An Oregon man jailed for collecting rainwater on his property, highlighting legal issues around water rights and public resource laws.
Key Takeaways
- Collecting rainwater on private property can be legally restricted under certain municipal codes.
- Water within city limits may be considered public property, including precipitation.
- Legal battles can arise over the interpretation of water rights and resource ownership.
- Even non-commercial use of collected water can lead to prosecution.
- Property owners should be aware of local laws regarding water collection and usage.
What the video covers
- Gary Harrington, an Oregon rancher, collected rainwater and snowmelt on his own land using reservoirs.
- He claimed the water was for fire protection and wildlife on his property.
- The state prosecuted him, labeling the collection as theft of public water resources.
- A municipal code declared all water within city limits, including precipitation, part of the public water supply.
- The city sought court orders to remove his water collection system and impose fines.
- Harrington argued that the water fell on his land and was for personal use, not sale.
- His appeals were rejected by the court.
- He was convicted of unlawful appropriation of state water resources.
- Harrington was sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined over $1,500.
- The case highlights conflicts between private property rights and state water laws.
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
An Oregon man was convicted and sent to jail for collecting and using rainwater on his own property, sued by the state for theft. Rancher Gary Harrington built three large reservoirs on his own land to collect rainwater and snowmelt. He claimed the water was primarily for fire protection reserves and for providing water to wildlife, but the state called it theft and prosecuted Gary. A municipal code stipulates that all water within city limits, including precipitation, is part of the public water supply. The city requested the court order the removal of his collection system and impose a fine. Despite Harrington's repeated appeals arguing, "The water fell on my land. I'm not selling it. I'm simply using it on my own property," the court ultimately rejected his claims. Harrington was found guilty on multiple charges, including unlawful appropriation of state water resources. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined over $1,500.
Speaker A
claimed the water was primarily for fire protection reserves [music] and for providing water to wildlife, but the state called it theft and prosecuted [music] Gary. A municipal code stipulates that all water within city limits, including precipitation, is part of the public
Speaker A
water supply. [music] The city requested the court order the removal of his collection system and impose a fine.
Speaker A
[music] Despite Harrington's repeated appeals arguing, "The water fell on my land. I'm not selling it. I'm simply using it on my own property." The court ultimately rejected his claims. [music] Harrington was found guilty on multiple charges, including unlawful
Speaker A
appropriation of state water resources. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined over $1,500.
Topics:rainwater collectionwater rightsOregon water lawpublic water supplywater theftproperty rightswater resource lawslegal casemunicipal codeenvironmental law











