His Web Bot Already PREDICTED The Globalist Fall & The … — Transcript

Analysis of Trump's strategy against globalists and the City of London bankers, exploring predictions and geopolitical insights.

Key Takeaways

Trump is strategically combating entrenched globalist powers and financial elites.
The City of London bankers are central to global geopolitical manipulation.
Predictive technology analyzing collective human psychic input has shown remarkable accuracy.
Trump's foreign policy is aimed at undermining globalist fronts rather than individual nations.
The geopolitical landscape is expected to shift significantly within the next 10-12 months.

Summary

The video discusses Trump's role in what is described as a modern American Revolutionary War against monarchists, globalists, and entrenched powers.
Trump is portrayed as strategically resurrecting Pax Americana by outmaneuvering his enemies.
The City of London and global banking elites are identified as key adversaries behind geopolitical conflicts, including proxy wars.
The transcript references a web bot program from the late 1990s that predicted major events by analyzing psychic human discourse online.
The speaker acknowledges the predictive accuracy of these analyses despite deliberate data pollution attempts.
Trump's attacks on Iran are framed as targeting a front for the City of London rather than Iran itself.
There is discussion about the broader vision of spreading American political economy globally as part of Trump's agenda.
The video includes reflections on the influence of deep state actors and their lack of personal courage.
Philosophical and metaphysical ideas such as simulation theory and human consciousness evolution are briefly touched upon.
The speaker expresses cautious optimism about Trump's success and the unfolding geopolitical phase over the next year.

Chapters

Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown

Speaker A

Trump is finishing up the American Revolutionary War against the monarchists, against the globalists, the Frankists, the Prussians. He is indeed resurrecting Pax Americana. There's no better strategy than to let your enemy think that you're playing into his hands and doing his work for him.

Speaker A

and doing his work for him. And so that's kind of what Trump's approach is.

Speaker A

And so that's kind of what Trump's approach is.

Speaker A

And if the city of London, the bankers, told them to launch nukes at Israel, they would do so.

Speaker A

He's attacking Iran not because it's the Iranians. What his big issue is that they are a front for the City of London.

Speaker A

conversations that turned out to be remarkably predictive. And then I discovered they were deliberately polluting my data streams.

Speaker A

And if the City of London, the bankers, told them to launch nukes at Israel, they would do so.

Speaker A

Sure. Sorry for all the problems. Hey, not a problem. Not a problem. I'm actually quite I might look really calm, but I'm quitely thrilled after all these years because I've listened to you for many, many years. And actually, I'm going to start

Speaker A

In the late 1990s, you designed a program that scrapes data off the internet based on the premise that human beings are psychic and the psychicness seeps out into our discourse. And then you designed the way of analyzing those

Speaker A

hundreds of thousands of people whose lives you've impacted through what through some of the really wacky way out ideas that you've presented that have been really useful as well. Right. So thank you very much for that for the

Speaker A

conversations that turned out to be remarkably predictive. And then I discovered they were deliberately polluting my data streams.

Speaker A

Thank you. I'm going to start with uh so when I've been following you for many many years, listening to all your stuff, then I noticed a few months ago you started reposting videos uh with Tom Luongo who's been a guest on my channel

Speaker A

Trouble to get anything out of. So it was an attack. Cliff, thank you so much for making yourself available.

Speaker A

share that point of view. So I wanted to ask you so so do you think Trump's going to be successful in that in that undertaking? Why do you repost those ideas? Is it something that you agree with or something?

Speaker A

Sure. Sorry for all the problems.

Speaker A

guy. But he was straying into areas that I'm very familiar with and I agree that uh with his opinion that um and with the iron colonel uh the the iron eagle there um that Trump is uh is finishing up the

Speaker A

Hey, not a problem. Not a problem. I'm actually quite—I might look really calm, but I'm quietly thrilled after all these years because I've listened to you for many, many years. And actually, I'm going to start

Speaker A

vision of those people that saw it just as Trump being hoodwinkedked by Jews in Israel and going for perpetual wars.

Speaker A

off if I do this properly, I may end up embarrassing you, okay? Which is start off by acknowledging you because one is I've learned a lot from you over the years, right? And I believe many, many, many, many—I don't know how many

Speaker A

Englishman who turned against the monarchist Mr. Payne and who said the American political economy needed to spread across the planet. And I believe that Tom that uh Trump is doing that. I know for certain that he's attacking what I call the city of London, which is

Speaker A

hundreds of thousands of people whose lives you've impacted through what—through some of the really wacky, way-out ideas that you've presented that have been really useful as well. Right. So thank you very much for that, for the

Speaker A

action, the um uh they have a strategic understanding that is a broad vision, right? And you can't fight uh an entrenched global uh entrrenched like dug into our social order enemy without a very strategic approach to it all that

Speaker A

difference that you've made and the difference you've continued to make. Now I'm going to start with a—You're welcome.

Speaker A

that's kind of what Trump's approach is, right? He's attacking Iran not because it's the Iranians, although there are aspects of the, you know, the radical Muslim stuff he doesn't like and the nuclear bombs and all of that, but he

Speaker A

Thank you. I'm going to start with, uh, so when I've been following you for many, many years, listening to all your stuff, then I noticed a few months ago you started reposting videos, uh, with Tom Luongo who's been a guest on my channel

Speaker A

What his big issue is that they are a front for the city of London. And if the city of London, the bankers told them to launch nukes at Israel, they would do so, right? In order to not for their own

Speaker A

for over nine years and then also the Promethean Action Team, Susan Kokindo and Barbara Boyd. And they're of the opinion that Trump is out to impose the American system of political economy and he's out to fight the globalists. And I

Speaker A

hierarchy behind that that Trump can clearly see and that's his targets. And ultimately the enemy on the other side of them that controls all of that is his enemy. And that's my view on it.

Speaker A

share that point of view. So I wanted to ask you, so, so do you think Trump's going to be successful in that undertaking? Why do you repost those ideas? Is it something that you agree with or something?

Speaker A

over time he has turned out to be accurate. He has like okay I need to listen to this guy. I'm actually and and I'm sure he's going to watch this because I'll let him know. But I'm actually grateful

Speaker A

Yes. Okay. So, um, until recently I've been hesitant to, uh, reflect Tom's material for fear of polluting his audience with my presence because I'm on the woo side of things, right? He's very much a practical economist kind of a

Speaker A

He's a very smart fellow indeed. He's a very and actually I'd say the same about Trump. I think people misunderestimate him. He he you cannot cannot get to where he is with all that opposition that he's had to deal with

Speaker A

guy. But he was straying into areas that I'm very familiar with and I agree that, uh, with his opinion that, um, and with the Iron Colonel, uh, the Iron Eagle there, um, that Trump is, uh, is finishing up the

Speaker A

Yes. In the late 1990s, you designed a program that scrapes data off the internet based on the premise that human beings are psychic and the psychicness seeps out into our discourse. And then you designed a way of analyzing those

Speaker A

American Revolutionary War. Okay, against the monarchists, against the globalists, the Frankists, the Prussians, however you want to think about it. And to do that, he had to be very strategic. And I object—or no, I don't object. I wanted to enlighten the

Speaker A

really really accurate. And I remember some of the um predictions that you'd made that completely boggled my mind like how like the rivers in the sky that you talked about and a few months later that happened and then what you said

Speaker A

vision of those people that saw it just as Trump being hoodwinked by Jews in Israel and going for perpetual wars.

Speaker A

Substack. But I want to talk to you about um the stuff that hasn't come to pass and in particular some of the stuff you said last year because it's it's and and mostly why I want to talk about it

Speaker A

That is not the situation at this time. It's going to appear that way for perhaps another 10 or 12 months and then we'll be into an entirely different phase. He is indeed resurrecting Pax Americana as seen by that famous

Speaker A

Okay. So it's a question of they have yet to appear. Okay. It's very muddy when you're looking at preient language.

Speaker A

Englishman who turned against the monarchists, Mr. Payne, and who said the American political economy needed to spread across the planet. And I believe that Tom that, uh, Trump is doing that. I know for certain that he's attacking what I call the City of London, which is

Speaker A

connotation. The connotation had all of that. It had those remarkable hits like the Costa Concordia, the ship that fell over and all of that, right? Absolutely uh blew me away. But uh a lot of it there there is no way to affix time to

Speaker A

the banking center. Again, it's just a, um, an arm of or a point of attack from the Prussians, the globalists, however we want to call them, right? And so I do agree with Tom. He's a very astute analyst. I agree with Promethean

Speaker A

I think those are next year. Okay. Okay. Good. I I I'll wait. Right. I'll wait. Then the other thing you talked about was when Doge were going through the US departments that they were going to discover all these dollar

Speaker A

Action, the, um, uh, they have a strategic understanding that is a broad vision, right? And you can't fight, uh, an entrenched global, uh, entrenched, like dug into our social order enemy without a very strategic approach to it all that

Speaker A

Veritasium. Now for those of you it's okay at the time of that prediction. Yeah. No, no, it won't.

Speaker A

may frequently, because it's to your advantage, reflect old past behaviors that they used to control. So there's no better strategy than to let your enemy think that you're playing into his hands and doing his work for him. And so

Speaker A

view is is not to be taken as being held and permanent. It's in the constant motion changing changing changing. I just have a snapshot of it. So that so I believe I'm firmly convinced that Bitcoin will rise well over a million

Speaker A

that's kind of what Trump's approach is, right? He's attacking Iran not because it's the Iranians, although there are aspects of the, you know, the radical Muslim stuff he doesn't like and the nuclear bombs and all of that, but he

Speaker A

will indeed present the situation such that that appears. Um Veritasium is another matter. Okay. So at the time that the Veritasium uh forecasts were presented, it tracked for a while after that through the early days of Veritasium and then some

Speaker A

knows that they're not their own master. So he doesn't really care, I don't think, about, uh, individual Iranians dealing with nuclear power.

Speaker A

streams. Okay? And I had to go to all different kinds of trouble to get anything out of it. So it it was an attack. They were they were trying to pollute the data as it arrived to me and

Speaker A

What his big issue is that they are a front for the City of London. And if the City of London, the bankers, told them to launch nukes at Israel, they would do so, right? In order to—not for their own

Speaker A

They put some considerable effort into that. This was in that 2015 2016 period of time. Bear in mind that my worst year for cancer was 2017. They had uh the deep state had beset me with um SEC with

Speaker A

interest, they would just be dupes and would just do it and it would serve the City of London in this perpetual war to erode humanity. And so I call it the City of London, but there's something behind that, right? There's a layer of

Speaker A

dying and at that point in 2017 I just let some things go. just did not bother to pursue what the deep state was doing because I didn't know how long I was going to live and if there was a point.

Speaker A

hierarchy behind that that Trump can clearly see and that's his target. And ultimately the enemy on the other side of them that controls all of that is his enemy. And that's my view on it.

Speaker A

trying to get everything settled so that her last days after I had died uh would be more pleasant for her than the circumstances we had been in. And um and so I altered how I did things and then

Speaker A

Right. Okay. And that's shared by Tom.

Speaker A

veritasium issue is this. There were decisions made on the part of the veritas or on the part of the government to steal Reggie's 98% of Reggie's veritasium right and there were decisions made uh against Reggie that affected him in the base of other

Speaker A

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. And I agree. He's a really, really astute analyst. I don't always agree with him. I don't always catch up with him, like, but I'll wait and see how it plays out. And invariably

Speaker A

that well. It wasn't really my my fight but I knew it was at that point it was headed down to another path than what had been described within the data. So when those predictions came out the deep state had yet to take its interest in

Speaker A

over time he has turned out to be accurate. He has, like, okay, I need to listen to this guy. I'm actually, and, and I'm sure he's going to watch this because I'll let him know. But I'm actually grateful

Speaker A

change constantly. My data is a snapshot that it is good for while it is put out there and then for however long it persists. But that other decisions can be made that will alter the projected um uh future there. usually by altering the

Speaker A

to him that he graces my channel as often as he does. Okay, now you—I'm gonna go.

Speaker A

And they learned that if they were to cause emotional change in large numbers of people, they could affect the um outcome of some of these predictions.

Speaker A

He's a very smart fellow indeed. He's a very, and actually I'd say the same about Trump. I think people underestimate him. He—you cannot, cannot get to where he is with all that opposition that he's had to deal with

Speaker A

whatever moment it's projected and that's it. That's as far as it goes. If it ever reaches that moment of manifestation, it can't and it's an if because it can be interfered with. And so, so um so I go I go to a store. This

Speaker A

without being really, really smart. That's my opinion. Okay. Now I'm going to say a little bit about your web bot, what it is for people who don't know, but you—I think in the late—Very strategic.

Speaker A

There was a young man and and uh two women that were getting their carts and choosing some vegetables out in the front of it. And off to the side was this um schizophrenic individual or a drug addict or whatever who was doing um

Speaker A

Yes. In the late 1990s, you designed a program that scrapes data off the internet based on the premise that human beings are psychic and the psychicness seeps out into our discourse. And then you designed a way of analyzing those

Speaker A

with schizophrenics as you have, I'm sure. And there and he was attempting the schizophrenic in my opinion was attempting to be aggressive to the point where he could just present himself in close proximity to the young man and the

Speaker A

conversations that turned out to be remarkably predictive. And then at some point in 2016, because of the censorship that was being imposed that started creeping in, the data that you were drawing upon became polluted. But prior to that, it was

Speaker A

know that there were two policemen pulling into the parking lot when this occurred. And I um but I knew what was going to be the outcome of this schizophrenic individual and this this uh this group of three people. And so as

Speaker A

really, really accurate. And I remember some of the, um, predictions that you'd made that completely boggled my mind, like how, like the rivers in the sky that you talked about and a few months later that happened and then what you said

Speaker A

just pointed at him and said in my dog command voice, "No, this is not going to happen." Right? And then I held up the $50 and that's all it took to derail that situation. That's kind of what the

Speaker A

about Bitcoin and stuff, right? So I do recommend people go and check out Cliff's work and I'll link to his stuff, his ex, in the description below and that's really the best place to find him and also your

Speaker A

held up the the options. I'm an old tough looking guy. I said no in a very firm voice, but I held out the the carrot to him, the $50, which he took, and he left. And the cops congratulated

Speaker A

Substack. But I want to talk to you about, um, the stuff that hasn't come to pass and in particular some of the stuff you said last year because it's—and—and mostly why I want to talk about it

Speaker A

a few things. I needed a few things. And so I was just doing it as long as I was there and in that town. And so it works that way. That's the way that deep state worked. They did that kind of thing to

Speaker A

is because I wanted it to come to pass and it didn't.

Speaker A

in charge of everything, did it all, he's a very intelligent man that way, technically astute, and so on, but perhaps like myself, not so much socially astute, and he didn't realize that he was being played uh because everything was coming his way. So, it's

Speaker A

Right. So one of the things you talked about, I remember you did a podcast about sigh waves.

Speaker A

because that takes away your power in all the situations. And that's what happened with Veritasia. Will it resurrect? Perhaps there are circumstances under which that can happen. It won't be easy and it won't be immediate. All all of these things will

Speaker A

Okay. So it's a question of—they have yet to appear.

Speaker A

state's doing us a favor, the hodlers, by making this occur in a shorter period of time because usually after a 50% retracement ahead of a havinging, it takes two years. I don't think it's going to take two years for this um the

Speaker A

Okay. It's very muddy when you're looking at preient language.

Speaker A

description below. That's interesting. Okay, two things. So, one is I understand it and I get how everything conceptually everything is vibration. Everything is vibration.

Speaker A

All of this is derived from the emotional import of the words. So it's all emotion.

Speaker A

whatever you thought or your web bot thought or I think is going to happen and that can alter the direction. So, I get that. But then there's something you're saying about the deep state that I wonder about. So the city of London

Speaker A

Okay? It's not the actual—it a connotation has the definition of the word with your emotional a

Speaker A

No, certainly JFK. Yeah. And and now we're looking at Donald Trump up against them. He's up against a really smart, strategic, highly evolved um enemy.

Speaker A

No. In my opinion, no. Um Okay, so this is part of of the thing. Um there are these uh all right I'll say it one way and then we can get into the meat of it all. Um things are

Speaker A

not always as they seem. Everything has a time and a and a nature. The universe in in our materium works in pendulums in in pendulum swings. And the deep state is on the downward side of that swing.

Speaker A

Right? They're they're losing power just naturally because they've been in in effect for so long. The pendulum rose.

Speaker A

They had their peak and now it's swinging back and going the other direction. All right. So, so there is that the enemy was weakening on its own when Trump appeared. And let us note that that the conspiracies are true and

Speaker A

factual in my opinion and that Trump is not acting alone. Okay? Trump is the uh the point man for a very large group of very strategic thinkers probably backed by AI that understands the enemy. the Frankus, the Prussians, city of London,

Speaker A

etc. They know that enemy is weakening and they're taking advantage of all of this. So, it's not what you would think in terms of a big robust enemy that Trump has to fight. Also, there are uh cautions in the language uh between

Speaker A

these enemies, between Trump and all of the people that he fights. In those cautions, he has presented language that they understand that his death unleashes holy hell on them that that the world that his death would create is not the

Speaker A

world that they can manage and control. In uh in the world in which Trump is assassinated, um the heads of uh of the British government will be decimated by homegrown they'll call them terrorists, but I'm saying patriots that will simply

Speaker A

assassinate them. They'll be stabbed. They'll be hauled off. They'll disappear. The individuals within the deep state are not as you and I. They have no personal courage. They are chosen for their roles because they're easily manipulated. Look at all of the

Speaker A

people that you see in any government anywhere. They are weak. They they can't stand pain. They can't take criticism.

Speaker A

And and their minds reflect all of this. It's another aspect of their whole organization uh weakening. So they know that if they take out the one sorry Cliff how can you describe K starmer and Ursula Vanderlayan and Kaakalis in those terms? Those are those

Speaker A

are political giants. How sorry I'm joking with you Cliff. Yeah. Yeah. But they're they're a political giant because of the organization underneath them. Not because of their own personal magnetism, charisma, intellectual power or physical power. Right. Or and so this is the reality of the world

Speaker A

that we live in. Right. They have no integrity. And here's the thing, none of these people that are uh what I call body criminals, okay? So, there's there's intellectual criminals that are that are uh stealing, doing bad things for an

Speaker A

intellectual purpose, a goal. There are the other class of criminals which is the majority of them who are responding to their own internal personal drives and they become criminals especially body criminals. Drugs, sex, uh power, death, trafficking, all of that is to

Speaker A

satisfy a thing arising out of their body. That makes them very weak because they're susceptible. They they respond to those those waves of stuff coming out of their own body. Trump's people know that to influence these evil [ __ ]

Speaker A

all they have to do is to upset the energy balance, the vibrational balance, the tone within that body, and they can make them ever so fearful. There was that British guy that I can't think of his name. I'm terrible with names and

Speaker A

personalities, but there was this high high ranking, maybe he's a prime minister, used to have a young boy brought to his yacht on a weekend, and they would go out sailing off the coast of England. He would rape the boy. He'd

Speaker A

give him a good dinner, rape it, and then he'd throw him over the side. And then the next and when they came back, the boy was not there. And so these individuals are responding.

Speaker A

Yeah. Ted Heath. They're responding, right? They're responding to their own body needs, which makes them very weak. Right. So I'm a fighter. I've done karate, wrestling, all kinds of fighting. And I love facing a bodydriven opponent. So I've been shot, stabbed. I've got over

Speaker A

3,000 sk uh stitches in me over my life. I understand pain. I welcome pain. It's just a sensation. The deep state guys are not like that. They're very fearful of anything upsetting their internal balance of vibration. And this is an

Speaker A

aspect of these seven algorithms that guide our reality that control our reality. They're actually called the the seven governors. And these seven governors are some of the most ancient information you can ever find. Um, I'm of the opinion that there are books that

Speaker A

are very old that have yet to be translated, have yet to see the light of day. I'm of the opinion that we'll find a giant stash, maybe a quarter of a million to a million volumes of books, uh, hidden in a probably a monastery,

Speaker A

but hidden in a cave sealed up, and they've been sitting there for perhaps 10 or 12 thousand years, and this will come out. The deep state is desperate to find these that they not come out.

Speaker A

However, the oldest recorded um book that we have is called the Hymn of Adapa. The Hymn of Adapa predates the anything in the Bible by thousands of years. Yet, it has the entire Bible story. Every damn Bible story, major

Speaker A

Bible story comes out of the hymn of Adapa. I think there is. And then right after that in terms of our chronology and understanding come the um comes the um hermeticum the the teachings of Hermes the corpus hermetica. Okay. And

Speaker A

in that they have described our reality. Now I came across this when I was a young man and um didn't believe it. I read the Hermes and I thought it can't be that simple. And so I've spent since

Speaker A

I was about I came across it when I was like 19 read it completely several times in my early 20s and since about 22 until now age 73 I've been applying first principles thinking and I have recreated in my own mind all of the seven

Speaker A

governors the descriptions of them the hermetic uh principles. Uh I didn't just accept what I'd read. Um if someone wants to get involved with it, the best uh thing available is the kyalon. This is a a um encapsulation. It takes out

Speaker A

all of the ancient language and presents it in a format that is more easily understood by the modern mind. And in there they discuss what we now call the simulation theory, right? That we all live in a simulation. And it has come to

Speaker A

me recently uh because I'm a programmer uh technician that a good way to think about this simulation about our reality is to consider that it's a simulation.

Speaker A

Now I know that it is not but there's no difference between what it is and a simulation. So there's no difference. So you have to ask yourself on a simulation theory paradigm what's on the other side of the simulation? bunch of old bald

Speaker A

guys and computers running an AI and we're all subprocesses within the AI. That's that's a good way to think about these things because it allows you to do an analysis that that can aid you in guiding your life. Right? If you

Speaker A

discovered that there were seven algorithms that controlled our reality, whether or not you considered it a simulation, it would be good to know those seven algorithms and to be able to use those in your reality. And these seven um algorithms are described as the

Speaker A

seven hermetic principles within the hermetic principles themselves. They call them the governors because they provide us the they provide this this simulation or this reality with the governing principles that affect all of our lives. They're they're really easy.

Speaker A

They're very straightforward. We've discussed one of them. Number three, the law of vibration. The principle the governor of vibration. Nothing is static ever. There's no such thing as rest in anything in our reality. The first one is mentalism. The second is

Speaker A

correspondence. As below, so above. They reflect each other. Number three is vibration. Nothing is at rest. Number four is polarity. Everything has an equal and opposite. Okay? And the opposites are always equal in terms of intensity and everything else. Up, down,

Speaker A

right, left, etc. You can't have one without the other. So how do you define left without having a right? Right? How do you find life? Define life without death. At any level, you can apply any of these principles and derive factual

Speaker A

information about our reality if you if you use first principles thinking. Number five here is rhythm. Everything flows in and out. The pendulum.

Speaker A

Everything has a waxing and a waning. You have power at one point and then the universe provides that power fade away for a lot of reasons. And we can get into the reasons if you want. And then there's uh number six which is cause and

Speaker A

effect which we call karma. You know, you kick someone in the nuts, they're likely to smack you in the face. And then there's gender. Everything has gender. So, there is a difference and the necessary difference between male and female, and it must exist. And so,

Speaker A

these seven governors were identified uh undoubtedly in many previous cycles, but for sure they were identified over 10,000 years ago because we have um symbolism that reflects the appearance of these governors showing up all around the planet. And we know the carving in

Speaker A

the rock was put there 22,000 years ago. That sort of thing. The painting on the cave walls from the Neanderthalss in in the southern France. All seven principles are are put there in the symbols. They were thinking about it.

Speaker A

And so um so I'm a very much a a follower of the kybalon or the seven hermetic principles because I use these algorithms in dealing with people just as I knew that that schizophrenic had his own issues. He was being generate.

Speaker A

It was all being generated by whatever it was within his body. Natural mental upset, drug induced. It didn't make any difference. All I had to do was to change the flow, change the the dynamic that had been set in motion, cause that

Speaker A

attention to be shifted and present the reward, the offering in order to get the the situation to diffuse itself. So, this is what Trump does very very much.

Speaker A

And I think it's not I think Trump is brilliant. I think he's uh perhaps one of the greatest certainly is the greatest political thinker I've ever encountered in my 73 years. Right? But I don't think he's alone. I think he has a

Speaker A

uh serious group of uh very deep thinkers that provide him with the basis from which these incredibly intricate strategies are uh derived. And we're living through this. And he he can and he frequently points this out. He points

Speaker A

out what he's doing, right? the trolling, you know how he trolls people, he's telling them in their face, but most most humans are not going to get it. The reason most humans are not going to get it is because as the Gita says,

Speaker A

humanity is divided into quarters. And basically threearters of all humans are simply in a growth process to become more human. And only one quarter of all of humanity has evolved to the point where they are self-aware, self-monitoring of their own thoughts

Speaker A

and are uh able to choose as an adult their own path as opposed to reacting to the trauma of their youth, the circumstances they're in and all of that. I'm sure in your work you have seen those people that live in absolute

Speaker A

horrendous circumstances yet are the most calm centered uh caring individuals you're ever likely to come across.

Speaker A

They're going to be rare. I grant you because they're already rare being in that last one quarter. You and I are both in that last one quarter. those people that have evolved enough that we're on our own life path, not 100%

Speaker A

dictated by our physical bodies and the circumstances that that we have there. And so this is this is an interesting observation that one makes. You you find yourself you put yourself in a in a one of these slots and you make decisions

Speaker A

about who you are and and where you are in your growth pattern and so on. It can lead to and frequently does lead to people having giant um uh religious experiences, getting grand egos. Think of David Ike when he first started

Speaker A

coming out and had his first enlightenment experience. He was wearing the jumpsuits and all of that, right? He was involved in the the the uh dynamic expression of it in that moment, right? And he evolved over time, but his basic core has not changed. our

Speaker A

reception of it has certainly and so so David Ike is up there in that one quarter and we we outside observers can have a um marker for his personal journey in his life when he started doing those television shows when he had

Speaker A

had that conversion from soccer hooligan into uh his spiritual experience right and that's overwhelming it's it it destroys you to have that experience and that's the the need of it you have to rebuild yourself from that the way I had

Speaker A

to rebuild from cancer. It's not an easy thing and there if you follow the hermetic principles and you apply first principles thinking uh you will become tougher that which does not kill me makes me stronger and it will sharpen

Speaker A

your thinking. It will provide a level of precision to your thinking that is can be quite lethal to uh those people that might intend otherwise. Another thing about this is that those people that have a tendency to to see

Speaker A

themselves in that last one quarter uh or the the high up up one quarter of humanity, however you want to think about it, the aware one quarter, they in my opinion, they have a tendency to to become um the majority of them um become

Speaker A

lifeaffirming. Well, they're all life affirming, but become life uh supportive, right? And so they wouldn't they're not corruptible really. Uh you know, you can bribe them. You couldn't bribe me. it's no point. I'm not going to take your money because I know the

Speaker A

the nature of the reality, right? But those people that can be bribed, you know, automatically are within that 75%.

Speaker A

Maybe they're in that that upper section of that 75%, but they're still directed by their reactions, their trauma, you know, everything a human goes through to get to that point.

Speaker A

Okay. But isn't there a risk that if I assume that I'm in the one quarter when I'm not and then I rob myself of my own opportunities of growth like I think that I'm in that quarter but really I'm

Speaker A

I'm not. No, you will drift in and out. Okay. So it's not a it's not a steady state.

Speaker A

Everything vibrates. Everything changes constantly. I will have thoughts that lower me down. Um I'm I'm into the metacognition. So I'm I manage my thinking in real time and can adjust as I'm going along. So I'm I'm somewhat rapid or or risen above that. There is

Speaker A

that assumed and presumed risk, but in reality it never manifests. Those people that get involved with the ego rapidly descend and and then they run into the problems that they bring on themselves dealing with their own uh karmic issues

Speaker A

and then have to refight their way back up. Sort of makes sense. Yeah. No, I get it. I get it. That makes sense. Okay. Now, in terms of the hermetic principle and that idea, how about this? There is this certain

Speaker A

reality. The only access that I have to it is to describe it through language and perhaps create it through language when I take on commitments or declarations like I'm going to cause this. I'm going to make this happen.

Speaker A

Like for example, the declaration of marriage. You know, I've been happily married for uh 27 years. I better remember that.

Speaker A

You were happily married until you forgot how long. And I tell my wife that she's also happily married so she doesn't forget.

Speaker A

Right. Right. So I've got this theory this set of concepts for describing reality but it's as flawed as any other conceptual framework. Couldn't that be correct about the hermetic principles? Now there's utility in it can be useful but that's not a flaw. You have to if

Speaker A

you understand these principles and apply them to that idea also they will assist you in in seeing the clarity of it. Okay. So that that that is a flawed understanding of how all of this stuff works. Um you have okay so you have to

Speaker A

start it it helps in my opinion I don't say you have to but uh it it helps to start with first principles. And so the very first principle in the hermetic uh understanding is that mind is everything. matter does not exist.

Speaker A

Everything else is an illusion. And this is because we have this concept. All right? Within the hermetic understanding, there is the absolute.

Speaker A

Right? And within absolute, people will look at at the absolute and they'll only see a little tiny bit of it, you know, and they will say that is God. I've seen God and I've had this incredible uh religious aesthetic vision. And all

Speaker A

they're looking is a little tiny bit of the of the absolute. It's not the whole of it in any way because we're all within the absolute. We don't exist outside of the absolute. Here's the ultimate problem for uh supreme

Speaker A

consciousness for the absolute. Nothing is outside of it. It knows everything. And so, how can it know itself without being able to see outside of itself and and see itself reflected? It can't analyze itself. So, its approach was to

Speaker A

create all of us. There's many other reasons we were all created, but one of them is to reflect back to it the experience we all have of the absolute itself. Yeah. Everything is mind. All right. All right. There's no there.

Speaker A

Okay. So there's no matter. So since everything is mind uh and in the hermetic principles they say mind is the son of god and in the in the hermetic principles in the um in the uh hermetic corpus Hermes says uh that he was told

Speaker A

by this um uh we'll call it a being an avatar whatever they call it poandrris the man shepherd um he was told that um we exist as mind ourselves but our minds are finite And that and so we'll never be able to

Speaker A

understand the infinite which is the absolute. And in and being finite as soon as you recognize your mind as finite, you apply that filter to everything. And you so you always question your own understanding. And you will always examine your own

Speaker A

understanding for greater and greater levels of revelation of what is actually uh physically or what is actually real, what is actually happening. And so this is using the hermetic principles. You can tell people that um and we're seeing

Speaker A

it now. So you're seeing scientists all over the world that are saying, "Oh geez, simulation theory, matter doesn't exist. More space between atoms than real matter within them. And none of the matter is is and all the matter is

Speaker A

moving constantly. And you don't know where an atom is until you actually go to look for it. And in fact, it may not actually exist until you go to look for it." So the neurons in my brain don't

Speaker A

exist until someone cuts my head open to look for them. It's not necessary that they exist in order for me to function.

Speaker A

And so this gives you a different kind of understanding of things. Since everything is mind, it's all illusion.

Speaker A

Um our minds are we don't own thoughts. We never we can think but thoughts are presented to our minds. This is why the body people react as they do because they think that thought of oh I got to

Speaker A

molest that child. I've got lust for that child. They think that's a real thought generated by themselves. It's an energy that they're susceptible to. So consider this aspect of your body. Your body. my body uh it's not an integral

Speaker A

hole. It's mostly made up of bacterium. Without your gut bacteria, you die within an hour probably. Without the bacteria that circulates in your blood, maybe you'll live a week. And there's specific beneficial organisms that are throughout you. You're a network. You're

Speaker A

a field. You're a field effect that clusters around a little tiny bit of consciousness that is loaned to you by the absolute because the absolute wants to know itself. This is a supposition.

Speaker A

This is a conclusion that the absolute wants to know itself and that wants to know one wants to know the and it has created a conundrum. Okay. So the ultimate mystery is that the absolute had a thought. I am everything. I know

Speaker A

everything. But is there something that could exist that I don't know ahead of its existence? Eight. And that is novelty. Could there be actual novelty?

Speaker A

were all in a giant experiment by the absolute to see if novelty can manifest because the mere thought that novelty could exist was novel itself and set all of us on this trail the creation of universe and the whole thing

Speaker A

there's no big bang there's no dark energy you can use hermetic uh understanding to prove to yourself with first principles that dark energy dark matter doesn't exist uh gravitons don't exist Um, gravity is not as we understand it. All of this is an

Speaker A

illusion and we're approaching all of this from the wrong viewpoint and that's a captured viewpoint. As we were coming out of the last reset in the 1700s, we had the age of enlightenment and we were captured deliberately by the

Speaker A

predecessors of the deep state in foisting the cartisian dialectic upon the natural philosophy and uh getting rid of the national natural philosophers Bosovich at all and replacing them with descart and all of the quote physicist or or solid scientists right which have

Speaker A

a very limited understanding don't accept the idea A that everything is mental. They think so basically I call them grtologists because they're under the they're operating under the paradigm that if all life died the rocks, the dirt, the sand, the water would still

Speaker A

exist. And that's not true. And we now know, for instance, that our own scientists with those with vision are proving that water is actually two liquids behaving in a particular way.

Speaker A

That water indeed is the ultimate storage for what we call the AOSIc record. and that it does much more than that. Further, they've they've established the hermetic principle that everything vibrates and everything is within a consciousness field because

Speaker A

they know that all life is connected between 005 hertz up to four hertz in frequency. The earth itself resonates at some point um 82 hertz. But we communicate telepathy telepathically uh with our between ourselves um and between ourselves and animals uh at uh

Speaker A

usually around two hertz to four hertz. And you constantly are communicating telepathically. You're constantly leaking out in your choice of words the psychic impressions that are moving within your body and and moving the emotions to get you to say those words

Speaker A

as part of this giant experiment. It is my projection and conclusion that we're moving into a point of if it were a play, it would be the the end, the denouncement of the of the play. We're coming up to a threshold. Many people

Speaker A

have called this the singularity, but I object to that that term for many reasons, mainly because it's reductionist. But we're coming up to an aggregation and that everything will start and I agree with Terrence McKenna, everything is going to just get start

Speaker A

getting so weird you can't believe it because we're in an accelerating path and it is necessary that we get to this point and then the space aliens will appear because it is necessary as an aspect of this.

Speaker A

They had to come, didn't they, Cliff? They had to come in this They've always been here, right? We are we are not alone. We've never been alone. All previous civilizations, all previous uh ages of men have had these

Speaker A

companions. And it's my my understanding of things that the aliens will be communicating to us on these frequencies of telepathy point 0.5 hertz up to four hertz. And we should be monitoring those frequencies for disturbances because that's their attempt to discuss things

Speaker A

with us to get a a telepathic bond with us and that that they're not going to be dialing in with radio or calling you on the cell phone, right? There's no point.

Speaker A

They understand the hermetic principles as well as us. Now I'm not saying all aliens there's aliens that are far more dense and stupid than humans. But all alien civilizations will be in the same situation as the human situation which

Speaker A

is described very well by the Gita as Krishna discusses Arjuna's um uh karma in the great battle in which he must fight his own cousins and why all this is necessary. And if you read the Gita with the understanding of of the modern

Speaker A

term and take out all of the ancient language and the politics of the time, you see that they're discussing the hermetic principles of as above so below, the pendulum, the the motion, the gender, the polarity and everything. And

Speaker A

it is necessary because these are the algorithms that govern our reality. whether or not you consider it to be a simulation. If you're a simulation believer, I have one question that you must answer in order for me to consider

Speaker A

your perspective valid. What's on the other side? And so there's no matter. So is there matter on the other side of the simulation? Are we living within a great computer that is actually uh physical matter somewhere? No, it doesn't work

Speaker A

that way. It's not necessary that that exists in this reality. and are um the absolute of which we are small little contained parts. Uh it tricks us all into believing ourselves isolated such that we can have these experiences so we

Speaker A

can know pain and suffering and so on. This is not hell. This is not a prison planet. There's every decision you make does not spin off another timeline. None of that is pertinent. All that new age stuff is just [ __ ] and is a pollution to

Speaker A

your thinking. Bloody hell, Cliff. Many of the aliens know this. Yeah. Okay. I I don't even know where to go. Right. And by the way, you did post this tweet I thought was very kind that you said you didn't want to waste my

Speaker A

time because I go deep. And I responded saying, "I'll try and stay shallow, but I don't promise how effective I'll be, right?" And at the fear and at the risk of becoming deep a little bit, I mean I

Speaker A

mean what you said is incredibly profound. Incredibly profound. And one of the things I appreciate about you is how certainly with me and I imagine many many others, you stretch my brain. So I don't put it on me. Don't put it on me.

Speaker A

All right. It's it's nothing I'm doing. It's not my You're the one right now who's communicating. And it may be coming through you or whatever. Ideas that are much much older and larger than you, but you're the one who's communicating it to

Speaker A

me. It's like, okay, right now and that's that's what universe has placed on me, right? That's that's my journey, right? That's my burden. This is not an easy thing to do. It has created a very strange life indeed and

Speaker A

has made me as I am. And um I accept service. Okay. Once I understand that I am just a part of the absolute, then I understand and I accept that I'm in service of the absolute. So I declare

Speaker A

myself to be samurai, which means to serve. And I serve because I am me. Not because of someone's need, not because I'm being told to serve, not because I'm being directed there, but because my mind says that this is the path that I

Speaker A

need to be on. If they benefit, that's fine, but I'm not going to get emotionally involved if they don't.

Speaker A

Right? Many people don't take my advice. And so I am kind. I let So there's a difference between being nice and kind.

Speaker A

So Heidi is nice. She doesn't want you to suffer. She would do anything she could to prevent you um your suffering.

Speaker A

I'm not that way. That's been burnt out of me. I used to be that way for a number of years and it trashed me. Now I am kind. I am willing to stand there and let you you experience the consequences

Speaker A

of your own actions. That is to say, your karma. If you make a bad choice, that's your choice. Yes, I could probably intrude. Yes, I could probably make you have another another choice.

Speaker A

But for whatever reason, universe wanted you to make that choice and and experience those consequences. Who am I to inter in intrude on your life and your relationship with the absolute?

Speaker A

It's okay. Even that is is just an extraordinary concept and I'm not in any way disputing it. I I do find it intellectually provocative and stimulating. So, thank you for that.

Speaker A

Going to the aliens. So, you thank me now, you'll curse me later. I won't do that on camera because I said to you beforehand that I'm respectful even of the guests I don't agree with who will bogle my mind. Right.

Speaker A

Okay. And and that's not the case here. I'm just fascinated. Well, okay. So, here's here's the thing, right? Rich is a nice guy. Okay. And I recognize that in you.

Speaker A

Okay. But not kind or kind and nice. I'm not nice. I'm kind. I'm kind.

Speaker A

Okay. I can be I can be nice, you know, and there would All right. And And to be honest, here's the thing. uh in I can see myself in situations where it would always be nice if Heidi was involved

Speaker A

because I don't want her to experience that suffering in my presence because I would too would take on that suffering.

Speaker A

Right. But in general, I am kind. Sure. Sure. And and I would So if if the schizophrenic had continued, I would I would right I would do what I would have to. I would inflict pain in order to get him away and and

Speaker A

change the circumstances. He chose the easy path. It was easy for for all of us. But under right circumstances, I can be brutal and effective in uh you know in being an agent of change.

Speaker A

Right. Okay. And I can certainly see that about me in my work as a social worker because I've had to be brutal and like I'm sorry you don't get to have your kids with you. Let grandma look after them cuz you can't give them what

Speaker A

they need. And how did you feel when you were doing that? Oh, it was horrible. I never like removing children. Never ever like doing it. I'm a father. I wouldn't want it to happen to me. But to be done,

Speaker A

correct? And so and so that's moving you on the path to accepting kindness as your nature and occasionally dipping into niceness.

Speaker A

Okay. All right. Well, just what you said about the universe putting you here and this is it sounded to me like a self-expression.

Speaker A

It is right. Okay. That's very very powerful when people authentically express themselves and who they are in the world and operate from that cuz that has integrity. That's the wor that is the worst aspect of um this particular path

Speaker A

that you are on as well as I and that is that you have to continually refine yourself in your vision of yourself moving through the reality and it is difficult right very difficult to accept all aspects even especially you get to

Speaker A

this point as you're coming out of neness and you think no I can't say that it'd be too egoistic right And so I don't bother anymore. It's factual.

Speaker A

Right? Just as I say that, you know, I may have done evil deeds in the past, I will also admit to um potentially participating in great deeds and not take an egoistic aspect of it on either.

Speaker A

I don't identify myself as a result of my actions. Most people do. The 75% of humanity identifies themselves with their behavior, with their race, with their thoughts, with some aspect that is not the absolute. Being a uh on the path

Speaker A

of the hermeticum corpus, I identify I apply first principles thinking to myself and position myself in every action uh within these principles in relation to the absolute. This I think this is the useful aspect of metacognition. Okay, metacognition is

Speaker A

the ab ability to see your own thoughts as they're forming and to change them rather than express them to react to them internally and not necessarily let them out. It's very rare. It may be that it develops because of the concentration

Speaker A

of the hermeticum and applying these principles to you. I can see how that has certainly trained my mind in thinking, especially these last nine or 10 years that I've rebuilt from cancer.

Speaker A

Bear in mind, I died, okay? I was 128 pounds. I'm 182 now. You know, getting it back, right? It's not an easy process. That was not done by medicine.

Speaker A

I fired my oncologist. I won't have anything to do with doctors. Um and it was done by mind by understanding that if every so if if you follow the first principle if we are indeed um even if we

Speaker A

are a simulation if we are subutines within a giant computer somewhere even then everything about your body is created by your mind. Everything the fact that I'm bald and you're not all of this is is from our minds. If I chose to

Speaker A

put the energy into it, I could probably grow hair, right? There's no point to me. But but so I built my body by using my mind to recover from cancer. And I'm very much along on the process now.

Speaker A

Maybe I'll live another 60 or 70 years given what is uh developing in our medical uh professions. Right? The the medical breakthroughs likely will not be pushed down into the greater mass of humanity. likely even if we have medbeds

Speaker A

you're not going to see these kind of things being uh used in India, Vietnam, China, that kind of a deal. They'll be um necessarily controlled by the globalists who have the money and all of this and it'll only be that upper one

Speaker A

quarter that is self-aware that seeks them out that goes through the trouble that would get to that level. The concept of a medbed is an artificial device that would alter your vibrations to get you to be able to return your

Speaker A

body to a natural more healthy state. Well, I did it without the medbed, right? I'm cancer-free. All of my last tests, there's not a single cancer cell within me. And even even that was so astounding that the laboratory that got

Speaker A

the tests and did the results contacted me to say, "Okay, we've never ever ever had a zero cancer cell test." Usually there's three to four cancer cells that we find in everybody, even if they're cancer free. We've never ever ever had a

Speaker A

zero cancer test. What What did you do to our tests? And so I did another one and another one after that and they said, "Okay, it's legit, but we can't understand it. I think it's 100 I know it's 100% the way that I conduct myself

Speaker A

relative to my mental attitudes about all of this." Bear in mind that cancer is just like any other aspect of your body. It is a cell. Many of these are part of your network. You can tune them.

Speaker A

For instance, I knew from the time I was 23 that there was something wrong with me. And from 23 until 40, I saw it. I probably spent a quarter of a million dollars in uh insurance money seeking whatever it was that was affecting me.

Speaker A

There was no visible signs of the cancer. Then when I'm in my 40s, it started showing up in little bits and pieces here. I had enough money working in the tech field. I got a private physician and I spent probably

Speaker A

uh easily half a million dollars between myself and the and the insurance on further tests trying to find it out.

Speaker A

None of them showed any of it. It wasn't supposed to happen. I was supposed to go through this in that most extreme state and I was supposed to die in order to get that information through that process, that experience in order that

Speaker A

it might impact my thinking and my formation. So I don't take it personally. Universe needed this particular samurai to experience those particular hardships and it made me stronger, made me more me. Make sense? So I would never I would

Speaker A

never have those. I would never go back in time if that were feasible. Time is not a dimension. We can't do that. But um I would never ever undo any of that.

Speaker A

I would accept all of that suffering because of what it has done to me to make me as I am. It was a necessary part of this reality. And how many other 73 year olds, you know, recover from

Speaker A

cancer, rebuild their body, find the love of their life, you know, much younger, gorgeous woman, agree to marry him, all of this kind of thing. So there's huge benefits to following your own path this way. And it started for me

Speaker A

with Hermes and then eventually I came across the Kybalong. So the if you read the Hermetica corpus, it's going to be difficult to understand unless you're attuned to reading ancient material. And I would recommend everybody that's encountering this information for the

Speaker A

first time to simply go to the encapsulated version, which is the Kyalon. It's cheap. You can get free copies online. There's Kindle copies.

Speaker A

There's probably dozens of print copies. And um and it's factual. It tells you what this reality is like.

Speaker A

Okay. At the risk of the repeating myself and then you've probably given me the similar answer to what you gave me earlier. The actors in the deep state would be aware of these principles. How do we know they're not using them and

Speaker A

applying them themselves? And could it be because of something that you and I agreed on earlier? They have no integrity the way that they're conducting themselves. And integrity is an outgrowth. It's not a state of being. Okay. So integrity is um

Speaker A

is something that we analyze after the fact from behavior. So I'm not sitting here as an in my integrity, but you get a particular action and I will act in an integrous manner. So you're correct. The deep state knows all of this. But

Speaker A

because they're not self-analyzing and never apply any of these principles to themselves, they're not going to get it.

Speaker A

They won't be able to effectively use it. This is why their magic has to resolve down to ritual. The the what do they call it? Spirit cooking. the blood, the urine, all of that kind of stuff, right? They think matter has power. They

Speaker A

they can only work through that. Their minds are limited because they don't apply these principles to themselves.

Speaker A

They can't apply these principles to themselves without totally destroying their own uh view of themselves, how they operate and everything because it would show in sharp relief what real [ __ ] they are. Right? So, so uh you

Speaker A

know what happens when a deep state person takes enough psychedelics? They're no longer a deep state person.

Speaker A

It changes them radically. If they were to apply first principles thinking and the and the seven principles to their own lives and their current state of being, that would be as disruptive to their minds as a huge psychedelic

Speaker A

experience and they would never be the same thereafter. So the deep state is in a bind. They know these things are extremely powerful. They try and use them as much as they can in a a distance, you know, kind of a way. Sort

Speaker A

of pushing it off as a computer or something, trying to do something in matter. But if you're trying to do anything in matter, you've forgotten the first principle. Everything is mine. And you need not involve yourself with the

Speaker A

grit. All right? So, they are self-limiting just because of who they are. and they're in the deep state because it is necessary that there be evil in the process here that there it is necessary in this our environment

Speaker A

that there are people that are working out their own issues that would present behavior that we would describe as evil.

Speaker A

The murderer must murder, the rapist must rape in order that there are these permutations and ripples that will go out through the vibrations. So in my opinion, we'll never ever ever eliminate all crime. We can make the world a great

Speaker A

great deal less suffering, a lot a lot better place, but it'll never ever ever be perfect. We'll always have to deal with these and we'll always have to work on it. So, liberty demands vigilance, right? Integrity demands self vigilance

Speaker A

constant. Is this action in uh correspondence? you know as inner so the outer so if if my action so I could no more have walked past that schizophrenic then I could turn myself green in this moment right it is in my nature to be

Speaker A

presented by these things and react to it because universe has presented this to me it has put me in that situation such that I will learn and my actions within in within the schizophrenic dynamic there were for my own purpose so

Speaker A

very selfish So this is another thing. If you get on this path, you are entirely self-directed. This is why Alan Watts and all of these great spiritual thinkers say concentrate on yourself.

Speaker A

There's no greater thing you can do than to perfect yourself. And it is not egoistic, right? It is it is a necessary aspect of these principles and and it causes its own reproduction or or own ripples, its own uh propagation. So

Speaker A

that's why I'm doing these interviews. I don't I don't sell anything anymore this way. I don't make money. I'm not motivated by material stuff this way.

Speaker A

But I am motivated by this aspect of service that I've willingly bonded to. And I'll keep doing them as long as this body exists and as long as there are requests. I limit them because they're they interfere with my life and there's

Speaker A

other things I do. I have many projects going. Um but uh I still do them because it is necessary. But there's many more people now like um many scientists that are coming up with these same conclusions from different viewpoints

Speaker A

with their machinery and stuff coming to the idea that all is illusion. Consciousness is the base substrate.

Speaker A

Matter doesn't exist. So they're on the right track but they haven't gone far enough. They haven't abandoned they need in my opinion they need to abandon materialism and get into mentalism uh and then proceed from there with first principles. So, as I said, it took

Speaker A

me almost 50 years, but I've recreated and validated all seven principles, applying them back and forth, going into deep thinking on them, uh, you know, every single way I could, and they all hold up and I derived them on my own.

Speaker A

And so, I'm not paring the hermetic stuff. I'm um, expressing it. I'm living it because it is an aspect. these seven algorithms exist. Whether or not we are a simulation, it doesn't matter to me if you think we're a sim simulation, that's

Speaker A

fine. I don't care. But the seven principles exist. If it's a if it's a simulation, then these are algorithms that are created by the designers of the simulation such that certain things would occur within the simulation. I' I've programmed simulation. I've

Speaker A

programmed neural networks that uh take the training obviously for my LLM and I understand this at that level. And there is value to thinking of ourselves as independent subutines that are spun off in a Unix or Linux style uh running on

Speaker A

our own and having some access access to central control. And in the um in the hermetic principles in the very beginning of it, Hermes says that which that in you which sees and hears is the logos. It is the word what we would say

Speaker A

the word of God. Okay. uh your mind is the son of God because it is somewhat self-directed. So you have free will to the limits of the free will um um dynamic within these seven governors.

Speaker A

And so um it's necessary that there be free will. Debates over it don't really further us. It is as it is, right? And so this is why I think of myself as a pirate. Okay? There's no sides. There's

Speaker A

no allegiances. There's no internal lowercase absolutes within our reality. There is only ourselves and our experience of it all. And we are experiencing not for ourselves, not to learn anything, but to have that experience go back up to the absolute so

Speaker A

that it can learn about itself. And that's why we're here. It's it's sort of a school, but it's not. It's sort of a prison, but it's not. It is what you make of it because it's all mental. If

Speaker A

we were all to be uh perfecti like the the Cathari or the Jane, okay, these were people that were in their last lives and they thought they were going to live a perfect life. So they would even in ancient times the Jane and the

Speaker A

Cathari would wear masks so they wouldn't suck in bacteria and disrupt the bacteria's life. Kind of a wonky way of thinking. It's necessary that you do so, but nonetheless, this was an outward expression of their thinking about that.

Speaker A

the perfect eye would get married and they wouldn't have children because it it wasn't appropriate. These were the uh self-declaring spiritual leaders of the Cathari and the Jane currently. They have perfect eye as well. You'll also find them in other Hindu sex. You'll

Speaker A

find them in Buddhist sex etc. And um if we were all that way it would be a different reality and maybe we would have a different reaction with the space aliens. But the space aliens are also in there though. Many of them understand

Speaker A

what I'm saying and they live within the same parameters that I live. So I might very well get a a UFO and go tooling off into space and find some other civilization. Not going to [ __ ] with it,

Speaker A

but I'm going to examine it and take what I can out of it. But it's not my place to intrude on them. Even if they're barbaric and killing each other or whatever, even if I thought I could correct it and aid their society, who am

Speaker A

I to to put my thoughts and stuff on their natural uh expression, right? I'm kind. They're going to to experience their own karma. That's the only way any of us learn.

Speaker A

Okay. Thank you for bringing it back to space aliens. So, this whole conversation about space aliens, this whole discourse, this is the way I look at it, right? So maybe there are space aliens and the deep state are going to say they're not. Or

Speaker A

maybe it's a blue beam. Or maybe there are space aliens and the deep state are somehow going to capture that whole conversation to use against us. How do how can I tell? How can any of us tell?

Speaker A

Maybe it doesn't it doesn't matter. It's it's immaterial, right? There is no matter. So it's immaterial. So here's the thing about that. The deep state wants to do all of that because they're trapped in their body reactions. They want power.

Speaker A

They want to be able to control all of that. So, they will indeed try and seize the conversation. They'll try and have a fake space alien invasion. I expect one of those at the end of next year. Um,

Speaker A

but that doesn't negate real uh non-human intelligence. Aliens, whether you think they come from space or not.

Speaker A

Um, all of things are within our universe are possible. Anything that we can conceive shall manifest. And um the manifestation process involves our own minds. Since we're constantly co-creating, there was never a big bang.

Speaker A

The matter does not exist. Uh if we all die, all matter goes away because there's no one there to perceive it. And thus, the absolute would simply get rid of it. So, at some point, it is and we're at that point now. It is necessary

Speaker A

that the perception of the space aliens of non-human intelligence be pushed down into that 75% of humanity. The the 25% that is at the top recognizes that so many scientists and all these people even government types with that are

Speaker A

thinkers will say yeah it's quite factual that there's non-human intelligence even if we don't have a UFO floating in front of us right at this moment it is factual. It is necessary that we understand this reality that way. And there will be further layers

Speaker A

and further layers and further layers as we go along. If you go back into the old gnostic belief, they took it from the other way. They applied reductionism to the absolute. And this is where we get the term diamon or demon. Okay? This is

Speaker A

where angels and all of this stuff comes in. Gods exist, but they're within the material. They're not the absolute. So you have to have a different understanding of the concept of God.

Speaker A

Actually if you read Benjamin Franklin in his debate in France, I can't remember the guy he debated with, he went into the deist position quite well and said that it is necessary that that we all encounter the devil in order that

Speaker A

we might understand the opposite because in hermetics there's always an equal and opposite, right? And so it it gets pedantic. It gets annoying as [ __ ] to run into someone like myself who always brings it back to these seven principles

Speaker A

and will say, "Oh, you're just overlooking this particular aspect of things. Apply this principle to your thinking and see where it leads you." And so, a lot of people don't like talking with me because I constantly bring this back that way. You know, I'm

Speaker A

fortunate that Heidi is a very intelligent woman and and um accepts this. So even though she doesn't, you know, everything is fake to her and space doesn't exist, but when aliens show up, she'll deal with them, right?

Speaker A

Doesn't matter if she thinks they're fake. We're all constantly manifesting them. We're co-creating this reality in this moment. So the things that you and I are doing now in this discussion we can have no con we have a very vague

Speaker A

minuscule concept of the ripples that it will cause but we'll never ever factually be able to understand how wide the effects and how deep they are but we know that they will occur. There is a c there is an effect that comes from every

Speaker A

cause. We are causing effects now in this conversation and those I think will be quite remarkable because I try and choose my timing. I have a an interest in uh the dynamics of expression at a level of time mainly because I got a lot

Speaker A

of the uh timing cues wrong in my early work. Bear in mind I've seriously evolved how I think about all of this since 1993 when I first got that idea.

Speaker A

And timing is its own issue. Time does not exist as a dimension. It is our perception of of duration that causes us to think of time. But within that understanding you get okay. So within the hermetic understanding you can get

Speaker A

to the point where you have a view of yourself feeding um experience up to the absolute. Jesus called this the plleoma.

Speaker A

He called the absolute the plleoma meaning the abundant fullness the source of everything. And if you read the gospel of Thomas there's a free version on my substack in which I've annotated uh focused on how to manifest. uh

Speaker A

there's many clues that he talks about relative to the event stream. The event stream is continuous constant. It never shuts down. It is this constancy of change. Everything vibrates. Right?

Speaker A

Going back to that principle, if you understand that everything vibrates, and I've done 54 years of iikido, shinshen Sou iikido, um you know that the way to deal with any physical attack is to just simply upset the balance, to intercept at an

Speaker A

appropriate moment the opponent's arm. You say, "Oh, here, take my hand." And you present them with your hand and let them have your hand. They think they're getting something that they want. All you're doing is is intruding into the

Speaker A

balance of the vibration of the energy. And one and you know that once something is in motion, it's easier to keep in motion and then to direct the way you want. And so the deep state would love to have that level of effectiveness and

Speaker A

skill, precision, and elegance. And they'll never get it because they're not self-examining beings. If you are self-examining and you apply these principles to yourself, you get to be very good at anything you should choose.

Speaker A

And we're at that point now. I think that universe wants us to accept new challenges. That's why the UFO stuff is coming out. That's why there's the social pressure for it. Uh, you know, the suppression of it ran 120 years, 80

Speaker A

years really solid. They were good at it. They had us all laughing at the aliens, all of this. And that pendulum is swung back the other way. Again, another hermetic principle, right? And so what I like to do is I like to see

Speaker A

where the attempt to see where the pendulum is and choose my moment to do things like this such that I will magnify that particular aspect of the swing just to see if I can just to see if I can [ __ ] with it and have that much

Speaker A

better impact right so in that sense it's egoistic in that sense it's self arandizing oh yeah I did that look what happened so you know and it's meaningless absolutely meaningless but it's it's satisfying in the moment It it is ultimately it is meaningless.

Speaker A

It really is ultimately but in the interim in this material world or the materium as you refer to it in your work is it's a certainly for me it occurs as a contribution.

Speaker A

Yes. So it feels so good you know. Yeah. So, so, so I'm like, okay, well, let me see if I can integrate what Cliff is saying, Cliff's ideas, and then see how I can grow from incorporating them and where they may be useful for me in

Speaker A

terms of fulfilling what I'm committed to and then take it the next step, make them your own and take it further than I have expressed.

Speaker A

Yes. Yes. Indeed. Indeed. Okay. Now moving on to um something in the material world because it makes sense to me that in in your work you talk a lot about what's happening in the US because you live in the US and the whole

Speaker A

world is impacted by what happens in the US but here I am in the UK and it looks like our government is going to not my government but this government is going to align itself closer to the European

Speaker A

Union. So how do you see things shaping out in this part of the world? It's very it's very clear and it was even in all the old altar reports. Okay, it led to that horrific period of time when um so

Speaker A

there's an there's a chance we can avoid this but the altar reports said that in UK it would actually start in Ireland.

Speaker A

There would be a rebellion against the government siding with the rapists and it would get so bad that the um uh the rape gangs and all of the invaders would be killed on site in um in street battles. And the description that I got

Speaker A

out of the data was that the young women that had been and boys that had been raped uh would go through the streets with knives and scissors and defile the corpses. And it would cause such a horror in the in the Muslim world that

Speaker A

hundreds of thousands of Muslims would flee the white countries. They would understand what they had done and how they had been in a minor way. They would be extremely fearful and they would leave. And it's going to cause a huge um

Speaker A

self-examination by all these white people as they look at the horror that they have caused. Now, we may avoid that, right? It's not fixed in stone, but at the time that those reports were were being written and that was coming

Speaker A

out 2008, so long before the rape gang stuff was really hitting the news, it was describing these situations. And it was describing it in that moment if we basically saying if we keep on this same path, this is what will happen. To your

Speaker A

point though, your government types, all of those internally uh driven pedophiles, coke addicts, whatever the hell is motivating them, power hungry people are aligning themselves with a pendulum that has peaked the EU and is already sliding down. Trump's going to

Speaker A

withdraw power from NATO and then what are they aligning to? Nothing but horror and and breakdown and degradation. No money and they will fail very rapidly.

Speaker A

So these next two years, this the rest of the time from now to the end of 2027 is going to be quite a peak period as all of these pendulums all come to the same point and all of these confluence

Speaker A

of events get to that level where they're interacting with each other in a visible fashion to those of us with the eyes to see. Thus, many people see Trump as perpetual war guy. But Tom Luongo, Colonel Watkins, all of these people

Speaker A

say, "No, he's stopping all of that. this is PAX Americana. This is the American epoch coming into existence around the planet and that it's not going to be globalism that conquers.

Speaker A

It's going to be this ideal. And so they see, they have the eyes to see. Most do not. And so all of the ignorant people that only see so far are going to be quite shocked, including those people

Speaker A

that participate in the horror. But they must. They've got to get that emotion out. So they will happily go and chop the penises off of their rapist lying dead in the street. run around waving them, scaring the [ __ ] out of Muslims

Speaker A

everywhere. Yes. Well, I hope that doesn't come true as I hope that things have advanced and in fact the pendulum seems to be on the downward swing. It doesn't seem that the government will be able to put up much

Speaker A

resistance. I think it will fall very quickly to the rebellion and it'll be a re it'll be a rebellion at first and uh a rebellion against an existing government. They'll in my data it showed as being an attempt to rebuild uh the

Speaker A

governmental structure and then that would fail and it would become a true revolution and they would again then they would start seeking the American ideal as a replacement as an operational paradigm that functions.

Speaker A

Okay. Well, one thank you for that. Um, one of the things I noticed around the July 4th celebrations is the difference in how Trump and Vance were speaking.

Speaker A

Speaking the future for the United States versus the the speaking of Ursula Vanderlay and a and Karma and Andy Bernham is going to replace him.

Speaker A

Completely different where Trump Yeah, it's completely motivating. It's taking care of the American people. It's expansive. It's inspiring. you're great.

Speaker A

We're going to be great. Whereas here, the speaking is all about crushing us. Where Andy Bernham, the naent prime minister, says these things aren't up for negotiation. The [ __ ] Yeah.

Speaker A

Yeah. In his in his mind, that's the way it is. He'll be saying that all the way to the gallows.

Speaker A

Yes. Yes. Okay. And many people will die on both sides, but you know, this is the way it has to be.

Speaker A

Yeah. And and there's another aspect of this too, the manifestation aspect. Go read the book of Thomas that I I annotated and you see that Trump and Vance are co-creating. They're manifesting the future they wish to live in. I'm I'm

Speaker A

with them. The more people that put their emotional weight behind that vision, the greater it grows. And then we shift into that paradigm. This is why I'm working so hard at this point putting out the efforts on the idea of

Speaker A

the ontology. In my opinion, we're going to have to get there anyway that where we recognize the absolute and the hermetic principles. And uh this is the the smart aliens believe this. I'm certain there is dense aliens that are

Speaker A

as stupid as any human. But there are smart aliens and we'll talk to them in these principles in these understandings. But it won't be our material scientists talking to them because they're just so ignorant of our actual reality. And so um but Vance and

Speaker A

Trump were cocreating in that language. It was so clear. Yeah. absolutely clear in in the way that my wife and I co-created our life together when we took our marriage vows and you co-create every damn day with every action, right?

Speaker A

So that's the way it is. I co-create with Heidi when I say, "Can I make you a breakfast?" Yeah. Cliff, thank you for co-creating with me this conversation. You really, really appreciate it.

Speaker A

Okay, so bear in mind that I'm gonna say it's not me. You know, the universe wanted you to have this conversation.

Speaker A

Fine. But in this material reality, you're the sack of bones that I'm talking to or rather the digital sack of bones. This digital sack of bones talking to this digital sack of bones.

Speaker A

Right. Right. So really, really appreciate it. Thank you so much. And I do recommend people you if you're not familiar with Cliff's work, take a look. Take a look. be willing to consider that which is ideas that are alien because it that are

Speaker A

outside paradigm because it's that's how come I discovered Bitcoin and did well out of it. That's how come I decided never to send my children to school.

Speaker A

That's how come I I reached out to Tom Lewongo. Thought this guy's interesting. Let me learn from him.

Speaker A

I love I love Tom and the Colonels. Yes. Yeah. And got to say they're all Thank you so much for when you've reposted my videos and the videos of the people that I have as guests. really appreciate it.

Topics:TrumpglobalistsCity of LondonPax Americanaweb botgeopoliticsdeep stateAmerican Revolutionary Warpredictionssimulation theory

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main argument about Trump's role in global politics?

The video argues that Trump is engaged in a strategic battle against globalist powers and the City of London bankers, aiming to restore American influence and undermine entrenched elites.

How does the web bot program relate to the video's content?

The web bot program, designed in the late 1990s, is highlighted for its ability to predict major geopolitical events by analyzing collective human psychic energy expressed online, lending credibility to some of the video's claims.

Why is Iran targeted according to the video?

Iran is portrayed not as a primary enemy but as a proxy or front for the City of London banking interests, making it a strategic target in the broader conflict against globalist control.

Get More with the Söz AI App

Transcribe recordings, audio files, and YouTube videos — with AI summaries, speaker detection, and unlimited transcriptions.

App Store Google Play

Or transcribe another YouTube video here →

Free tools: TXT to SRT · SRT Validator · Merge SRT · Subtitle to Text · All tools