Speaker A
Hello, I'd spent many years thinking about something that had a very simple solution, and I've made many videos about it: the reconciliation of light and matter. Since Mother Nature is so simple and she doesn't have a calculator and a slide rule, she's just a simple chick with dreadlocks and muddy feet and hairy armpits, right? Not complicated at all. What about the reconciliation of light and magnetism? Everything current science believes or understands about magnetism is entirely wrong, and all of quantum, by their own admission, is based upon their understanding of the nature of light. That's what quantum is based upon, which of course is atomism. Now, when you're a hammer, everything is a nail. When you're an atomist, everything is a particle. The notion of a photon is completely arbitrary and nonsensical. That's not just my premise; it's also the premise of Nikola Tesla, the great masters of field theory: Steinmetz, Heaviside, James Clerk Maxwell, Eric Dollard. Yep, there's no such thing as a photon. That's an arbitrary concept. Light doesn't propagate; it doesn't move from point A to point B, but anything that has a speed. Every human being suffers under, and I did most of my life suffer under, the delusion that something that has a speed is obviously moving, kind of like a car going down the street. It's moving from point A to point B. Well, that's not conventional movement, nor is it actually propagating. That is the hysteresis of the ether, or specifically the rate of induction—how fast a perturbation can actually propagate. If a person is in the middle of a pond flapping their arms, they're not emitting anything; they're actually creating a disturbance in the field. Now, let me quote Nikola Tesla for you, who specifically said that light can be nothing other than a sound wave in the ether. Now, sound has a speed, but nobody emits sound. What we do is we set up a disturbance in the air. When I speak or when the sound occurs, we set up a perturbation, and that perturbation has a rate of induction. Now, the speed of sound, quote unquote, changes depending on whether the air is very dense, whether it's cold or whether it's hot. And also too, we can reconcile sound and light vis-à-vis the Doppler effect. Sound has the exact same occurrence in light; we call that redshift and blueshift. Now, let's talk about a couple things here and explain, right? Light, really, really simply—so simple that even a child can understand it. Because even the fool Einstein himself said, if you can't explain something so simply that a barmaid can understand it, then you really don't understand it. Yes, I actually quoted Einstein there, but he's right on that, just as a broken clock is right twice a day. So let's try to reconcile light and magnetism very, very simply. Let's first take a look at this, and this is a fact of science, and this is undeniable: that the smaller the space is, from my book on uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism, which is a free download on archive.org, by the way, it's in its third edition, that the smaller the space, the higher the capacitance. Now, I'm about to tell you here in a few minutes that the reconciliation of light and matter, of course, is divinely simple, just as I figured out the reconciliation of light and matter was extremely simple and, of course, was right in front of my face all the time. Mother Nature is a simple chick. You only have the conjugate geometry of the magnetic and the dielectric, and that's like saying ice and water. It's like, well, ice and water are the same thing, aren't they? Yes, they are. Human beings love to pigeonhole things. We see something different, "Well, that's something different. We need to call it something different." And advanced alien race, if they were to land, they said, "Well, magnetism is not something different from dielectricity. It's the exact same thing. Magnetism is the dielectric field," just as we could say ice or steam is the field modality of water. Of course, ice is not a, or water is not a field, but we could use that analogously for a mental image of, "Ah, aha, I understand that now." But the smaller the space, the higher the capacitance. In other words, when we move from red light towards ultraviolet and, of course, eventually towards X-rays and gamma rays, we have a smaller capacitance. I mean a smaller space, the higher the capacitance. The smaller the space when we move up an eV, the actual power, of course, once you move towards gamma ray, gamma rays act exactly like atomic nuclei, and that's why they destroy our DNA, and that's why gamma radiation is so darn dangerous, because it is essentially extremely close to what a nuclear particle would be. It's extremely, extremely tiny as compared to red light or green light or yellow light. So, when we increase the dielectric, we're increasing the capacitance because dielectric is capacitance, and it has a much smaller space. Yes, and this girlfriend, yes, is the reason why. And this is a really, really powerful N58 Gauss neodymium boron. You see this huge black space in the center? You can see the actual outline of the physical magnet right here. On a normal magnet like an N35 and 42 and 45 Gauss, the actual dielectric black center would be about a third as big as this. People say, and people have bought really powerful magnets to say, "Why is the field so small?" It is because when you increase the capacitance, you decrease the spatial footprint. Magnetism is the dielectric field. They're not two different things, the conjugate geometry of the entire universe. So, when you increase the dielectric, when you make a magnet more powerful, you're not making the magnetism more powerful. Well, you kind of are in this very small peripheral zone. What you're doing is you're increasing the dielectric. Yeah, I kind of gave the analogy before of, you know, the shower output in your bathtub as opposed to the drain. Well, imagine in the case of our magnet, when you increase the outflow of the shower head pressure, which you're also unwittingly doing, and showers don't work this way, but magnets do, what you're unwittingly doing is creating this stronger and stronger vacuum suction at the bottom where the water drains out down the drain and the bottom of your bathtub. Of course, bathtubs, like I said, shower bathtubs don't work like that, but our magnets do work like that. This is a reason why very powerful magnets have smaller spatial footprints of magnetic fields. Once again, like I said, all of quantum is based upon their conceptual understanding of the nature of light. I'm going to quote Captain Goofy here, Mr. Einstein, who said, "We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality. Separately, is the particle enzyme fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do." Now, there's no such thing as a photon. This is an arbitrary concept, and there are no dualities in nature because that implies an inherent contradiction, and Mother Nature doesn't do contradictions. Completely impossible, illogical, implausible, ridiculous, absurd, nonsensical. And I've given this drop analogy: it's particle versus wave, because there's no such thing as a wave. You know, let's just establish that right now, okay? Let's repeat after me: there is no such thing as a wave. Yeah, there's no such thing as a shadow either. Sure there is. Everybody knows a shadow. Stand in a shadow, you feel cold. Well, a shadow can have attributes. When you stand in a shadow, you feel cold, but a shadow is not a thing. A shadow is a conceptual reification and a philosophical fallacy. It has no principality. It is a posterior attribute, is a privation said of the absence of something else. A wave is not a thing. A wave is what something does. There's no such thing as a wave, and you find wave in the dictionary as a noun, but of course a wave is not a principle, nor is it a thing. So what is light, therefore? Of course, I've spoken endlessly about light on countless videos and also too in my free book that I mentioned. It's free, that the light is a coaxial circuit. Okay, and it depends on how you look at it. We look at the...