Sara Duterte's camp calls House impeachment hearings unconstitutional amid allegations and defense rebuttals ahead of May 11 vote.
Key Takeaways
- The impeachment hearings are highly contested with constitutional and procedural disputes.
- Defense claims the evidence and process are flawed and politically motivated.
- The House Justice Committee has found probable cause despite defense objections.
- A significant House vote is required to proceed with impeachment and Senate trial.
- Political tensions and accusations of coercion surround the impeachment process.
Summary
- Sara Duterte's defense team claims the House impeachment hearings are unconstitutional and exceed the committee's mandate.
- Lawyers argue the hearings are a fishing expedition and that evidence presented is curated and taken out of context.
- Vice President Duterte's lawyers plan to address allegations in proper legal fora outside the House hearings.
- House Justice Committee found probable cause in two impeachment complaints against Duterte.
- House Senior Deputy Minority Leader Leila de Lima supports the impeachment process and defends the evidence's authenticity.
- Davao City Rep. Paolo Duterte denies allegations of coercion involving district fund threats related to impeachment votes.
- A vote of at least 106 House members is needed to impeach Duterte and send the articles to the Senate for trial.
- The House Committee on Justice is expected to vote on the impeachment report and articles before the plenary vote on May 11.
- The impeachment complaints include allegations of inciting sedition and grave threats against the Vice President.
- The defense team highlights procedural and constitutional issues with the impeachment process.











![Snowstorm:Rosario+Vampire:Full English Cover:[SEDGEIE] — Transcript](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7JYqQ1bVl5M/maxresdefault.jpg)