Learn how to solve a phonology problem using Korean s and sh sounds by analyzing data, environments, allophones, and phonological rules.
Ask about this video. Answers come from its transcript only — with the timestamp, so you can check them.
Generated from the transcript and can be wrong — check the timestamp.
Key Takeaways
- Minimal pairs are essential but not always available; environment charts help analyze sound distribution.
- Allophones occur in complementary environments and must be phonetically similar.
- The phoneme is the more general sound; allophones are contextually conditioned variants.
- Phonological rules describe how phonemes are realized as allophones in specific environments.
- Feature notation can generalize phonological rules but is not always necessary.
What the video covers
- The video demonstrates solving a phonology problem starting from a data set.
- Focuses on distinguishing Korean sibilants: s and sh.
- Explains the search for minimal pairs and the absence of minimal pairs for s and sh.
- Introduces environment charts to analyze the contexts in which s and sh occur.
- Determines that s and sh are allophones based on complementary distribution.
- Identifies that sh occurs before the vowel E, while s occurs elsewhere.
- Discusses the importance of similarity between sounds to be considered allophones.
- Explains the concept of the phoneme as the more general sound (s) and allophone as the conditioned variant (sh).
- Formulates a phonological rule: s becomes sh before E.
- Mentions the possibility of using feature notation for more generalization.
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
In this video, I'm going to do a complete phonology problem, starting from a data set and then searching for allophones to phonemes, searching for the environments where the allophones may occur if there are any, and then making a formal rule for that phonological process.
Speaker A
There's a pretty systematic way to do things, so we're going to take a look at Korean S and sh, so in other words, we can call this the Korean sibilant problem.
Speaker A
And here is the data. Now, this might not be 100% accurate for Korean native speakers, there may be some slight alterations here, this is to simplify the data set to make it easier to work with.
Speaker A
And this is pretty standard practice in phonology, because in reality, data sets can be very messy.
Speaker A
And if we had these really messy data sets, there would be no way to start and learn.
Speaker A
So.
Speaker A
The first thing we do when we compare two sounds.
Speaker A
And usually we're told which sounds we're looking at when we have these data sets.
Speaker A
And we're looking at s and sh.
Speaker A
We're looking for minimal pairs with these sounds.
Speaker A
So, we can look and we can say, are there any minimal pairs with s and sh?
Speaker A
I see a minimal pair for n and m, but we're not working with that.
Speaker A
So, that's not going to help us too much.
Speaker A
In fact, I'm sure you've taken a look right now.
Speaker A
And you'll notice that there are no minimal pairs for s and sh.
Speaker A
So, when there's no minimal pairs, we have to resort to a more monotonous task.
Speaker A
And that is writing out environment charts.
Speaker A
So, an environment chart essentially pinpoints the sound.
Speaker A
And writes down one sound to the left of it and one sound to the right of it in all circumstances.
Speaker A
So, for instance, let's do s first.
Speaker A
The alveolar fricative.
Speaker A
And we'll go word by word.
Speaker A
So, in the first word, we see son.
Speaker A
So, the S O N.
Speaker A
And in this environment, it starts at the beginning of a word.
Speaker A
So, we can do the pound symbol on the left for the word boundary.
Speaker A
And then immediately after it is the O.
Speaker A
So, this would be one environment for S.
Speaker A
In the word shilsu, we see an L before the S.
Speaker A
And then an U afterwards.
Speaker A
In Isa, we see an E before it.
Speaker A
And an A after.
Speaker A
And we'll just continue going through this word by word.
Speaker A
So, shinho, there's none.
Speaker A
Shihap is none.
Speaker A
Shibsam, we have the P and an A after.
Speaker A
In som, we have S at the beginning of the word.
Speaker A
And an O after, but we already have that environment listed once.
Speaker A
So, if we want, we can just put another check by it to say, okay, this repeats again.
Speaker A
In soso, we see the same thing.
Speaker A
In sal, it's at the beginning of the word.
Speaker A
But there's an A after it.
Speaker A
In mashida, there's nothing.
Speaker A
In sek, the beginning of the word and an E is after.
Speaker A
And then an oship, there's nothing.
Speaker A
So, now we have all the environments for s.
Speaker A
Let's work on sh.
Speaker A
So, shilsu is at the beginning of the word.
Speaker A
And there's an E after.
Speaker A
In shinho, shihap, and shibsam, it's all the same story.
Speaker A
So, we see that three more times.
Speaker A
In mashida, I see an A before and an E after.
Speaker A
And then an oship, I see an O before and an E after.
Speaker A
So, what are the environments?
Speaker A
In fact, the first thing we have to ask is, are these allophones?
Speaker A
And in order to determine if they're allophones.
Speaker A
We have to make sure that there's no similar environments between the two sounds.
Speaker A
So, for instance, if I say, okay.
Speaker A
Maybe this is something to do with being word initial.
Speaker A
It can't be because there's word initial environments for both sounds.
Speaker A
In fact, it can't be between word initial and vowel.
Speaker A
Because again, we have a word initial followed by a vowel in both circumstances.
Speaker A
So, we need a tighter environment.
Speaker A
So, the, I think the very clear environment.
Speaker A
If we take a look at sh specifically.
Speaker A
Is that it occurs before E.
Speaker A
And if we take a look at the alveolar fricative.
Speaker A
There is no circumstance where it occurs before the sound E.
Speaker A
So, we can say that there's no overlapping environments.
Speaker A
Sh would be before E.
Speaker A
And s would be everywhere else.
Speaker A
Okay, so there's kind of one important thing that I should discuss.
Speaker A
Before we really drill down with the phonemes and allophones for this.
Speaker A
And that is in order for allophones to be connected to the same phoneme.
Speaker A
The sounds should be relatively similar.
Speaker A
So, for instance, if I was comparing something like sh and k.
Speaker A
These are unlikely to be allophones, even if there aren't any overlapping environments.
Speaker A
Simply because the properties of the sounds are so different.
Speaker A
Now, with s and sh.
Speaker A
What's really the difference between these?
Speaker A
Well, it's just anterior.
Speaker A
It's just the anterior features.
Speaker A
S is forward, sh is more backwards.
Speaker A
So, we have our allophones at this point.
Speaker A
We know one is sh and one is s.
Speaker A
And what's the environment?
Speaker A
Well, I said that sh is just before the sound E.
Speaker A
In fact, we saw that by listing all the environments.
Speaker A
And s is more general.
Speaker A
It is everywhere else.
Speaker A
So, which is the phoneme?
Speaker A
Well, the phoneme is the more general sound.
Speaker A
It's the sound that occurs in the most places.
Speaker A
And that would be s.
Speaker A
Now, you might be saying, why?
Speaker A
Well, we're about to form a rule for this.
Speaker A
And I have a question, would you rather make a rule that takes the alveolar to an alveopalatal sound?
Speaker A
Or would you rather take an alveopalatal sound?
Speaker A
So, the sh to a s.
Speaker A
Now, when you just say, oh.
Speaker A
One of these.
Speaker A
It doesn't really matter.
Speaker A
But when we consider the fact that we have to write a rule for the environment.
Speaker A
Which environment is easy to capture in a rule?
Speaker A
Before E.
Speaker A
Or everywhere else.
Speaker A
It's pretty easy to write an environment for before E.
Speaker A
But it's not so easy to write an environment for everywhere else.
Speaker A
So, that's why we take the elsewhere condition as the main phoneme.
Speaker A
And then these allophones are rules taking from phoneme to the allophones.
Speaker A
Okay, so the rule.
Speaker A
The rule will state that the phoneme S will be realized as the alveopalatal sh.
Speaker A
When before the sound E.
Speaker A
And you might be thinking, hold on a second.
Speaker A
Why aren't we writing this with features?
Speaker A
And the reason we don't need to write this one with features.
Speaker A
Is because these are very specific sounds.
Speaker A
We're not necessarily targeting a natural class of sounds.
Speaker A
It's not s and some other sound changing features together.
Speaker A
It's this one specific sound changing into this other specific sound before this very specific vowel.
Speaker A
So, because these are very specific changes.
Speaker A
We don't need to generalize to features.
Speaker A
However, as an exercise on your own, you could write the features.
Speaker A
So, for instance, if I want to be more general with features here.
Speaker A
I could say that S essentially becomes minus anterior.
Speaker A
Because that's what's happening.
Speaker A
The s on the alveolar ridge is moving backwards to the alveopalatal region.
Speaker A
And becoming sh.
Speaker A
And maybe this isn't just E that it's in front of.
Speaker A
But maybe all high front vowels.
Speaker A
So, if I want to target all high front vowels.
Speaker A
Then I could say something, this is like plus high.
Speaker A
Minus low, minus back.
Speaker A
Plus front.
Speaker A
And of course, we should definitely specify that this is going to be plus syllabic.
Speaker A
So, if we wanted to target E.
Speaker A
Then we could write these features.
Speaker A
This may include something like U.
Speaker A
Korean doesn't have U.
Speaker A
It might target E.
Speaker A
Which, not sure Korean has E.
Speaker A
But if it did, then we would expect these patterns.
Speaker A
So, essentially, the more we generalize like this, the bigger predictions we make.
Speaker A
So, that is a full phonology problem from the data set to listing environments, to finding allophones, to producing a rule.
Speaker A
Hopefully, this helped a little bit.
Speaker A
And if you have any questions, please leave them in the comments below.
Speaker A
And I will do my best to answer them.
Topics:phonologyphonological rulesallophonesphonemesKorean sibilantsminimal pairsenvironment chartcomplementary distributionalveolar fricativealveopalatal fricative
![[Introduction to Linguistics] Phonetics, International … — Transcript](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jBpC4cftHs4/maxresdefault.jpg)










