench to be closer to a port, or the weather windows to be longer. You work within the constraints that the geography provides, or you don't go at all.
Speaker A
The five deeps expedition met those terms once under exceptional circumstances with exceptional resources. Meeting them again and again after that in the kind of sustained way that actual science requires is a problem that weather alone does not solve. But weather makes everything else
Speaker A
harder. It is the first obstacle, the one that shapes every decision that follows it. and it is one that the location of Factorian Deep makes essentially permanent. Suppose though that you solve it. Suppose a future expedition arrives at the trench with a
Speaker A
capable vehicle, a welle equipped support ship, a favorable weather window, and a team of scientists ready to work. Even then, the seafloor itself presents its own set of complications, ones that have nothing to do with weather or distance and everything to do
Speaker A
with the geological forces that created the trench in the first place. The South Sandwich Islands are not a place most people have ever thought about. They sit in the South Atlantic, roughly between the southern tip of South America and
Speaker A
the edge of Antarctica. 11 small volcanic islands arranged in a loose ark that curves from north to south across roughly 350 km of cold gray ocean. There are no permanent inhabitants, no hotels, no research stations, no supply ships making regular
Speaker A
runs. The islands are a British overseas territory administered from afar, visited occasionally by scientists and wildlife photographers who come for the penguins and the seabirds and then leave as quickly as the weather allows. They are in almost every practical sense the
Speaker A
edge of the inhabited world. And they are volcanically alive in a way that most people would find surprising if they knew about it at all. Zavadovski Island at the northern end of the chain has an active volcano called Mount Curry
Speaker A
that has been erupting intermittently for years. Saunders Island has a volcanic crater called Mount Michael, which satellite imagery has confirmed contains an active lava lake, one of only a handful of persistent lava lakes on Earth, sitting in one of the most
Speaker A
remote and inaccessible places imaginable. Montagu Island, roughly in the middle of the chain, has shown signs of volcanic unrest and has been observed emitting steam and gas on multiple occasions. These are not dormant mountains. They're active geological systems sitting above a subduction zone
Speaker A
that has been in motion for millions of years. And they are producing heat and pressure and material at depth in ways that affect the entire region, including the seafloor directly beneath and around the South Sandwich Trench. This matters
Speaker A
for exploration in a very direct way. The same tectonic forces that created the trench, the South American plate sliding beneath the Scotia plate, driving the seafloor downward into a deep, narrow valley, are still operating. They did not stop once the
Speaker A
trench reached its current depth. The subduction continues. The crust moves. The pressure builds and releases, and when it releases, it does so as earthquakes, sometimes large ones. The South Sandwich region is one of the more seismically active parts of the Southern
Speaker A
Ocean. Earthquakes here are not rare events that happen once a generation. Magnitude 5 and six events occur regularly throughout the year. Most of them happening offshore and at depth, felt by nobody cuz there is nobody nearby to feel them. The larger events,
Speaker A
though, are harder to ignore. In August of 2021, a magnitude 8.1 earthquake struck the South Sandwich Islands region. One of the largest earthquakes recorded anywhere on Earth in that year and one of the largest ever documented in this part of the ocean. It generated
Speaker A
a tsunami warning across parts of the South Atlantic. The seafloor shifted. The water column above it moved. And somewhere below, at depths approaching 7,000 or 8,000 m, the sediment that had been quietly accumulating for thousands of years was disturbed. That is worth
Speaker A
sitting with for a moment. An earthquake of magnitude 8.1 is not a small tremor.
Speaker A
It releases energy roughly equivalent to about 30 times that of the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption. At the surface, such an event would be catastrophic in any populated area.
Speaker A
At the bottom of a deep ocean trench, the effects are different, but not benign.
Speaker A
Sediment clouds, vast, slowmoving plumes of disturbed material, can rise from the seafloor and hang in the water column for hours or days.
Speaker A
Submarine landslides triggered by seismic shaking along the steep walls of the trench can send cascades of sediment and rock debris down into the deepest parts of the basin. The physical geography of the seafloor can change.
Speaker A
Features that were mapped before such an event may look different afterward. Ridges may partially collapse. Sediment drifts may shift. The flat fine grained floor that Vesco observed during his 2019 dive may have been altered in ways that a future visitor would notice.
Speaker A
Though without a second visit, there is no way to know. For a submersible operating at depth during or after a seismic event, the risks are significant and specific. A sediment cloud reduces visibility to near zero. The cameras see
Speaker A
nothing but a pale swirling merc and navigation becomes extremely difficult. Sampling equipment which typically uses open chambers or mesh collection bags can become clogged with fine particles.
Speaker A
Thrusters can ingest sediment and lose efficiency. The pilot who is already operating in darkness with limited communication to the surface now has to make decisions in conditions that the pre-dive planning did not anticipate.
Speaker A
None of this is insurmountable. Submersible pilots are trained to handle degraded conditions, but it adds another layer of operational difficulty to an already demanding environment. Submarine landslides are a more serious concern.
Speaker A
The walls of the South Sandwich Trench are steep, in some places extremely so, and they are composed of material that has been accumulating and compressing for a very long time. When seismic energy passes through that material, the layers that were stable under normal
Speaker A
conditions can become unstable. A landslide on the wall of a trench can generate a turbidity current, a fastmoving sediment laden flow that travels down the slope and across the floor at speeds that can reach tens of kilome hour. A submersible caught in or
Speaker A
near such a current would face a serious emergency. The force of the flow combined with the sediment load would be enough to damage external equipment, disrupt buoyancy systems, and potentially disorient the pilot entirely. Turbidity currents are not common, but they are real, and the
Speaker A
tectonic setting of the South Sandwich Trench makes them more plausible here than at many other deep ocean sites.
Speaker A
There is also the question of volcanic input. The active volcanoes of the South Sandwich Islands are not only erupting at the surface. Volcanic systems of this kind typically extend to depth and submarine volcanic activity. Eruptions or venting that occurs on the seafloor
Speaker A
rather than above it is a real possibility in this region though it has not been confirmed at Factorian Deep specifically.
Speaker A
The sediment record at the bottom of the trench contains layers of volcanic ash deposited over thousands of years as eruptions from the islands above sent material into the water column and let it drift downward.
Speaker A
Geologists can read those ash layers like pages in a book. Each layer corresponding to a particular eruption event datable by its chemical composition and position in the sediment column. But to read that book, you need sediment cores, which means drilling or
Speaker A
cing equipment that has to be deployed at 7,434 m in an active volcanic and seismic environment from a ship that is itself operating in the southern ocean. The possibility of hydrothermal venting is worth mentioning even though it remains
Speaker A
unconfirmed at this location. Hydrothermal vents, places where sea water percolates down through cracks in the seafloor, is heated by volcanic activity and then rises back up carrying dissolved minerals are found at many subduction zones and spreading centers around the world. The mid-Atlantic
Speaker A
ridge, these Pacific rise, the Mariana Bachark basin, these are all places where venting has been documented.
Speaker A
The South Sandwich back basin, which sits to the west of the trench itself, is geologically the kind of setting where venting might be expected.
Speaker A
Whether any such activity occurs at or near Factorian Deep is not known. The single dive in 2019 did not find obvious evidence of venting. No chimneys, no characteristic shimmering water, no vent specific fauna like tubeworms or vent crabs.
Speaker A
But 4 hours on one part of the seafloor in a trench that stretches nearly a thousand km is not enough to rule anything out. If hydrothermal venting does exist somewhere in the trench system, it would change the scientific
Speaker A
picture considerably. Vent communities are among the most biologically productive environments in the deep ocean, supporting ecosystems that run entirely on chemical energy rather than sunlight. They're also among the most scientifically significant.
Speaker A
Some researchers think that life on Earth may have originated in hydrothermal environments and studying vent communities in geographically isolated locations like the South Sandwich Trench could offer insights into the early history of life itself.
Speaker A
That is a large claim from a small piece of evidence and it should be treated carefully. But it is the kind of possibility that makes the geological instability of this region not just a barrier to exploration, but also a
Speaker A
reason to want to explore it more. The volcanic ash in the sediment presents a more immediate practical problem for the kind of science that researchers would want to do here. When you take a sediment core from the deep ocean,
Speaker A
you're extracting a vertical column of material that represents thousands or millions of years of accumulation. The layers within that core can be dated using various methods. Radioarbon dating for younger material, oxygen isotope ratios for older sequences, and the
Speaker A
chemical fingerprinting of volcanic ash layers which can be matched to known eruptions and used as time markers. This is painstaking careful work and it depends on the sediment being relatively undisturbed and the ash layers being clearly defined. In a region with
Speaker A
frequent seismic activity and ongoing volcanic input, the sediment record can be complicated. Earthquake triggered turbidity currents can mix layers that were originally separate. New ash can obscure old ash. The record becomes harder to read and the interpretations become more uncertain. This does not
Speaker A
make the science impossible, but it makes it slower, more expensive, and more dependent on multiple cores from multiple locations, which again requires repeated visits that have not happened.
Speaker A
What all of this adds up to is a geological environment that is not passive. Most discussions of deep ocean exploration focus on the physical challenges of pressure and darkness and distance, and those are real. But the South Sandwich Trench is also an active
Speaker A
system, one that is generating earthquakes, depositing volcanic material, and potentially rearranging its own seafloor on time scales that matter for human exploration. A future expedition planning a dive to Factorian Deep has to consider not just the weather and the engineering, but the
Speaker A
possibility that the environment at the bottom of the trench may behave in unexpected ways. A magnitude 7 earthquake occurring while a submersible is on the seafloor is not a scenario that a mission planner can simply dismiss.
Speaker A
It is a low probability event on any given day. But in a region where such events happen regularly over years and decades, it is a real operational consideration.
Speaker A
None of the scientists or engineers who work in deep ocean exploration would say that this makes Factorian deep unexplorable.
Speaker A
They would say correctly that risk can be managed. That seismic monitoring systems can provide warning of significant events, that submersibles can be designed with emergency protocols that allow rapid ascent if conditions deteriorate. The limiting factor, the vehicle that made the 2019 dive carries
Speaker A
drop weights that the pilot can release to trigger an immediate ascent, a fail safe that does not depend on thrusters or navigation, just gravity running in reverse.
Speaker A
These are sensible precautions and they work. But they also illustrate the point that operating in this environment requires a level of preparedness and contingency planning that adds cost, complexity, and time to every aspect of the mission.
Speaker A
The geological instability of the South Sandwich Trench is not the largest barrier to exploring Victorian Deep. It is one layer among many, but it is a layer that distinguishes this trench from some other deep ocean sites, and it
Speaker A
is one that future researchers will have to account for carefully. The trench was made by forces that are still operating, and those forces do not pause to accommodate scientific expeditions. They continue quietly and enormously at depths and pressures that no instrument
Speaker A
has yet fully characterized, reshaping a seafloor that almost no human eye has seen. And all of this is before considering the problem of communication, or more precisely, the near total absence of it once a submersible descends below the
Speaker A
surface and begins the long fall toward the bottom of the world. There is a particular kind of loneliness that comes not from being alone in a room, but from being unreachable.
Speaker A
From being in a place where no signal can find you, where no voice can carry, where the ordinary invisible web of communication that connects modern life simply does not exist.
Speaker A
Most of us have experienced a version of this in a small way. A dead zone on a mountain road. A basement where the phone shows no bars. A flight over the ocean where the Wi-Fi drops and you are
Speaker A
briefly mildly cut off. That feeling, mild as it is, gives some faint sense of what it means to operate at the bottom of Factorian Deep. Except there, the silence is not a dead zone. It is the nature of the medium itself.
Speaker A
Water and radio waves do not get along. This is not a technical limitation that engineers have simply failed to solve.
Speaker A
It is a fundamental property of physics. Radio waves or electromagnetic radiation and seawater with its dissolved salts and ions is an excellent conductor of electricity.
Speaker A
Conductors absorb and attenuate electromagnetic waves with remarkable efficiency. The result is that a radio signal that travels thousands of kilometers through open air is completely absorbed within a few meters of entering the ocean. Very low frequency radio waves, the kind used to
Speaker A
communicate with submarines, can penetrate to perhaps a few hundred meters under ideal conditions, but they carry almost no data and they require enormous shorebased transmitter arrays to generate. They're useful for sending a briefcoded message to a submarine at
Speaker A
moderate depth. They're not useful for guiding a research submersible through a complex geological environment at 7,434 m in real time while trying to collect samples and navigate around seafloor features. So the engineers who design deep ocean submersibles use sound
Speaker A
instead. Acoustic modems, devices that convert data into sound pulses and transmit them through the water column, are the standard communication method for deep sea vehicles. Sound travels well in water, much better than it does in air in some respects. And acoustic
Speaker A
communication systems have been in use in oceanography for decades. They work, but they work slowly and with significant limitations that become more pronounced the deeper you go. The data rates achievable with acoustic modems at Hadal depths are by the standards of any
Speaker A
modern communication system extremely low. A good acoustic modem link at depth might achieve a few kilobits per second under favorable conditions. Many links operate at a few hundred bits per second. To put that in perspective, a standard home internet connection today
Speaker A
might deliver data at 100 million bits per second or more. A text message is typically a few thousand bits. A single uncompressed photograph from a scientific camera might be several million bits. Transmitting that photograph acoustically from the bottom
Speaker A
of Factorian Deep to the surface ship would take minutes, not fractions of a second.
Speaker A
And that is assuming the acoustic link is working cleanly with no interference from the seafloor geology, no noise from the ship's own machinery, and no multipath effects. The phenomenon where sound bounces off the seafloor and the surface and arrives at the receiver as a
Speaker A
confused jumble of echoes. At 7,434 m, the travel time for a sound pulse from the seafloor to the surface is roughly 5 seconds each way. That means any exchange of information between the submersible and the support ship involves a 10second roundtrip delay at
Speaker A
minimum. In practice, the delays are often longer. This is not a situation where a surface controller can watch a live video feed and guide the pilot through a maneuver.
Speaker A
The video doesn't exist in real time. The guidance can't happen in real time. What the surface crew receives is fragmentaryary. Occasional status updates, brief acoustic check-ins, whatever compressed data the system manages to push through the the link between exchanges. The pilot, meanwhile,
Speaker A
is making decisions based on what they can see through the viewport and whatever information the submersible onboard instruments provide. Victor Visco, who made the 2019 dive to Factorian Deep, described the experience of deep diving as one of genuine
Speaker A
isolation. Not frightening in his account, but genuinely remote, a kind of solitude that is difficult to convey to someone who has not experienced it. Inside the limiting factors titanium sphere, the pilot sits in a space roughly 1.8 m in
Speaker A
diameter. The viewport in front of them is a cone of acrylic 15 cm thick.
Speaker A
Looking out into water that is at that depth completely and absolutely dark. The submersible's external lights illuminate a small cone of visibility a few meters in each direction depending on the turbidity of the water. Beyond that cone there is nothing. No reference
Speaker A
points, no horizon, no sense of scale. Navigation at the bottom relies on pre-programmed waypoints and the acoustic positioning system, which provides an estimate of the vehicle's location relative to transponders deployed around the site. The estimate is useful, but it is not precise. At
Speaker A
7,434 meters, the accuracy of a USBL ultrashort baseline, acoustic positioning system degrades. The geometry of the acoustic signals, the speed of sound variations in the water column, and the sheer distance involved all introduce uncertainty. A position fix that might be accurate to
Speaker A
within a meter or two at shallow depth may carry an error of tens of meters at Hadal depths. For a pilot trying to navigate to a specific feature on the seafloor or to relocate a lander that was deployed hours earlier, this
Speaker A
matters. The landers themselves, the instrument platforms that are dropped to the seafloor ahead of a dive to collect biological and chemical samples, operate without any real-time communication at all during their deployment. They are dropped over the side of the ship. They
Speaker A
sink for hours under the weight of their ballast. They sit on the seafloor collecting whatever arrives and then they release their ballast weights on a timer or in response to an acoustic command and they float back to the
Speaker A
surface. The surface crew then has to find them which involves both an acoustic transponder on the lander and once it surfaces a radio beacon and a flashing light. In calm conditions recovering a lander is straightforward.
Speaker A
In the southern ocean, in deteriorating weather with a lander that has surfaced a kilometer from its expected position because of currents during its ascent, recovery becomes a difficult and sometimes dangerous operation. All of this means that the information flowing
Speaker A
out of Factorian Deep, even during an active expedition, is thin. A few hours of video footage compressed and stored on board. Acoustic status updates.
Speaker A
Whatever the landers collected in their sample traps, position logs from the submersible internal navigation system.
Speaker A
These are valuable, genuinely valuable, and the 2019 expedition extracted real science from them. But they are not the kind of continuous high bandwidth data stream that researchers would want from a site of this scientific significance.
Speaker A
They are fragments, impressions, a few frames of a picture that is mostly still dark. There is a psychological dimension to this communication blackout that is worth sitting with for a moment. When a submersible pilot is at 7,434 m, they are as unreachable as a person
Speaker A
can be while still being on Earth. The surface ship floating overhead knows roughly where the vehicle is. They can send and receive brief acoustic messages. They can monitor the submersible's transponder ping, but if something goes wrong, a thruster
Speaker A
failure, a seal leak, a navigation error that puts the vehicle against a cliff face, the surface crew cannot intervene.
Speaker A
They cannot see what is happening. They cannot send instructions fast enough to matter. The pilot's only real emergency option is to drop the ballast weights and descend. This works if the vehicle is not physically trapped. It works if
Speaker A
the weights release correctly. It works if the ascent is not interrupted by some geological feature that wasn't visible during the descent. These are all reasonable assumptions in most circumstances, but they are assumptions.
Speaker A
And at 7,434 m in the Southern Ocean, the margin for error is narrow. This is not meant to suggest that deep ocean diving is reckless or that the engineering is inadequate. The limiting factor was designed specifically to be safe at full
Speaker A
ocean depth and it performed exactly as designed during the five deeps expedition. The point is simply that the communication blackout is not a solvable problem in the way that say thruster efficiency or battery life might be solvable. It is a consequence of the
Speaker A
physical environment and it shapes everything about how deep ocean exploration is conducted. Missions must be planned in exhaustive detail before descent because there is no opportunity for real-time guidance from above. Contingencies must be built into the mission plan because there is
Speaker A
no way to adapt on the fly based on surface input. The pilot must be capable of making every significant decision independently in real time. with incomplete information and no external support. That is a demanding set of requirements and it limits who can
Speaker A
conduct these dives and how frequently they can be done safely. There is also the question of what happens to the data once the submersible returns to the surface. The video footage, the sonar logs, the instrument readings, all of it
Speaker A
is stored on board and retrieved after the dive. There is no possibility of streaming data to a shore-based research team during the mission. Scientists who want to be involved in real-time analysis of what the submersible is observing simply cannot be. They receive
Speaker A
the data after the fact, sometimes days or weeks later once the ship has returned to port and the drives have been offloaded. This is a meaningful limitation for a research program. Part of what makes modern field science productive is the ability to adapt, to
Speaker A
notice something unexpected in the data and immediately redirect resources toward it. To ask a follow-up question while the equipment is still in position. At Factorian Deep, that kind of responsive science is not possible.
Speaker A
The expedition goes, the data comes back, and the analysis happens far away and long after the moment of observation has passed. Some researchers are working on approaches that might partially address this. Fiber optic tethers, which can carry enormous amounts of data at
Speaker A
the speed of light, have been used with some deep ocean instruments. The cabled ocean observatories off the coasts of Canada and the United States, for example, use fiber optic cables to transmit continuous realtime data from seafloor instruments to shore. But a
Speaker A
fiber optic tether connecting a free diving submersible to a surface ship at 7,434 m would need to be nearly 8 km long. It would need to be managed carefully to avoid tangling or snagging and it would fundamentally change the dynamics of how
Speaker A
the submersible moves. Tethered vehicles work well for some applications, but they are not well suited to the kind of exploratory diving that Factorian Deep requires, where the pilot needs to maneuver freely across a seafloor that has never been mapped in detail.
Speaker A
Acoustic communication technology is improving. Newer modem systems can achieve higher data rates than those available even a decade ago. And researchers are developing better signal processing techniques that can extract cleaner data from noisy acoustic channels. Some experimental systems have
Speaker A
demonstrated data rates of tens of kilobits per second at moderate depths. Whether these improvements will translate meaningfully to huddle depths in the difficult acoustic environment of an active subduction zone is an open question. The physics of sound propagation in the deep ocean is
Speaker A
complex, and the South Sandwich Trench with its seismic activity and its unusual water column properties may present acoustic challenges that are harder to overcome than those in quieter deep ocean environments. For now, the communication blackout at Factorian Deep
Speaker A
remains one of the more fundamental constraints on what exploration there is possible. It means that every dive is, in a real sense, a solo mission. The pilot descends with a plan, executes that plan as best they can given what
Speaker A
they find, and returns with whatever data the instruments collected. The surface crew waits, monitors the acoustic transponder, and hopes. This is not a failure of technology or a failure of planning. It is simply the reality of operating at a depth where the ordinary
Speaker A
tools of modern communication do not function in a medium that has its own rules about what can pass through it and what cannot. The ocean keeps its silence, and the submersible somewhere in the dark below navigates by sound and
Speaker A
guesswork and the careful preparation of people who knew before the dive began that once the hatch closed and the vehicle slipped beneath the surface, they were on their own.
Speaker A
Communication is one form of invisibility, but there is another kind. the invisibility of the data itself or more precisely the invisibility that comes from not yet knowing the shape of the place you are trying to explore.
Speaker A
Because even the basic geography of Factorian Deep, the contours of its walls, the features of its floor, the ridges and valleys that may exist nearby remains in large part unmapped.
Speaker A
There is a particular kind of not knowing that is different from simply lacking information. It is the kind where you do not yet know what questions to ask because you have not seen enough of the thing to know what is missing.
Speaker A
That is roughly where we stand with the seafloor around Factorian Deep. We have a depth. We have a name. We have a few hours of camera footage and some biological samples in jars. But the actual shape of the place, its walls,
Speaker A
its floor, its surrounding terrain exists mostly as a rough sketch, not a map. To understand why that matters, it helps to step back and think about ocean mapping in general because the situation is stranger than most people realize. If
Speaker A
you ask someone on the street whether we have mapped the ocean floor, they would probably say yes or at least assume that we have. We have satellites, we have sonar, we have been sailing these waters for centuries. Surely someone has drawn
Speaker A
the bottom. And the answer is sort of. We have picture of the ocean floor. But the resolution of that picture across most of the ocean is much lower than people tend to imagine. The global ocean floor maps that most people have seen,
Speaker A
the ones that show the mid ocean ridges, the trenches, the abyssal plains in satisfying detail, are largely derived from satellite alimemetry. What this means in practice is that satellites measure tiny variations in the height of the sea surface. And from those
Speaker A
variations, scientists infer the shape of the seafloor below. The logic is that large underwater features, mountain ranges trenches ridges exert gravitational pull on the water above them, causing the sea surface to bulge slightly over dense formations and dip
Speaker A
slightly over depressions. By measuring these surface variations with extraordinary precision, you can reconstruct a rough picture of what lies beneath. It is genuinely clever and it works reasonably well at large scales.
Speaker A
The problem is resolution. Satellite derived bethimemetry as this technique is called can reliably detect features that are roughly a kilometer or more across. Anything smaller than that tends to get lost in the noise. For some purposes, understanding the broad
Speaker A
architecture of the ocean floor, tracking the general path of a mid ocean ridge, this is adequate for the purposes of actually exploring a specific trench, planning a submersible dive, understanding the local terrain, or looking for features that might harbor
Speaker A
unusual biology or geology. It is far too coarse. A feature the size of a football stadium would be invisible in satelliterived beimemetry. A ridge 50 meters tall would not appear. A secondary depression adjacent to the main trench would likely be missed
Speaker A
entirely. The only way to get genuinely useful resolution is to put a ship directly over the area and use multi-beam sonar, a system that sends out a fan of acoustic pulses from the hull of the ship and listens for the
Speaker A
return signals, building up a detailed picture of the seafloor one swath at a time as the ship moves forward. Good multi-beam systems operating in deep water can achieve resolutions of roughly 50 to 100 m per pixel, sometimes better
Speaker A
in shallower water. That is the difference between a blurry photograph and one where you can actually see what you are looking at. The Kongsburg M124, which the DSSV pressure drop used during the five deeps expedition, is one of the
Speaker A
most capable multi-beam systems available for deep water work. It is designed specifically for full ocean depth surveys and it performed well during the expedition, producing the most detailed maps of the Factorian deep area that currently exists.
Speaker A
The survey that preceded Vesco's dive in February 2019 gave the team enough information to identify the deepest point, plan the descent route, and understand the general layout of the trench floor. That was exactly what they needed for the dive. But a research ship
Speaker A
conducting a multi-beam survey covers a finite area in a finite amount of time. The pressure drop was not on an open-ended scientific mapping cruise. It was executing a specific mission which was to reach the deepest point of the
Speaker A
southern ocean and the sonar survey was conducted in service of that goal. The coverage extended over the area needed for the dive and not much further.
Speaker A
The broader region of the South Sandwich Trench, a structure nearly a thousand km long, remains largely surveyed only at satellite resolution, which is to say not really surveyed at all, at least not in any way that would be useful for
Speaker A
detailed scientific work. This is not unusual. It reflects a global pattern. As of the most recent estimates available in the early 2020s, less than a quarter of the global ocean floor has been mapped at a resolution better than
Speaker A
100 m per pixel. The number varies depending on how you count and what threshold you use, but the broad picture is consistent. The vast majority of the ocean floor has never been directly surveyed by a shipmounted sonar system.
Speaker A
Most of what we know about the shape of the seafloor comes from satellite inference, which tells us roughly where things are, but not what they actually look like up close.
Speaker A
The seabed 2030 project is the most ambitious effort to change this. It is a collaboration between the General Baometric Chart of the Oceans known as GEBCO and the Nippon Foundation of Japan.
Speaker A
Launched in 2017 with the stated goal of producing a complete highresolution map of the entire ocean floor by the year 2030. It is a genuinely impressive undertaking and real progress has been made. Research ships from dozens of countries have contributed data.
Speaker A
Commercial vessels have been equipped with sonar systems that collect baometric data during normal operations.
Speaker A
Crowdsourced contributions from fishing fleets and cargo ships have added coverage in areas that dedicated research vessels rarely visit. Even with all of that, the Southern Ocean remains one of the least covered regions in the project's data set. The reasons are not
Speaker A
hard to identify. The Southern Ocean is remote. The weather makes sustained survey operations difficult and expensive. There are fewer ships operating in those waters than in, say, the North Atlantic or the Western Pacific. The routes that commercial vessels take do not pass over the South
Speaker A
Sandwich Trench because there is no reason for a cargo ship to go there. and dedicated scientific survey cruises to the region are rare because funding is limited and the southern ocean competes with many other priorities for the attention of oceanographic institutions.
Speaker A
The result is that even the basic geography of the area around Factorian Deep is not well understood. The main trench is mapped well enough to know where the deepest point is. But the walls of the trench, how steep they are,
Speaker A
whether there are ledges or overhangs, what the texture of the rock looks like, are known only from the limited footage captured during a single dive. The surrounding seafloor, which in other trenches has revealed unexpected features like secondary basins, volcanic
Speaker A
mounds, and chemosynthetic vent communities, has not been surveyed at the resolution needed to know what is there. There could be significant geological features within a few kilometers of Factorian Deep that no instrument has ever detected simply because no ship has passed over them
Speaker A
with the right equipment. This matters for exploration planning in a practical way. Before you send a submersible to a specific location, you want to know what the terrain looks like. You want to understand the slope of the descent
Speaker A
path, the nature of the seafloor where the vehicle will land, whether there are obstacles that might interfere with navigation. The five deeps team had enough information to execute their dive safely. But a more ambitious scientific program, one involving multiple dives to
Speaker A
different parts of the trench or an attempt to survey the wall systematically, would require much more detailed prior mapping than currently exists. Planning a dive into terrain you have not mapped is a bit like trying to navigate a city using only a map that
Speaker A
shows the major highways. You know roughly where you are going, but the details that matter at street level are invisible. There is also a subtler issue which is that incomplete mapping means incomplete understanding of what is even worth exploring. In other deep ocean
Speaker A
environments, detailed baimetric surveys have revealed features that nobody anticipated. hydrothermal vent fields that were not predicted by the surrounding geology, seamounts that turned out to host unusual biological communities, sediment deposits that provided unexpected records of past climate events. These discoveries
Speaker A
happened because someone mapped the area carefully enough to see that something interesting was there and then went to look at it. At Factorian Deep, we do not have that foundation. We cannot identify the most scientifically interesting targets because we have not looked
Speaker A
carefully enough at the train to know where those targets might be. The multi-beam sonar data from the five deeps expedition was made available to the scientific community which is genuinely useful. Researchers can work with it, publish analyses based on it
Speaker A
and use it to inform future expedition planning. but it covers a limited area and the resolution while good by the standards of what was available before 2019 is not as fine as what a dedicated extended survey cruise could produce.
Speaker A
The Kongsburg EM124 is an excellent instrument, but it was being operated in support of a dive mission, not as the primary purpose of the expedition. A survey designed from the ground up to produce the most detailed possible map of the South
Speaker A
Sandwich Trench would look different, slower, more methodical with overlapping swaths to improve coverage and repeated passes over areas of particular interest. What would it actually take to produce that kind of map? A research vessel equipped with a highquality
Speaker A
multi-beam system operating in the South Sandwich Trench region for several weeks could make a meaningful difference. The ship would need to be capable of operating in southern ocean conditions which limits the options. Not every research vessel is built for those
Speaker A
seastates. It would need to be provisioned for an extended cruise far from any port and it would need funding which brings its own complications.
Speaker A
A dedicated baimetric survey of a remote trench in the southern ocean is not the kind of project that tends to attract large grants easily because the immediate scientific return is difficult to quantify in advance. You're mapping a place to find out what is worth
Speaker A
studying, which is a reasonable scientific priority, but a harder cell than a project with a specific hypothesis and a clear predicted outcome. Some of the gap may be filled over time by vessels that pass through the region for other purposes. The
Speaker A
southern ocean sees scientific traffic related to Antarctic research, fisheries monitoring, and climate studies. And some of those ships carry multi-beam systems that collect baimetric data as a matter of routine. If that data is submitted to seabed 2030, it gradually
Speaker A
builds up coverage. But the South Sandwich Trench is not on the route between anywhere and anywhere else. So it is unlikely to benefit much from incidental coverage. Getting good maps of this specific area will require someone to go there specifically for
Speaker A
that purpose. Until that happens, Factorian Deep remains a place whose shape we know only an outline. We know it is deep. We know roughly where the deepest point is. We know a little about the immediate vicinity of that point from the footage
Speaker A
and data collected during a few hours in February 2019. But the broader landscape, the full extent of the trench, the features of its walls, the terrain of the surrounding abyssal plane is for practical purposes unknown. It is a
Speaker A
place that exists on our maps as a name and a number, surrounded by regions that are, in the most literal sense, blank.
Speaker A
There is something quietly disorienting about that if you sit with it for a moment. We are talking about a feature on our own planet. A trench nearly a thousand km long in an ocean that covers a significant portion of the Earth's
Speaker A
surface. And we do not know what most of it looks like. Not in the way that we could look at a satellite image of a mountain range and say, "Yes, there is the ridge, there is the valley, there is
Speaker A
the glacier. We have a rough gravity derived sketch and a few hours of camera footage. That is the state of our knowledge of one of the deepest places on Earth. It is not a failure exactly.
Speaker A
It reflects the genuine difficulty of doing science in an environment that does not cooperate. The Southern Ocean is hard to reach, hard to work in, and hard to fund expeditions to. The technology for deep ocean mapping is improving, but it is expensive to
Speaker A
operate and requires ships that can handle extreme conditions. Progress is being made slowly and incrementally by projects like Seabed 2030 and by research cruises that manage to include the region in their plans. But the gap between what we know and what we would
Speaker A
need to know to truly explore this place is large and closing it will take time and sustained effort that has not yet materialized.
Speaker A
We do not fully know the shape of the place we are trying to explore. And not knowing the shape of the place means not knowing what questions to ask about it, which is a kind of scientific silence that compounds everything else. The
Speaker A
pressure, the distance, the weather, the engineering cost, the communication limits, all of those are real obstacles.
Speaker A
But this one is quieter and perhaps less obvious. We are in a meaningful sense still finding out where Factorian Deep actually is. Which makes the question of what science most wants to know about it all the more interesting because the
Speaker A
answers when they eventually come may look quite different from anything we currently expect. So what does science actually want from Factorian Deep? Not in a vague general sense, not just more knowledge or a better understanding of the ocean, but specifically
Speaker A
what are the concrete questions that researchers would bring to this place if they could? And why does this particular trench matter in ways that other deep sites might not? The organisms that live below 6,000 m have a name. They are
Speaker A
called hadal fauna from Hades, the underworld, the place below. It is a fitting name, not because it is dramatic, but because it captures something true about the geography. The Hadal zone is not simply a continuation of the deep sea. It is a distinct
Speaker A
environment, one defined by the combination of extreme pressure, near freezing temperatures, and the physical structure of the trench itself. a narrow elongated basin that channels organic material downward and concentrates it in ways that the surrounding abyssal plane does not.
Speaker A
Animals living in this zone have adapted to conditions that would kill almost everything else on Earth. And those adaptations are genuinely interesting from a biological standpoint, not just as curiosities, but as evidence of what life is capable of. The South Sandwich
Speaker A
Trench is geographically isolated in a way that most other Hadal environments are not. The Marana Trench is in the Western Pacific, part of a broader system of deep trenches that arc across that ocean basin. The Kerdc Trench is in
Speaker A
the southwest Pacific, the Tonga Trench nearby. These places are separated by distance, but they exist within the same general ocean system. And there are questions, still being debated, about whether had species can move between them, carried by currents or by their
Speaker A
own dispersal over geological time. The South Sandwich Trench sits in the Southern Ocean, separated from the Pacific trenches by vast distances and from the Atlantic trenches by the geography of the mid ocean ridge system.
Speaker A
If there is a Hadal community living in the South Sandwich Trench, it has been living there in relative isolation for a very long time. And that raises a question that biologists find genuinely compelling. Did it evolve independently?
Speaker A
The amphopods collected during the 2019 dive offer a partial answer, but only partial. Amphipods, small shrimplike crustations, are among the most common hadal organisms. They are found in virtually every deep trench that has been sampled, often in large numbers,
Speaker A
and they have been studied extensively in places like the Mariana and Kerdc trenches. Some of the specimens collected at Factorian Deep were sent for analysis, and the early indications were that at least some of them may represent species not previously
Speaker A
described. Whether they are truly unique to this trench or whether they belong to species with a wider distribution that simply hadn't been sampled here before requires more specimens, more analysis, and more dives.
Speaker A
A single collection event from a single location within the trench is not enough to draw conclusions about the biological community as a whole. The trench is nearly a thousand km long. The landers were deployed in one area. The seafloor
Speaker A
of the rest of the trench remains biologically speaking a complete unknown. Beyond the question of species identity, there is the question of community structure. In the Mariana Trench, researchers have found that the biological community changes with depth.
Speaker A
Different species dominate at different pressure levels and the deepest zones have their own distinct assemblages.
Speaker A
The same pattern may or may not hold in the South Sandwich Trench. It might follow a similar pattern because the physical conditions are similar or it might not because the evolutionary history and the local food supply are different.
Speaker A
The only way to find out is to sample at multiple depths along the trench which requires multiple deployments of landers or submersibles at different locations.
Speaker A
Something that has not happened here. Then there is the question of the microbial community which is in some ways more scientifically consequential than the larger organisms even if it is less visually striking. The sediment at the bottom of deep trenches is densely
Speaker A
populated with bacteria and archa single-sellled organisms that process organic material cycle nutrients and in some cases produce compounds with unusual biochemical properties.
Speaker A
At other Hadal sites, microbiologists have found organisms with novel enzymes, novel metabolic pathways, and novel adaptations to pressure that have no equivalent in organisms living at shallower depths. Some of these discoveries have had practical applications in biotechnology because
Speaker A
enzymes that function under extreme pressure and near freezing temperatures have properties that are useful in certain industrial and pharmaceutical processes. The microbial community at Factorian Deep is, as far as published science is concerned, almost entirely unknown.
Speaker A
The sediment samples collected in 2019 were analyzed for some purposes, but a thorough microbiological survey of the kind that would characterize the full diversity of the community has not been done. It would require sediment cores, long cylinders of sediment extracted
Speaker A
from the seafloor, taken at multiple locations and depths within the sediment column, then analyzed using modern genomic sequencing methods. The technology for doing this exists. The samples from factorian deep do not.
Speaker A
Carbon cycling is another area where the science is genuinely incomplete. Deep ocean trenches are not passive geological features. They're active participants in the global carbon cycle.
Speaker A
Organic material produced in the sunlit surface ocean sinks through the water column and a portion of it ends up in the sediment at the bottom of trenches where it can be sequested for very long time scales. The trench acts as a kind
Speaker A
of carbon trap pulling material down and holding it. How much carbon ends up at factorian deep, how quickly it accumulates, and how efficiently the local biological community processes it.
Speaker A
These are questions that matter for climate science, not just for oceanography. The Southern Ocean as a whole absorbs a disproportionate share of the CO2 that humans are adding to the atmosphere. Estimates suggest around 40% of the ocean's total CO2 uptake happens
Speaker A
in the Southern Ocean. The deep trench at the bottom of that ocean is part of that system. Understanding how it functions could refine climate models in ways that are practically useful, not just academically interesting.
Speaker A
But that understanding requires data, sediment cores, water column samples, measurements of biological activity that have not been collected here.
Speaker A
The geological record locked in the sediment is another thread that researchers would want to pull. The South Sandwich Islands, which sit above the subduction zone that created this trench, are among the most volcanically active island chains on Earth. Eruptions
Speaker A
from those islands have been depositing ash into the ocean for millions of years, and layers of that ash are preserved in the sediment at the bottom of the trench. Each ash layer is a geological timestamp, a record of a
Speaker A
specific eruption with a chemical signature that can be matched to its source volcano and dated using isotopic methods. A sediment core from Factorian Deep would contain a stratographic record of volcanic activity in the South Sandwich Islands going back potentially
Speaker A
millions of years. preserved in a sequence that has been accumulating undisturbed in the cold, dark, pressure stable environment of the deep trench.
Speaker A
It would also contain records of other events, changes in ocean temperature recorded in the chemistry of foreign miniferous shells, evidence of past seismic events in the form of disturbed sediment layers, and possibly records of changes in ocean circulation that
Speaker A
affected the southern ocean over geological time scales. A single well-coled sediment core from this location could be scientifically valuable in multiple disciplines simultaneously.
Speaker A
Volcanology paleoclimatology sedimentology, and biology would all find material to work within the same core. The barrier is not the science.
Speaker A
The science is clear about what it wants. The barrier is getting the equipment to the location and deploying it successfully in conditions that do not cooperate.
Speaker A
The connectivity question, whether Hadal species can travel between isolated trenches, is one that the entire field of Hadal biology is working on. And Factorian Deep is a piece of that puzzle that is currently missing. If the amphipods at Factorian Deep turn out to
Speaker A
be closely related to amphipods at the Keradec or South Sandwich trenches, that would suggest a level of connectivity that current models do not fully account for. If they turn out to be genuinely distinct, that would suggest that Hadal
Speaker A
communities are more isolated than we thought, which has implications for how we think about speciation and evolution in the deep ocean more broadly. The answer matters not just for understanding this particular trench, but for understanding how life distributes itself across the deep ocean
Speaker A
as a whole. And right now, the answer is not known because the sampling from Factorian Deep is too sparse to support a firm conclusion. Either way, there is also the question of what the trench looks like beyond the single dive
Speaker A
location. Vesco descended to the deepest confirmed point, which is what the expedition was designed to do. The landers were deployed in the same general area, but the South Sandwich trench is nearly a thousand km long, and the biology, geology, and chemistry of a
Speaker A
trench that size are not uniform along its length. The conditions near the northern end of the trench may differ from those near the southern end. The sediment composition may vary. The species assemblage may shift. There may be areas of the trench wall where
Speaker A
hydrothermal activity is occurring. Not confirmed, but not ruled out either given the tectonic setting. Hydrothermal vents support their own distinct communities independent of the food supply from the surface. And if they exist anywhere along the South Sandwich Trench, they would be scientifically
Speaker A
significant. But finding them requires surveying the trench systematically, not just visiting the deepest point once. Each of these questions, the biology, the carbon cycling, the microbiology, the geological record, the connectivity, the possible hydrothermal activity, requires not a single expedition, but a sustained
Speaker A
research program. multiple cruises over multiple years with different instruments and different scientific objectives building on each other's findings. That is how science works in places that can be reached relatively easily. In the southern ocean, where every expedition is expensive and
Speaker A
logistically complex, that kind of sustained program is much harder to build. The scientific community knows what it wants to learn. The obstacles are not intellectual. They are practical, logistical, and financial.
Speaker A
And all of those obstacles compound each other in ways that make the gap between the questions and the answers feel very wide.
Speaker A
What is perhaps most striking when you lay all of this out is the contrast between the richness of the scientific questions and the thinness of the data.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep is not a place that researchers have studied and found to be uninteresting.
Speaker A
It is a place that researchers have barely studied at all, and what little has been found suggests that it is genuinely interesting in multiple directions at once. The few organisms collected in 2019 hint at a biological community that may be unlike anything
Speaker A
described elsewhere. The sediment barely sampled holds a geological archive that could span millions of years. The microbial community is essentially a blank page. The full extent of the trench remains unmapped in a field where data is hard to come by. This is an
Speaker A
unusual situation. Not a place that has been studied and exhausted, but a place that has been barely touched and where almost every measurement that could be made would be new information.
Speaker A
That is what makes the scientific case for Factorian Deep so straightforward to articulate and so frustrating to act on.
Speaker A
The questions are clear. The value of the answers is clear. The methods needed to obtain those answers are known and in principle available.
Speaker A
What is missing is the combination of funding, logistical support, and institutional will to mount the kind of sustained research program that this place deserves.
Speaker A
A single dive in 2019 opened a door. What lies behind that door is still almost entirely unknown. And the science is waiting, patient in the way that only science can be, for the resources and the opportunity to go and look. Which
Speaker A
raises an uncomfortable question, one that is not really about science at all, but about priorities and money. Because the science knows what it wants. The harder problem is whether anyone with the means to support it is willing to do
Speaker A
so. That uncomfortable question about priorities and money is not a new one in ocean science.
Speaker A
Researchers have been asking some version of it for decades. But when you apply it specifically to Factorian Deep, the answers become both clearer and more frustrating because the situation here is unusually stark.
Speaker A
The Five Deeps expedition was not a government program. It was not a collaborative international research initiative. It was funded by one person.
Speaker A
Victor Vesco, a former naval officer turned private equity investor who had already climbed the seven summits and wanted a new kind of challenge. He spent approximately $48 million on the expedition across its full scope. And that money came from his personal
Speaker A
resources, not from any public science budget. That is the reason Factorian Deep was visited at all. And it is also in a quiet way part of the problem.
Speaker A
Private funding can do remarkable things. The Five Deeps expedition proved that. It reached all five deepest ocean points, produced genuine scientific data, confirmed depths that had never been precisely measured, and named a place that had not previously had a name
Speaker A
on a map. That is a significant accomplishment by any measure. But private expeditions are designed around the goals of their funders, and their funders are not usually running multi-year research programs. They are pursuing an objective. Once the objective is achieved, the expedition
Speaker A
ends. The ship goes home. The submersible gets put on its next project. The scientists who participated go back to their institutions and write up what they found. And the place that was visited, Factorian Deep in this case, returns to its previous state of
Speaker A
almost complete inaccessibility with no follow-up planned, no sustained monitoring, and no institutional home responsible for continuing the work. No government agency has mounted a dedicated expedition to Factorian Deep since 2019.
Speaker A
That is worth sitting with for a moment. 5 years have passed since the only human visit to the deepest point of the southern ocean. And in that time, no publicly funded research program has gone back. The National Oceanic and
Speaker A
Atmospheric Administration, Noah, is the United States agency most directly responsible for ocean research, and its deep sea science budget is genuinely small relative to the scale of the ocean. Noah's total budget in recent years has been in the range of 6 to7
Speaker A
billion annually. But the portion directed specifically toward deep sea research below a th000 m is a fraction of that competing with weather satellites, fisheries management, coastal monitoring, and dozens of other programs. Deep trenches in remote ocean basins are not at the top of that list.
Speaker A
The National Science Foundation funds a significant amount of American ocean research through its polar programs and ocean sciences division. But those polar programs are focused heavily on Antarctica itself. The continent, the ice sheet, the atmospheric science above it. The seafloor of the southern ocean
Speaker A
is somewhat adjacent to that mission, but not central to it. A research cruise to the South Sandwich Trench would need to compete for funding through the regular grant process, which is a long and uncertain path. A scientist who
Speaker A
wanted to lead such an expedition would need to write a proposal, survive peer review, secure ship time, arrange for the right equipment, and then actually execute the cruise. A process that typically takes several years from idea to water, assuming the proposal is
Speaker A
funded at all, which many are not. Ship time alone is a significant constraint. Research vessels capable of operating in the southern ocean are not abundant and they are heavily scheduled. The few ships that could support a deep ocean
Speaker A
expedition to the South Sandwich Trench. Vessels with dynamic positioning, deep water winches, and the ability to handle the seastates common in that region are in demand from multiple scientific communities. Scheduling a dedicated cruise to Factorian Deep means competing
Speaker A
with Antarctic biology programs, physical oceanography cruises, geological surveys, and all the other scientific work that depends on the same limited pool of capable ships. Even if the funding was secured, finding the ship time in the right season with the
Speaker A
right equipment might take additional years. The argument that is often made in public discussions about ocean exploration, the one about how we know more about the surface of Mars than about the deep ocean, is sometimes dismissed as a rhetorical
Speaker A
oversimplification, and it is to some extent. The comparison is not quite apples to apples. Mars is studied primarily from orbit using instruments that can cover enormous areas without the physical challenges of reaching the surface. The deep ocean cannot be studied from orbit in the same
Speaker A
way. But the underlying point about funding disparity is real. NASA's annual budget is in the range of $25 billion.
Speaker A
The total global investment in deep ocean research, not just Noah, but all nations combined is a small fraction of that. The Mars Science Laboratory mission alone, which delivered the Curiosity rover to Mars in 2012, cost approximately 2.5 billion.
Speaker A
For that same amount of money, you could fund a very substantial sustained research program at Factorian Deep, including multiple expeditions, purpose-built landers, and years of sample analysis.
Speaker A
That program does not exist. There is a reasonable counterargument here and it is worth acknowledging. Space exploration generates public enthusiasm, technological spin-offs, and geopolitical significance in ways that a remote ocean trench does not.
Speaker A
Governments fund things that capture public imagination and serve national interests. And a crude mission to Mars does both more visibly than a lander deployment in the South Sandwich Trench.
Speaker A
That is not an irrational calculation. Even if it produces an outcome that is frustrating from a scientific perspective, the public does not lie awake thinking about Factorian Deep. Most people, as noted earlier, have never heard of it.
Speaker A
Making the case for sustained investment in a place that almost no one knows about in one of the most difficult to reach corners of the planet is genuinely hard. Not because the science is weak, but because the competition for
Speaker A
attention and resources is intense. There is also a particular irony in the Southern Ocean situation that deserves to be said plainly.
Speaker A
The Southern Ocean is not a scientific backwater. It is one of the most important ocean systems on Earth in terms of its role in global climate. The Southern Ocean absorbs roughly 40% of the carbon dioxide that human activity
Speaker A
releases into the atmosphere each year. It is a critical driver of global ocean circulation, influencing temperatures and nutrient distribution across the entire planet. The Antarctic circumpolar current, which flows through the Southern Ocean, is the largest ocean current on Earth. Researchers who study
Speaker A
climate change consider the Southern Ocean to be one of the key variables in understanding how the planet's heat and carbon budgets will evolve over the coming decades. And yet, the deepest point of this ocean, a place that sits
Speaker A
at the bottom of one of the most climatically significant bodies of water on Earth, has been visited once briefly by a privately funded expedition and has not been systematically studied since.
Speaker A
The carbon cycling question is particularly pointed in this context. Deep trenches act as carbon sinks, accumulating organic material that falls from the surface and is buried in the sediment.
Speaker A
Understanding how efficiently Factorian Deep captures and stores carbon, how much organic material makes it to the bottom, how quickly it is processed by microbial communities, how long it remains sequestered is directly relevant to understanding the Southern Ocean's role in the global carbon cycle. That is
Speaker A
not a niche scientific question. It connects to the same climate questions that drive enormous amounts of research funding in other areas. But the connection between deep trench carbon cycling and global climate models is not yet well established enough to
Speaker A
consistently attract the kind of funding that climate research commands. The link exists and researchers who work in this area know it exists. But translating that into sustained research investment at a specific remote trench is a slow process.
Speaker A
International collaboration is often suggested as the path forward for expensive, logistically difficult research programs. And in principle, it makes sense. Share the costs, share the ship time, share the expertise. Several countries have active deep ocean research programs. Japan's Jamstack,
Speaker A
which operates the Shina Kai 6,500 submersible. Germany's Geomar, the United Kingdom's National Oceanography Center, a multinational expedition to Factorian Deep, combining resources and scientific objectives from multiple institutions would be more feasible than any single country attempting it alone.
Speaker A
But international collaborations take time to build. They require coordination across different funding agencies, different academic calendars, different institutional priorities, and different national science policies. They are not impossible. They happen regularly in Antarctic research, for example. But they do not happen quickly, and they
Speaker A
require sustained diplomatic and scientific effort to organize. The academic grant system, which funds most of the world's basic ocean research, is also not well suited to the kind of high-risk high-cost logistically extreme expeditions that Factorian Deep requires.
Speaker A
Grants are typically awarded for defined projects with clear objectives and reasonable expectations of success. An expedition to the South Sandwich Trench involves so many variables. weather windows, equipment performance, sea state, the possibility of mechanical failure that proposing it through a
Speaker A
standard grant mechanism is difficult. The risk profile is high, the timeline is uncertain, and the outcomes, while scientifically valuable are hard to guarantee in the language that grant applications require. This is a structural problem in how ocean science
Speaker A
is funded and it affects not just Factorian deep but many of the most challenging research environments on Earth.
Speaker A
What has partially filled this gap in addition to private expeditions like the five deeps is the growing use of autonomous and semiautonomous technology that can reduce the cost and risk of deep ocean work. Landers in particular are relatively affordable compared to
Speaker A
crude submersible operations. A well-designed Hadal lander can be built for a fraction of the cost of a man dive deployed from a ship that does not need to be a specialized research vessel and left on the seafloor for days or weeks
Speaker A
collecting data before releasing its ballast and returning to the surface. Several institutions have used landers extensively in deep trench research. The Hadal Ecosystem Studies Project or Hades funded by the National Science Foundation deployed landers in the Marana Trench and other Pacific trenches
Speaker A
over multiple years producing significant biological and chemical data. A similar program at Factorian Deep would be scientifically valuable and relative to crude submersible operations more achievable.
Speaker A
But it still requires ship time in the Southern Ocean, which brings all the logistical challenges back into play.
Speaker A
The situation, when you look at it honestly, is one where the obstacles are not individually insurmountable, but collectively very heavy. No single barrier, not the weather, not the funding, not the ship availability, not the engineering, would be enough on its
Speaker A
own to prevent research at Factorian Deep. But all of them together compounding and reinforcing each other create a situation where the easiest path is always to go somewhere else. To study a trench that is closer, calmer, more accessible, or that already has an
Speaker A
established research program attached to it. The Mariana Trench has all of those advantages. The Kerdc Trench in the Southwest Pacific has a growing body of research.
Speaker A
Even the Puerto Rico trench in the Atlantic, the deepest point of that ocean, is more accessible than the South Sandwich Trench by virtue of simply being in a less hostile ocean.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep keeps losing the comparison, not because it is less interesting, but because it is harder, and private expeditions, for all their value, cannot substitute for the kind of sustained institutional commitment that serious science requires. A privately funded expedition can make a first
Speaker A
descent, confirm a depth, collect initial samples, and put a location on the map. Victor Visco's expedition did all of those things and did them well.
Speaker A
But a private expedition cannot run a 10-year monitoring program. It cannot build the cumulative data set that allows researchers to detect change over time. It cannot train generations of graduate students in the specific challenges of Southern Ocean deep sea
Speaker A
research. It cannot establish the kind of institutional knowledge, the logistical expertise, the equipment familiarity, the regional relationships that makes repeated expeditions progressively more efficient and productive. Those things require institutions and institutions require sustained funding and sustained funding requires someone to decide that this
Speaker A
place is worth the ongoing investment. That decision has not yet been made. And until it is, Factorian Deep will continue to exist in a kind of scientific limbo. Known, named, confirmed, briefly visited, and genuinely significant, but not yet the
Speaker A
subject of the research program it warrants. The gap between what we know and what we could know is not closing at any meaningful pace. The organisms collected in 2019 have been analyzed and some of that work has been published. The sonar
Speaker A
data from the five deeps mapping has been incorporated into global bometric databases. The depth record stands but the place itself remains almost entirely unexplored waiting for the combination of resources, will and logistical good fortune that would allow science to go
Speaker A
back and stay long enough to actually learn something. technology at least is moving in a direction that might eventually make that easier and that is where the next part of this story begins to open up. There is a particular kind
Speaker A
of optimism that lives inside engineering. It is not the loud confident kind, not the optimism of a press release or a funding announcement.
Speaker A
It is quieter than that. It is the kind of optimism that shows up in a design document at 2 in the morning where someone has written out a list of constraints and then very carefully begun working around them one by one.
Speaker A
The engineers and oceanographers who think about places like Factorian Deep tend to carry that kind of optimism.
Speaker A
They know the obstacles. They have counted them and they are building around them anyway slowly with the particular patience that difficult problems require.
Speaker A
The most significant shift happening in deep ocean exploration right now is not in crude submersibles.
Speaker A
It is in autonomous systems, vehicles and instruments that can operate without a human pilot, without a tether, and in some cases without realtime communication with a surface ship at all. Autonomous underwater vehicles, commonly called AUVs, have been part of
Speaker A
oceanographic research for decades, but their capabilities have expanded considerably in recent years. The basic concept is straightforward. A vehicle is programmed with a mission.
Speaker A
Before it is deployed, it executes that mission on its own and it returns to the surface when finished. No pilot needed.
Speaker A
No life support, no pressure hull thick enough to protect a human body. That last point matters enormously. The engineering cost of making a vehicle safe for a human at 7,434 m is a large part of what makes crude
Speaker A
submersible so expensive and so rare. Remove the human and the problem changes shape. The vehicle still needs to withstand the pressure, still needs reliable thrusters and navigation systems, still needs cameras and sampling equipment rated for the environment.
Speaker A
But it does not need a titanium sphere 90 mm thick. It does not need life support or an emergency ascent protocol or the psychological infrastructure of keeping a pilot calm and functional for hours in a space smaller than a closet.
Speaker A
The engineering requirements are still demanding, but they are a different kind of demanding and in many ways a more tractable one. The challenge historically has been depth rating. Most AUVs in regular scientific use are rated to around 6,000 m, which covers a large
Speaker A
portion of the ocean floor, but falls short of the Hadal zone, which begins at 6,000 m and extends to the deepest points of the ocean trenches. Factorian deep at 7,434 m, sits comfortably inside that zone.
Speaker A
For a long time, this meant AUVs simply could not go there. The vehicles that could reach those depths were either crude submersibles, rare, expensive, logistically demanding, or landers, which are simpler instruments, but cannot move around or navigate. In the
Speaker A
early 2020s, this began to change. Several institutions and engineering teams started working on full ocean depth AUVs, vehicles rated to 11,000 m or more, capable of reaching any point on the ocean floor.
Speaker A
The Hadal mapper developed through a collaboration involving Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and other partners is one example of this direction. Kongsburg, the Norwegian company that made the multi-beam sonar system used by the five deeps expedition has been developing autonomous systems
Speaker A
with progressively deeper ratings. These are not yet standard tools in any research fleet, but they exist. They are being tested and the trajectory is clear.
Speaker A
Within a decade, it is plausible that a full oceond depth AUV could be deployed from a ship in the southern ocean, descend to Factorian Deep, spend several hours surveying the seafloor, and return to the surface without anyone having to
Speaker A
sit inside it. What that would enable is significant. A single AUV mission to Factorian Deep could map a far larger area of the seafloor than the limiting factor covered in its one crude dive. It could photograph the sediment surface in
Speaker A
high resolution across kilometers rather than meters. It could collect water samples at multiple depths on the way down and on the way back up. And because it does not carry a human pilot, the risk calculus is different. Losing an
Speaker A
AUV to a mechanical failure or a navigation error is a serious setback and an expensive one. But it is not a catastrophe in the way that losing a crude submersible would be. that changes what kinds of missions are considered
Speaker A
acceptable to attempt. Lander technology is the other piece of this picture and in some ways is already closer to practical deployment at Factorian Deep than AUVs are. A Hadal lander is in its simplest form a metal frame carrying
Speaker A
instruments, cameras, and bait containers waited to sink to the seafloor and anchored there by the ballast alone. When the mission is complete, triggered by a timer or an acoustic command from the surface, the ballast weights are released and the
Speaker A
lander floats back up. No propulsion needed, no navigation, just gravity on the way down and buoyancy on the way up.
Speaker A
It is an elegant solution to a difficult problem and it works. The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has been one of the leaders in Hadal lander development, running extensive programs in the Mariana Trench and other Pacific trenches as part of projects
Speaker A
like Hades, the Hadal Ecosystem Studies Program. Their landers have sat on the seafloor at depths exceeding 10,000 m, collecting video footage of organisms attracted to bait, measuring water chemistry, and recording pressure and temperature data over periods of days.
Speaker A
The biological footage from these landers has been remarkable. Dense aggregations of amphipods swarming bait within minutes of deployment. The occasional passage of a larger animal.
Speaker A
The slow drift of marine snow settling through the water column above the trench floor. Landers have produced some of the most detailed biological data we have from halal environments precisely because they can stay in place long enough for the animals to arrive and
Speaker A
behave naturally. None of this has happened at Factorian Deep. The landers deployed during the five deeps expedition in 2019 were there for a limited time as part of a mission that had many objectives and a tight operational schedule. They collected
Speaker A
samples which were valuable, but they were not part of a sustained monitoring program. A dedicated lander deployment at Factorian Deep, even a single one left on the seafloor for a week, would produce more biological data about that location than currently exists. Multiple
Speaker A
deployments over multiple years would begin to answer questions about seasonal variation, species behavior, and the long-term dynamics of the Hadal community there. This is achievable. It is not cheap, and it still requires ship time in the Southern Ocean, but it is
Speaker A
within the range of what a wellunded research program could accomplish. The question of communication, the near total acoustic isolation of a vehicle or instrument at 7,434 m is also being worked on, though progress here is slower. Acoustic modems
Speaker A
remain the primary means of communicating with deep instruments, and their bandwidth limitations are a genuine constraint. Sending a highresolution image from the seafloor to a surface ship acoustically takes a very long time. Sending live video is essentially impossible with current
Speaker A
technology, but researchers have been experimenting with fiber optic tethers for some deep deployments. Not the kind of tether that would be practical for a vehicle that needs to move freely, but for stationary landers or observatory style instruments, a thin fiber optic
Speaker A
cable can provide dramatically higher bandwidth than acoustic communication allows. The cable creates its own complications. It can tangle. It can break. It constrains where the instrument can be deployed, but for a fixed monitoring station, it is a real
Speaker A
option. There's also been growing interest in the concept of a semi-permanent deep ocean observatory, a network of instruments anchored at depth connected by acoustic links to surface boys, which relay data via satellite to researchers on shore. This kind of
Speaker A
infrastructure exists in other parts of the ocean. The Ocean Observatories Initiative funded by the National Science Foundation maintains arrays of instruments in the Atlantic and Pacific that transmit continuous data streams to shore-based servers. Nothing like this exists in the Southern Ocean and
Speaker A
certainly not at Hadal depths, but the concept is not science fiction. It is engineering, an expensive engineering at that. But it is the kind of infrastructure that once built would transform what we know about a place. A monitoring station at or near Factorian
Speaker A
Deep, even a modest one, measuring temperature pressure current and recording acoustic data, would be a permanent scientific presence at a location that currently has no presence at all.
Speaker A
Artificial intelligence is beginning to play a role in this picture as well. Though it is worth being careful about overstating how much AI assisted analysis of video footage from deep sea cameras has become genuinely useful in recent years.
Speaker A
Identifying species from video manually is slow and requires specialized expertise. A researcher has to watch hours of footage and recognize organisms that may be unfamiliar, partially obscured, or moving quickly. Machine learning systems trained on labeled deep sea footage can assist with this,
Speaker A
flagging frames that contain organisms of interest and in some cases making preliminary identifications. This does not replace expert taxonomists, but it can make their work faster and more efficient. And it means that a lander deployment producing many hours of footage does not necessarily
Speaker A
require months of manual review before it yields useful data. For a location as data sparse as factorian deep, where every bit of biological information is valuable, that kind of efficiency matters.
Speaker A
There is also the possibility, still fairly distant, but worth mentioning of AI assisted navigation for deep AUVs.
Speaker A
Current AUVs follow pre-programmed routes, which means they need to know roughly what the terrain looks like before they go. At Factorian Deep, where the seafloor mapping is still incomplete, that is a limitation. A vehicle that could navigate reactively,
Speaker A
adjusting its path in response to what its sensors detect, avoiding obstacles, following features of interest, would be far more capable of exploring an incompletely mapped environment.
Speaker A
This kind of autonomous navigation exists in surface robotics and is being developed for underwater applications.
Speaker A
But making it reliable at halal depths in an environment where sensor performance is affected by pressure and where communication with the surface is essentially impossible in real time is a hard problem. It is being worked on. It is not solved yet. What all of this
Speaker A
technology adds up to when you consider it together is a future in which the human presence at a place like Factorian Deep becomes less necessary for certain kinds of exploration. Not irrelevant.
Speaker A
There are things a human observer can notice and respond to that no autonomous system currently can. But less necessary. An AUV can map. A lander can observe and sample. A fiber optic tether can transmit. an AI can analyze.
Speaker A
The combination of these tools deployed intelligently and repeatedly could build a picture of Factorian deep that a single crude dive, however carefully executed, never could.
Speaker A
Not because the crude dive was inadequate. It was a remarkable achievement, but because one visit, however deep, is not the same as sustained scientific attention.
Speaker A
The honest caveat to all of this is that technology alone does not solve the Southern Ocean problem. A more capable AUV still needs to be carried to the South Sandwich Trench on a ship. That ship still needs to operate in some of
Speaker A
the most difficult sea conditions on Earth. The weather windows are still narrow. The distance from port is still vast. A lander that can survive a week on the floor of Factorian Deep still needs to be deployed and recovered,
Speaker A
which means a ship needs to be in position. and the seastate needs to be manageable enough to work safely on deck. These are not problems that better software or more capable sensors can fix. They are physical realities of the
Speaker A
location and they will remain constraints regardless of how sophisticated the instruments become. But there is a difference between constraints that make something impossible and constraints that make something difficult and expensive. For a long time, Factorian Deep sat closer to
Speaker A
the impossible end of that spectrum. The technology to reach it barely existed and the technology to study it meaningfully from a distance did not exist at all. That is changing. The spectrum is shifting. The place is not becoming easy to explore. It may never
Speaker A
be easy, but it is becoming more tractable in the specific sense that the tools available to researchers are increasingly capable of operating in the conditions that Factorian D presents.
Speaker A
Whether that capability translates into actual research depends on factors that technology cannot control. Funding decisions, institutional priorities, the willingness of a ship operator to spend weeks in the Southern Ocean for science that will not produce immediate practical results. Technology is a
Speaker A
necessary condition for exploring Factorian Deep more thoroughly. It is not by itself a sufficient one. The Southern Ocean's conditions remain the hardest variable to solve as they always have been. And that leads to a question that goes beyond engineering, beyond
Speaker A
logistics, beyond the practical details of submersibles and landers and acoustic modems. It leads to a question about what we think places like this are worth and what our relationship with the deep ocean actually is.
Speaker A
There is a photograph taken by NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter that shows the surface of Mars in extraordinary detail. Individual boulders, the rippled texture of ancient dunes, the faint tracery of dried rivers that haven't carried water in 3 billion years.
Speaker A
The image resolution is fine enough that you can see rocks roughly the size of a dining room table. Scientists can zoom into that image and argue about the minology of a specific outcrop, the angle of a slope, the likely age of a
Speaker A
particular crater rim. It is in its way a remarkable achievement of remote sensing. Mars is at its closest about 54 million km from Earth. Factorian Deep is about 7.4 km below the surface of the ocean we live on. We have better maps of
Speaker A
Mars than we do of the floor of the South Sandwich Trench. That fact is not presented here to embarrass anyone. The reasons for it are understandable. Radio waves travel through space just fine and they do not travel through seawater at
Speaker A
all, which makes remote sensing of the ocean floor an entirely different technical problem from remote sensing of a planetary surface. But it's still a striking fact to sit with. We are a species that has sent probes to the
Speaker A
outer planets, that has landed rovers on Mars and listened to the sound of Martian wind. that has photographed the rings of Saturn in enough detail to measure the gaps between them. And yet, the deepest confirmed point of the
Speaker A
Southern Ocean, the ocean that encircles our entire planet and drives much of its climate, has been visited by one human being once for approximately 4 hours.
Speaker A
There is something quietly disorienting about that if you let yourself think about it for a moment. We tend to think of Earth as the known world, the place we understand, the backdrop against which we measure the strangeness of
Speaker A
other places. Space is the frontier, the unknown, the place where the maps run out. But the maps run out much closer to home than that. They run out at about 200 m of depth where sunlight fades and the ocean
Speaker A
stops being the ocean we see from beaches and boats and becomes something else entirely. Something that covers roughly 71% of the planet's surface and that we have in any meaningful scientific sense barely touched. The Hadal zone, the region below 6,000 m,
Speaker A
named after Hades, the Greek underworld, represents only about 1 to 2% of the ocean floor by area. But it exists in trenches scattered across every ocean basin, including this one, and the organisms that live there, the geological processes that shape it, the
Speaker A
chemistry of its sediments. These are not isolated curiosities. They connect to systems that matter at a planetary scale. The hadal zone is where organic material goes to be buried. It is where subducting plates carry carbonrich sediment down into the mantle. It is
Speaker A
where the deep circulation of the ocean ultimately terminates in a cold dark stillness that is the end point of currents that began thousands of kilome away at the surface.
Speaker A
Factorian Deep sits at the bottom of all of that. It is not separate from the world above it. It is part of it in ways that are still being worked out. The microlastics finding from the 2019 dive is worth returning to here because it
Speaker A
carries a particular kind of weight. When the lander samples came back from the floor of Factorian Deep from a place that no human being had ever visited that sits in one of the most remote and least navigated stretches of ocean on
Speaker A
Earth, they contained microlastics, tiny fragments of synthetic material. The residue of manufacturing and consumption and disposal happening thousands of kilome away and thousands of meters above. The same finding has been made at Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench, at the Kerdc Trench in
Speaker A
the Pacific, at deep sites in the Arctic. It appears to be universal. The deep ocean which we have barely explored, which we cannot easily reach, which most people on Earth will never think about. It already carries our fingerprints.
Speaker A
There is something almost paradoxical about that. The place we understand least is also in a sense the place that most clearly reflects back the scale of our impact on the planet. We have not explored Factorian deep. We have contaminated it.
Speaker A
Those two facts exist simultaneously and they do not cancel each other out. They just sit there side by side asking to be noticed. What this suggests, and it is worth being careful here, because this kind of observation can slide quickly
Speaker A
into preachiness, which is not the intent, is that our relationship with the deep ocean is asymmetric in a way that is worth being honest about. We affect it constantly through the carbon we emit that the Southern Ocean absorbs.
Speaker A
Through the plastic that finds its way into the water column and settles eventually to the floor. Through the fishing pressure that affects deep water species even at depths that trolls cannot reach. We affect it in ways that are measurable and ongoing. And yet we
Speaker A
have almost no direct knowledge of what we are affecting. We are changing a system we have not described. We are altering an environment we have not mapped. That is not a call to panic. It is just a description of where things
Speaker A
currently stand. The Southern Ocean to focus on the specific geography here is one of the most important bodies of water on Earth from a climate perspective. It absorbs something in the range of 40% of the carbon dioxide that
Speaker A
human activity has added to the atmosphere. The exact figure varies by study and by year and the ocean's capacity to absorb carbon is not fixed.
Speaker A
It changes with temperature, with circulation patterns, with the biological productivity of surface waters. Understanding how the Southern Ocean functions as a carbon sink, and how that function might change as the planet warms is one of the more pressing
Speaker A
scientific questions of the current moment. And the deep floor of the southern ocean, including the trenches, including factorian deep, is part of that system. Carbon reaches the deep sea floor through what oceanographers call the biological pump. Organic material
Speaker A
produced at the surface by photosynthesis sinks through the water column. Much of it decomposing along the way, but some fraction reaching the bottom and being buried in the sediment at Hadal depths. that buried carbon may stay buried for geological time scales.
Speaker A
The trench floor is in a sense a long-term carbon archive. What is in the sediment at factorian deep? How much carbon in what form deposited over what time frames is information that could be directly relevant to understanding the
Speaker A
southern ocean's role in global carbon cycling. It is not there just for the sake of completeness. It connects to questions about how the planet's climate system works and how it might respond to future changes. None of that science has
Speaker A
been done at Factorian Deep. One dive, a few sediment samples from a lander, a handful of organisms and collection containers. That is the current state of knowledge about the deepest point of the ocean that performs one of the most
Speaker A
important climate functions on Earth. There is a concept in philosophy of science sometimes called the known unknowns. The things we know we don't know as opposed to the unknown unknowns.
Speaker A
The things we don't even know to ask about yet. Factorian Deep is full of both. We know we don't know what species live there in any comprehensive sense.
Speaker A
We know we don't know the detailed geology of the trench floor or the full sediment record or the microbial community in the sediment or whether there is any hydrothermal activity at depth. Those are the known unknowns and they are substantial. But the unknown
Speaker A
unknowns are by definition harder to characterize. They are the things that the single 2019 dive might have revealed if it had lasted longer or covered more ground or that a second or third dive might reveal or that a year of land or
Speaker A
observations might turn up. Things we're not even framing as questions yet because we have so little data that we don't know what questions to ask. Every time a new deep sea environment has been studied with any sustained attention, it
Speaker A
has produced surprises that nobody anticipated. The hydrothermal vents discovered at the Galapagus Rift in 1977 revealed entire ecosystems powered by chemosynthesis rather than sunlight. A discovery that fundamentally changed the understanding of where life can exist. The cold seeps
Speaker A
found in the Gulf of Mexico in the 1980s showed that similar communities could form without the heat of vents driven purely by methane and hydrogen sulfide.
Speaker A
The woodf falls and whale falls studied in subsequent decades reveal that deep sea ecosystems can be structured around isolated food sources in ways that ecologists had not imagined. Each of these discoveries came from sustained investigation of specific locations, not
Speaker A
from a single visit, but from repeated dives, long duration observations, and the kind of careful cumulative scientific attention that builds understanding over years. Factorian Deep has had none of that. It has had one afternoon. It is worth being honest
Speaker A
about what that means in terms of what we actually know versus what we are guessing. The organisms collected in 2019, the amphipods, the sea cucumbers, the polyaty worms tell us that life exists at that depth in the South
Speaker A
Sandwich trench. They do not tell us how diverse that community is, how it is structured, what it eats, how it reproduces, or how it compares in any detailed way to had communities in other trenches.
Speaker A
The sediment samples tell us that microplastics are present and give a snapshot of whatever else happened to be in the material collected. They do not tell us about the sediment's full composition, its layering, its age, or the history encoded in its chemistry.
Speaker A
The sonar mapping conducted by the pressure drop gives us a reasonably good picture of the large-scale topography of the trench in the area surveyed. It does not give us fine scale detail across the full extent of the trench and it does
Speaker A
not tell us what the seafloor looks like at the scale of meters or cm.
Speaker A
What we have in other words is a sketch, a rough outline of a place that deserves scientifically speaking a great deal more than a sketch. And yet the sketch is not nothing. It is worth saying that clearly because there is a tendency in
Speaker A
this kind of discussion to frame everything in terms of what is missing and that can create the false impression that the 2019 dive accomplished nothing significant. It accomplished a great deal. It established the depth of the deepest point of the southern ocean with
Speaker A
precision. It confirmed that life exists at Hadal depths in the South Sandwich Trench. It collected the first biological and sediment samples ever taken from that location. It produced the first visual footage of the Factorian deep sea floor. It gave the
Speaker A
place a name and a confirmed position on the map. Before 2019, Factorian Deep was a sonar shadow, a number estimated from satellite gravity data, a feature inferred rather than observed. After 2019, it was a real place that a human
Speaker A
being had seen. that matters. First contact always matters. It is the difference between a location and a place, between an abstraction and something with texture and color and organisms moving through it. But first contact is by definition a beginning.
Speaker A
And the question of whether that beginning leads anywhere, whether the sketch eventually becomes a portrait, depends on decisions that are still being made by funding agencies and research institutions and governments and private individuals who may or may not decide that the floor of the South
Speaker A
Sandwich Trench is worth sustained attention. There is a version of the future in which Factorian Deep remains for another decade or two, approximately as unknown as it is today, in which the 2019 dive stands as the only crude
Speaker A
visit. In which a handful of lander deployments add incrementally to the biological record, in which the sediment cores that could reveal millions of years of geological history are never collected because no research vessel with the right equipment makes the
Speaker A
journey. That version of the future is not implausible. It is in fact arguably the default. The thing that happens if nothing intervenes to change the current trajectory.
Speaker A
And there is another version in which the technology described in the previous section. better AUVs, longer duration landers, AI assisted analysis, possibly a fiber optic monitoring system combines with a renewed institutional commitment to understanding the Southern Ocean, and
Speaker A
Factorian Deep begins to receive the kind of attention that its scientific importance arguably warrants, in which the sketch becomes something more detailed, in which the known unknowns start to shrink and the unknown unknowns begin to reveal themselves.
Speaker A
Neither version is guaranteed. Both are possible. What Factorian Deep represents in the end is something about the particular kind of ignorance that comes not from lack of capability, but from lack of attention. We're not entirely incapable of studying it. We have
Speaker A
visited it. We have technology that is approaching the ability to study it more systematically. The barriers are real.
Speaker A
the distance, the weather, the pressure, the engineering cost, the communication limits, but they are not absolute. They are barriers that have been crossed before in other contexts when the will and the resources were present. The question of whether they will be crossed
Speaker A
here is really a question about what we think the deep ocean is for. Whether it is a resource to be managed, a curiosity to be occasionally visited, or something more like what the hadal biologists who study it tend to call it in their
Speaker A
quieter moments. A fundamental part of the planet we live on, one that we have a responsibility to understand simply because we are here and it is here and we are already affecting it whether we understand it or not. That is not a
Speaker A
scientific question. It is a question about values and it does not have an easy answer which is perhaps why it tends not to get asked very directly in the context where research funding decisions are made. What it does have is
Speaker A
a very specific, very concrete, very dark and cold location where the question sits waiting 7,000 434 m below the surface of the Southern Ocean in the deepest point of a trench that most people have never heard of under a
Speaker A
pressure that would destroy almost anything we built to reach it in a silence so complete that it is difficult to even imagine from the surface of the world.
Speaker A
Which brings us back, as it must, to the question the title asked. So why can't we truly explore Factorian deep? The answer, as you've probably gathered by now, is not a single thing. It never is with places like this. It is not simply
Speaker A
the pressure, though the pressure alone. 744 bar, more than 10,000 lb pressing on every square in of any surface that descends into it. would be enough to end the conversation for most of human history. It is not simply the distance,
Speaker A
though. 2,000 km from the nearest real port across some of the most hostile water on Earth is a distance that makes routine operations essentially impossible. It is not simply the cost, though. $48 million for one expedition privately funded by a single individual
Speaker A
tells you something important about what it takes just to get there once. It is not the weather alone or the communication blackout alone or the unmapped terrain alone or the institutional indifference alone.
Speaker A
It is all of these things together stacked on top of each other. Each one compounding the others so that the total difficulty is not the sum of the individual barriers but something larger than that. Something that functions less
Speaker A
like a list of problems and more like a kind of gravity. a persistent patient pull toward leaving the place alone. And the place has been almost entirely left alone. That is the quiet fact at the center of all of this. That the
Speaker A
Factorian Deep has existed for millions of years. The South Sandwich Trench began forming when the tectonic geometry of the Scotia region shifted and the South American plate began its long slow descent beneath the Scotia plate. A process that
Speaker A
has been ongoing for tens of millions of years, deepening the trench incrementally, building the volcanic islands above, shaping the seafloor in ways that are still not fully understood.
Speaker A
All of that time, the Hadal community at the bottom of the trench has been doing whatever it does. Feeding, reproducing, dying, evolving, adapting to conditions that would be lethal to almost anything else on Earth. The amphipods have been
Speaker A
there. The sea cucumbers have been there. The polycate worms moving through the fine sediment have been there. The microbes in the sediment with their biochemical adaptations that we've not yet had the chance to study have been there. None of it waiting for us
Speaker A
exactly, just existing in the dark and the cold and the pressure in a place that had no name until 2019.
Speaker A
We gave it a name. We descended into it once for a few hours in a titanium sphere with a thick acrylic viewport.
Speaker A
And a man looked out through that window at the seafloor and saw it flat, covered in fine sediment, quiet.
Speaker A
Whatever he saw in those few hours is the sum total of direct human visual observation of Factorian Deep.
Speaker A
Everything else we know comes from instruments, sonar returns, pressure readings, the contents of lander traps, the chemistry of sediment samples.
Speaker A
Good information, real information, but information gathered from a distance, filtered through technology, incomplete in the way that all remote sensing is incomplete. We have never simply been there in any meaningful sense. We have touched it once briefly and then left.
Speaker A
What we took with us when we left is worth naming carefully. a confirmed depth of 7,434 m. A set of sonar maps covering the area the pressure drop surveyed showing the large scale shape of the trench in that
Speaker A
region. A collection of amphipods and other organisms, some of which may represent species new to science, though the analysis has been slow and the results have not been widely publicized.
Speaker A
sediment samples containing microplastics, which told us something we perhaps already suspected, but now have direct evidence for. That human contamination reaches, even here, to a place that almost no human has ever approached, at a depth that no human
Speaker A
technology visited until very recently. A few hours of camera footage showing the seafloor in the submersible lights and a name on a chart, Factorian Deep, honoring the vessel that made the dive possible. That is not nothing. It is
Speaker A
genuinely not nothing. The name alone matters more than it might seem because named places are places that can be discussed, referenced, returned to in conversation and in planning. Before the name, before the confirmed depth, before the 2019 dive, the deepest point of the Southern
Speaker A
Ocean was a vague region, a probable location inferred from satellite gravity data, a depth estimated rather than measured. Now, it is a specific place.
Speaker A
That specificity is the foundation for everything that might come next. You cannot propose a research expedition to a place that does not have a confirmed location and a confirmed depth. You cannot write a grant application around a feature that exists only as a
Speaker A
satelliterived approximation. The 2019 dive created the conditions under which future science becomes possible. That is not a small thing. But it is also honestly almost nothing measured against what the place actually is and how long it has existed and how
Speaker A
much it contains that we do not know. 4 hours of observation in a location that has been accumulating biological and geological history for tens of millions of years. A handful of organisms in a sample jar. A sona map that covers a
Speaker A
fraction of a trench nearly a thousand km long. It is the kind of beginning that makes you aware very acutely of how much beginning there still is to do. And the honest answer to the title question why we can't truly explore it is that we
Speaker A
lack the sustained will and the sustained resources to do so. And we have not yet made the collective decision that it matters enough to change that. The barriers are real, but they are not permanent. The Southern Ocean's weather is brutal, but research
Speaker A
vessels operate there regularly for Antarctic science. The pressure at depth is extreme, but we have built vehicles rated to withstand it. The communication limits are frustrating, but autonomous systems are being developed that can work within those limits. The cost is
Speaker A
high, but it is not higher than what we routinely spend on other scientific endeavors that we have decided are worth the investment. The distance is great, but distance has never permanently stopped exploration when the motivation was sufficient. What is missing is not
Speaker A
capability exactly. It is priority. Factorian Deep has not been decided to be important enough by the people and institutions who make those decisions to justify the sustained effort that real exploration would require. And there are reasons for that, some of them
Speaker A
understandable. The southern ocean is vast and the demands on research resources are many. The trench is one of dozens of underststudied deep sea environments. The immediate practical applications of studying it are not obvious in the way that say studying
Speaker A
fisheries or sea ice or ocean temperature gradients is obvious. The case for going back has to be made carefully, and it has to compete with a great many other cases being made carefully by people who care just as
Speaker A
much about their own corners of the unexplored ocean. But there is something worth sitting with here at the end of all of this. The Southern Ocean absorbs roughly 40% of the carbon dioxide that human activity puts into the atmosphere
Speaker A
each year. It is one of the most climatically significant bodies of water on Earth and its deep circulation patterns. The way cold, dense water sinks and moves along the seafloor, a part of the global system that regulates temperature and distributes heat and
Speaker A
nutrients across the planet. The Hadal zone of the South Sandwich Trench sits at the bottom of that system in the most extreme expression of the Southern Ocean's depth. What happens there? How carbon is processed, how organic material is broken down, how the
Speaker A
microbial communities in the sediment function is connected in ways we do not yet understand to processes that matter enormously to the surface world. We're not talking about a curiosity in a jar.
Speaker A
We're talking about a piece of a system that we depend on, that we're already altering, that we have barely looked at.
Speaker A
The microplastics in the sediment are the most uncomfortable detail in all of this, and it is worth returning to them one more time. We have never mounted a sustained scientific expedition to Factorian Deep. We have never deployed a
Speaker A
longduration lander there, never collected a sediment core, never mapped the full extent of the trench at high resolution. We have done almost nothing in terms of deliberate scientific engagement with this place. And yet, our contamination is already there. The
Speaker A
plastic that human industry has shed into the ocean over the past several decades has found its way through ocean currents and the slow sinking of particles through the water column to the deepest point of the southern ocean and it is sitting in the sediment
Speaker A
alongside the forominifera shells and the volcanic ash waiting to be studied. We have affected the place before we've understood it. That is not an unusual situation in human history, but it is a particularly stark version of it. There
Speaker A
is something almost philosophical about the shape of this situation, though it is also very practical. We have a place that is scientifically important, biologically rich in ways we have barely glimpsed. Geologically active in ways that could tell us a great deal about
Speaker A
the history of this part of the planet, and climatically connected to processes that affect all of us. We have the beginnings of the technology to study it. We have visited it once and we have already contaminated it. The question of
Speaker A
what we do next is genuinely open. Factorian Deep is not going anywhere. That is perhaps the most quietly striking thing about it. The trench will continue to deepen very slowly as the tectonic plates continue their movement.
Speaker A
The hadal organisms will continue to live and die and evolve in the dark. The sediment will continue to accumulate layer by layer, recording the volcanic eruptions of the South Sandwich Islands above and the seismic events that shake the region and the organic material that
Speaker A
drifts down from the sunlit water far above. The place is patient in a way that geological time tends to make things patient, indifferent to whether we return, unchanged in any meaningful way by whether we pay attention to it or
Speaker A
not. It will be there whenever we decide that it is worth the effort. If that decision comes soon in the form of better autonomous vehicles and renewed institutional commitment and sustained research funding, then the sketch that the 2019 dive produced will begin to
Speaker A
fill in. The organisms in the sample jars will be joined by more detailed biological surveys. The sonar maps will be extended and refined. The sediment cores will reveal the layered history of a subduction zone that has been active
Speaker A
for longer than our species has existed. And the unknown unknowns, the things we do not yet know that we do not know, will begin slowly to surface.
Speaker A
If the decision is delayed or never quite made, then Factorian Deep will remain approximately what it is now. A name on a chart, a confirmed depth, a brief moment of human contact in 2019, and a very long list of unanswered
Speaker A
questions, not forgotten exactly, known to exist, known to be important, but not studied in any serious way. A place that we know is there without really knowing what it is. Either way, it will be dark down there. Cold. Quiet in the way that
Speaker A
only places without any sound at all can be quiet. The pressure will be exactly what it is, 744 bar, patient and absolute. The amphipods will move through the sediment. The water will sit just above freezing and the trench will wait as it has always
Speaker A
waited for whatever comes next. Thank you for spending this time here tonight or this morning or whenever you have found this. If something in this surprised you, the single visit, the microplastics, the gap between what we know and what we might know, I would
Speaker A
genuinely love to hear about it in the comments. These kinds of places deserve more conversation than they usually get.
Speaker A
And the fact that you are here listening to a long description of a trench most people have never heard of suggests you might agree.
Speaker A
If you have not already, a like on this video does help more than it might seem.
Speaker A
And subscribing to Life Beyond Scene means you will be here the next time we find something worth sitting quietly with.
Speaker A
Take care of yourselves. Sleep well if that is where this is taking you. And think occasionally about the dark water.
Topics:Factorian DeepSouth Sandwich TrenchSouthern Oceandeep sea explorationsubmersibleFive Deeps expeditiondeep sea biologyocean trenchunexplored placesmarine science
![[YBA] frosti — Transcript](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KAH0o3xSL3w/maxresdefault.jpg)
