Speaker A
Look at what the Republicans have done in the past year and a half. People are not even aware of the breadth of what they've done.
Nick Fuentes criticizes Republicans for prioritizing Israel over Americans, contrasting their policies with Democrats' America-first stance.
Ask about this video. Answers come from its transcript only — with the timestamp, so you can check them.
Generated from the transcript and can be wrong — check the timestamp.
Key Takeaways
- Republicans prioritize Israel's interests over American citizens across multiple sectors.
- Democrats oppose some Israeli policies and focus more on domestic welfare and affordability.
- U.S. foreign and domestic policy is heavily influenced by pro-Israel agendas.
- There is significant suppression of anti-Israel activism within the U.S., including visa and citizenship revocations.
- Voters should critically assess party loyalties given these foreign influence concerns.
What the video covers
- Republicans have aggressively supported Israel through wars, foreign aid, and domestic policy enforcement.
- The GOP has facilitated conflicts with Iran and the Houthis, costing the U.S. trillions and billions in military expenses.
- Republicans have influenced education by imposing pro-Israel measures on universities and suppressing anti-Israel activism.
- Visa and citizenship revocations target individuals critical of Israel, enforced by DHS and other agencies.
- Trump's administration facilitated control over TikTok's US operations by Israel-aligned interests.
- Multiple U.S. departments and agencies are described as serving Israeli interests rather than American ones.
- Democrats are portrayed as opposing Israel's treatment of Gaza and pushing to reduce Israel's foreign aid.
- Democrats focus on domestic issues like housing, healthcare, and affordability, contrasting with Republican foreign priorities.
- The video argues that both parties are flawed but Democrats are more America-first in their policies than Republicans.
- The overarching concern is foreign influence over U.S. politics, particularly from Israel, undermining American interests.
Chapters
- 00:00Republicans' support for Israel and war efforts
- 01:44Education and anti-Israel activism suppression
- 03:39Visa and citizenship revocations for Israel critics
- 05:11Criticism of Republican policies and Israel alignment
- 06:53Democrats' opposition to Israel and domestic focus
- 08:20Democrats' election strategies and affordability focus
- 10:20Foreign influence and party comparisons
- 12:29Political betrayal and distrust in politicians
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
You got the big ones. The US has gone to war against Iran in many ways at the behest of Israel. Do not forget, we went to war against the Houthis in Yemen in the spring of last year. We bombed Iran in Midnight Hammer
Speaker A
in June of last year. We're in now a 140-day war with Iran this year, which will cost us a trillion dollars when all is said and done. The actual operations have cost us $50 billion, but once all is said and done, the
Speaker A
damage to the economy, the deployment of the carriers, replenishing the interceptors, all of it, it may cost us hundreds of billions, maybe up to a trillion dollars. This is a big-ticket item that Israel is getting.
Speaker A
We have funneled an additional $12 billion foreign aid to Israel to fight in Gaza.
Speaker A
Fought their wars against Iran, fought their war against the Houthis. You also have the cover-up of the Epstein files. Who's the primary beneficiary there? We're saving Israel from embarrassment. We're saving Israel's allies, their spies in America, from embarrassment.
Speaker A
People like Ronald Lauder and people like Peter Thiel and the rest of them, we're sparing them from embarrassment when the DOJ covers up the files. Those are the big ones. This is what the Republicans have done for Israel. War with the
Speaker A
Houthis, war with Iran, $12 billion in aid, a trillion-dollar potentially war, burying the Epstein files to spare Israel's oligarchs from the embarrassment of being associated with the sex criminal.
Speaker A
But it doesn't even just stop there. The Department of Education seized billions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars, from Harvard, Columbia, University of Pennsylvania. The list goes on and on. All the highly selective schools were held hostage by the
Speaker A
Department of Education taking their federal grants, loans, and other monies unless those universities brought on anti-Semitism monitors, unless they let the Department of Education rewrite their Middle Eastern studies curriculum to be pro-Israel, unless they gave reparations to their Jewish faculty. I'm
Speaker A
not even making that up. At Northwestern University, you have to undergo some kind of pro-Israel screening process to be admitted into the university. That's in Evanston, north of Chicago.
Speaker A
You have Trump personally conducting bilateral negotiations with China to sell TikTok's US arm of their business to Larry Ellison's Oracle.
Speaker A
Larry Ellison will control the TikTok algorithm, control US users' TikTok data, and he owns the biggest share of TikTok, up to 20%.
Speaker A
And Larry Ellison's a friend of Netanyahu. Trump and Larry Ellison, through the FTC, have green-lit his son David Ellison's acquisition of First Paramount Pictures and now Warner Brothers, which has allowed Barry Weiss to take control of CBS News and CNN.
Speaker A
Homeland Security and the Department of State are reviewing every single US visa holder, every foreign worker, every foreign student, every tourist.
Speaker A
They're all being spied on by DHS to see if they've ever posted anything critical of Israel on social media. And if they do, their visas are revoked.
Speaker A
We're looking at students, even those that have citizenship, even those that have been naturalized. If they've participated in Israel-critical activism, their citizenship is revoked, their visas are revoked.
Speaker A
This is the breadth of what the Republicans have done for Israel. It's in every sector of society, through every department and agency.
Speaker A
It's the FTC. It's the FCC. It's the Department of Education, Department of State, Department of Homeland Security.
Speaker A
At Health and Human Services, they declared anti-Semitism a public health crisis. It's the Department of War, prosecuting these wars. It's the National Security Council where Mike Waltz was passing intel to Israel.
Speaker A
It's the Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, who's in bed with Israel. Every department and agency. It's across the board. It's all for them.
Speaker A
Nothing for us. It's all for them. I mean, come on, guys. If you hear all of this, and this is insane, how can you still support the GOP? Like, excuse me, but it's almost like voting for the Republicans at this point is like voting
Speaker A
for Israel. They're advertising themselves as America first, make America great again. But, if you hear all of this, does it sound to you to make America great again? It looks like they're more busy with how to make Israel great again, how to give Israel a
Speaker A
golden age instead of us. And, yeah, then I just don't understand, why would you still vote for them? And, if they don't do anything in favor of you, but they're doing almost everything in favor of other people, of another
Speaker A
country, why would you support them? Meanwhile, you've heard a lot of this before. Meanwhile, what's happening on the Democrat side?
Speaker A
On the Democrat side, so far in this administration alone, the Democrats voted to release the Epstein files.
Speaker A
The Democrats, working with four Republicans in the House of Representatives, forced a vote on compelling the DOJ to open up the files. The Democrats in the Senate and the House voted for the War Powers Resolution to stop the war in
Speaker A
Iraq. The Democrats signed a letter to the Trump administration that they acknowledge Israel's illicit nuclear weapons program. The Democrats, the majority of them, voted to strip Israel of all their foreign aid. The Democrats have acknowledged and opposed the
Speaker A
influence of AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in our politics. The Republicans have given Israel everything. The Democrats, ironically, have been America first on this issue.
Speaker A
Every way you cut it. Just the same way. I would even argue, I would go further and I would say the Democrats, in their focus on housing and health care, that's an indirect way that they are America first. Republicans' education
Speaker A
policy is eradicate anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel. Democrats' education policy is subsidize education for Americans.
Speaker A
Republicans' health care policy is that anti-Semitism is a public health crisis. Democrats' health care policy is make health care more affordable.
Speaker A
Okay, think about it. Democrats are winning elections in Pennsylvania, in New Jersey, and they're running on affordability.
Speaker A
They're running on the impact of data centers. They're running on affordability of housing and health care. They're running against the wars and in favor of subsidizing our own population, making sure that we're stakeholders in the AI economy boom, and
Speaker A
that all the wealth doesn't go up to the firm owners that actually control these industries.
Speaker A
Meanwhile, the Republicans are shoveling money to Israel, shoveling money to Israel-aligned oligarchs. They're prosecuting a regime change in American institutions to make sure that pro-Israel retain control over them.
Speaker A
Now, once again, let's not overstate things. Here's the other issue. The Democrats are not even America first. Why are they doing this against Israel?
Speaker A
They're doing all these things fundamentally because they oppose Israel's treatment of Gaza. And I oppose Israel's treatment of Gaza, but that's not even really the biggest problem.
Speaker A
Fundamentally, the biggest problem is that a foreign country is controlling our nation and our affairs.
Speaker A
The Democrats have said, "Look, we want to keep giving Israel humanitarian aid, and we might even want to give them security assistance, but they just have to not attack Gaza." Well, I don't even really want to give them security assistance.
Speaker A
And if we do, I don't even just want it to be contingent on that. I'd want it to be contingent on other things, too.
Speaker A
So, Democrats are even coming at it from a different place. They, in a way, they want to stop giving money to Israel so that we can give it to illegal immigrants. So, we can give it to, you know, these huge amounts of people in our country that don't work. To people that are already the beneficiaries of major govern
Speaker A
you know, these huge amounts of people in our country that don't work. To people that are already the beneficiaries of major government programs and in-kind transfers through services.
Speaker A
I mean, I get the point Nick is trying to make here, but I don't believe that all Democrats they think like this. I actually do believe that some Democrats they're also so done and they're also so annoyed by the fact that Israel has so
Speaker A
much power in our country. And I actually support that they're going against it. If the Republicans are not doing this, then it's actually good that at least the Democrats are doing it. And of course, I also don't support many
Speaker A
things what the Democrats want. I'm also like, by the way, kind of surprised that Nick was like shilling for the Democrats. Like lately, he has been shilling for the Democrats a lot. But I was like, who is responsible for that?
Speaker A
It's the Republicans because they don't listen to us. So, of course, if they don't listen to us, why would we listen to them? Like they're not entitled to your vote. Let me make this very clear.
Speaker A
The same goes for the Democrats and the Republicans. They are not entitled to your vote. They have to work for your vote. They have to listen to you. They should do the things what you want instead of the other way around. They
Speaker A
work for us. We don't work for them. Let me make this very, very clear. And as long as like the Democrats, if they're going against Israel, I can I support it. I really support it. Like This is where the Republicans have an
Speaker A
opportunity. Okay? This is why I'm not a Democrat. This is why I'm saying we need to vote for Democrats to make a point. In the same way the [clears throat] Democrats are voting to strip Israel of its foreign aid to make
Speaker A
a point, we need to vote for Democrats to make a point. Here's the larger picture.
Speaker A
The real opportunity, it's not with the Democrats. Cuz what are the Democrats going to do? They're going to continue to support Israel, no doubt about it.
Speaker A
And they're going to put America last in other ways. Open borders, pathway to citizenship, taxing white people to give money to foreigners. They're just going to They're going to reopen USA ID, and they're going to give all the foreign
Speaker A
aid to Africa instead of Israel, okay? Let's not go crazy here. When I say that Israel's more America rather Democrats are more America first than Republicans, I mean that to make a point, which is Republicans bill themselves as America first, and they're
Speaker A
compared to the Democrats, they're not. Here's the opportunity. Republicans have a real opportunity in '28 or in '32 to rebrand and seize the initiative on this issue.
Speaker A
Democrats will eat our lunch unless Republicans meet them where they are. What do I mean by this?
Speaker A
If Democrats' message is, "Let's take the money that we're giving to Israel and give it to illegal immigrants.
Speaker A
Let's take the money that we're giving to Israel and fighting the wars, and let's make healthcare free, and let's make everything free for all these people that don't work, and let's open the borders and have queer liberation." What are the Democrats doing?
Speaker A
They're isolating the Republicans with the one issue we can't give up. They're saying, "Look, [clears throat] we may control the borders and we're going to reduce prices, and unlike the Republicans, we don't have the Israel issue. They're unwilling to give it up.
Speaker A
We're going to seize the initiative on economic populism. We're going to seize the initiative on other issues." Republicans have an opportunity to outflank the left in exactly the same way.
Speaker A
The Republicans need to learn how to play politics and say, "Look, unlike the left, we're going to give you free stuff, too. We're also going to kick the illegals out.
Speaker A
We're going to close the border. We're going to kick the illegals out. We're going to put America first, and we're going to We're going to give all the freebies, as well. Yeah, we're going to take care of everybody. We'll have We'll
Speaker A
have Medicare for all, too. We'll have Medicare and Medicaid for all, too. Who gives a [ __ ] We're not going to touch social security. We're not going to touch Medicare. We're going to make housing more affordable. We'll do all the things
Speaker A
the Democrats are doing. We're going to end the foreign wars, too. We're tired of the foreign wars. We're going to defund Israel, and we're going to have a strong border. And unlike the Democrats, we're not going to have [ __ ] and
Speaker A
we're not going to have open borders. We're going to do the things that they won't do, which is we're going to stop the worst excesses of wokeism that are still there, and we're going to close the damn border.
Speaker A
That's something Democrats will never do. We'll give you everything we're giving and the things they're not willing to give.
Speaker A
That's the winning Republican message, and you know what that's called? It's called America First.
Speaker A
It says, "Look, we're in the late stage republic. It's a giveaway, anyway." People go, "Well, we can't just give away things." They're going to be given away, anyway.
Speaker A
We're already giving everything away, anyway. Nobody works. Nobody pays taxes. Everybody's living on the dime of everybody else.
Speaker A
It doesn't matter. Promise everything. It doesn't matter. Just retain control over the administrative state.
Speaker A
Republicans need to learn the lesson, which is if we can run on an economic populist message, vague promises of cheap housing and cheap education and cheap health care, if we vow to do the popular things, ending the wars, getting rid of
Speaker A
the Epstein files, or I should say giving the Epstein files to the public, anti-corruption, close the borders, then we can win. If we can combine an economic populist message with an anti-war message, an anti-corruption message, and if it's credible, then we
Speaker A
can take the initiative from them, because then what are going to What are going to be the sticking points?
Speaker A
For the left, it'll be open borders and wokeism, and nobody wants that [ __ ] But right now, the sticking points are support for Israel, and nobody wants that, and that's the thing Republicans can't give up.
Speaker A
Now, what's funny about this is that, by the way, this was the Trump strategy in 2016. This was literally the Trump playbook in '16.
Speaker A
Exactly, but come on, Nick, it's not that easy. Like many of these politicians, they are just liars. You can't trust them at all. They're saying all these kind of things what the people want to hear to collect votes, but the
Speaker A
moment when they are in power, they forget about this. That's exactly what the Trump administration did, by the way, and that's exactly the reason why everyone is so mad now, and why everyone feels betrayed by our own administration, because they did this
Speaker A
already. So, why would we trust them? And by the way, do you really think that, for example, the biggest donors of the GOP, that they want to have mass deportations, that they want to completely close the border? No, they
Speaker A
love the cheap labor, they love the consumers, they can make a lot of money, so they don't even want this. And do you think that, for example, the biggest donors, like a Larry Ellison, like a Miriam Adelson, do you think that they
Speaker A
like this war with Iran? Yes, of course, because they are loyal to Israel. So, no matter how you're going to how no matter how you want this, everything what you just said, they are saying that they will give this back to the people
Speaker A
because they need their votes, but the biggest donors, they don't want this. So, they always have to listen to the biggest donors because they're the ones in this country who have real power, and that's so wrong. Of course, I wish that
Speaker A
like the politicians would listen more to the people instead of to the biggest donors, but that's just the world we live in now. They don't care about us.
Speaker A
They're only saying the things what we want to hear, but they always listen to their biggest donors. That's just how it goes, and I I agree. This is so wrong.
Speaker A
When Trump was asked about healthcare, which was extremely expensive even then, did Trump say we're going to privatize it and we're going to get rid of Obamacare? No. Trump said, "We're going to take care of everybody. I don't
Speaker A
care." He said, "I'm just going to give everybody cheap healthcare, and we're going to take care of everyone." He said, "The real problem is crime and the open border and the foreign wars." He said, "But I'm going to bring back
Speaker A
jobs. I'm going to stop the job-killing trade deals. We're going to have jobs again. We're going to revitalize the mid-size towns and cities.
Speaker A
We're going to put tariffs on other countries. We're going to make money. We're going to bring jobs back. We're going to take care of everybody with healthcare. We're going to have infrastructure. We're going to have fiscal stimulus. I'm going to give
Speaker A
everybody jobs. Shovel-ready jobs, sound familiar? We're going to rebuild everything. And we're going to bring the troops home from Iraq, and we're going to put Americans first." Okay, he said, "We're going to stop the big money in politics. No special
Speaker A
interests. No international bankers. No globalists." It's literally that was the Trump playbook. It was economic populism and the wars, anti-corruption, basically a Keynesian economic stimulus.
Speaker A
That was the Trump message even back then, but he drifted away from that. And what we got in 2024 was a supply a [ __ ] supply-side tax cut.
Speaker A
That's what the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was in '17, which he extended in the big beautiful bill.
Speaker A
It's a corporate tax cut. That's a supply side tax cut. We got Reaganomics. We have that. We have the neocon foreign policy, a war with Iran for regime change about a WMD program that doesn't exist.
Speaker A
We have, by the way, high prices anyway. And this is why the Democrats are eating our lunch.
Speaker A
So, all I'm saying is let us hearken back to the playbook that works. Trump tested it, tried it out. It is what created this movement and sustains it in spite of his betrayal of that original premise.
Speaker A
All right, the Trump playbook in 2016, it basically died in 2017. And yet, that playbook was so powerful, the idea behind it was so powerful, it sustains the Trump movement to this day, 10 years later, in spite of Trump's
Speaker A
fundamental betrayal of its principles. Those ideas from 2015 and 2016, when Trump said, "I'm rich. I don't want their money. I don't need their money.
Speaker A
Those global special interests and international bankers, they don't control me. Politicians are puppets. They're all talk, no action." "I will deliver true change, tariffs, jobs, infrastructure, and the wars." I mean, that that message, the patriotism, "We're going to make
Speaker A
America great again. We're going to be proud of our country." That message is still so resonant and still so powerful and still so desirable.
Speaker A
The Democrats have synthesized this into their playbook. That's what Tim Walls was. That's what, in a way, Andrew Yang was. That's what Zoran Momdani is.
Speaker A
The Democrats, if you're paying attention, they have imbibed they they have metabolized Trumpism, and they're giving their own version of it. They learned all the right lessons from it.
Speaker A
They took America first to its logical conclusion on the left, which is housing, healthcare, and AIPAC.
Speaker A
And they took the lessons from Trumpism, which is be relatable, don't be politically correct, don't alienate normal white people. And they're still progressive, but they're doing it in a way that's more disarming.
Speaker A
They learn it's so powerful. It still carries the Republican Party. It has transformed the Democrats, and it is that they metabolized the lessons from Trumpism, which is how they're coming back.
Speaker A
Younger, more patriotic, more unified, less woke, less politically correct. In a way, they're giving their to the best of their ability their version of America first. Jon Ossoff, the Jewish Democrat senator from Georgia, said on the 4th of July, he said, "Think of
Speaker A
where our country is on the 4th of July. What would the founding fathers say?" And everybody boos.
Speaker A
Cuz the liberal progressive audience is thinking, "Yeah, Cheeto Hitler wannabe king is [ __ ] on the Statue of Liberty and the Declaration." So, Jon Ossoff says, "If the founding fathers could see 250 years in, what would they think of us?" And these
Speaker A
liberal progressives assume, they go, "Boo! Yeah, they'd be ashamed of this wannabe king that's making a dictatorship." And Jon Ossoff goes, "They would see that we've abolished slavery, and they would see that we gave everybody civil right." And people go, "You know what?
Speaker A
Yeah." What is he doing? He's reconstituting Make America great again. He It's a reconstitution. It's a recapitulation in a new way of what Make America Great Again meant. Whereas in 2016, the Democrats were downright anti-American saying the only way to
Speaker A
make America better is to basically fundamentally reject America's roots, its founders, its documents, its history, you know, we need a black national anthem and a black flag and a black this and that and you know, destroy the monuments.
Speaker A
Jon Ossoff is recapitulating and saying, "No, we can appropriate the American story. No, the founding fathers are with us and they always have been. We've al- we're still on the right side of history. We marched in Selma and we've
Speaker A
freed the slaves and we did whatever. We can keep making America great. Joe Biden sort of started it and you can see it it's still being expressed by people like Mondani and people like Ossoff. They're finding their voice with
Speaker A
this. I don't know and maybe this is just me, but I feel like I can't trust any politician anymore in this country, no matter if they're on the left or the right. I don't care about that, but I
Speaker A
feel like they're all just saying everything what the people want to hear because they're big demagogues. Like they're kind of smart. For example, like I I hate Trump. I don't like at all what he is doing now, but he's actually very
Speaker A
smart. What he did, how he tricked us, like you could almost write a movie about this. Everything what he promised us, everything what he told us so people would vote for him and he only did this again in my opinion and I said this
Speaker A
multiple times. be wrong, but I feel like Trump only became a pre- president to like enrich himself, to like stay out of jail, to make sure that his family has like generational money. Like what he made two billions of dollars almost
Speaker A
like with his crypto meme coin scam. That's generational money. So of course, if he has to trick his own people, he doesn't care about us. So he will say whatever we want to hear because then people would vote for him and then he
Speaker A
can enrich himself, then he can stay out of jail. So why would he not do that?
Speaker A
Why would he not do that? He did it very smart. Like he tricked almost like millions hundreds of millions of people.
Speaker A
He tricked all of these people. It's crazy actually. People should write a a book or a movie about this. But and this is so wrong. Like they always do this.
Speaker A
They're just saying what the like all these politicians, they don't care about us at the end of the day. They're just acting like they care about us to collect our vote and the moment when they are in power, they only care about
Speaker A
themselves. And this is how it always goes and I can understand that many people or I will talk for myself in this case. If you have been betrayed multiple times by a politician, why would you still believe in them? Why would you
Speaker A
still trust them? So this is why I'm telling people like let's refine. Let's be progressive. The Trump playbook in 2016 is still the most revolutionary thing that has happened in 10 years. But we're forgetting the lessons that it taught us. The Democrats
Speaker A
are picking them up and that's why they are insurgent and ascendant because we forgot what they have learned the hard way.
Speaker A
So just go back to that. That's why they're [ __ ] us up. If Republicans came out with a credible platform of America first on economics, anti-corruption, money out of politics, against foreign influence, in favor of domestic security, which is closed borders and
Speaker A
police, maybe minus surveillance, anti-war, I mean we have it for the taking. Here's the problem, however, no one from the Trump administration can credibly put forward this message because they are tied to Trump and they live and die by him.
Speaker A
They live by his endorsement and his support and association with him, but they die by the same thing.
Speaker A
Cuz no one in the middle and the left is going to believe that someone from the Trump movement can deliver those things cuz they're cynical about it. This is why we need an outsider to shake things up in the Republican primary in '28. We
Speaker A
need somebody in '28 who's going going in from the outside and say look, the GOP is a disaster. We failed. We failed you.
Speaker A
But I wasn't a part of it, you know, and not not, you know, they wouldn't say it that way obviously, but they'd say like, you know, I'm a different kind of Republican. I'm younger. I'm actually America first. I'm
Speaker A
a breath of fresh air. We're going to move on from Trumpism. We're going to advance Trumpism. Not Trumpism without Trump. We're not sliding back to the old way. It's not Nikki Haley. It's not compassionate conservatism. It's a progression from Trumpism. It's it's
Speaker A
something more dynamic, more sophisticated, having learned the lessons of Trumpism. That's what we need.
Speaker A
And maybe we'll get it in 2028 and maybe we'll get it in 2032, but that's the only way.
Speaker A
But I think first the Republican Party has to be degraded and diminished entirely by having the Democrats utterly annihilate them for a couple of years at least.
Speaker A
Okay, but what if the GOP and the Democrats, if they're almost the same, if it's like two different sides of the same coin, how do you want to solve this problem then? Like it doesn't make any sense at all. And by the way, I think we
Speaker A
should forget about Trumpism at this point. Just don't speak about Trump anymore. Forget about Trumpism. That era is closed. Like it was a it was one big disaster.
Speaker A
It's over. Don't even waste your time anymore to talk about Trumpism. I really believe, and again, that we just need a third party. I don't believe in the Democrats anymore. I don't believe in the Republicans anymore. It's always the
Speaker A
same. Every time they they they trick us, they make us believe that we that we have an option, that we can choose between one or one or the other. It's exactly the same in my opinion. Like correct me if I'm wrong. I just don't
Speaker A
trust them. No matter if it's like another person. I don't even care about the person anymore. It's the party. The parties are the problem. Party and the Republican Party, they're responsible for so many disasters in this country.
Speaker A
And I don't blame them or I mean like I do blame them, but I think instead of like blaming them, instead of like wasting our time to talk about about like how wrong they are, talk about a solution. I really think,
Speaker A
in my opinion, and again, I'm just thinking out loud, I really believe the only option we have is a third party.
Speaker A
Call it the America first party, call it however you you want to call it, I don't care, but as long as it's not the Democrats or the Republicans anymore.
Speaker A
They had enough time, they could prove themselves so many times, and every time they proved themselves wrong.
Speaker A
I don't I don't trust them anymore. I don't trust any politician of the Democrats or the Republicans. But again, guys, this is my opinion. I think we need a third party. New people, normal people, not people who are controlled by
Speaker A
the Israel lobby, not people who listen to their biggest donors. We need people in office, we need a guy in office who listen to the people of this country.
Speaker A
Instead of like a guy in office who who listen to like a lot of rich billionaires. That's over. We did this, we've been there, over. That's Trumpism in a nutshell. Betraying your own people and only listening to like the biggest
Speaker A
donors. I don't want that anymore. I don't support that. Third party. But again, guys, my opinion, I'm very curious about your opinion. Do you agree with Nick on this one? Do you disagree with him? Like, what do you think? Would
Speaker A
Do you think it's a good idea if we would start like a third party? What is your opinion about that? Please let me know in the comments. It's very important to say. I read all comments. I even try to reply to some of your
Speaker A
comments. So, I'm very very curious. As well, guys, if you like this video, please hit the like button. I would really appreciate it. If you really like these kind of videos, consider subscribing. I would appreciate it even more. And then you make sure you don't
Speaker A
miss anything. Thank you guys for watching. I hope you have a wonderful day, and I'll see you in the next one.
Speaker A
Ciao.
Topics:Nick FuentesRepublicansIsraelU.S. foreign policyIran warEpstein filesTikTok OracleDemocratsAmerica FirstAnti-Semitism
