Vervaeke traces how Luther's radicalized self-negation and sola fide, shaped by Augustine and Paul, responded to the meaning crisis of the Scientific Revolution.
Key Takeaways
- The Scientific Revolution and the Protestant Reformation jointly isolated the individual from both the cosmos and tradition, intensifying the meaning crisis.
- Luther's radical self-negation and sola fide reflect a response to deep existential anxiety rather than a stable resolution of it.
- Luther's rejection of participatory knowing and reason in salvation shifted meaning toward arbitrary will and individual acceptance.
- Self-destructive behavioral patterns, as Luther described them, parallel modern psychodynamic insights about unconscious repetition.
What the video covers
- Recaps the Scientific Revolution: Copernicus, Galileo, and mathematics as the language of reality undermined sensory experience and left the universe purposeless.
- Describes the resulting sense of being an isolated mind trapped behind veils of illusion, with God increasingly understood as a matter of will.
- Introduces Martin Luther as a Titanic figure shaped by Rhineland mysticism, Augustine, and Paul, and by his own terror of divine wrath.
- Explains Luther's view of the self as radically self-obsessed and self-destructive, interpreting pride and rebellion against God as intrinsic to human nature.
- Uses the example of repeated self-destructive relationship patterns to illustrate the parasitic, self-consuming unconscious processes Luther described.
- Presents Luther's doctrine of salvation by faith alone, in which faith becomes passive acceptance of grace rather than participatory knowing.
- Contrasts Luther with Erasmus's notion of synergy, showing Luther's view that God's saving act is arbitrary and driven by will rather than reason.
- Argues the irony that Luther's attempt to free people from self-obsession produced a new form of anxiety and self-negation.
- Connects the Protestant Reformation's attack on tradition and institutions with the Scientific Revolution's cutting of the self off from the world, compounding anxiety.
- Notes the emergence of the priesthood of all believers and early ideas of separating church and state, alongside the rise of an individualistic search for personal election.
Chapters
- 00:00Recap: The Scientific Revolution and the Loss of Meaning
- 03:39Introducing Martin Luther and His Inner Conflict
- 18:00Luther's Self-Negation and Self-Destructive Pride
- 28:20Salvation by Faith Alone and the Arbitrariness of Grace
- 43:20Luther's Attack on Tradition and Institutional Authority
- 55:00The Priesthood of All Believers and Church-State Separation
- 66:40Anxiety, Election, and the Lack of Certainty
- 83:20Hobbes, Computation, and the Pursuit of Certainty
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
[Music] you [Music] welcome back to awakening from the meaning crisis last time we took a look at the advent of the Scientific Revolution and we looked at the work of Copernicus and how the important advent of a scientific description of reality
Speaker A
had with it the consequence that most of our experience our sensory experience was questionable as illusory in nature galileo also developed that idea of the math as the language of reality and use that with the new experimental method a
Speaker A
method also born out of the idea that most of our cognition is deceptive and biasing in nature and he used that to discover inertial motion and that and change the notion of matter into something that exists and resists our
Speaker A
will but that had the effect of killing the universe and making it purposeless in nature and thus we become odd islands of meaning and purpose in a vast ocean of meaningless purposeless material motion so all of that of course is gonna
Speaker A
have an impact on people's self understanding their their the meaning that they're using to make sense of their existence and look what's happening here that Aristotelian idea that the structure of your experience and the structure of reality conform has
Speaker A
been radically undermine and now you are trapped within your own mind behind veils of illusion disconnected from the world and God has become progressively more and more a matter of will there's an individual that takes all of this up
Speaker A
and he does more than just think about this or speak about it or write about it he's one of those really Titanic individuals who exemplifies the chaos and the anxiety of his time this is Martin Luther he's definitely
Speaker A
deeply influenced he's German he's deeply influenced by the Rheinland mystics he's influenced by that growing tradition of the self as radically self negating inner conflict being at the core of spirituality he's an Augustinian monk he's deeply influenced by Augustine's ideas of self
Speaker A
depravity and our inability to achieve mystical union with God unaided and through Augustine Luther of course is deeply immersed in and impressed with Paul's ideas about our inner conflict and now that parallels a conflict within God between God's love towards us and
Speaker A
God's justice driven anger and wrath towards us and Martin Luther is very terrified of that wrath he's very terrified of it and he has taken that notion through Tyler of mystical self negation and it has become radicalized because of the influence of Augustine
Speaker A
and Paul and his own inner conflict so that the self negation in Luther's psyche has become self-loathing he experiences the self as radically folded into itself obsessed with itself in a completely immoral self-centered fashion so the self is this radical self feeding
Speaker A
self negating because as the self is unfolded and obsessed with itself it is simultaneously being cut off from God and cut off from reality so it is very much a self-destructive process and I really want you to hear that self
Speaker A
destructive process that he sees as the essence of the self so this is Luther's interpretation of the biblical notion of pride and rebellion against God that we are intrinsically self-obsessed in this self-aggrandizing self-destructive fashion so try to try to think of
Speaker A
moments in your life that will give some substance to what Luther is saying you have discovered a pattern of behavior self-destructive for example perhaps you keep dating the same kind of person and you keep going back to this and it keeps
Speaker A
turning out to be wrong for you and perhaps also wrong for the other person so you step back and you've talked to friends and you reflect it and you make a deliberate conscious effort oh no no I'm not going to date this purse this
Speaker A
kind of person anymore I'm not going to date that type of person I'm gonna date this type of person and that will change things I'll break this pattern and you go in and you find somebody they seem to
Speaker A
be totally different and you start dating them and then lo and behold against your will even though it seems to be something that you willfully brought about you find yourself caught in the same destructive pattern again and of course Freud and Jung and the
Speaker A
whole psychodynamic tradition very much part of the legacy of Luther by the way are gonna make much of that fact that we keep repeating even in our conscience efforts to change our behavior we keep repeating these self-destructive patterns so although I'm critical of
Speaker A
Luther there's a deep truth here in Luther right there is the touching of the group the way in which our unconscious processes or unconscious cognition can be beset with these we've talked about these parasitic processes that have a life of their own and can
Speaker A
consume us so Luther is convinced that he cannot do anything to save himself he takes Augustine's notion right that the Neoplatonic mystical ascent is insufficient on its own and has to be supplemented with you know the love of God through Christ
Speaker A
he takes that and he radicalizes it in a very powerful way because of his own personal wretchedness he comes to the conclusion that there is nothing he can do and that leads into a startling interpretation of Paul an interpretation
Speaker A
that is going to put him at odds with the Catholic Church and this is the interpretation that we are saved by faith alone where faith becomes nothing more than a complete acceptance of God's saving grace so let's unpack this very
Speaker A
carefully because it's become so immersed in our way of thinking and being the idea here is that faith has is right it notice what's happened all that sense of part participatory knowing the sense that we're participating in a
Speaker A
process remember the Israelite notion that we're participating in our cultural history were participating in the creativity of God all of that is now gone it's gone and your sense of what it's like to be you your sense of self
Speaker A
is completely twisted and illusory so all the prospective of knowing all the participatory knowing is being eradicated it's being reduced down to the acceptance of a proposition and an acceptance that is cannot in any way be based on evidence or argument because
Speaker A
that would be your mind participating in your salvation it has to be a radical pure acceptance so that the self negation of the Rheinland mystics has come to fruition in Luther's ideas here now what does that mean that means that you have to what you
Speaker A
radically radically have to accept is there's absolutely nothing you can do and even your affirmation of the proposition of the Creed of Christianity is something that has to be given to you now what does that mean from God's side
Speaker A
of this equation it means that God's act of saving you is completely arbitrary there is not B since there is nothing you do there's no thought word or deed that you perform that in any way earns or has any causal effect upon God's
Speaker A
behavior and you and I'm not over representing this look at the debate between Lutheran Erasmus Erasmus tried to propose what he called synergy that the human being and God were working together in a participatory fashion for salvation with God of course having the
Speaker A
bulk of the work and Luther rejects that utterly God saving of an individual is completely arbitrary so God has become right remember what we talked about an ahkam right that God's will supersedes his reason God's reason is now not involved at all
Speaker A
it is just an arbitrary act of will that saves us and we have to radically accept that arbitrariness now think about what that means and there's a weird there's an irony here there's an irony here and it's it's almost a self-referential
Speaker A
irony because Luther is trying and I I think he's he's very sincere but he's trying to rescue us from right the fact that we are obsessed with ourselves in an idolatrous fashion and that we that that obsession is one a source of deep
Speaker A
suffering from for for us we know that that self-obsession cuts us off separates us but the irony is in his endeavors to deal with that look at what Luther is teaching what he's what is he what is he putting into
Speaker A
our cultural grammar that we are inherently worthless and that our inner life is one of self-loathing and the only solution to that is arbitrary or betray unearned regard this is the cultural training for narcissism narcissism is to be trapped to be
Speaker A
self-obsessed within self-loathing and that what you want to alleviate is unearned positive regard not for any reason not for anything you've done completely amoral unearned positive regard that's narcissism so the one of the deep ironies of Luther's revolution is that
Speaker A
and I think this says something about what's going on at the time what are the deep ironies is he actually lays the grammar for cultural narcissism we are all being trained to experience ourselves as wretched self-obsessed and that the only solution is unearned
Speaker A
positive regard and so we can see we can see the spirit of Luther in our obsession with Instagram and our obsession with snapchat we constantly want unearned positive regard now there are other consequences of this radical change of course immediate
Speaker A
consequences Luther comes into conflict he protests against the Roman Catholic Church that's what Protestant comes from because the Catholic Church has a different doctrine of salvation right that it's one in which the human being has still has a participatory role and
Speaker A
because of that the church also thinks that its cultural history think of how this is still an Israelite notion the church still thinks that it's tradition matters for human salvation that participating in that tradition the tradition the cultural history of the
Speaker A
church is also something is that is needed now I'm not advocating for Catholicism here over Protestantism I'm trying to get you to understand what the two sides were standing for so Luther is attacking all of that he's attacking the
Speaker A
authority of the church he's attacking the authority of tradition so history and tradition an institution don't matter why because Luther is a child of his time he is trapped inside his own mind he advocates that all that really
Speaker A
matters in matters of faith are with individual conscience and please remember what this word means it means knowing yourself science kansai ins conscience knowing yourself the one thing you know is yourself and so Luther refuses to recant he
Speaker A
refuses to change his interpretation to be in line with the church and he valorizes individual conscience as the final authority over a person's spiritual life this lays the foundation so do you see what's happened here this withdrawal of
Speaker A
meaning into the individual mind isolated individual mind is now being appropriated as well that must mean that the mind the individual conscience is the final sole authority of what matters it's a radical idea many other cultures find this a bizarre idea that we possess
Speaker A
in the West and so of course there's a lot of discussion nowadays about individual responsibility individual authority we have as Adorno talked about it we have a cult of authenticity that being true to yourself and this is Lutheran being true to yourself is the
Speaker A
ultimate authority by which you should judge and evaluate your life now notice what has happened the connection to reality being true to reality has been superseded by being true to yourself and it that is also emerging with a cultural
Speaker A
grammar that is training us in narcissism now because of this Luther Luther was a monk and yet he comes to the conclusion that the monasteries should be shut down why would he why would he come to that conclusion well right the West for a
Speaker A
long time had these paired institutions he had a knowledge institution that has already emerged and is being developed right you know in the Middle Ages and this of course is the University we're supposed to get a universal education
Speaker A
come to understand right as much of reality the universe as you can and that was paired to a place where right you have to go through transformation in order to acquire wisdom and this is the monastery and so this is the idea here
Speaker A
right that here you're seeking that self transcendence this is this is right this is the legacy of the axial revolution this of course is a response to the emergence of first Aristotelian science and then the new science of people like
Speaker A
bacon right Copernicus Galileo and the two are supposed to represent an important synthesis of how human beings are to make sense of themselves and to find a meaningful life but this institution places a huge premium on self transcendence as we've seen
Speaker A
and for Luther this is the grand illusion the idea that human beings are capable of self transcendence is something he thinks is the greatest lie that our self tells us he sees that as the greatest instance of the sin of
Speaker A
pride see as if you lose the perspectival participatory sense of faith if faith just becomes assertion born out of radical acceptance then the idea of this being even possible to you disappears and so what happens is that these institutions are being shut down
Speaker A
now that means the university now needs something else in order to take this knowledge and give it existential transformative relevance to individual lives the university has to be attached to something else that transforms people's lives gives structure and
Speaker A
purpose to their existence and of course we know what that's going to be that's going to be the state and knowledge is not going to be linked so much to wisdom it's going to be linked to politics and
Speaker A
of course that is going to be supported by the new science people like bacon famously arguing that knowledge is power the forerunner of the work of Michel Foucault and others so we get the loss of all the psycho technologies of wisdom
Speaker A
of cultural communities that are committed to providing guidance and support to people who want to cultivate wisdom of a historical tradition that can relay to us this the patterns of success and failures and give us practice that we can use to test out and try for
Speaker A
transformation all of that is being lost so you know where to go for information you know where to go for knowledge but now today you do not know where to go for wisdom we have Sapienza obsolescence of our
Speaker A
knowledge and we have knowledge being inextricably bound to the machinery of the state and to politics such that it is becoming increasingly difficult right now for us as a culture to distinguish politics from knowledge from the willful assertion of things that we must simply
Speaker A
accept because of an arbitrary will wielding power so the Protestant Reformation is Titanic it is really inappropriate if you're trying to understand the advent of the meaning Christ is to only look at the Scientific Revolution you must look at the
Speaker A
Scientific Revolution and the Protestant Reformation together they are conjoined now there are other important aspects of the Protestant Reformation that come to the fore because of his attack on tradition and institution Luther advocates what he calls the priesthood
Speaker A
of all believers there is nothing in between there is no mediator between you and God there is no church there's no priest right there's nothing here there is just a direct personal relationship again this idea of your own
Speaker A
personal spirituality has its root here now because of this Luther argues that for the priesthood of all believers everybody has an equal spiritual authority because of course learning processes of growth and self transformation those are no longer important criteria all that matters is
Speaker A
the degree to which God has saved someone now we've talked about some of the negative consequences of that but a positive consequence for that is that Luther argues for a complete form of democracy within the church everything should be decided democratically because
Speaker A
there should not be any significant Authority or hierarchical structure because Luther is rejecting all of that this of course is why the Catholic Church is so like resisting to him like why they are so inimical to him they
Speaker A
just want this idea eradicated because it Minh the very structure and existence of the institution of the Catholic Church now Luther doesn't propose political democracy he only proposes democracy within the church but nevertheless that is going to give people in their day-to-day lives
Speaker A
experience with democratic processes democratic decision-making in fact in the areas that they consider most important about their lives they're going to be acting democratically now Luther thinks that there shouldn't be democracy in the world outside of the church and when the peasants revolt in
Speaker A
Germany because they're being influenced by this idea of the importance of the individual individual conscience and authority Luther does not side with the peasants he sides with the princes he sides with established authority he has a two worlds doctrine there's a doctrine
Speaker A
within the church and that's a world that is remember how God is divided right that's the world of God's love and that's where we act democratically but outside the church we don't know who's saved and who's not saved we'll come
Speaker A
back to that point and because of that that's the world under God's wrath then that's a world that has to be kept in check by political authority wielding the sword of power again that's a that's a dark aspect of Luther
Speaker A
it also brings with it the beginning of an idea of the separation of church and state radical new idea now Luther of course is proposing it because he's proposing it that within the church under God's love people should be
Speaker A
treated one way and outside of the church which is under God's wrath there should be a different way in which people are treated and politically operate and they then the state should not interfere with the church so that we
Speaker A
get the beginnings of separation of church and state which we take for granted but this is going to further drive the secularization of the culture it's going to further drive the secularization of the culture because more and more people are experiencing
Speaker A
the sacred as something private separate secluded unto itself for a separate from the state in politics and of course also science and the University now that not knowing who's saved of course also brings with it terrific problems this was made into a classic
Speaker A
argument which has come under some criticism but I think the core insight is still a value by Max Weber the problem with Luther's model right is you there's nothing you can do to know that you're saved because there is nothing
Speaker A
you can do to bring you have no causal role which means there's no causal evidence there's no evidence how do you know if you're saved because God chooses people arbitrarily so this provokes terrific anxiety right there's tremendous anxiety about whether or not
Speaker A
you're safe yeah you have your own in 2c and Luther gives you there's this dramatic tension and Luther he gives you this this this double boy double bind right he tells you that what you ultimately have to rely on is your
Speaker A
individual conscience but he tells you that that inner world is one of overwhelming self-deception and so what do you do with this anxiety well you can't do anything officially but what you can do is you can work hard to make
Speaker A
your life good because if you're succeeding in the world especially socioeconomic success that surely is a sign that God has chosen you that God loves you so what I'm going to do is I'm going to develop what becomes you know
Speaker A
called the Protestant work ethic because my right my only way of knowing is this unofficial way this relatively unconscious way of knowing that I'm saved is if I'm succeeding well so I'm gonna work hard to succeed and I'm not
Speaker A
going to use my wealth in any way to promote myself right I'm not going to do any what would later be called conspicuous consumption because that would be a sign of pride so I work hard and in order to avoid pride I'm
Speaker A
gonna plum I'm gonna push that the the money the wealth I acquire back into my business I'm gonna get the Protestant work ethic and the IND and this is gonna align so well with the emerging corporations we talked about
Speaker A
the immersion the emerging ascendancy of the commercial class and we get the advent of capitalism as vapors book famously puts it the Protestant work ethic and the spirit of capitalism and you see and and this worry this worry is
Speaker A
a real worry and look this is the like what she watch happen and and this and and what's amazing is how Luther was surprised by this right for a man who has in many ways brilliant he translate the Bible into German into German by the
Speaker A
way he makes the Bible readable for everybody because of the priesthood of all believers and he's a brilliant translator many people consider him as one of the foundational figures of modern German but what he doesn't he honestly he honestly thought that
Speaker A
everybody would read the Bible the same way he did so he thought we've gotten rid of the Pope but there would be right there would be some a unifying thing that would hold Christianity together which is the idea of the Bible so the
Speaker A
Bible becomes very holy and many people have said that what Protestants have is a paper Pope the Bible takes the role for them that the Pope does for the Catholic world and of course we are facing struggles right now in our
Speaker A
culture because we don't quite know what to do with this terrible and awesome book in the Bible what shocked Luther and shouldn't shock us is that Protestantism quickly fragments because when you give people no authority other than their own
Speaker A
individual conscience when you separate them from any claims upon them of tradition any claims upon them of history or institution and he claims upon them of knowledge the idea that they will all agree is actually a ridiculous idea and so what happens and
Speaker A
continues to happen to this very day is the huge and ongoing and accelerating fragmentation of Protestantism into denomination after denomination after denomination and you get what has been called in in other quarters but can be applied here the narcissism of small
Speaker A
difference right there's you have to find that piece of evidence that shows that you are unique that shows that of all out of all of the damned masses God has elected you your uniqueness your specialness your unearned unique
Speaker A
specialness has to be guaranteed and if the more I'm like these other people the more that comes into question so not only am i driven by my own radicalized subjectivity in my interpretation I'm also hungry for a spark of specialness
Speaker A
for me that will show that I am saved and so the narcissism and the fragmentation of Protestantism walk march in lockstep together mutually accelerating so notice what's happened take a look like right you're getting God is withdrawing God's withdrawing by the
Speaker A
time of Luther God has become very much this arbitrary will in a world that is nothing but a battle of wills think about how not that long after Luther you have Shakespeare Luther is the great writer of German Shakespeare's the great
Speaker A
writer of English and notice how somebody who is plumbing the depths of the human psyche Shakespeare in a way that of course has struck most of us as perennial II profound how absent God is from that world of Shakespeare there's
Speaker A
supernaturals there there are the witches in Macbeth there are ghosts in Hamlet but God is not ever present and the supernatural is absurd and arbitrary and largely an agent of chaos and a destiny that thwarts people in their
Speaker A
endeavors it's telling how much God has withdrawn into being an arbitrary absurd supernatural agency that largely thwarts and undermines human activities so the Protestant Reformation is fundamental to our grammar of how we understand ourselves and the problem is even though
Speaker A
we are many of us are children of the secularization that is accelerated by the president Reformation we still carry that grammar around in our head we have to work hard we have to work very hard and if we don't work hard there's
Speaker A
something where it's gonna be revealed how worthless we are and that we hunger for that unearned positive regard we need to find that mark of our uniqueness that shows that we are chosen from the Damned and that we will not disappear
Speaker A
into nothingness and meaninglessness but instead we will be adored or simply who we are now all of these factors the Scientific Revolution the Advent night of the beginnings of capitalism especially corporate capitalism and the Protestant Reformation are all mutually
Speaker A
reinforcing each other they're giving people tremendous anxiety so the Scientific Revolution is basically cutting you off from the world and the Protestant Reformation is basically orphan a--from the mother church and tradition and history you look you look you have to bear at all your individual
Speaker A
you alone by yourself you have to bear it all while simultaneously being told you don't have the resources or the capacity within you to do it you're a nothing that has to bear it all you cut out from the world you cut off
Speaker A
from reality behind illusion there's a restless battle of wills you're cut off from instant wisdom institutions with sappy uncial obsolescence so this is a time of a lot of existential dread you see the very thoughtful response of people like Pascale who's now
Speaker A
experiencing the cosmos not as a cosmos remember what cosmos means a beautiful order that we can participate in and that will afford our self transcendence no Pascal who's a mathematical genius he gets the new math he looks out at the
Speaker A
cosmos and he says those infinite spaces terrify me the cosmos is now cold and terrifying its vastness is inhuman and crippling of the human spirit there's an individual who arises same time and wants to address this anxiety and we
Speaker A
will talk about the comparison between Pascal and this person this person is Rene Descartes Descartes wants to take this grammar of the Scientific Revolution about math as the marker of reality and he wants to use it to come
Speaker A
up with on his own like a good Protestant although he's Catholic but on his own from his own individual conscience he wants to come up on his own forget the history forget the tradition this is Descartes going to use
Speaker A
the new math to come up with a saloon to this emerging meaning crisis now Descartes so genius and what he does is he invents a new psycho technology one of those powerful psycho technologies a psycho technology that has been so
Speaker A
internalized into our culture and our cognition that it is almost transparent to us we do not realize it is the lens by which we see and understand the world take I'd like to sleep in it's probably led to his death because when he was had
Speaker A
to go to Sweden he they didn't let him sleep in and he got it had to go Anna cold air and that's probably what led to his death so he'd like to sleep in so one day he's laying in bed and it was
Speaker A
the fashion at the time the architectural fashion further to be tiling on before and tiling on the walls there's a fly for flying around the room now for most of us that's where we spent that's it that's all we got fly in a
Speaker A
room the Descartes notes that he noted that if he counts the number of tiles along right these three axes he can come up with three numbers that will plot wherever the fly is in the room Descartes invents Cartesian graphing the
Speaker A
system we use today the XYZ system he takes the new algebra the new way in which write the new way in which Galileo had been using math and he pushes it even further he invents graphing and what what psycho technology because
Speaker A
that's what it is this is a standardized strategy learn from your society a socialized standardized strategy for information processing what psycho technology more means science to you than a graph when I'm going to make a graph I'm doing
Speaker A
science when I can think graphically I'm thinking scientifically this is one of the most powerful and pervasive psycho technologies and he invents it and this brings with it a powerful idea because he invents analytic geometry any geometrical shape can be converted into
Speaker A
an algebraic equation equations capture reality because remember what Galileo has done math doesn't have to look like it doesn't have to share the same Gestalt as what it's representing that has now been taken to its fulfillment in descartes the equations are not in any
Speaker A
way like what they represent but nevertheless following up on Copernicus and Galileo they are what cut through illusion in into reality now this is a radical idea because of graphing and analytic geometry we get this idea that we can grasp the world with equations so
Speaker A
you think that this captures something deep about the world e equals MC squared and you should because when you really understand this you can take a paper clip worth of matter and you can smash a city to the ground men and women like
Speaker A
gods that's intoxicating the power that it puts at our fingertips it seems to provide overwhelming evidence that this way of thinking puts us deeply in touch with the fiber and fabric of reality we are in fundamentally in contact but
Speaker A
it's not a contact of experience it's not the aristotelian conformity it's not participatory it is purely propositional it is purely abstract it is purely symbolic now that's gonna bring with it a radical idea Descartes thinks well you know what this is how I can understand
Speaker A
the meaning crisis all this anxiety he didn't of course call it the meeting crisis so that's anachronistic on my part but I'm putting words into his mouth so that we can talk to him across space and time there's all this anxiety
Speaker A
there's all this sense of disconnection so Descartes understands the meaning crisis as a lack of a search for certainty conformity in the aristotelian the Neoplatonic sense right participatory perspectival conformity has been replaced by propositional certainty and of course the thing about math for
Speaker A
Descartes is it gives you certainty that's why math cuts through all the illusions that's why it allows us access to such power so Descartes thinks the answer to the crisis is to change transform our minds not in any kind of
Speaker A
spiritual transformation but to transform our minds into machines of certainty Minds that will only work mathematically and logically in terms of equations the way to get certainty is to turn myself into a machine that represents the world through abstract
Speaker A
symbolic propositions and then manipulate those propositions in a purely logical mathematical function so what Descartes is proposing is that the way to address the anxiety of the age is for each one of us to adopt a method that will turn us into computers that's
Speaker A
what a computer is peter is originally a word applied to people by the way in the 1930s or 40s you could have a job as a computer that was your job you would be given the task of taking equations and prop and
Speaker A
processing them in a logical mathematical fashion so reasoning is being reduced to computation we'll talk about what that might mean in a minute the idea is if we can make our minds into purely computational machines then we will achieve certainty certainty in
Speaker A
our beliefs right will give us what Descartes thinks we need in order to alleviate the anxiety that we're suffering and of course we we do that right we we are still business so we on one hand we have the cultural grammar of
Speaker A
Luther and the narcissism and the radical self-doubt and on the other hand we have the Cartesian grammar we seek certainty we don't we won't believe anything until it's certain and of course we vacillate between I must accept it without any evidence or reason
Speaker A
Luther I could only accept it if it's absolutely certain then beyond question Descartes and both of these of course are pathological the first is pathological because if you completely remove people's agency in how they come to their beliefs then you radically
Speaker A
undermine any meaning in life they might possess the other one the pursuit of certainty and there are individuals who seem to speak as if mathematical science will still give us certainty that's an illusion part of what we discover after
Speaker A
Descartes and they Kurt was also surprised and that people ended up disagreeing with him is that science doesn't and can't provide certainty these two equations I put up on the board this is from Einstein this is from Newton what Einstein showed is things
Speaker A
that Newton thought were certain absolute space and time these kinds of formula actually don't possess the certainty that Newton thought they did we'll talk a little bit later about why we can't except in very limited context there are deep deep reasons why we can't
Speaker A
pursue certainty and therefore we can't seek certainty as of the solution to the loss of connection connection to ourself connection to the world connection to other minds now why does Descartes it's like this again this radical irony it's
Speaker A
very similar to Luther why does de cartes attempt to address this burgeoning loss of connections why does it actually result in exactly the opposite an increased sense of disconnectedness well part of it of course is the failure of the project of
Speaker A
certainty so you can understand the a the 18th and the 19th and especially right the 20th centuries as scientific historical histo and philosophical undermining of the idea that we can achieve certainty of course one of the great principles of modern physics is
Speaker A
the uncertainty principle but let's go back so Descartes right proposes that we should do this but there's an individual at his time there's a contemporary of Descartes who makes it explicit and radical and then challenges Descartes with with that radical derivation Hobbes
Speaker A
says well you know all of this what this means is that cognition is computation Hobbs says that he uses an older word he says ratiocination what we would now say is cognition by ratiocination I mean call computation cognition is
Speaker A
computation now there's a lot of people who were going to disagree right with this model of computation there's a lot of discussion right now Brian Cantwell Smith a colleague of mine at the University of Toronto does a lot of
Speaker A
important work on the metaphysics of computation I am NOT trying to state that this is the absolute truth about computation that of course would be ironic given what I just said about certainty all I am arguing is historically this has been the
Speaker A
interpretation of what computation was for people like Descartes and Hobbes that's all we need for this argument but Hobbes says cognition is computation and then here's the radical idea he proposes he takes a new idea current at the time
Speaker A
remember the idea that matter is a substance remember the old Aristotelian idea is matter is pure potential but with Galileo matter is a reality right in the sense of a substance it resists and it's good that it resists because I
Speaker A
need something that resists my will in order to help me with my biases so matter is inert it's resistance it's really there I push on it notice that again all that's left of Conformity is resistance of will Hobbes says well
Speaker A
matter is real and what if I built a material machine that did computation if cognition is just computation and I can build a machine that does computation and some of the first automatic machines are being built at this time calculating
Speaker A
machines if I can make a material a machine that does computation I will have made cognition I will have made ant mind right there at the heart of the Scientific Revolution Hobbes is proposing artificial intelligence notice how artificial intelligence Oh
Speaker A
artificial intelligence is a child of the advent of the meaning crisis and the Scientific Revolution it's not a modern idea artificial intelligence goes back to this time and see what is Hobbs doing with this so you know think you know I
Speaker A
said Galileo kills the universe and Copernicus right kills the reality of our Sense experience but Hobbs is doing something way more personal because up till now like you've been isolated inside your own mind but at least still there I
Speaker A
still have something special unique something spiritual Hobbs kills the soul so soul because if artificial intelligence is right if I can build a machine purely material machine that is capable of computation then I will have made a mind and I didn't have to involve
Speaker A
any soul stuff any spirit stuff in making it and that's radical we'll take a look at how Descartes responds to that and how deep that response is woven into our culture and the meaning crisis and how we move between AI and Descartes
Speaker A
even today thank you very much for your time and attention [Music] you you
Topics:Martin LutherProtestant Reformationmeaning crisisScientific Revolutionsola fideAugustineDescartesErasmusself-negationJohn Vervaeke











