현 중국땅에는 존재한 적 없는 중국 왕조 남극에?

This video critically examines the historical accuracy of Chinese eclipse records in ancient texts, highlighting inconsistencies and lost original manuscripts.

Key Takeaways

Ancient Chinese eclipse records are incomplete and often lack exact dates, undermining their reliability.
The Records of the Grand Historian has been heavily reconstructed, making it a questionable source for accurate history.
Historical texts were possibly manipulated for political reasons, distorting the true historical record.
Original manuscripts are mostly lost, with only later copies and fragments available.
Verification and critical examination of historical records are essential to uncovering the truth.

What the video covers

The video investigates total solar eclipse records in ancient Chinese historical texts, especially the Records of the Grand Historian.
It argues that much of the known history is unreliable due to missing dates and inconsistent eclipse records.
The Records of the Grand Historian, written by Sima Qian, has undergone centuries of copying, editing, and loss, making the current versions untrustworthy.
Ancient eclipse records often lacked precise dates and were used as political or symbolic warnings rather than scientific observations.
Fragments of original manuscripts exist only as facsimiles or copies from later dynasties such as Tang and Song.
Many ancient documents, including those from Dunhuang, were taken by Western countries, limiting access to original sources.
The video suggests that official histories were reconstructed and possibly forged or heavily edited over time.
It highlights discrepancies in eclipse records across different dynasties and geographic locations, questioning the historical narrative.
The video also touches on the political implications of historical record-keeping and the manipulation of history.
Overall, it calls for skepticism and verification rather than blind acceptance of traditional Chinese historical texts.

Chapters

Why are the solar eclipse records in ancient Chinese texts considered unreliable?

Because many eclipse records lack exact dates and were often used symbolically or politically rather than scientifically, making them inconsistent and incomplete.

What happened to the original manuscripts of the Records of the Grand Historian?

Most original manuscripts were lost or damaged over centuries, and the versions available today are reconstructed copies from later dynasties, which may contain distortions and errors.

How do the Dunhuang documents relate to the study of ancient Chinese history?

The Dunhuang documents include ancient manuscripts from the Tang dynasty that provide fragments of historical texts, but many were taken by Western countries, limiting access to original sources for verification.

Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown

Speaker A

I'm going to try to look for total solar eclipse records with Jamie. There is so much to say because the history we know now is just complete nonsense. Especially in the Records of the Grand Historian, the annals of the Qin state, specifically volume 26.

Speaker A

state, specifically volume 26. Uh, they say there are solar eclipse records in volume 27 and the astronomical records in volume 27. Well, okay. I looked, and I’ve read through the entire Records of the Grand Historian from the beginning myself. I have read the

Speaker A

They say there are solar eclipse records in volume 27 and the astronomical records in volume 27. Well, okay. I looked, and I’ve read through the entire Records of the Grand Historian from the beginning myself.

Speaker A

Later Han, a systematic and continuous table of solar eclipse dates is not laid out in relatively great detail.

Speaker A

I have read the Records of the Grand Historian as well, but I don't think I've seen those records; that's what I'm talking about right now. So, while it does deal with history and astronomical phenomena, compared to later official histories like the Book of Han or the Book of the Later Han, a systematic and continuous table of solar eclipse dates is not laid out in relatively great detail.

Speaker A

to verify it. Uh, in some sections of the annals covering the early history of the Qin and Han dynasties, solar eclipses or strange stellar phenomena are mentioned intermittently. In ancient records, a solar eclipse that occurred during a king's reign was

Speaker A

That is why you can never trust what they say. You have to verify it no matter what. They lie so much; they are geniuses at lying. They are complete and total liars. So, you should never just take their word for it; you have to verify it.

Speaker A

Records of the Grand Historian from beginning to end. Very thoroughly, too. However, it is difficult to find scientific or meteorological descriptions of total solar eclipse phenomena in the modern sense, or consecutive dates of solar eclipses, in the entire text of the Records of the

Speaker A

In some sections of the annals covering the early history of the Qin and Han dynasties, solar eclipses or strange stellar phenomena are mentioned intermittently. In ancient records, a solar eclipse that occurred during a king's reign was recorded as a warning to the ruler or as an indicator of the era.

Speaker A

date records. Not a single one. So I asked, is a record without a date even possible? A solar eclipse, a total eclipse, is an incredibly important event, a major incident, so how could there be no date recorded? Uh, they are

Speaker A

Now, let's see exactly how it was written. From my perspective, I have also looked through all the eclipse records in the Records of the Grand Historian. I have read the Records of the Grand Historian from beginning to end. Very thoroughly, too.

Speaker A

such, we could cross-reference them. Then it would become evidence that this history is a lie. Now, then, let's look at the solar eclipses of the Han dynasty period. So, since the Han dynasty came first after the two states

Speaker A

However, it is difficult to find scientific or meteorological descriptions of total solar eclipse phenomena in the modern sense, or consecutive dates of solar eclipses, in the entire text of the Records of the Grand Historian.

Speaker A

significant parts even before the Eastern Han period. So, the book we know as the "Records of the Grand Historian" was written by Sima Qian during the Han dynasty, but that " Records of the Grand Historian"...Even before the Han dynasty, a significant

Speaker A

That’s right. It is not recorded. There are no dates. I'm saying the dates, the dates aren't written down. What kind of record is it if there's no date? What kind of record is that? It’s not there. There are no date records. Not a single one.

Speaker A

years ago, but reconstructed versions that have undergone centuries of copying, proofreading, and editing. Even if the "Records of the Grand Historian" survived into the Song dynasty, it was all reconstructed, meaning the work itself cannot be trusted. Currently, fragments of the "

Speaker A

So I asked, is a record without a date even possible? A solar eclipse, a total eclipse, is an incredibly important event, a major incident, so how could there be no date recorded?

Speaker A

Records of the Grand Historian" are also partially preserved in the form of facsimiles. This is the oldest printed version of the "Records of the Grand Historian" that humanity can currently verify as a physical object. So, the " Records of the Grand Historian" we know

Speaker A

They are continuing to lie. If it wasn't tied to dynastic political significance or deemed worthy of being recorded, it could have been omitted from the historical text. This is a lie. It means it's a book of lies.

Speaker A

Tang dynasty are included among the ancient documents discovered in the Dunhuang Mogao Caves. Where are these documents, you ask? Most of the documents discovered in Dunhuang are now held by Western countries; the United States, Britain, Germany, and France have all taken them away. Only

Speaker A

Why? Because if they recorded the exact dates and such, we could cross-reference them. Then it would become evidence that this history is a lie.

Speaker A

, but most of those documents were taken away by the U.S., Germany, France , and Britain. Did they take them and edit them all together to create a bogus book? I said it was created by those British fellows. That was back in

Speaker A

Now, then, let's look at the solar eclipses of the Han dynasty period. So, since the Han dynasty came first after the two states, and the Han dynasty is the earliest eclipse record, if you look at the Book of Han or later historical records, the original text of the Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji) had already been torn or lost in significant parts even before the Eastern Han period.

Speaker A

contemporary standards, but if you trace its roots back, you reach the Northern and Southern Song Dynasty woodblock prints, and even Tang Dynasty hand-copied manuscripts, dating back at least a thousand years. This is how it is now. This, this is correct. It is

Speaker A

So, the book we know as the Records of the Grand Historian was written by Sima Qian during the Han dynasty, but that Records of the Grand Historian... Even before the Han dynasty, a significant portion of the original text had already been torn or lost.

Speaker A

manuscripts are what remain. Therefore, a manuscript has no real meaning. But only manuscripts remain. They are things without meaning. In the process of being copied countless times, they already suffered from the loss of the original form, distortions, and typos.

Speaker A

And the standard versions of the Records of the Grand Historian we see today, such as those published after the Song dynasty, are not the original manuscripts written by Sima Qian 2,000 years ago, but reconstructed versions that have undergone centuries of copying, proofreading, and editing.

Speaker A

have been pieced together into a mess; the current Book of Han you are reading is essentially a book of lies. Starting with the aforementioned Song editions, the Ming Dynasty editions, such as those from 1583 during the Wanli era,

Speaker A

Even if the Records of the Grand Historian survived into the Song dynasty, it was all reconstructed, meaning the work itself cannot be trusted. Currently, fragments of the Records of the Grand Historian printed from woodblocks during the Song dynasty exist in places like the National Library of China or Japanese collections.

Speaker A

Han printed during the Joseon Dynasty, are still preserved in domestic libraries and museums in Korea. 1929 was merely a period in modern times when various old editions were collected, corrected, and reprinted, while numerous physical copies of the Book of Han from the periods before

Speaker A

Only a very, very small part of it remains. Some of the original, authentic copies of the Records of the Grand Historian are also partially preserved in the form of facsimiles. This is the oldest printed version of the Records of the Grand Historian that humanity can currently verify as a physical object.

Speaker A

pretext of modernization or readability , they arbitrarily inserted place names or commentaries into the original texts or added footnotes to subtly distort and alter the original geographical reality; this is the core of the matter . This is the most, this is the

Speaker A

So, the Records of the Grand Historian we know is actually one created in 1929. There are fragments of the Records of the Grand Historian from the early period before the Qing dynasty, specifically 7th to 8th-century copies from the Tang dynasty; these handwritten fragments copied by hand during the Tang dynasty are included among the ancient documents discovered in the Dunhuang Mogao Caves.

Speaker A

This is our national treasure. This is, uh, a map created in Goguryeo around the 1st century BC, it's a map of the constellations in the sky, created around the 1st century BC, and then in the 1st year of King Taejo of the

Speaker A

Where are these documents, you ask? Most of the documents discovered in Dunhuang are now held by Western countries; the United States, Britain, Germany, and France have all taken them away. Only small fragments of these books remain now.

Speaker A

After four years of research, it was engraved in stone in the fourth year of King Taejo of Joseon. This is a map made during the Goguryeo era. This is a map made in the 1st century BC during the Goguryeo era. So, this map

Speaker A

Only a few fragments remain, you say? Those books were found in China—that is, in Cave 17 of the Mogao Caves in Dunhuang—and a massive number of ancient documents were found in Cave 17, but most of those documents were taken away by the U.S., Germany, France, and Britain.

Speaker A

But the most important thing here— what is truly crucial—is that this is the South Pole. The South Pole. The Zhou Dynasty's location is drawn at the South Pole. The Zhou Dynasty was at the South Pole. The Zhou Dynasty was at the

Speaker A

Did they take them and edit them all together to create a bogus book? I said it was created by those British fellows. That was back in 1929.

Speaker A

It was near the South Pole. At the South Pole. It means the South Pole was a massive landmass. The South Pole was a vast land where humans could live.

Speaker A

So, in 1929, the modern and contemporary official histories of China were re-published in the form of modern movable type or edited versions, which is what we call the "Baina" edition—the 104 histories, etc.

Speaker A

Pole, this land called the South Pole, was a massive territory. A massive land . But they are lying about the South Pole. Now, let's take a look at that.

Speaker A

The 1929 book is a modern edition close to contemporary standards, but if you trace its roots back, you reach the Northern and Southern Song Dynasty woodblock prints, and even Tang Dynasty hand-copied manuscripts, dating back at least a thousand years.

Speaker A

the Piri Reis map. It is the Piri Reis map, and what this means is that the current appearance of the South Pole is drawn here—this is Antarctica. This is the map of Antarctica, the area around the South Pole, and it is called

Speaker A

This is how it is now. This, this is correct. It is the so-called woodblock print published during the Song Dynasty. This is extremely important. This woodblock print was written by Ban Gu.

Speaker A

exposed. It is completely exposed. The coastline of Antarctica is shown, and there is a map showing ships sailing there. So, let's take a look at this.

Speaker A

The original copies of the Book of Han, or the Later Han, were manuscripts written on bamboo or silk. They say that these manuscripts are what remain. Therefore, a manuscript has no real meaning.

Speaker A

maps, as well as maps by Columbus. This map was officially presented to the Sultan in 1517 and has been kept in the Topkapı Palace in Istanbul ever since.

Speaker A

But only manuscripts remain. They are things without meaning. In the process of being copied countless times, they already suffered from the loss of the original form, distortions, and typos.

Speaker A

Reis map dates back to 1513. Because it is from 1513, they argue it would have been impossible to depict Antarctica before it was even discovered.

Speaker A

The oldest existing editions are from the Song Dynasty; just like the Records of the Grand Historian, the oldest actual physical copies of the Book of Han handed down today are those fragments published during the Song Dynasty.

Speaker A

an American professor named Charles Hapgood requested the U.S. Air Force to analyze the Piri Reis map and received a reply confirming that it clearly depicts Antarctica. Consequently, there is a claim that Hapgood searched the Library of Congress and found other

Speaker A

Only pieces remain, and they have been pieced together into a mess; the current Book of Han you are reading is essentially a book of lies.

Speaker A

believe the map in Hwasun is this one; it depicts Antarctica as a giant landmass—you need to know the truth about what is real—it is shown as a massive land. I could understand if there were only one or two, but there

Speaker A

Starting with the aforementioned Song editions, the Ming Dynasty editions, such as those from 1583 during the Wanli era, and the movable type or carved editions, were published countless times by both the state and private individuals up until the Qing Dynasty.

Speaker A

This map. Now, this map is that very piece of evidence. This is a map drawn by a person named Olive Martin, and this right here is North America. North America. It is North America, and this is South America. But the middle is

Speaker A

This is how history was forged. It is all induced history; history books like these, including old editions of the Book of Han printed during the Joseon Dynasty, are still preserved in domestic libraries and museums in Korea.

Speaker A

side. On this side. So the center is a massive sea. It is drawn as a massive sea, as you can see. The center, this center is drawn as a massive sea. This massive sea is drawn right here. So it

Speaker A

1929 was merely a period in modern times when various old editions were collected, corrected, and reprinted, while numerous physical copies of the Book of Han from the periods before that still exist.

Speaker A

By the sea. So, this image remains exactly as it was. What this is, right here, is Cuba. This right here is Cuba.

Speaker A

What is the difference between the editions before 1929 and the one published in 1929? The 1929 edition is the most decisive and fatal problem with historical books published around the time of the New Culture Movement is that, under the pretext of modernization or readability, they arbitrarily inserted place names or commentaries into the original texts or added footnotes to subtly distort and alter the original geographical reality; this is the core of the matter.

Speaker A

this sea on this side, all the way from top to bottom, is all ocean. It was completely, totally split apart. So it was like this, and this side should actually be over there. However, a map proving this has been discovered. Ah,

Speaker A

This is the most, this is the Cheonsang Yeolcha Bunyajido. All of history is recorded on this celestial map.

Speaker A

so what it says here is "The Sea of China and India.""The Sea of China and the Indies," the sea. This means it is the Indian Ocean. Where is this sea? It is the sea just below Virginia that is

Speaker A

called this. It is written here. "India of China and," so what is it? It is written as "The Sea of China and the Indies." Do you know why this place name "Virginia" is called Virginia?

Speaker A

This name "Virginia" comes from this person, Sir Francis Drake, who is a hero of the war between England and Spain. The war where the Spanish Armada was first defeated and won during the Anglo-Spanish War is the Battle of

Speaker A

Gravelines, and the person who led the Battle of Gravelines to victory is this man. So, it is the Queen of England.

Speaker A

But the Queen of England at that time, Queen Elizabeth, was the "Virgin Queen. " So, after occupying this region, after taking this land, England took this land in the fight against Spain.

Speaker A

While taking it, they named this land after the "Virgin Queen.""Virginia" means "virgin," and it is dedicated to the Virgin Queen. So it means, "I dedicate this land to the Virgin Queen.

Speaker A

" That is what it means. I dedicate this land to the Virgin Queen. That is why they named it Virginia. However, regarding this land, it is written here as "The Sea of China and the Indies." In other words, this land was called

Speaker A

the Sea of China and India. So, we can see that the claim that Columbus discovered the West Indies and mistook it for India is a fraud. Well, this place was India from the very beginning . Why, for this, you have to look at

Speaker A

what I mentioned earlier to understand. The country The Zhou Dynasty was in the Antarctic, wasn't it? It is written right here that the Zhou Dynasty was here. It's the Antarctic. The Zhou Dynasty was in the Antarctic. The Zhou

Speaker A

Dynasty was at the pole, and the Qin Dynasty of Qin Shi Huang was right next to the Zhou Dynasty. It was on the axis . The Zhou Dynasty. Then, what country was Qin Shi Huang of the Qin Dynasty

Speaker A

from? This Qin Shi Huang, what kind of person was he? King Ashoka of India is actually Qin Shi Huang. I talked about that. No one watches it. What am I supposed to do when no one watches it?

Speaker A

Anyway, for Qin Shi Huang, the time the Zhou Dynasty started to become powerful is called King Zhaoxiang of Qin, also called Ying Ying Ying-si. That King Ying-si is actually who? He is the 26th king of the Zhou Dynasty. Being the

Speaker A

26th king, and since in the old days it was a duchy, the 25th king of the Zhou Dynasty was Duke Xiao of Qin. Duke Xiao of Qin's name was Ying Quliang. But during the time of Ying Quliang, the

Speaker A

Zhou Dynasty grew tremendously. During Ying Quliang's time. It grew during that time, and Ying Quliang's son, King Zhaoxiang, is actually Alexander the Great. No matter how much I explain, what can I do if no one watches? They don't watch. No one watches. They

Speaker A

aren't interested. So, on the seal used by Alexander the Great, the four-wheeled chariot, said to have been found in Qin Shi Huang's tomb, is imprinted exactly. The exact same four-wheeled chariot is imprinted there . That So, Alexander is actually King

Speaker A

Zhaoxiang of Qin. King Zhaoxiang. So King Zhaoxiang, Alexander, is the 26th king, and they call him King Huiwen.

Speaker A

King Huiwen. The 26th king, it's the same 26th king. And this Then who is Qin Shi Huang? Then, India's Qin Shi Huang is actually India's King Ashoka is Qin Shi Huang. No matter how much I explain it to you, no matter how

Speaker A

detailed I am, what can I do if no one watches it? Really, no one is interested. No one is interested. They are only interested in garbage. They are only interested in nonsense, garbage, and lies, and even when I

Speaker A

teach the truth, what am I supposed to do when no one pays attention? It's written here. The Qin Dynasty was here.

Speaker A

Here. But this Qin Dynasty was here, and at that time, India was in this part. India. So King Ashoka unified the entire world. So, naturally, the land of America became India, too. Do you understand what I'm saying? Well, since

Speaker A

he unified the entire world, that place naturally became India, too. That is why it was named the Indian Ocean. Why was the name "China" attached to that place? Our country was China. The word "Kore" means China. So that means our

Speaker A

country was located over there, in American territory. That is why the names "China Sea" and "Indian Ocean" were given. I mean, how on earth can I explain this so you'll believe it?

Speaker A

Because the Qin dynasty controlled the whole world, the Han dynasty took control of the Qin. Since the Han dynasty took control of the Qin, where does the Han solar eclipse appear? It appears in America. Why? Because that was the core region. So it is normal

Speaker A

for the Han dynasty's solar eclipse to be visible from America. So, I am going to show the Han dynasty's solar eclipse . This is from the Hunminjeongeum Haerye. It says "The sounds of our country's language differ from those of

Speaker A

China," and I said an explanation was provided here. About China. "China is the country where the Emperor resides," and it is written that it is our country. It says China is the land of the Emperor. But do you know what this

Speaker A

means, everyone? It says "the country where the Emperor resides," but in our linguistic customs, one cannot refer to one's own country as the land of the Emperor by elevating oneself. So, what does the word "Emperor" mean here? It

Speaker A

is a term referring to the Yongle Emperor. Who is the Yongle Emperor? Why did I say it is our country? The Yongle Emperor is exactly King Taejong.

Speaker A

Taejong is exactly the Yongle Emperor. Regardless of Chinese history or Korean history, in any history, it is impossible for kings of neighboring countries to use the same temple name in the same era. To use the temple name "Taejong." That is something that

Speaker A

cannot happen. It is an impossible thing. But Taejong and the Yongle Emperor used the same temple name, Taejong. That is evidence that they are the same person. So why was our country called "Little China"? Ah, you can know

Speaker A

that if you read the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty carefully. So, if you look at the records from the Joseon Dynasty period, Now, King Taejong's son is Sejong, right? But Sejong appears as the third son. There were two sons

Speaker A

before him. Yes, there were two grand princes before him. There were two older brothers. But it's not that there were only two older brothers. If you look at the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty, there were five older brothers

Speaker A

. Five. However, regarding those three brothers, it is recorded when they died . It says they died when they were young, but there is no record of when they were born, how old they were, or how they died. Those records are in the

Speaker A

records of the Ming dynasty of China. What does that mean? Now, do you know what this means? This is our country, and during this King's reign, up until King Sejong's reign, there was no distinction between our country and the

Speaker A

Ming dynasty. There is no distinction. In one country. However, King Taejong split the country into two during his reign. He gave the Ming Dynasty to his eldest son, and to his third son, the one he cherished most, to his most

Speaker A

cherished son, Sejong, he gave our country. That is why our country became the "Little China." So, when we say " our country is the land where the Emperor resides," this means it was a period when the Ming Dynasty and our

Speaker A

country were indistinguishable. They were one country. At that time. And as I analyzed the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty, I explained that all of this is an account of the Yongle Emperor. I talked about that. It is about the

Speaker A

Yongle Emperor. But people don't believe it. People just don't believe it. How on earth? I mean, do they not know what these characters mean, or what this implies? These records are primarily the history of the State of Lu. In other words, the Chinese book

Speaker A

called the "Spring and Autumn Annals," said to be written by Confucius, is a book centered on the State of Lu. It is mainly a history book of the State of Lu. But this history system of Lu is, specifically, it has a significant

Speaker A

number of solar eclipse records. They have specific dates, and so within the solar eclipse records of Lu, there are quite a few specific solar eclipses recorded. Most of the ones observed in the Spring and Autumn Annals were seen

Speaker A

from the South Pole. This is a solar eclipse of Lu. That, most are such solar eclipses, and this too is a solar eclipse of Lu in 42 BC. This one too.

Speaker A

Now, this one is Ah, this one here is a solar eclipse of the Han Dynasty. The date for this is quite off. It is off by about three months. So, this solar eclipse cannot be verified. Since it is

Speaker A

a completely false eclipse, off by about three months, this is the same case as well. This one is also off by about three months. However, in general , the solar eclipses are caught near the South Pole. These are. Generally

Speaker A

speaking. Now, this is, a solar eclipse of the Han Dynasty. This is a Han Dynasty solar eclipse. It is a Han Dynasty eclipse, but since this is 272 AD, it is the Later Han period. This is indeed a solar eclipse from the Later

Speaker A

Han period. This is exactly a Later Han eclipse, and it was captured in Central America or a bit toward South America.

Speaker A

But because the eclipse line enters here, it is very close. It is on the side close to the South Pole. A total solar eclipse was captured in this area . That is one of them. This 297 AD eclipse is significantly off in its

Speaker A

date, so it cannot be verified. This is also off by about three months, and this one is in 521 BC. It is a solar eclipse, and a Han Dynasty one at that, but the date is also very wrong. The

Speaker A

date is off by about three months, so this cannot be verified either, but generally, it is caught at the South Pole. It is. This is a solar eclipse from the era after 583. I can't confirm this one, but this is a Tang dynasty

Speaker A

eclipse. Since the Tang dynasty records are mixed up, I can't be sure, but it generally appears near the South Pole.

Speaker A

This is it. It is generally near the South Pole. And this eclipse is a Sui dynasty eclipse. Today, quite a lot of Sui dynasty eclipses are appearing as well. The duration is short, but there are many Sui dynasty eclipse records,

Speaker A

and those Sui eclipses are captured up in the north like this. This is Greenland. It’s something that can only be observed right next to Greenland here. It means the Sui dynasty was a country located very far north. It doesn't even come close to

Speaker A

the Chinese mainland here. In 591, this is also a Tang dynasty record. The Tang dynasty was also a country that existed in South America. The Tang dynasty in South America, this is South America, right? The total eclipse line is

Speaker A

passing right through the middle of South America. This is a Tang dynasty eclipse. Now, this is also a Tang dynasty eclipse, and it is mainly captured in the Antarctic like this.

Speaker A

This Tang dynasty eclipse. So it means it was located near the Americas. This goes for all of China's successive dynasties, so China is a very different country from ours. Because China uses a chair-based culture. They live with beds. Their grammar is exactly the same

Speaker A

as Westerners '. Everything really aligns with the West. It is so very different from our country. I mean, the grammar is different, and their lifestyle is different. They live with beds. It is so, so different. From our country, and this is all written in the

Speaker A

eclipse records. This one as well, for 607, I can't quite tell if it's a Tang or Sui dynasty eclipse. It looks like a Tang dynasty eclipse. Ah, is it a Song dynasty eclipse? Let's take a closer look. Ah, it is a Tang dynasty eclipse.

Speaker A

Yes. 668. Wait, this is a Sui dynasty eclipse, 668. Ah, it's a Sui dynasty eclipse. This one. It's a Sui dynasty eclipse. The 600 area earlier is the same. The Sui dynasty is generally captured near Alaska like this. Not

Speaker A

even once is this total eclipse captured near the Korean Peninsula or the current Chinese mainland. This is an eclipse from 695, anyway, whatever eclipse it is, what is this? This also seems to be captured in the Antarctic.

Speaker A

727. Ah, this is a Song dynasty eclipse . I didn't specifically write down the name of the country for this eclipse, so anyway, I've investigated the successive total eclipses of China.

Speaker A

These are all captured in the Antarctic . All of them, most of them are captured in the Antarctic. Most of them were observed in the Antarctic. So, as the South Pole melted completely and turned into a mass of ice, these

Speaker A

species all migrated. They were all captured at the South Pole. All of this is from the year 760. What is this record? If it’s the year 760, it’s not the Song dynasty era, this is Tang dynasty style too. Now, all those solar

Speaker A

eclipses are being captured near the South Pole. That’s why the theory of uniformitarianism is needed to deceive people. Do you understand what I’m saying? Yeah.

Topics:Chinese historysolar eclipseRecords of the Grand HistorianSima QianHan dynastyhistorical accuracyancient manuscriptsDunhuang documentshistorical forgeryeclipse records

Get More with the SozAI App

Transcribe recordings, audio files, and YouTube videos — with AI summaries and speaker detection. 30 minutes free.

App Store Google Play

Or transcribe another YouTube video here →

Free tools: TXT to SRT · SRT Validator · Merge SRT · Subtitle to Text · All tools