Speaker A
Hello. Sorry about that. Like... wait, wait, wait, isn't that a bit weird? You went out of your way to...
Discussion on a disputed 400,000 yen receipt related to political fund reporting and election expenses involving Mori and Matsuyama.
Key Takeaways
- A disputed 400,000 yen receipt has caused significant concern regarding political fund transparency.
- Correcting the political fund report and reissuing a proper receipt is seen as the best resolution.
- Misunderstandings or misrepresentations of payments can lead to serious political and legal consequences.
- Transparency and clear communication are crucial to resolving financial controversies in political contexts.
- The issue has attracted public and council attention, highlighting the importance of accountability.
What the video covers
- The conversation centers on a 400,000 yen receipt allegedly issued for venue setup fees linked to political activities.
- There is controversy over whether the payment was made to Mori or someone else, with implications for political fund reporting.
- Handwriting on the receipt is questioned, and there are suspicions of document forgery or misrepresentation.
- Internal inquiries and meetings have been held due to the issue gaining attention within the Nishinomiya City Council.
- The parties discuss the need to amend the political fund report and reissue a corrected receipt to resolve the matter.
- Concerns are raised about the potential legal and ethical consequences if the payment was improperly recorded or used.
- The discussion touches on the logistics of venue rental and equipment costs related to election setups.
- There is a call for transparency and clarification to avoid accusations of bribery or financial misconduct.
- The speakers emphasize the importance of admitting mistakes to prevent further escalation.
- The situation is ongoing, with uncertainty about how involved parties, especially from the Kansai region, will respond.
Chapters
- 00:00Introduction and initial concerns about the receipt
- 00:33Contacting Mori about issuing the receipt
- 01:05Issues with payment and internal inquiries
- 01:40Meeting and discussion on venue setup fees
- 01:58Questioning the legitimacy of the setup claim
- 02:18Handwriting and receipt authenticity debate
- 02:31Political fund reporting and correction plans
- 03:41Clarifying payment and receipt reissuance
- 03:57Concerns about legal and ethical implications
- 04:41Details on venue rental and equipment costs
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
No, no, it's just that... yes. I'm thinking about how to resolve this, but is it already decided?
Speaker A
Well, my memory is that I contacted Mori and told him to issue a receipt.
Speaker A
Yes. Yeah. I think it's recorded as having been paid to me. It is. It was.
Speaker A
But... yes. Is it a problem for Mori that it was paid to me?
Speaker A
It's not just a problem, but yesterday Mr. Nakamichi...
Speaker A
came to visit. At the office.
Speaker A
Yeah. And, well, to be honest, we've been getting quite a few inquiries internally.
Speaker A
Yeah. We've been getting calls too, so it's becoming a big deal. So, we even held a meeting.
Speaker A
Yeah. And, well, what Mr. Nakamichi certainly said was... yeah. About that venue setup fee, you know?
Speaker A
Yeah. What was actually set up? That was the first question.
Speaker A
Yeah. The Reno Maison, when they were in business, and...
Speaker A
Yeah. ... Mr. Matsuyama's election setup were the exact same thing. So, claiming "setup" was done is a logical fallacy from the start.
Speaker A
Yeah. Also, the handwriting on the receipt is clearly Mr. Matsuyama's, he was exposed.
Speaker A
Yeah. Yeah. Why did he write it? Well, it's already being discussed on X that it might not be his handwriting.
Speaker A
Yeah. It's all over the place, so the resolution would be to say, "We misunderstood the 400,000 yen receipt." I think we have no choice but to fix it.
Speaker A
Yeah. It wasn't paid to me.
Speaker A
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Something like, what was it paid for? That...
Speaker A
That's the point. For that 400,000 yen, the first step is the political fund report.
Speaker A
Yeah. We make a correction.
Speaker A
Yeah. And we reissue a proper receipt for that 400,000 yen.
Speaker A
I think the only way is to go with, "We made a mistake at that time."
Speaker A
Yeah. I see.
Speaker A
And what I can say is, "I didn't create that receipt." "I did not receive the 400,000 yen." I don't know who was paid, uh, and I can only tell you to please ask Mr. Matsuyama. I don't think I should say anything
Speaker A
beyond that.
Speaker A
Yeah. If, hypothetically, well, maybe it was paid to someone, some Nishinomiya citizen. And if it was for election purposes or something, it would probably be a huge problem, right? It would end up as bribery, or like a payoff, so that's why...
Speaker A
That's the part that needs to be clarified.
Speaker A
Yeah. Also, well, for now, we could say "we didn't pay it." "It was a misunderstanding." I think that's the only way to go, isn't it?
Speaker A
I see.
Speaker A
It’s a pretty big deal in the Nishinomiya City Council right now.
Speaker A
Oh, really?
Speaker A
Yes, it is. It really is. People are even coming to observe the sessions.
Speaker A
Well, in my opinion,
Speaker A
Yes. The point is, with Renomaison, you usually just rent the space, right?
Speaker A
Yes. And, for instance, equipment isn't included in the rent, right?
Speaker A
Normally, no. Like desks and things like that.
Speaker A
Yes. Yes. So, in my opinion, obviously you have to procure those somewhere, but if they are Renome's property, and they are left there as they are, then regarding that...
Speaker A
For example, well, when you went there, um, everything, well, the toilets and such were scattered about, but things used for the office, things that were modified, yes.
Speaker A
Well, for those office supplies,
Speaker A
Yes. Like being allowed to use the printer, it makes sense on the surface to pay for those costs.
Speaker A
Well, I wonder about that. But I've already said I didn't receive it.
Speaker A
Oh, you did?
Speaker A
Yes. That I haven't received it and it's not written on the receipt.
Speaker A
Yeah. Already.
Speaker A
Oh, who are you telling that to?
Speaker A
Nakamichi.
Speaker A
Just Nakamichi?
Speaker A
Yes. Anyone else?
Speaker A
Uh, well, I've obviously told the writer.
Speaker A
Oh, you told them.
Speaker A
Yes.
Speaker A
Hmm. That’s the situation.
Speaker A
Yeah. I see. So, if you divert the destination here,
Speaker A
Yeah.
Speaker A
I think it’ll probably be found out. And if I hypothetically find out who it was paid to, it’ll probably come back to me.
Speaker A
I see.
Speaker A
Yes. So I think the cleanest way is to just amend the financial report. "There was a small mistake here." So, I don't know if they're going to claim they made a mistake and thought they had paid it.
Speaker A
Yeah. I think this is dangerous. I seriously think it's dangerous. Seriously. I'm not saying I'd file a criminal complaint for document forgery, but, you know... Well, if you could just state on SNS or something that it wasn't a renovation, but that you
Speaker A
changed the name on your end, then I wouldn't need to file a damage report or anything like that. It’s turned into a situation where it looks like I forged the document myself, you know. I have no intention of filing anything
Speaker A
like that. If you could just say that, yeah.
Speaker A
I see. So, regarding the next steps, I don't know how the other party, or rather, the Kansai side, will move.
Speaker A
Yeah. You remember how I got angry when SUP did that last November, right? Like, "What is this?" That...
Speaker A
I probably still have the LINE logs.
Speaker A
Oh, to me?
Topics:political fundreceipt disputeMoriMatsuyamaNishinomiya City Councilelection expensesfinancial report correctiondocument forgeryvenue setup feepolitical accountability
