A preacher argues 'neighbor' and 'peer' imply an ordered hierarchy, that heritage Americans owe distinct loyalty to each other, and that enemies (including immigrants framed as threats) should be resi
Key Takeaways
- The speaker argues that Christian love is ordered, with different obligations owed to different categories of people.
- The video frames immigrants and religious minorities as threats to be resisted rather than neighbors owed equal standing.
- The argument relies on a contested reading of biblical 'no distinctions' passages as context-specific.
- The content advocates restricting civic equality and supports deportation and stigmatization of certain groups.
What the video covers
- The speaker asks what Jesus meant by 'neighbor' and whether it means everyone, questioning why it would be qualified if so.
- He draws a parallel between 'neighbor' and the legal concept of a 'jury of your peers,' tracing it to the Magna Carta.
- He claims an ordered social hierarchy upheld for most of human history has been eroded in the last ~65 years by multiculturalism.
- He asserts that heritage Americans are neighbors in a way that immigrants, including Hindu and Muslim residents, are not, describing them as strangers or enemies.
- He argues that different categories of love (wife, child, citizen, stranger, enemy) are distinct and should not be treated as equal.
- He states that loving one's enemy means refraining from vengeance and praying for repentance, but not granting equal access to land, laws, or inheritance.
- He frames loving one's actual neighbor as opposing those seen as threatening the civilization they live in, including exposing, stigmatizing, and deporting them.
- He describes the biblical world as one of sharp ethnic, religious, and sexual distinctions, and argues that Paul and Peter's 'no distinctions' teaching was a corrective to that context.
- He contends that the modern West has swung to the opposite extreme, labeling all remaining distinctions as racist or bigoted.
- The clip is promoted as part of an NXR conference and a paid streaming app, with a call to purchase access.
Chapters
- 00:00Defining 'Neighbor' in Christian Teaching
- 00:44The 'Peer' Analogy and Magna Carta
- 01:30Conference Promotion and Subscription Pitch
- 02:30Who Counts as Neighbor: Immigrants and Heritage Americans
- 03:36Categories of Love and Loving Enemies
- 05:30Historical Context of Biblical Distinctions
- 07:28Modern Shift Away from Distinctions
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
And so, what does it mean to love your neighbor? What does it mean to love your neighbor? Again, we're asking obvious questions with obvious truths, but in our generation, these are complex discussions.
Speaker A
It seems like this should be a very easy question. And it was for most of human history.
Speaker A
But today, in our anthropological confusion, we need to ask, who is my neighbor? What did Jesus mean when he used the term neighbor? What does he mean by that? You see, neighbor is not some sort of abstract interchangeable
Speaker A
unit of humanity. Is everyone your neighbor? If that's the case, why didn't he just say just love everyone?
Speaker A
Now, we are called to love everyone. But we're going to use this term. Now, I want to talk about a similar parallel to this idea of loving your neighbor. It's actually in our American justice system. We've uh seen the
Speaker A
phrase. has been embedded into our legal system. It says that you have a jury of your peers here in the United States.
Speaker A
You have an opportunity to have a trial with a jury of your peers. It comes from the Magna Carta, which is the foundation about much of our legal system is built. But like the word neighbor, what is a peer?
Speaker A
Is a peer just another person with a pulse? Is that what Christ meant? Is that a neighbor is just anybody and a peer? Is that what our founders meant that it just it's just another human being?
Speaker A
If so, why qualify these terms at all? Why not just say love everybody? Anybody can be on your jury. This is a clip from our NXR conference, Christ is King, America after Trump, which is happening right now as you've watched the clip.
Speaker A
And if you download the NXR Plus app, you can watch every single one of the remaining sessions from this conference as it's happening, as well as all the previous sessions that have already taken place. You can watch it on demand
Speaker A
at the NXR Plus app for just $10. So go to your favorite app store, find the NXR Plus app, and start watching the conference live as it's happening now.
Speaker A
Are the 40 H1B Indians who moved into your housing complex your neighbors? Is the Somali Muslim woman on your court case jury my peer?
Speaker A
The answer to both these questions historically is certainly no. These statements were not written in our multicultural society that has perverted the natural order.
Speaker A
And when it says neighbor or when it says the word peers, it has a particular social order in mind.
Speaker A
And that order was upheld for all of human history up until about 65 years ago.
Speaker A
So as an American, the Hindu on our welfare system who is defrauding our country through hospice scams is not my neighbor in the same way that the heritage American is.
Speaker A
the Muslim man who relocated their family specifically to claim my home and to claim my land and his religion to crusade over my people is not my neighbor in the same way that the heritage American that has been here who
Speaker A
has relatives in the Civil War. These people are strangers if you want to use biblical terms at the very least, but more often than not, they are actually my enemy.
Speaker A
Now, you might say, "But Dale, Jesus says to love your enemies as well." To which I say, "Yes." But again, we get into categories. What is an enemy?
Speaker A
What is a neighbor? What is a peer? They're not the same. In fact, the love required for each of these is not identical. Neighborly love is the positive duty of ordered affection and protection within the bonds of people
Speaker A
and place and land. It's what is required of heritage Americans to give to other heritage Americans.
Speaker A
God calls us to love everyone. But again, he doesn't call us to love everyone equally in the same way.
Speaker A
The loves are different for a wife and for a child and for a citizen and for a sojourer and for a stranger and the love for enemy. These are real categories of love, but they are very different. And
Speaker A
we don't want to fall into the egalitarian framework where everything is the same. Enemy love is the restraint of personal vengeance and the refusal to return evil for evil.
Speaker A
But loving your enemy does not mean granting him equal access or or equal claim on your land and your laws and your daughters and your children's inheritance. That's not the way that you love your enemy. In fact, it's also not
Speaker A
the way that you love your actual neighbor. It doesn't mean that you get to treat his evil intent as neutral or his religious crusade as some sort of non-threatening activity that's happening right in your home.
Speaker A
It doesn't mean that you get to forget about justice and about righteousness. It means this, and this is important.
Speaker A
Pay attention here. It means you pray for his repentance even as you refuse to hand him the civilization that he's trying to steal from you.
Speaker A
It means that you will pray for his conversion to Christianity while you work diligently to deport him.
Speaker A
In fact, a great way to love your actual neighbor is to go to war with those who are trying to steal his home.
Speaker A
A great way to love your actual neighbor is to expose and to stigmatize and to reject those people who are threatening to harm the civilization your actual neighbor lives in.
Speaker A
We have to remember that these verses, these love your neighbor, there are no distinctions.
Speaker A
They were written in a world that is completely opposite to ours. It's a world where visual and national and linguistic and sexual and racial distinctions were so sharp and so hostile.
Speaker A
I mean, think about this for a second. Jews refused to help dying Samaritans because they were considered halfbreed heretics.
Speaker A
White Gentiles were considered unclean animals by the Jews. Often still are. Romans called Jews the enemies of all mankind.
Speaker A
Greeks viewed black skin as an omen connected to death. Slaves were worthless people. Husbands were legally allowed to kill their children and their wives.
Speaker A
Bloodlines were everything. The distinctions were so sharp. It is a completely opposite world to the world that we live in today.
Speaker A
In other words, ethnic and cultural prejudice, real, genuine, and often sinful prejudice was just a fact of life in the biblical world.
Speaker A
This is the context that we need to read into these passages. So Paul and Peter, they needed to do what? Well, they needed to stress the opposite that salvation and entrance into the kingdom of God. There is no racial, there is no
Speaker A
ethnic, there is no sexual, there is no moral distinction in which will keep you from entering the kingdom of God. All you need is faith in Christ.
Speaker A
So when you understand the context of why he said no distinctions, you realize, okay, this is a different world that we live in.
Speaker A
There was no lawkeeping. There's no circumcision. There's no spiritual rituals. There's no bloodline. It was only faith that was required.
Speaker A
So in our generation on the opposite side, the pendulum has swung all the way to the other extreme and we went from a world of such sharp distinctions to a world that has no distinctions.
Speaker A
We made this huge shift. We went from men can kill their wives and kill women to what is a woman?
Speaker A
We have a huge shift. We went from black skin means death to one race, the human race. We're all the same, aren't we?
Speaker A
We went from hating all foreigners to Arabs or English. It's like, what what's happening here?
Speaker A
We've lost all reference points to reality and we labeled every remaining distinction as racist or misogynistic or bigoted.
Speaker A
Even if those distinctions are real and true and beautiful and good.
Topics:neighborheritage AmericanChristian nationalismimmigrationbiblical interpretationenemy lovejury of peersNXRDale Gribblemulticulturalism











