Speaker A
Manifestation is nonsense, and action is the only thing that matters. A huge amount of the delay that happens when people are starting out is the amount of time it takes for them to realize there is no easy way.
Alex Hormozi reveals the top strategy to become a millionaire in 2025, emphasizing action over manifestation and spotting supply-demand gaps.
Key Takeaways
- Action and persistence are more important than manifestation or waiting for luck.
- Recognizing and capitalizing on supply-demand gaps is crucial for rapid business growth.
- Technology and AI continually lower barriers, creating new opportunities for entrepreneurs.
- Distractions and comfort can hinder potential, but success is achievable with focus and skill.
- Luck amplifies success but does not replace the need for skill and repeated effort.
Summary
- Manifestation is dismissed as ineffective; action is the key to success.
- Entrepreneurship involves enduring different types of suffering, including patience and focus.
- Success often requires sticking with the process until one big win changes everything.
- Current market opportunities arise from supply-demand discrepancies, such as TikTok Shop.
- Technology has lowered barriers to starting businesses, making success easier but distractions greater.
- Luck plays a role but is secondary to skill and recognizing opportunities.
- Macro opportunities include the internet, Web 2.0/social media, and AI.
- Micro opportunities exist within these macro trends, offering outsized returns during early adoption phases.
- Success demands skill development and consistent effort rather than relying on luck or shortcuts.
- Comfort and distraction are major challenges preventing people from reaching their potential.
Chapters
- 00:00The Importance of Action Over Manifestation
- 08:20Challenges Entrepreneurs Face: Suffering and Patience
- 18:20Luck vs Skill in Business Success
- 25:00Identifying Supply-Demand Discrepancies Today
- 31:40Macro and Micro Opportunities in Technology and AI
- 38:20The Role of Skills and Consistency in Capitalizing on Opportunities
- 45:00The Impact of Comfort and Distraction on Potential
- 51:40Final Thoughts on Persistence and Winning Big
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
This is the blueprint to becoming a millionaire, and I'm going to walk you through the levels to becoming one. So, where do most businesses get stuck?
Speaker A
Suffering is constant. It's just that the nature of the suffering changes. It stops being about how hard you can push.
Speaker A
Sometimes it's about how long you can wait. Sometimes it's about how focused you can stay. One of the really interesting things about entrepreneurship is that you get these unlimited lottery tickets. You just pay time to get them. And so a lot of people
Speaker A
just will choose not to cash their tickets in at all. And you only need one really big win to change your life forever. And so it's really just sticking with it. What's going on today that people aren't recognizing the
Speaker A
potential in? There's a huge supply-demand discrepancy right now. I know a lot of people who have really never done much and then just like within 60 to 90 days are doing a million a month.
Speaker A
[Music] Alex, thank you so much for coming on the Iced Coffee Hour. Really appreciate it.
Speaker A
Thanks so much for having me. I've been a huge fan of your Twitter lately.
Speaker A
It has been on fire. You seem to be tweeting all the time.
Speaker A
Yeah. Really insightful stuff. Recently, you tweeted that it has never been easier to be successful. Why do so many people feel like it's not?
Speaker A
I think it's just never
Speaker A
been easier to be distracted. So, it's like the bar has never been lower, but the bar is even lower to not do it. And I think people have never been more comfortable than they are today. And so, it's like Netflix and
Speaker A
chilling and like Uber and DoorDash and all of that stuff has just made everything like comfort. We're like comfort maxing right now. And so, like all of these other tools like, you know, these software platforms and AI and all
Speaker A
this stuff has like lowered the bar for people to make content or start businesses or advertise or whatever they want to do. But, um, it's just like it's so hard to take a risk when you could literally just do nothing. And the way
Speaker A
that, like, society is now, it's like you, you're not going to go homeless and you're not going to starve. So, like, which I see as the most exciting part because you could just, you could take a huge shot and the worst case
Speaker A
scenario is like you're not going to starve and you're going to have shelter. So, do you think it's a blessing or a curse?
Speaker A
I would say it's a blessing. I mean, at the end of the day, I think
Speaker A
technology is always going to move things forward. So, that's like it's never been easier than it is today. And 20 years ago, it was never easier than it was then up to that point. So, it's like it will always get easier for
Speaker A
people to start businesses, which I think is a good thing. In terms of optimizing for comfort, what is the downside of purely just being someone at home scrolling all the time? How big is it for them not to reach their
Speaker A
potential? I think it's a, it's a, it's a them thing. So, I don't see it as a problem at all. I mean, I think it's only a problem if you're making some sort of demand of the universe that your
Speaker A
life must be a certain way. And so, I think that's where it's kind of all the shoulds like I should, like my life should have meaning, my life should have this impact, my life should all these things. If you believe that, then yeah,
Speaker A
it'll be an issue because it's a, like I believe in conditional shoulds, not absolute shoulds. So, like if this then you shouldn't probably scroll on your phone as much. If you want to get in shape, like maybe don't eat more than
Speaker A
you burn. Like, but don't eat more than you burn as a general statement. It's like do whatever you want. That's, it's your, it's your life. I just have the issue when people want something different than the way they act. Do you
Speaker A
think it's overall lowered the bar for excellence? Like a lot of people can kind of just become successful by happenstance or by luck.
Speaker A
Now, I think there are definitely people who get lucky. Um, repeat and serial entrepreneurs less so.
Speaker A
Um, I've only really encountered maybe like a couple people in my career from the entrepreneur side that I'm like, "This guy was just lucky." Um, I think there are elements of luck, but it's like luck becomes a, a, like it becomes
Speaker A
gas more than the thing that like built the car. It's like they were going to be successful, they just got way more successful because they had like kind of multiple things aligned. Can you give us some examples of luck like that?
Speaker A
Yeah, sure. Like if you were, if you were an Amazon in 2013, 14, 15 and you put up a product, you could just crush. Like you didn't have to like really know anything. There was just all this demand
Speaker A
that was there. If you were running Facebook ads in 2011, it was just like not hard to crush. If you, um, if you were doing SEO in like 2008 and seven with like you could literally just put like coffee in like
Speaker A
white font on a white background. So the whole background of a website just said coffee, but like if you looked at the site, you wouldn't see it. But if you like took a cursor, you could just
Speaker A
see it just says coffee because the algorithms weren't like that advanced. And so you can just rank and get all of Google's traffic. So there was just like a lot of the things that were lucky were just like typically I'll put it
Speaker A
differently. Luck will come from a supply-demand discrepancy within a window of time. And so where there's a huge amount of demand and a small amount of supply and then you happen to be one of those people who gets in on that. Now,
Speaker A
that being said, part of that is like recognizing opportunity. Um, and so like to what degree is that luck? You know, I think the question of whether it's luck or not is whether you can repeat it. So I'm curious where those opportunities
Speaker A
are today because it seems like every few years in hindsight you could look back and be like that was the best time to do that. What are, what's going on today that people aren't recognizing the potential in? I think there's micro and
Speaker A
macro opportunities. So like from the macro perspective, I think we've had like three big ones. So at least in my lifetime. So it's like we've had internet,
Speaker A
which is like kind of opportunity number one. Opportunity number two is kind of like web 2.0, which
Speaker A
is social. Um, and then opportunity three is AI now. So there's the three macro ones. Now underneath of that it's kind of like, well, Facebook ads was kind of like a, like an opportunity kind of like within that and then like Google search
Speaker A
was an opportunity like all of those are kind of like sub, kind of like micro, opportunities like I think like TikTok shop right now. Um, a lot of people are kind of, kind of like in that Amazon
Speaker A
of 2013, 14 like I know a lot of people who are who've really never done much and then just like within 60 to 90 days are doing a million a month and it's just because there's a huge supply-demand
Speaker A
discrepancy between the amount of influencers that are there that want to make money and the amount of products to sell and they will just continue to populate it until eventually it becomes a stabilized market. But it's like when
Speaker A
those, when those market, those land grabs occur, that's when there's typically outsized returns to be had. What do you think people need to be able to capitalize on these opportunities? I think you have to have skills just straight up. Yeah. Like you
Speaker A
just have to have skills. Like I remember it was really funny like, um, our first ever conversation that we had, um, I was like, man, if I had your amount of following I was like I'd be a billionaire. And I saw that as a supply-
Speaker A
demand, um, like and even so like when you asked just a few minutes ago like, you know, what's the, what things are there now? Like I still kind of see social media still there. I still think that opportunity exists for peop
Speaker A
So what they want is what every investor wants, which is what, you know, I I tried to set out to do in the very beginning, which was um they want proprietary deal flow. So they want people who want to specifically do deals
Speaker A
with one person. So it's not like they're shopping. They're like, I want to do a deal with you. And ideally, you have some sort of captive market or niche. Um and so for acquisition.com, we are kind of low mid-market in terms of
Speaker A
what what companies or businesses are kind of attracted to my stuff. And so it's typically the business is doing like between $1 and $100 million a year.
Speaker A
And so and this was kind of the thesis of acquisition in the beginning was like okay everything's sub a million. There's tons of people who you know help people get their first customer a few hundred,000 in revenue first five
Speaker A
clients things like that. Like there's tons of kind of like the coaching consulting whatever you know coaching course world is there. Then if you go like 100 million and up then you've got like Mackenzie Bane, BCG, uh Deote, PWC
Speaker A
EY, like a lot of these Gartner, like all these kinds of consulting firms that deal with like kind of above there, but there's just not a lot in like the one to 100 million range. And what's interesting about that particular range
Speaker A
is that that's where a huge amount of like alpha is created in terms of investing returns. And so like for example, if you have a business and this is probably going to lose half the half the audience, but if you have if you
Speaker A
have a business that's doing call like $3 million in IBIDA or profit, right per year, and you can make a handful of tweaks and get it from 3 to 8 million the $3 million IBIDA business might be worth $12 million. Maybe the $8 million
Speaker A
IBIDA business can probably get somewhere between like 80 and hundred million in a sale. And so it's like you have a a a huge multiplier effect that increases once you get above about $5 million in profit and especially as you
Speaker A
approach 10 where you now become uh a target for institutional grade investors. So that because they can write they have to put to work hundreds of millions of dollars. And so they basically become the customer of buying the product which is the business that
Speaker A
you created. And so our thesis of acquisition.com was like, well, we want to get people right before they're at that that level, buy at really small prices, make the changes in the business, and then capture this huge upside. So where do most businesses get
Speaker A
stuck? I mean, businesses get stuck at all different levels. I mean, because all you'd have to do is just look at the the the revenue breakdown. It's like 95% of businesses are less than a million dollars a year. So a lot of businesses
Speaker A
just like barely even get to the million dollar in revenue point. Above that it's um I think it's 1 in 250. That's 4% get to $10 million a year. Um, so is that a market problem or or an operator
Speaker A
problem? Um, I think it's almost an always an operator problem like unless you like in people will name these like really random weird businesses where someone like tries to come up with something entirely new. Um, but I see
Speaker A
there's kind of like three kind of types of big type buckets of risk in terms of picking an opportunity. You've got um like a product market fit risk which is I'm gonna come up with something that no one's ever done before and see if people
Speaker A
want it. That's like an Uber like we like let's see if strangers will pick up strangers and taxis like maybe it sounds made sound crazy at the time, right? So that's a product market fit risk issue.
Speaker A
Those are in my opinion extremely risky. The second category are uh technical risk issues. So like if I just said "Hey, I can come up with an AI salesperson that can take all your phone calls for you." I don't need to guess
Speaker A
whether people are going to want that. They're for sure going to want it. The problem is how likely you can actually do the it's the difficulty of actually solving the problem, right? The Uber thing, it's like, well, there's some
Speaker A
technical risk there, too, but will people even want this versus they want it, I don't know if I can deliver it.
Speaker A
And then the third category is what I would say is the the vast majority of business owners, which is just execution risk. There's other longare businesses that do $100 million a year. The path is really literally in front of me. The
Speaker A
only risk is whether I'm skilled enough to do it. That's it. So, what are the biggest operating obstacles you've personally ran into trying to scale acquisition.com into a billion dollar business and how did you overcome it?
Speaker A
Suffering is constant. It's just that the nature of the suffering changes and so it's like the hard is always hard and it just and I think what makes it more difficult as as the business continues to develop is that you end up trading
Speaker A
things that you didn't expect you'd have to trade. And so, like in a lot of people's minds, it's like, oh, I can push really hard. It's like it stops being about how hard you can push at a certain point. Sometimes it's about how
Speaker A
long you can wait. Sometimes it's about how focused you can stay. Sometimes it's about what kind of person you're able to attract to the business. Um, sometimes it's just the quality of your decisions right? Well, a lot of times it's the
Speaker A
quality of your decisions and those are just kind of like micro examples. But like, you know, in the very beginning you have to overcome a lot of uh environmental issues. It's like you have your friends and family who are telling
Speaker A
you that it's not going to work whatever, and they think your idea is stupid. And so you have to overcome that. And then maybe you have to overcome your own limiting beliefs. So you have to overcome that. And then you
Speaker A
start doing things and and you start advertising and letting people know that you have stuff and and selling them on your services, your product. And then quickly you have to learn like the first level of management. So it's like, okay
Speaker A
well now it's not me, it's me and maybe a couple of, you know, virtual assistants. And then you're like, okay this is too much for part-timers. I need some full-timers. So you have to level up to basically being a manager, which
Speaker A
you haven't done before. And then once you're a manager, it's like, okay, well I'm managing this half. I have to get somebody else. And you get your first manager. And then all of a sudden you have multiple managers. Now you're a
Speaker A
leader, right? And then you have to attract leaders which is a totally different skill because you have to lead leaders. And so at every level um I see entrepreneurship as a forcing function for pain but also a forcing function for
Speaker A
progress. Um in that um you will stay in pain until you progress and then you will find new pain. So what's something that you've tweeted or said that people clearly agree with but just don't implement?
Speaker A
I mean, like, we could pull it up. Like where do you want to start? Now, if there's one thing I absolutely can't stand, it's wasting money. And I know we've all done it. We've sign up for subscriptions that you don't really
Speaker A
realize in the moment. You forget about them, and then pretty soon, you're charged out the wazoo for things that you never really needed or used. That's why, no joke, I started using today's sponsor, Rocket Money. With Rocket Money, I could see all my subscriptions
Speaker A
in one place. I could easily cancel the ones I'm not using, and then I could put that money back in my pocket. For those that don't know, Rocket Money is a personal finance app that helps you find and cancel your unwanted subscriptions
Speaker A
monitors your spending, and helps you lower your bills so you can grow your savings. Inside Rocket Money's dashboard, you can track all of your spending, create personalized budgets and even get alerts if your bills go up or if there's unusual activity. Rocket
Speaker A
Money will even try to negotiate lower bills for you. They'll automatically scan all of your expenses, find potential opportunities to save, and then they'll negotiate. They'll deal with all the customer service so you don't have to. Rocket Money has over 5
Speaker A
million users and have saved a total of $500 million in cancelled subscriptions saving members up to $740 a year when using all of the app's premium features.
Speaker A
I genuinely can't wrap my head around $500 million in unwanted subscriptions. So, don't wait. Cancel your unwanted subscriptions today and reach your financial goals faster with RocketMoney.
Speaker A
Go to rocketmoney.com/istic today to get started. That's rocketmoney.com/istic. Rocketmoney.com/istic. Thank you so much to RocketMoney for sponsoring this episode. Where do you want to start? Uh you think Twitter's like a high ROI activity for you? Um, Twitter is it's
Speaker A
like I can't help myself. You just can't. That's that's one of your indulgences. Yeah. Like, let's see.
Speaker A
Let's see what what what did people not understand about this? Suck at something. Work for free lots of times.
Speaker A
Suck less. Wait until people ask for free work and you can't take them on.
Speaker A
Now you have more demand than you have supply. Begin to charge money. Boot out the free clients for paid clients and then offer to keep working with those clients for money. Congrats, you have a business. So, I will I agree with that.
Speaker A
Now, now here's a counterpoint to that. It is hard to take people from free to paying for a service. Totally. What is your way around that? Well, it depends.
Speaker A
So, it depends on how how high value the service is, number one. And number two is we start with free because you need to get reps because you probably suck.
Speaker A
And so, it's like you're really getting free feedback from people that otherwise like shouldn't because you will be terrible. Um, but the transitioning people from uh free to paid really comes down to just how good you are. And if
Speaker A
you are like, so for example, if I if I was redoing all your YouTube thumbnails and I said I would do it for free. Now at the at your level, so everybody who's listening, don't immediately DM Graham because he already has somebody, right?
Speaker A
But like the thing is go for somebody who's like onetenth of Graham's size who can't really afford it. Give that guy the thumbnails. And if your thumbnails beat his thumbnails, uh, he will if you're like, "Okay, well, I have now all
Speaker A
these people who are paying me. So, um you can pay me what they're paying me or I'm just going to work with them." At that point, he'll either pay if he's making any money on his channel or he
Speaker A
won't. But like there's a there's real value that's being created there. But the idea is you want to get your your roster filled so that at that point, and I think part of this I I give this as
Speaker A
advice because a lot of people in the beginning don't believe they can charge anything. And so it's like fine, don't charge, get better. And then once you literally can't take people on, it's like, dude, I I can't take you on. And
Speaker A
then they're like, well, what would it take? And you're like, oh, money, money. I could do that. I could do it for money. And then now it's like you actually can help someone break through the belief of like, yeah, you can ask
Speaker A
you can ask for money for stuff. Do you think there's something to look out for for people who just want something for free and will never pay for it? Well I'll say this. My big caveat for free if I'm going to give it away, is I have
Speaker A
to give I'll give something away for free. I'll give tons I'll give stuff away for free that cost me money if it's to a qualified prospect. So if I'm giving, you know, if I'm trying to get into enterprise IT services, right? I'm
Speaker A
not going to start with a local I, you know, dry cleaning business who can't afford what I would like to eventually charge. So I want somebody who has, you know, bant, which is budget, authority need timing. So do they have the money
Speaker A
to spend? Do they have the authority to make the decision? Do they have the need for this specific thing? Is now a good time? If I can get those four things I'll give that person free stuff. Like if it's like, hey, I'm only doing back
Speaker A
massages for billionaires. Fine. Then like, you got to be a billionaire and I'll give it to you for free. eventually I'll charge. But no, the homeless guy on this on the corner of the street will also take a free massagers, but he'll
Speaker A
never be able to pay. And so it's not that we want to give free to anyone.
Speaker A
It's just that we want to get the most qualified prospects, get good feedback from those customers, which they we should treat them like customers, so that we can then eventually charge people just like them based on the feedback that we got. Otherwise, we'd be
Speaker A
building a product for somebody who's not who's the wrong person. How do you make your offer unbeatable then? Um where it's unfair. Yeah. If people feel stupid saying no. Um there's there's four elements of value as I've kind of
Speaker A
defined in the book the $und00 million uh offers book. So you have the dream outcome, right, which is like what is what am I actually going to give this person? Every product is the dream outcome. Every service has a dream
Speaker A
outcome, which is like what's the thing that they want to have happen? Okay cool. So that's going to be our baseline in terms of value. Like if I'm going to help somebody make an extra million a year or $10 million a year, that's going
Speaker A
to be a baseline, but there's still going to be a discount that's applied to that. And there's basically three factors that apply to that discount.
Speaker A
Number one is how fast is it going to happen? Number two is how much effort is it going to take on behalf of the customer. And then number three is how likely is it to occur? And so fundamentally those are the elements of
Speaker A
value that are either multipliers or detractors of what you can ultimately charge a customer for whatever it is that you sell. So how do I make it fast?
Speaker A
How do I make it easy? And how do I make it risk- free? And so within each of those components, like part of the way of making it risk- free to them is if I have 10,000 other people I've done this
Speaker A
for, it's much less risky, right? That's proof, right? You could also do that with covenants and terms. You could either do it based on performance that shifts more of the risk to you. You could also just give guarantees and
Speaker A
satisfaction. You get guarantees that are conditional based on things that they do. Those are all elements of things you can do to decrease risk which you can uh reverse into price. And so said differently, I could say, "Hey
Speaker A
um, I'll charge you $5,000 to do this thing." And if someone says, "Uh, well no." It's like, "Okay, well, I'll do it for $3,000, but I won't give you a satisfaction guarantee." And then what you'll find happen is they're like, "Oh
Speaker A
well, I'll do it for 5,000 with the guarantee." So people resell themselves on a higher price if you take away a component that's valuable. So that's that's the risk one. From a speed perspective, I would say that the more
Speaker A
I've studied like human behavior, sales persuasion, marketing, the more I really lean into speed. Like if you want to enter any new marketplace, just look at what everyone else is doing and see if you can do it in half the time. And
Speaker A
there's just so much value in speed. Like humans are so immediate reward focused. Like almost every business can offer a speed version. So it's like you're a YouTube thumbnail agency and you say, "Cool, I'll get you thumbnails in a week normally." It's like, oh, if
Speaker A
you want for 50% more, I'll get them to you in 24 hours and for and for 300% I'll get to them to you in the next 60 minutes. The same cost to you. It's the same work, but you just give someone
Speaker A
priority access and it's all margin. So it's like you can always play with speed as another variable of value. And then the uh the third element has two pieces to it, which is ease, like how does it have two elements? Well, one is what are
Speaker A
the bad things that I I hate doing that I get to not do as a result of buying right? All the stuff I don't like you're going to take away. Great. But I also want to make sure that I don't
Speaker A
prevent someone from doing the things they do enjoy doing, right? And so I give a classic example of like if you sign up at a gym, uh, all of a sudden you have to start doing things you don't
Speaker A
want to do, but you also have to stop drinking margaritas, you have to stop taco Tuesday, you have to stop having cupcakes and stop having your McFlurryries. So it's like you have to give up stuff you like and you have to
Speaker A
do stuff you hate, which is why it's such a hard sale. So do you study psychology in order to be a more effective salesperson? I wouldn't say I study psychology. Um, I would say I just look at data of business because I the
Speaker A
the the one advantage that I have is I have a a huge amount of data that I sit on top of between the companies that we invest in, the companies that uh come use our services on the advisory
Speaker A
division um and the companies that well companies we own and the companies we invest in. And so it's like I get to see a lot of different data and so when we make changes into a sales process or a
Speaker A
change in terms of an offer um I could see the improvements in conversion rates. And so, uh, that's where a lot of my like thesis have come from. Are you ever surprised by the data or is most of
Speaker A
it kind of just confirming your intuition all the time? I get surprised all the time. What's been like one of the biggest surprises about this data?
Speaker A
Yeah, we had a we had a company um that uh sells B2B services and I had this guest that um based on uh basically we could collect the data of the size of the revenue of the companies that were
Speaker A
basically leads that were coming in the funnel. And so I wanted to shut off the bottom third of the leads because they were the lowest revenue leads and just have the team focus on the top two/irds.
Speaker A
And so I was like, "Hey, just pull pull the sales data because I'm going to bet that all the conversions happening on the top end." And the conversion rate was actually evenly spread. And so um I was like, "Huh?" Like almost to the
Speaker A
percentage point. I was like, "That is not what I would have expected." And again, that could be unique to that specific business. I would still posit that in general more qualified customers buy on average more and spend more money
Speaker A
just in this particular business and maybe that means that that business is mispriced which would be a different problem but given that data I was like huh that's interesting we have people who are 10 times the size buying at the
Speaker A
same rate as people who are onetenth the size wild and it's way more of a stretch for these people than it is for these people so maybe we're missing our message did you ever find out why have you dug into that and gotten to the
Speaker A
bottom I it's a it's a great question because like I I try it's really hard to say why because like I think I think a lot of people like to use because because it's very compelling. Um, but I
Speaker A
just try and stick with like this is the data that I have within this given context and in this situation it worked and I know there are principles like things that are fast will sell better than things that are slow, things that
Speaker A
are easy will sell better than things that are hard. Things that are risk-f free will sell better than things that are not risky. Like I can take that to the bank. So like I try and think of like what are the few principles that
Speaker A
will always uh be true and then the rest is application. What's something that you track within a business that most people don't even look at? I'll give you a handful of metrics that I track. So you'll be like, I didn't need that many.
Speaker A
So, if I had to solve for two things, it would be uh gross margin and revenue retention. So, fundamentally, like what do we make per sale in terms of uh like is there a lot of margin that's there?
Speaker A
If so, like that's an that's more attractive to me. And then secondarily uh how likely is that this person is going to continue to buy from us next year and the year after that? So, if I have a business that I have
Speaker A
hypothetically 100% gross margins and 100% revenue retention, that's an amazing business. They literally just print money and they never lose it.
Speaker A
Like, that's cool. Uh, that's a very attractive business. So, if I only knew those two things, the only other thing I'd want to know is what's my cost to acquire a customer versus my lifetime gross profit per customer. So, how much
Speaker A
money does it cost me to get somebody and then how much do they pay me over time? And so basically that fundamental the LTV to CAC ratio or LTGP to CAC ratio. I know fancy acronyms but uh that
Speaker A
ratio between those two numbers is the fundamental economic arbitrage that exists within businesses and fundamentally that's why um private businesses will get the highest returns in terms of uh returns on capital because in in in in so few places like
Speaker A
if you were to put it in the S&P 500 those companies are already at scale and it's harder for them to grow you know at huge huge percentages. Um maybe you let's say you put $1,000 in and you get
Speaker A
10% so you're 1100 bucks at the end of the year. In a business you could put $1,000 into paid ads and make $30,000 in gross profit in 24 hours. Like that happens all the time. And so it's like
Speaker A
that's how somebody can go from $0 to a billionaire in four years because the returns on capital are absurd. And this is also what I think one of the big opportunities of of social media is is that like okay, why is social media so
Speaker A
powerful? It's because it drives CAC to zero. Do you trust customer satisfaction? I take it as I'll I'll take surveys. So, we survey um across all the companies that we have because I like to have leading indicators in terms
Speaker A
of like what's going on? I like I care more about the reason why that they give. It's kind of like the comment section. Like I care more about that. Um but I care far more about renewal rates.
Speaker A
So, if we're getting bad scores, but everyone's buying, then I'd be like "Okay, well, we found something that people need but hate that they have to buy from us and they'll be very quick to switch." Um, but as of right now
Speaker A
there's no one else who can do it either better, faster, or cheaper than we can.
Speaker A
Um, but I would renewal rate, like how you spend your money is what I care the most about. And I would say what you think. It's kind of like what do you want? And people like I want faster
Speaker A
horses versus the car. So it's like I care about that a little bit, but I care far more about what the data suggests about purchase behavior. When you make an offer to somebody and they say no I'm not interested. How often is that
Speaker A
able to be turned around across what setting? Is that in a sales setting? in a sales setting. Um I think it depends on the reason the person said no. So it that would that would be a like it would
Speaker A
be a discovery question after that. So be like well what are the variables you use to make the decision? And sometimes like I think there's a there's a big difference between a no based on value uh or a no based on details or a no
Speaker A
based on authority or a no based on timing. Like just kind of said budget authority and timing. These are the kind of the components. Well, how do we make sure that we can can I control can I can
Speaker A
I overcome some of these issues? Now, if someone's like, uh, love what you have.
Speaker A
Um, I don't buy coats because I live in Panama. I'm like, okay, there's no need.
Speaker A
Like, I could try and sell what I like like, hey, I've got a gym membership.
Speaker A
Uh, why aren't you signing up? It's like, well, you're in Iowa and I live in Florida. Like, like, I'm never going to get there. Like, so it's like where it depends on the reason for the no. And what if it's a price issue? Mhm. Where
Speaker A
do you draw the line between lowering the price and cheapening the product and getting someone who's qualified or keeping the price the same but losing the sale? Yeah. So, I I'm a very firm believer in never negotiating with
Speaker A
terrorists, including price terrorists. And so, if someone wants to look like if someone says, "Hey, can you do it for cheaper?" You know, we always I mean, we train on saying like, "We can do it for more." And people are like, "Okay, yeah
Speaker A
I got it. I'll I'll buy at that price." Um, but I the price that you quote is the price that you stick to. Otherwise every as soon as you negotiate once every price you have is negotiable which sucks as a business and is a pain
Speaker A
in the butt and I hate it. So, um, and you want price standardization anyways because you don't want different people getting sold different prices. People could talk. It's kind of sucks. So, um my big thing is price and terms. And so
Speaker A
if we have this price, if I'm going to change it, then I will also change terms. So, if someone's like, "Hey, I I would love to buy the $5,000 thing, but I can't afford it." If we've already looped a couple times and said, "Okay
Speaker A
why can't you afford it? Why how important is this to you? What would it cost you to to not do this? You know quantify as many of these things as possible." And they're still like, "I literally just don't have this amount of
Speaker A
this is here's my bank account. I have $3,000. I will buy it for $3,000." Then in that instance, like, I can't ethically sell you the same thing as somebody else for $5,000 for $3,000. I can't do it. What I can do is I can
Speaker A
remove a component. So, let's look at these things that we have here. Uh, we have this guarantee. I can remove the guarantee and I can knock $1,000 off.
Speaker A
Does that work? Okay. Um, also instead of, you know, coming to the gym, you know, three times a week, if you come to the gym twice a week, will that work for you? Great. Well, let's just do that.
Speaker A
You could do one workout at home. So I'll I'll I'll want to change the terms of the agreement if I'm going to change price. But, I can't I won't just say "Sure, I'll do it for less." I just
Speaker A
won't do that. Why do you think that most people fail? Is it a skill gap, a belief gap, or is it just distraction? I think it depends on how we define failure. So for the people who don't start then it's probably a belief issue
Speaker A
like they they didn't they failed by never starting. Um and that's the vast majority of the people they failed before they start the race. Um of the people who do start the race um I think just for for people sub a million
Speaker A
dollars almost all you know what it's not I would even say that it's at all levels distraction is a huge one. They start six businesses in the hopes that one of them will take off because they fundamentally don't understand how
Speaker A
business works. like you only have you have very constrained resources in terms of time, money, effort, human capital people. Um, and you have to allocate all of those things to one business to just have a hope that it's going to work. Um
Speaker A
so I think focus is a a massive one. Um so that's kind of equal opposite of distraction. And then in terms of beliefs, the belief is the early days.
Speaker A
Distraction kind of is pervasive. Um sometimes it's just business model things. Um, which I would just translate up to skill deficiencies. So once someone gets started, there's there's I think there's just two buckets. You've got um you've got procedural knowledge
Speaker A
and declarative knowledge, which is basically the two sides of knowledge that exist, which is knowing how to do something and knowing that something exists or that something's possible. And so this is where people talk about mindset, manifestate, whatever. It's
Speaker A
like fundamentally it's just like you have to believe that something's possible. And so if you meet somebody who's doing $10 million a year and they're same age as you, grown up in the same hometown, you're like, well, I
Speaker A
guess that's possible, right? And all of a sudden it's like, man, my perspective totally changed. like my mindset I manifest who knows whatever but like you fundamentally now believe it can happen cool so then the only delta that you
Speaker A
have is how to do it right that's procedural so I could talk like we could talk about private equity all day on here and someone could listen to every private equity podcast in the world you understand that people are doing it but
Speaker A
you don't understand how to do it and you can understand all the steps but until you go through it there's you won't you won't know how it works and then once you do then you can do it again so what's some of the lowhanging
Speaker A
fruit that people could start implementing today that'll make a big difference long term I think shrinking the time between when you make a decision and when you take action on the decision is probably one of the strongest coralates with like high high
Speaker A
producers. Um you always talk about that. Was there like a specific moment that you kind of had that realization and then ever since you made that decision you're going to decrease that amount of time that like the business
Speaker A
went exponential? So two things. So one is if you define a god being as omnipotent then as they think things things would exist and so if someone is ultimately powerful that means like the moment they think of it it happens right
Speaker A
and so it's like okay if that's the hypothetical ideal then everything reversed from that is less and less powerful and so if I want to be a more potent person or less impotent then I should shrink the time between when I
Speaker A
make a decision and when I act on that decision and try to make it into reality so that's number one the second issue when it comes to decision ision making is that the vast majority of speed I think that happens within a business
Speaker A
comes down to speed of decision-m like there are so many decisions that have to occur every single day that most of the time and you guys experienced this within your own business it's like you know the team says hey what do we do
Speaker A
with here and then you're like okay let me think about that or let me give you a couple like give me a day or two I'll come back to you but one of the good frameworks that I have is just asking
Speaker A
myself the question will I get more information to make this decision if the answer is no then make the decision like you're not going to get more information to make it. So, you might as well just make it now. And so, that the
Speaker A
interesting thing about that is like that speed though, a lot of times people take let's say seven days to make a decision or even a month to make a decision. But if I can make a decision now and then make a second decision 2
Speaker A
minutes later, make a third decision 2 minutes later like in a very real way. I could I could operate a thousand times the speed somebody else's. And I think that's fundamentally like how Elon operates um and how he can just get so
Speaker A
much stuff done. He also obviously distributes a lot of decision-m to people who are intelligent. How important is intuition when it comes to making a decision that you just feel one thing over the other? Well, I think I
Speaker A
think intuition is just like a really really amorphous word for having a history of reinforcement with variables that you can identify or have trouble trouble identifying. So, it's like, you know, this girl walks in, I've got a bad feeling about her. That's my
Speaker A
intuition. Well, you have a history of seeing lots of women walk in. And if you have uh people or women who looked a certain way or acted, you know, the way they carried themselves, the way they dressed, the way their hair looked, the
Speaker A
way they did their makeup, the way they talked, the way they breathe, the way they all these other variables that you're taking in. If somebody else in the past you had a negative experience with, you would then say, oh, I get bad vibes because
Speaker A
it's just harder for you to be be like hey, subconscious, what was the variable that you identified that was similar to this other past experience that sucked?
Speaker A
Harder to do. So, um, do I trust uh intuition? I will definitely pay attention to it. Um, will I believe that it's some magic power? No. I just think it's just like there's something that I haven't been able to identify. Maybe if
Speaker A
I spend more time thinking about it, I could maybe, you know, like, it wasn't this, it wasn't this, it wasn't. You know, this is what it was. Now, you might not know it yet, but there is a growing expense eating into your
Speaker A
company's profits. It's your cloud computing bill. You might have gotten a deal to start, but now your spend is skyhigh and it's increasing every single year. But what if you could cut your cloud bill in half and improve
Speaker A
performance at the exact same time? Well, if you act by May 31st, our sponsor, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure could help you do just that. OCI is the next generation cloud designed for every workload where you can run any application, including any AI projects
Speaker A
faster and more securely for less. It is such a good deal. In fact, Oracle has a very special promotion where you can cut your current cloud bill in half when you switch to OCI. And the savings are real.
Speaker A
OCI costs 50% less for compute, 70% less for storage, and 80% less for networking. Join Modal, Skyance Animation, and today's innovative AI tech companies who upgraded to OCI and saved. The offer, by the way, is only for US customers with minimum financial
Speaker A
commitment. See if you qualify for half off at oracle.com/istic. Again oracle.com/istic with a link down below in the description. Thank you so much Oracle, for sponsoring this episode. And now, let's get back to the podcast. Do you have a BS meter to tell if people
Speaker A
are fake or if they're just maybe a bit of a a fraud? I don't I don't know if I have a BS meter. I think that asking questions can help a lot. So like if someone just walked in and said like I
Speaker A
am a this I'm like I don't know. Uh maybe you know um if I asked 10 more questions about that thing and I know more about that thing than they do then I would have a better idea. If someone's
Speaker A
talking about how to train a sales team uh and they're like I know how to do that. I'd be like okay well how do you think about this? You know how do you think about this? Um, and if they gave
Speaker A
bad answers, then I'd be like, "Okay, we don't really know how to train a sales team." And so, it depends on my um skill level within that domain that someone's supposed to, you know, be good at. I think that people have a lot I
Speaker A
think I think people have far more I think people have far more experience deceiving other people than we do protecting against deception. So, I think there's always going to be people who are more skilled at deception than people who are better at at detecting
Speaker A
it. And so I'll say honestly I operate from the perspective that um I don't know and that I'm probably being deceived and would I still do it anyways um within these guard rails and so I just try and operate that way. Mine tend
Speaker A
to be if someone's doing really posed photos in front of expensive cars. Usually, it depends on on the industry.
Speaker A
Usually, bad vibes usually head to toe designer like they're really watch like it has diamonds on it and stuff. Unless you're in the music industry, which is fine. You have to be in one in the music industry. I feel
Speaker A
like that's that's got to be it can be usually that's a red flag. Um, and then also when they describe what they do and you still don't understand how they make their money. There have been some people that just say, "Oh, I do this and that."
Speaker A
I'm like, "I I don't get it. You explain it." And they explain it and I still don't understand. And then it turns out the dude's just like siphoning money from somebody else and it turned out the whole thing was smoke and mirrors. I'm
Speaker A
like, I had a feeling about that guy that I will say. Well, it's funny cuz you say that because that like then it gets into a domain that I feel comfortable with where if someone's like, "Well, this is how we market blah
Speaker A
blah blah blah or this is how we sell. This is how we price. This is how we you know, anything that's business related I'll be like, "No, that doesn't make sense." And it's like I'm like I don't know like I'm I feel I feel confident
Speaker A
enough in my in my skill level to say like no that doesn't that doesn't make sense. Um, but yeah, so I think it's gonna it's be it's going to be domain specific for me to be able to say like
Speaker A
I'll have a better judge um of character, but still even then, you know, I get I get I get I want to say deceived, but like I make wrong picks all the time, you know, like with team and people, you know, hiring things like
Speaker A
it happens, you know, just part of the game. What about things that are too good to be true? How often are people pitching you things that seem to be that way and they're actually accurately representing their skill or the value of
Speaker A
their business? It's I think the too good to be true is uh happens all the time. I I' I've yet to see something that has been too good to be true. I think Chat GPT when it came out I was
Speaker A
like that's too good to be true and then it was. So like then they became a gazillion dollar company. I was like okay that checks out that tracks. Um but most things that are too good to be true
Speaker A
like the saying exists for a reason. How important is intelligence in entrepreneurship? I think it depends on what level of success you're shooting for. I think like if you were like I wanted to get into AI like you've got to
Speaker A
be probably really smart. And I think it's it's not even because like you're the one who's going to be the engineer doing it. It's like you need to be smart enough that an engineer who can do that is impressed by you, right? Like so I
Speaker A
think I think it's really in the recruiting aspect where uh high intellect, if you will, will matter more. If you were, you know, use the lawn care example, like you can succeed in the lawn care business without being
Speaker A
brilliant. You can succeed in in the gym business without being brilliant. You can succeed in a lot of businesses, I'd say most businesses without being, you know, you know, above 50% IQ. I think there are there are skills which people
Speaker A
say as traits uh that are more important. I think courage is incredibly important. Um I think high agency so the ability to make your own decisions without being influenced by others. Um I think I think honestly just like
Speaker A
perspectacity like being able to endure and persevere. Um because one of the really interesting things about entrepreneurship is that you get life gives you this like these unlimited lottery tickets and you just pay time to get them but you just can always get
Speaker A
them to cash them in. And even if you cash 10 tickets in and they don't don't work. It's like you still have 11th one.
Speaker A
You still have a 12th one. And so a lot of people just will choose not to cash their tickets in at all or even grab the tickets to begin with. And I think that that ability to persevere is what gives
Speaker A
you more shots on goal. And you only need one really big win to change your life forever. And so it's really just sticking with it. And I think that's the like on a long enough time horizon somebody who sticks with it just gets
Speaker A
enough like they just get so many chances that something that luck does happen. What percentage would you allocate to being the person in charge of running it versus the business itself? Man, I'll say 50/50. Like I was lean I was going back
Speaker A
and forth. It's like, you know, cuz Uncle Warren has, uh, you know, great manager, uh, bad market, bad market wins. Um, you know, good market, uh, bad manager, good market wins. Um, I think that like the market is for sure the
Speaker A
most powerful thing. But if we control for market, like, you know, if you're selling toilet paper in COVID, you're going to make money whether you're an idiot or not. Like, it's going to work.
Speaker A
Um, but I think the vast majority of marketplaces are not on either extreme. You're not selling to newspapers and you're not selling toilet paper during CO. Most businesses are just kind of like in the middle. They're in markets
Speaker A
that are just normal. And in those situations, um, the business model obviously has to be sound, but the business model is a reflection of the entrepreneur. And so if we remove market, then I'll say it's entrepreneur.
Speaker A
Um, for sure, but market is more important if it's in one of these extremes. What qualities do you see in those people? Are there similarities between the two? Yeah, there's, you know, it's interesting because there's like there's there's for sure
Speaker A
similarities. I think there's far fewer than most people expect cuz um like even if you look at the top entrep like I think Basos and Elon are some of the goats of all time in terms of entrepreneurship so different in terms
Speaker A
of their personalities the way they behave their even values like all those things I think they have some significant differences but in terms of like what are the commonalities about how they operate they all they focus on speed they focus on having an
Speaker A
exceptional product both of them talk about just I mean Elon doesn't say customers chess he says products obsessed but they they translate to the same thing which is like they focus on product first above everything else. Um they're super long-term focused. Uh
Speaker A
people might have, you know, some something to say about me saying this but like I think they both have high ethics. Um, like, ah, he's devil, but whatever. I won't even comment. Leave it there. Um, but high ethics, uh, high
Speaker A
customer obsession, long-term perspective, huge ability to tolerate pain, um, and the ability to tolerate risk, which is to to have the courage to do it. And because both of them had so many moments where they just went all in
Speaker A
on Amazon or all in on Tesla or um SpaceX or whatever. It's like you have to have some ability to make to to go big and bet the farm. And I think that that every entrepreneur that almost every entrepreneur that I know who's
Speaker A
made it really big has had a moment where they're like this could not work and I'm just going to try and make it work. It's so interesting because I feel like there's a huge trend online right now and also maybe for the past like 5
Speaker A
10 years of there can never be an ethical billionaire. Do you think in order to get to that level of wealth there needs to be a time where you compromise your ethics or do you think that's just a bunch of stuff that people
Speaker A
like like to throw out there to maybe self argrandise themselves? Well, as somebody who's whatever um go ahead as someone I am I am biased so I'll state my bias. um I am trying to hit it or in
Speaker A
process of hitting it. And so I obviously don't think that there's an an ethical um like that you have to I think I'll say it differently. If you took a random slice of the population just just America or even the world you're going
Speaker A
to have certain percentage of people who are ethical and have certain percentage of people who are not ethical and the skills to run a business I think can operate in some ways independently of those things. So you can become super
Speaker A
financially successful and be unethical and you can be super financially successful and be ethical. And so I think that you'll have a distribution that is normalized at the top as much as you do in the middle. Like how many
Speaker A
people are divorced, how many people are married, how many people are like you're going to have how many people have kids how many people don't have kids. Like you're going to have a random distribution there. And I think people
Speaker A
will just cherrypick uh bad actors. Um and there's also like allegations based on like regulations. Like if you look at all the big fortune whatever companies it really starts to come down to like what do you if we I mean it gets into ethics
Speaker A
which is a totally different can of worms. But if you were to say like uh you know the TCPA which is telephone consumer protection agency whatever they go after a company and it was because the company didn't put the right
Speaker A
language on their you know landing page and because of that they sued Facebook for $700 million.
Speaker A
Is Facebook being unethical or are they operating in ignorance? Um, oftentimes when you have more laws than you can keep track of, um, or somebody makes an oopsie, uh, those things happen. And so it really depends like, okay, well, are
Speaker A
we now saying that Facebook's unethical? Now, I'm not saying that I think that they're good for the world, but I'm saying fundamentally like, um, I think mistakes can happen. And so the idea that people will say a billionaire um
Speaker A
might be unethical is probably different than a billionaire has made mistakes. And I think those are very two very different things. Um because for sure every billionaire has made mistakes and for sure has done things that they wish
Speaker A
they hadn't because that's what humans do in life. What's a mistake you made recently that may have either cost you time, money, or credibility? I invested in a company um that I didn't do enough due diligence and um they were doing
Speaker A
some things that weren't compliant that I found out about later and I just said I don't want to be associated and I lost millions of dollars and I just said I'll I just I will give you the equity back.
Speaker A
I don't even want it. I just don't want to be associated. What could you have done differently? Could have done better. What do you look for when when we probably could have reviewed you know reviewed reviewed the internal data
Speaker A
better? probably could have done more in-depth interviews with some of the the the key employees. Um could have done more, you know, customer call reviews uh both on sales side, marketing side and also on the delivery side. We
Speaker A
probably could have done more of that. If you were to observe all of the mistakes that acquisition.com makes and aside like a pie chart, would you say the largest slice of the pie would be lack of due diligence or where do you
Speaker A
think you lose the most return or value? Honestly, I think the biggest mistakes we make are hiring. I think it's people but it's really pe I mean fundamentally it's going to be people at all sides.
Speaker A
Like people on the deal side, it's going to be people like even with when you're bringing in talent like it's a deal.
Speaker A
Like you're signing an agreement between two parties in exchange for money, you know? So like it's I mean you're just you have the thing is the number of deals that we have to do um every day every week, every month, every year is a
Speaker A
lot. And so we're just going to make mistakes. Um we're going to try our best to learn from them and we're ultimately going to be rewarded by the quality of our decision-m but we're going to mess up. When do you know how to cut the
Speaker A
business or try to fix it? Like in that case, I would be looking at that and thinking, well, is it worth trying to or is it just we can't work with these people? No, it's a good it's that last
Speaker A
thing you just said. That's really what it comes down to. So, if someone I think is um knows about it and hasn't done anything about it and then we find out about it and say, "Hey, you should do
Speaker A
something about it." And then they don't do anything about it. That's where I'd be like, "Okay, this isn't going to work." if you know a founder's made aware of it. It's kind of like the TCPA thing. Like if let's say you had optins
Speaker A
on a page and you just didn't have like all the disclosures that you're supposed to have to make it compliant to like text somebody or call somebody or whatever, right? If someone did that I'm not going to be like, "Oh my god
Speaker A
this guy sucks." I'd be like "Oh, he didn't know." Like, "Let's let's fix this stuff." And so that's kind of an example. It really comes down to the willingness of the founder to make to make things right. I
Speaker A
think that's anybody. Yeah. Do you have assessments of ethics of the people that you end up partnering with? And how important would you say ethics are? Do you not really consider it and you just kind of look at you look at the data as
Speaker A
you suggest cuz cuz you could ask someone why they do something and they could say whatever they want but you don't necessarily know until you've known them for a while. I feel like there should be a personality test like
Speaker A
the Jordan Peterson personality test that you have he does or 15 bucks or something understand.com I think is what it is. It's interesting because you can also with this data compare how two personalities will interact with one another. So, for
Speaker A
example, Graham and I, we were pretty different in a lot of categories, but it did say that we had good cohesion. Oh sweet. Yeah. But they had studies for like business and for personality and for relationships. With large data, you
Speaker A
could probably get a pretty good approximation. Interesting. I don't think we have enough data to actually do like big data like analysis for that. If you're thinking 20s, 30s, like it's not a lot. It's not enough. You need like
Speaker A
30,000. You need a lot more n to have statistical power. Um we actually used to do a lot more tests uh earlier on and I think we ended up um foregoing them.
Speaker A
Same on the recruiting side. We used to do a lot more like personality testing things like that mostly because um the recruiting team ended up being like overrelying on tests and then would just like have a star candidate and they were
Speaker A
like well they they scored. I'm like this guy's just that like bring this guy in. And so we ended up doing away with it. Um, I think everybody wants a test to tell them the answer. And so I think
Speaker A
in a in a in a job where you have a lot of decision-m that has to occur, it's hard to not default to tests because it's so quantitative that you want to just like it's just kind of like trading
Speaker A
algorithms. Like if the algorithm says like you want to have that and so fundamentally either it's like you know I tend to be somewhat binary in this but like either we believe this 100%. Or we kind of don't. And the only times um and
Speaker A
I'll quote Leila on this one, but um like if we do have a test that we're going to have somebody take on like a recruiting side, the only time that we would really use it if it's a red flag
Speaker A
uh in that it seems like it's completely contrast from what we're seeing. And so if someone's like, "Oh, I'm really deoriented. I'm really timely. I'm really whatever." And then they get on they're like, "I'm a creative and I'm so
Speaker A
all over the" and they're like, "No that doesn't make sense." So then we're just like, "Okay, now it's just an ethical issue. They're just lying." So you're saying you don't want to focus on qualifying someone because if you're
Speaker A
testing them that means you probably have some dissonance between what you think about them and what they say about themselves. And if you f Yeah. Yeah. I think you will like by this is me talking more as a as a you know company
Speaker A
owner than anything else which is like if you tend to give a team a tool and they have to make a lot of decisions and the tool supposedly helps them with the decision the the law of least effort
Speaker A
will typically rain and they'll just start using the test to make all the decisions and I think that makes for worse decisions than actually just using everything else. So if someone's studying you let's just say what do you
Speaker A
think is the biggest misinterpretation of your strategy or character? Um, I think most people think that I'm meaner than I am. Um, I think he's a sweetheart, guys. Alex is really a nice guy. So nice on and off camera. Very
Speaker A
very outstanding gentleman. Thank you. Um, I think that and then also in like a different setting than like a podcast you know, it's like, you know, it's a diff like when I'm with my team, I joke around a ton. And so I'd say like I do a
Speaker A
lot of jokes a lot. Um, and I think I have I mean Daniel could probably say but I think Yeah. What's your funniest joke? Can't say it. Give us a joke. I have a lot I have I have tons of Yeah. I
Speaker A
have a lot of like dirty jokes. Yeah. Inappropriate. Like a true grandma, man. Yeah. A lot of a lot of a lot of That's what your mom said. Um that's that's Graham's favorite, too. I love those.
Speaker A
It's a classic. It's a classic for Jack. I'm always like, "Yeah, my mom's going to watch this." Yeah. Yeah. Cats out the bag. Yeah. Smoke shop. No.
Speaker A
But no, I'd say that those are probably the two um the two bigger misconceptions. So, moving on from that how do you eliminate distraction? Oh this is fun. Okay. Um so, I eliminate it by eliminating it. And that sounds
Speaker A
ridiculous, but like I think the vast majority of productivity hacks can get boiled down to remove everything that isn't work. So, like my office has no outside light. Um I try to minimize all the sound in the office. I also put on
Speaker A
earplugs and headphones. Um, there's a great app that you can use uh that like blocks your phone so like nothing can get through. So, including text, phone calls, slacks, everything, not just social media. Like it's a dead element
Speaker A
essentially. Um, and you have to physically move across the building which is how I do it for mine. Um, to like un un mess up your phone and then I just have a clear idea of the work that
Speaker A
I need to do. And so it's like when you eliminate everything else, um, and then I just set a kitchen timer for when I how long I expect a task to last, that is when I'm like peak productivity per
Speaker A
unit of time. Uh, because there's nothing else to do. So is this science or is this just you? Because eliminating eliminating natural light. Why light for me? Like I I get I get so distracted by light. I get boost by like seeing the
Speaker A
outdoors and seeing greenery. It's nice. It doesn't work for me, man. Yeah. And I I'll I'll be clear like if you find something that works for you, I'll say do that. And for anybody who's like, I do do it your way. I don't care. Like
Speaker A
I'm just saying this is what's worked for me. I do think there's a decent amount of data that suggests that anything that is not the work distracts you from the work. How do you differentiate between distractions and rest? Great question. So um I think
Speaker A
there's there's like kind of like micro macro. So like from a micro perspective if you work for 60 minutes or 45 minutes or whatever and then you're like, "Okay I need a break." if you take the five or
Speaker A
10, you know, 10-minute like walk around the building or walk outside. To me that's where you can get your natural light and all of that stuff, but then you come back and then you're fresh again and then you hit it. Um, I see
Speaker A
that I see that rest as productive because it increases the overall net production over a larger period of time.
Speaker A
So, if you work like that for 12 hours uh, and you worked without doing that maybe you can only work 8 hours or you can work the same 12, but you don't get as much done. So, for me, uh, it's
Speaker A
really just the net productivity of a human being is what they get done over a period of time. So productivity has a temporal component to it and an output component. So maximizing output per unit of time is productivity as I define it.
Speaker A
And so it is okay anything that uh increases that rate of of of work which for the most part is just deleting the things that aren't work because few people actually work faster. You just don't work when you want to be working.
Speaker A
And so I think if you just eliminate all the time that you're not working when you want to be working, you work a lot more. And if you've ever done the timer thing, which I would highly recommend you see if you like you truly take your
Speaker A
phone away and you block out every single notification and you have, you know, you have to script a YouTube video or write an email or make a script or whatever you have to do for your business or write make a landing page.
Speaker A
Um, you'll notice that like you'll be like, "Oh my god." And you'll look, it's been like 8 minutes and you're like "Oh my god." Like your like monkey brain like wants to reach sleeping when I keep looking at the time and thinking, "Oh
Speaker A
man, another 10 minutes went by. That's another 10 minutes I'm not going to be sleeping." Do you ever look at the time and see 10 minutes went by now I only got this amount of time and your mind's
Speaker A
focused on the time and not the task? I don't think about that at all actually.
Speaker A
If I if I like if 8 minutes goes by and and I and I worked to the 8 minutes and I'm like oh my god it was only 8 minutes. I'm like I have so much time.
Speaker A
Like I did all that in 8 minutes because I was focused the whole time and I only went to go reach for my phone at 8 minutes. I'm like oh my god I have I have six more. You don't see the time as
Speaker A
a distraction? No, not really. Do you have any distractions that still sneak past your filters? Oh not I mean not on the phone. I mean that that thing's done. Like it's cooked. Twitter. No, I mean when I when I'm working I'm not
Speaker A
going to What about music? You listen to music? No. Only when I live. Silence.
Speaker A
Mhm. Yeah. I have earplugs and headphones. Like it's true silence. What do you listen to when you lift? Oh, just like the same songs I've had for like 15 years. I don't really change. Um I like Lincoln Park a lot. Like little Lincoln
Speaker A
Park. I listen to 50 Cent. I like 50 Cent. Get Rich or Die Trying. I like that entire album. I still also like some of my white boy music. I'll still listen to Little Green Day, Little Third Eye Blind. Little Third Eye Blind.
Speaker A
That's good. Yeah. I like I I only have like, you know, 20 or 30 songs that I can listen to like in a workout. So it's like I kind of have like a list of hundred and they randomly shuffle and
Speaker A
that's like my life. How often do you skip the song? Uh, it depends on what kind of set I'm doing. Okay. It's like if I'm if I'm early like if I'm about to hit a work set, like I want to make sure
Speaker A
it's a good song. But I think that's everybody. So, do you think distracted people then just want it less? H I don't even know how to define wanting it less.
Speaker A
Um I would say that for whatever reason they're being more rewarded from their current path than they perceive the reward of the path that they're trying to get on. Like it's I mean I just I think of everything in carrots and
Speaker A
sticks. It's like they have enough stick of other people judging and enough carrot of staying the same that they don't change. They just have to overcome inertia and they just can't do it for whatever reason. And I don't want to
Speaker A
pretend like I have some like superhuman willpower. It's just like, you know, I had, you know, it's funny cuz like when I quit my job, which was still to this day the hardest decision I've ever had to make in my whole life because believe
Speaker A
it or not, I'm actually very riskaverse. Um, I can take bigger bets now, but it's because I have more and so like if I lose, it's not like the end of the world. Um, but at the time there was
Speaker A
like risking everything or what felt like risking everything. And um that was was it was because I was so miserable. It was the only reason I was able to to do it. Like if if I had been employed at probably just even a
Speaker A
different job at a different place, I probably would have been fine. And I don't think I'd ever even be here. So I don't think I had a high like predisposition towards entrepreneurship like some people do. Like I've been an
Speaker A
entrepreneur my whole life. Like I wasn't I didn't start any businesses. I did well in school. It wasn't like a school failed me. like I did well in school like I studied hard I got good grades and I graduated in three years
Speaker A
from Vanderbilt like I did well and then I got a good job you know in terms of on paper after that and it was only like when I had done two years there and that normally you'd go to like business
Speaker A
school that I was like I hate this I don't want to do this again and I would rather take a shot. So it spurred from being discontent with where you were at.
Speaker A
That's interesting because that is exactly what led to me trying out all these different business ideas and then starting up this thing with Graham. But I never asked you like why what would what motivated you in that beginning
Speaker A
that planted that seed to try to you know become big in real estate on YouTube. Was it because you were discontent with where you were at or just honestly it was just it's the stupidest thing. It was that uh entry.
Speaker A
Yeah. With data. It was doing data entry. I wanted to be an investment banker just because I was like they make a lot of money. I just wanted to be successful. And I would email all of these investment firms just asking to do
Speaker A
anything for free. I'm like, I'll get you. I'll make copies. Just let me do anything I'll just be there. And I emailed maybe like six, seven places that I found on Craigslist. Like two of them turned out to be like MLM
Speaker A
companies. And uh one emailed me back and said, "Yes, actually, we're looking for a data entry position. If you want to interview it, come on in." And I interviewed and it looked fantastic. And they had like a sales team in the front
Speaker A
and a back off back office uh in the back. Yeah. Uh, and they hired me to do data entry at I think back then it was like $8 an hour. And I was so excited to go in because they made you wear like a
Speaker A
suit every day. And I was like, I get to wear a suit to work. That's so cool. And I went in there and everyone is a zombie and everyone just hated life. And the first like day was okay. But I started
Speaker A
getting in trouble for stupid things. Like I I wanted to wear a headphone to listen to something throughout the day.
Speaker A
lessly. Yeah. And they said I couldn't do that. And then I made a comment about they had styrofoam cups and I said that like the paper cups were better for the environment. And they said we're not changing. They got really upset that I
Speaker A
even made that suggestion. And then I went up to the CEO's office one day.
Speaker A
This is all in the first week just to say hi to the guy and introduce myself.
Speaker A
And I'm like I've just started working here. And he wasn't in the middle of something and he was friendly to me. But I got called into the manager's office later that day and they said, "Hey there's a chain of command. like you
Speaker A
can't just go up to this person and talk to them. You have to talk to this manager, get their approval, it goes to me, and then I could. It made no sense.
Speaker A
But I hated it there. And the only time that people came to life was Friday at like 400 p.m. And you started seeing people laughing and joking around and like being themselves. And then I remember there's like they had like a
Speaker A
casual like one day a month they had like a casual day where people could wear like jeans into the office. I thought it was just stupid after a while. Like I didn't get it. Uh but yeah, that that single job made me hate
Speaker A
life so much that I would do anything to never return to that because I honestly thought if this is the next like 40 years it like this is it. That you were willing to do something for free which
Speaker A
was assistant to the real estate thing. Correct. Uh but also during that time they had a sales team in the front. I said I'd be a great salesperson. I just want to do sales and they were making like a hundred to like 300 grand a year
Speaker A
doing like phone sales. I wanted to do that and I was told you have to work your way up. You have to do data entry to go into the mail room to go into like this thing to this thing and then it
Speaker A
would that was like years away and they also told me no one would trust me cuz I was 18 at the time like no one trust you on sales and yeah so and then I got into sales and did well. Yeah. Like that
Speaker A
didn't matter at all. But that for me was like the big six weeks it was only there six weeks but that made a lifetime impact. I want to highlight one thing that you said which is just for anybody
Speaker A
who's who's listening. Um Graham said I'll do anything and then they said well we do have this roll up and do this. I would strongly recommend if you want to quote do anything then just look at the jobs they have available and try and do
Speaker A
that. So rather than just going in like empty, just be like, "Oh, you have a data entry position. I'll do that for you." And then in all of the extra time that's where you try and have lunch with
Speaker A
people. That's where you try and basically build your network within the business so you can start leveraging like relationships to gain more skills and then you can start, you know, moving your way in and learning what you want
Speaker A
to learn. What about applying to businesses that don't need your help or aren't hiring? One of my things I always thought it was great to approach places you'd want to work and just say, "I'll take on any role." I think it's like I
Speaker A
think it depends on it depends on the visibility of the company. So if if the company has like a really big social media presence, they have so many people doing that that the supply demand of people asking for that specific thing is
Speaker A
super not in your favor. If you went to a business that's not based on that like you go to an electric, you know like a HVAC company, you probably could find some work there that they'll let you do. And so I think it's again it's
Speaker A
like try and shoot where like the big the big arbitrage in life is finding supply demand discrepancies uh that are in your favor. And so you have a supply of work they have a demand. Now if there's way more supply so many people
Speaker A
offering it then they can dictate their own terms and if they don't need it then they don't need it. What's holding people back from excelling beyond average? Do you think it's talent belief? I think people don't do very
Speaker A
much. I think people do a lot of talking about doing and not a lot of doing. And I think it's the doing that does everything. And I think that's the and whether it's lack of motivation, lack of focus, lack of like lack of a hundred
Speaker A
different things, um it just comes down to number of actions taken per unit of time. And I think the vast majority of people just wildly underestimate the volume that's required. And I think that's like I I I hit on this so hard
Speaker A
because like like when I'll tell you a story to illustrate the point. When I when I had my first gym, I had a mentor who told me that he got all of his leads off of flyers. And so that's what he
Speaker A
did. And so I put out a flyer and I waited two weeks and one guy called me and said, "Hey, you dinged my Mercedes." And I was like, it's the only call I got. So I called the miserable up two
Speaker A
weeks later. And I was and he's like "Hey, how'd that go?" And I was like ready to give. I was like, "It didn't work." You know, like and he was like and he like totally took it in stride
Speaker A
and he was like, "Well, what was your test size?" And I was like, "What do you mean?" He was like, "Well, what was your test amount?" I was like, "Well, I mean I put out 300 in total." And he was
Speaker A
like, "Oh, man." He's like, "Hard to know if anything's going to work with 300." He's like "We test with 5,000 per batch." He's like "And then once we find a winner," he's like "We do 5,000 flyers a day." And I was like, "Oh." So
Speaker A
he's doing 150,000 flyers a month for his business and I had done 300. And this is why like I think the vast majority of people dramatically underestimate how much volume it is.
Speaker A
Like I mean, right when we started this you're like, "Seems like you tweet all the time." It's like I post that often on a lot of platforms. Now, Twe Twitter is my my home base for how I where
Speaker A
everything is generated from, but like we make 450 pieces of content a week. And so people are like, "Hey man, I've been making content for 90 days and that would already put them in the top, you know, 1% because everyone gives up." But
Speaker A
if you actually made a post every day for 90 days, be like, "It's amazing.
Speaker A
That's 90 posts." Uh, I do that in two days. And so, but they get there and they're like, "But I'm not Mr. Beast yet." you know, and and it's just and there's just people think that someone else is doing two times or three times
Speaker A
as much, but it's more often that they've done a thousand times or like two 10,000 times the amount of work that they have. Like if you count the amount of videos that you've put out in terms of longs and shorts or minutes of
Speaker A
content that you've put out over the last four or five years compared to somebody, it's not even it's like it's so so ridiculous the discrepancy. Same thing with sales guys. They're like "Hey, I've been I've been selling for 90
Speaker A
days." I'm like "Okay, so how many calls a day do you take?" and they're like, I end up taking, you know, five or six live calls. I'm like, okay, so you've been doing it for 90 days. You've taken like 400 live calls. It's like
Speaker A
okay, well, this is John. He's closed 4,000 deals. Not calls taken, deals. That's why he's better than you. It's just like there's just a dramatic misunderstanding. And that probably with a 30% closure, he's taking 12,000 calls.
Speaker A
It's like he's done 300 times the work you have. Like it's a lot or 30, but like it's a lot more than people. So how do you compete with that guy? Cuz I bet there's a lot of those guys out
Speaker A
there. you start. I mean, I think it's like you just start. And um I think it's like I think a huge amount of the delay that happens when people are starting out is the amount of time it takes for
Speaker A
them to realize there is no easy way. So they spend a huge amount of time, they figure out what the what how to do it, and then they spend a really long time trying to figure out if there's an easier way, and then they
Speaker A
give up trying to find an easier way and then they just start the hard way because the hard way is the only way.
Speaker A
Now, you might have noticed that I'm someone who pays close attention to trends. And lately, I've been noticing cowboy boots everywhere. It's pretty clear that a great pair of boots isn't just for the ranch anymore. They pair incredibly well with everything from
Speaker A
casual outfits to full-on business attire. And that's why I'm excited to announce today's sponsor, Teco. Have you ever wondered if you could pull off boots? I'll tell you what, I absolutely have. Let's be honest, you owe it to
Speaker A
yourself to try out Tokovas. Dovas makes handcrafted western boots with over 200 meticulous steps for a perfect fit right out of the box. Whether you're a lifelong cowboy or a first-time boot buyer like myself, you'll feel right at
Speaker A
home in them. A great pair of boots really just pulls everything together. With Tokovas, you don't just look put together, you feel put together. And trust me, people notice. And right now you can get 10% off when you sign up for
Speaker A
email and text when you go to to.com/istic. That's teas.com/ceeded. to kovvis.com/istic. Plus, Tovus backs every pair with their best in the west guarantee with free returns and exchanges for 30 days. Seriously, guys I genuinely recommend Tovus. And if you
Speaker A
think you can't pull off cowboy boots see for yourself. You might be surprised. Thank you so much to Kovus for sponsoring this episode. Now, as business owners, we know exactly what expense chaos feels like. It's endless receipts, invoices, and subscriptions
Speaker A
that nobody remembers signing up for. It's a nightmare. But with today's sponsor, RAMP, managing your expenses could be completely transformed. For most companies, finance teams spend about 80% of their time doing tactical busy work like chasing down receipts and
Speaker A
reconciling statements and only 20% on highv value strategic thinking. And RAMP completely flips that equation. It's a free corporate card that handles all of the tedious financial operations so your finance team can focus on what actually moves the needle, forecasting, strategic
Speaker A
planning, and driving growth. We've been using RAMP ourselves and it's been a game changer. It saved us a ton of time on our finances, keeping everything organized and making expense tracking effortless. And switching to RAMP is also incredibly simple because they
Speaker A
offer a complimentary white glove onboarding service to help you smoothly migrate your current corporate card to RAMP. Plus, new members receive a free metal card. So, why wait? Switching to RAMP is like having a full-time expense management team working for you. It's
Speaker A
really no surprise that over 25,000 businesses trust RAMP, including Shopify and the Boys and Girls Club of America which is why they were just rated number one in spend management by G2. And now for a limited time, listeners of the
Speaker A
show can get $250 when you join RAMP. All you got to do is go to ramp.com/ic ramp.com/ic ramp.com/ic and we have a link down below in the description. Cards issued by Sutton Bank member FDIC. Thank you so much to RAMP for sponsoring this
Speaker A
episode. How often do you get emotionally tied to outcomes? Um, I would say less and less over time. I'm sure that there it depends on the outcome. Um, yeah, it depends on the outcome. What outcomes are you still
Speaker A
emotionally tied to? Even though you may know better. Well, I think if the book launch for my next book that comes out like if that goes well, I'll be stoked.
Speaker A
If it doesn't go well, I'll be bummed. You know, like those are like and I'd say on a micro level, like we always hope that, you know, a YouTube video does well. you know, we hope that but obviously we have our constraints of
Speaker A
like, okay, well, do I want this to be for a business owner audience or do I want this to be for more of a beginner audience? If it's a beginner audience, I have to kind of recalibrate my expectations because it'll get way more
Speaker A
views. So, um, it's not like I'm a robot. I think I would say that my my emotional regulations just gotten better over time. It's not like it doesn't exist. What other parts of your identity have you had to kill to become where you
Speaker A
are right now? Um, plenty. Um, I know one was attachment to the approval of your dad. That's something that's been spoken about quite often. any other yeah I think so it really depends on how we define identity um but if we define that
Speaker A
by the actions that we take like if you were to describe somebody like he is this way you really describe it by the actions that person does right it's very hard to say someone is something without doing something about it right um we
Speaker A
even describe people by what they do like he's a carpenter he is selfish which means that he acts in selfish ways like it's all based on activity and so um for me like the changes in behavior which then ladder up to identity um I've
Speaker A
had to become more patient I've had to figure out, which I define as figuring out what to do in the meantime. I've had to just have times where I'm like, I just I need to let I just need to let
Speaker A
the let the turkey cook. I just got to let it cook. There's nothing like I shouldn't the right the right task for me to do is nothing. Um I've had to learn that. Um wasn't an easy change to
Speaker A
like permanently tremendously hard. No I don't think it's permanent. I think you have to fight it every day like addiction. And so you think there are certain characteristic traits people just naturally have or aspects of their identity that they will have for their
Speaker A
entire life. They just have to be able to detect which ones keep them weak and then it's an active battle for the rest of their life. I guess instead of anthropomorphizing, so kind of like humanizing the things that we're
Speaker A
fighting against in terms of behavior it's more thinking like I have been rewarded in the past for behaving in this way. And so it's hard for me to change that behavior, but I realize that that behavior no longer serves me. Now
Speaker A
you're still going to have the memory of the reward of doing that thing over and over again. And so, um, what's what's really tough about human behavior is that, uh, punishment fades, but reward sticks. Meaning, like when you go out
Speaker A
and drink, if you drink too much, the next morning you're hung over, and you're like, I'm never going to drink again. But then a week later, you're like you remember the reward, but you don't remember the the the the
Speaker A
punishment, right? It's the same reason that people go back to exboyfriends and ex-girlfriends. It's like they remember the good times, but they forget about the bad times. So, punishment fades, but reward sticks. And so the hardest behaviors to change are ones that have
Speaker A
rewarded you in the past because you will tend to remember the reward and want to repeat them. And so the only way to really beat those is to find something to do instead that rewards you better. What's one of the things that
Speaker A
worked for you in the beginning that stop serving you as you've gotten bigger or more successful? Well, one of the biggest ones that I talk about is um when you when you when you quit the job and you start entrepreneurship, you get
Speaker A
rewarded really big for taking a risk for doing something different. But you don't need to take those kind of existential risks all the time. And the problem is that you get a massive reward for doing so in the beginning. And then
Speaker A
you almost have to immediately unlearn that and then stick with this current path for an extended period of time. But you kind of always remember the hit of trying something new. Which is why I think so many entrepreneurs tend to
Speaker A
always want to do lots of new things when most of the time they need to just get better at the thing that's in front of them and confront whatever problem they don't know how to solve so they can
Speaker A
get that thing to the next level. And so they think that by doing something new because that's what worked for them in the past that's going to get them to the next level when in reality they just end
Speaker A
up distracting themselves and trying to chase two or three masters at a time and never getting there. What's a small hill you're willing to die on that some people might just think is trivial? That manifestation is [ __ ] and action is
Speaker A
the only thing that matters. Wouldn't you say that manifestation is the first step before action? So if we it depends on how we define manifestation. So if we define manifestation as like an electrical signal occurs in your brain
Speaker A
sure. But I don't think that's how most people describe it. So I would say be totally on board with manifestation if we defined it as knowing that like I know that this is possible. Um like I saw this or I have some perspective that
Speaker A
has changed. Um to me that's just knowledge. So if you have knowledge that you can start a bank, you have to have the knowledge that you can start a bank before you start a bank. That makes sense. So fine. But the bank doesn't
Speaker A
occur until you take the action. But the idea of like the mindless ideation of like I'm going to manifest my husband into existence is I think relatively [ __ ] Now that being said, there's some people who do that and then also
Speaker A
take actions that then change their circumstances and then they get the husband and then they misattribute what was the thing that caused it. And so for me, I think I mean fundamentally the position that I'm in is trying to
Speaker A
identify causal relationship as accurately as possible. And so, you know, the logical proof that I use with this is just simply mindset plus no action, no outcome.
Speaker A
you know, mindset plus action outcome. No mindset, action, outcome. So, the action is really going to be the only thing that's going to I would argue that you need mindset. You need some sort of mindset to have the action. Like, I'm
Speaker A
I'm kind of big into manifestation. So it's it's interesting to for me. There you go. Like, to me, like the example of people get so upset by this, by the way when I bring I find it really interesting. What's their main
Speaker A
contention? Well, they have a history of being reinforced for talking to other people about manifestation. And so, they want to talk about have other people nod and smile and agree with them. and those are all pro-social behaviors and so I
Speaker A
think it makes sense that they would do that. Um again it depends on how we define manifestation which I've yet to find anyone who's been able to define it well. Um action you can define really easily. Uh and so that's the that's the
Speaker A
part right. So it's like it's really just this word that has all these positive connotations. I just think it helps you with focus. But like what is manifestation? Let's say the uh let's just say the the boyfriend girlfriend
Speaker A
example where you manifest the perfect but what is manifestation? you thinking clearly about your wants, needs, goals what to look for, who this person prioritization, correct? Now, by manifesting that, you're going to be on the lookout for those sort of qualities.
Speaker A
But is the manifesting the prioritization or the man like you we said prioritization and then manifesting? I think the problem is that you're kind of using a derivative definition of prioritization. This is fundamentally why I have an issue with
Speaker A
and and then because you're using manifestation to indicate some sort of data or information. A lot of people that have a different definition of manifestation are going to apply that to their definition of manifestation. I just think manif people know what
Speaker A
manifestation is. They don't that's actually a lot of people think like you sit down and you manifest something and then they think it's going to walk right through that door. Like they think that cosmically everything will just like
Speaker A
somehow get bestow that's doing better than nothing. But I think there's there's there's data that shows that you can trigger the same dopamine receptors when you think about getting a billion dollars than when you get a billion dollars. Like it's it's a
Speaker A
similar thing. Obviously, it's going to be a lot less intense when you think about it. But when you daydream about all these amazing things that are happening, it doesn't actually change the the reality of your existence. It's only giving you small dopamine. When
Speaker A
when you could get yourself to have a firm belief that something is going to happen and that nothing is going to get in the way, your actions are going to be reinforced by that. Well, the action is the only thing that will matter. I think
Speaker A
there's got to be a belief in yourself to stick with those actions. You have declarative knowledge, but also those are skills. And so like, so if someone tries a 100 times versus 10 times, I would say the fact
Speaker A
that they took more action is the reason they got to where they're trying to go.
Speaker A
Now, when we try to get to like why did they do that? I don't think anyone has the answer to that. I think the reason for that is because no one knows why they do that. I think they have a core
Speaker A
belief in what they're doing that that dealing is going to have an outcome. to defend Graham. When I first reached out to Graham to try to provide value, you manifested this. Exactly. I manifested sat in my room like you manifested this
Speaker A
podcast. So I I had no skills whatsoever. The only thing that I had was high confidence in my aptitude and and confidence. Like I knew that I could provide value, but it was more of just like something that existed in my brain.
Speaker A
I don't know if I necessarily had evidence to support that. Sure. I just knew that I was competent enough. And so maybe I manifested that. One could argue that. So the big the big zooming all the way out here just for for context. I
Speaker A
think the reason that people get really up in arms about it is because like I mean these are these are dogmas right?
Speaker A
These are belief systems which people operate at their very core. Um which really just means ways of being which means ways of behaving and ways of talking is included in that in terms of behavior. But people have a very hard
Speaker A
time defining what the hell they're talking about when we ask some of these words that are amorphous. And so I have by and large just removed them from my vocabulary so that I can describe the observable and it has been probably the
Speaker A
single most productive thing that I have done in my career. And so is it a small hill? It is probably the only hill and the main hill that I will die on which is that behavior rules everything. And
Speaker A
you have a history of past you know reinforcers or punishers for a set of behaviors and you repeat them in the future and that's the only thing that I will say about why someone does something. You've been rewarded in the
Speaker A
past for reaching out to people for doing things and it can be cross domain.
Speaker A
So it's like maybe you reached out to girls and they was able to jump into business and you were able to reach out to business owners. So it's cross well I know that I know hypothetical obviously not but like but you get the idea of
Speaker A
like it's a cross but like those are just sets of skills. Those are behaviors. And so focusing exclusively on behaviors and unbundling terms that are amorphous has been I think the key to my ability to communicate to people
Speaker A
train staff, um, and kind of enlist people to where we're trying to go. And I think that like that has really been like when people are like, man, I feel like Alex is so good at making things clear. It's like because I just do not
Speaker A
use amorphous language. And if I want to use a term, I will define the term. So now by the observable but I believe to shift belief starts with mindset. Well it's like we're so it's like what's belief? What's like what's belief?
Speaker A
What's mindset? What's manifesting? You went with this is like this isn't not to put like I actually just I just want to help um not not you guys everyone else.
Speaker A
Um no but I I just I don't think it serves people and that's why and like I just don't like now some people like I mean yes you feel great about it. I'm glad that if you if you had the option
Speaker A
between making 100 phone calls and and sitting there and manifesting, you will get further making 100 phone calls. And so I'm trying to decrease the amount of time it takes people to just do the thing. It's funny the the first podcast
Speaker A
we had with you, you were mentioning that you had recently removed the word I think it was should. It was should. You had also removed like because Yeah.
Speaker A
calls relationships. We don't know. you you you remove all of these words and every single podcast you're like I've since removed this word and now I guess it's just like you've gone to the meta of just reducing amorphous descriptions
Speaker A
of things just to the observable just to the observable on this existence it's been it's been it will be I'll call this I think that the book that I write on behavior well I'll tell all of my books
Speaker A
put together tell us about the book on behavior I'm curious it's it's it's outlined yeah it's it's cooking um but I I have this belief and it's probably my own limitation, but I want to have a publicly verified billion dollar plus um
Speaker A
net worth uh so that I can then I think have the pedestal or at least the pedestal is not the right word um credentials. I'll I'll give you an explanation of of what I mean by this.
Speaker A
So it's like in the beginning we have to start defining terms of like what's the what's the meta concept that I kind of operate off of and the biggest one is fundamentally that like what is learning right like what is learning adaptation
Speaker A
so it's it's same condition new behavior that's fundamentally like from a from a behavioral science perspective it's like if you were so if you're you know person is condition A and then we teach them something when they reenter condition A
Speaker A
they change their behavior so it's observable so same condition behavior if you the phone rings and you say XYZ and then I say hey don't say XYZ say Z YW the phone rings again you say XYZ you haven't learned if you say ZYW you have
Speaker A
learned if you say something else you've learned but the wrong thing right but fundamentally it's a change in behavior within the same condition and so it's like okay if we say that as as kind of like tenant number one the next ten is
Speaker A
like okay then what is intelligence so intelligence is going to be rate of learning so if I have to do that you know example 10 times with you know Jack and five times with Graham then Jack has less intelligence than Graham does in
Speaker A
this context this is hypothetical Jack and hypothetical Graham these names are completely taken at at random. Um but then it's like that but but the reason I think that's important is because then it allows people to have um direct
Speaker A
influence on their own intelligence. So if you learn faster, you change your behavior faster than somebody else then you can in a very real way be more intelligent than them. And so when we asked originally like you know do you
Speaker A
have to have real intelligence? I think it depends on what type of intelligence you're talking about when it comes to to learning behaviors. This is how I define it. But beyond that it's like okay well then uh like a lot of words like so
Speaker A
what's an excuse? So like an excuse is a statement to avoid punishment which is very simple. It's like okay that's what it's a statement that like someone says something like what's an excuse like show me when an excuse has occurred and
Speaker A
by by looking at like you know patience I've defined this plenty of times cuz I had to use it all the time which is figuring out what to do in the meantime.
Speaker A
So if you say to a young kid be patient they don't know what that means. It's a bundled term. It means nothing. Be patient. It means nothing. So how would I give some directions on how to be patient? Figure out something else to
Speaker A
do. That's all you have to do. We are all being patient right now for our S&P 500 accounts. We're being we're doing something else. That's all we have to do. It's just something else. And so it makes patients uh operationalized
Speaker A
right? Like how can I do patients? I have a very So you're really just kind of redefining all of these words or at least simplifying the words that are important and and by defining them, it's more putting them into a context that
Speaker A
we're all talking on the same plane. Well, it's it's it's it's defining them within the observable universe. Oh, that way we can all agree these are the things that we see. When someone has exhibited resiliency, it means that
Speaker A
they've returned to a baseline of behavior. And how resilient they are depends on how quickly they do that. If someone's not very resilient, it means that they extend the the change in behavior for a long period of time. If
Speaker A
they're permanently quote traumatized it means they never change their behavior, right? So it's like what's trauma, right? Trauma is a permanent change of behavior based on an aversive stimulus, a negative stimulus, right?
Speaker A
But then the question is, okay, if we have this trauma, right? And then people are like, I store trauma in my spine.
Speaker A
It's like what where is there is there a hard drive in your like where what cell is this being? People just say things and so it's just it's a permanent change of behavior from something bad happening. Okay. Now, if you're a little
Speaker A
baby and you touch a stove and it burns your hand and that's an aversive stimulus and you change your behavior you don't touch hot stoves again. Was trauma bad? I love that. I actually like once you said that you're redefining
Speaker A
everything into terms of the observable universe, I think that that I think it'll be my most I think it'll be my most successful. I'm curious though for something as I would say like like what's courage? What's courage? Right.
Speaker A
So the interval of time a potentially bad thing affects whether you do it. What about something that's so like like purpose or meaning? Those I feel like are really like I can't imagine how to define those. I don't I think they're
Speaker A
they're definable. It just takes a long time to really think like the the question you have to answer is what would someone do for me to say purpose has occurred? I guess maybe it's so hard. That's why you have to because you
Speaker A
have to completely shift how you're seeing things and be able to observe them kind of like firsthand. And so it's like what's authenticity? It's how you behave when you have no risk of punishment and someone that obeys all of
Speaker A
the terms that you've outlaid in that book. It's not of obeying. It's just like this is t like I have to define these terms in order to talk about them because they're all if I never define them then I would just be making face
Speaker A
noise and other people would be perceiving my face noise in whatever way they think it means which they haven't defined anyways. And so then there'd be a lack of communication. I think fundamentally like good communicators are able to transfer ideas efficiently
Speaker A
because they use language that everyone understands and ideally things that everyone can observe with their own two eyes. And so that's I try and stick to everything being observable. And so as a result it's made persuasion way easier.
Speaker A
It's being the most important one is to like if I want to train which is happens a lot in a business setting. It's like how do you train someone and you're like be more confident. What does that mean?
Speaker A
Tell a six-year-old be confident. It means nothing. It means nothing. They might just say like that means talk louder. I don't know what that means.
Speaker A
Right? And so it's a bundled term. And so we have to break the term down and say like okay well this is actually a series of many behaviors underneath of confidence that when taken in aggregate we then describe that person as
Speaker A
confident. So maybe they look at you in the eyes when they talk. Maybe they nod their head when they're listening. Maybe they repeat back the last thing that you said. Um maybe when um when there's uh when there's something that has
Speaker A
potential risk or downside, they're willing to do it. Like these are all things that we can observe and they say "Okay, well, if you have these these you exhibit these traits, these skills in this setting, people describe you as
Speaker A
confident." Does that make sense? And so being able to break things down like that has allowed me to um help my team when I'm like, "Hey, you know, I've told this story before, but basically I had I had a guy who um you know, a lot of
Speaker A
people were saying, hey, this guy's acting like a dick, but he was a star performer." So we're like "Okay, let's see if we can save him." you know, and so we talked to three or four of the leaders in the company and he was still
Speaker A
a dick. And so I was like, "What'd you tell him?" We're like "Oh, we told him to stop being a dick." And I was like "Okay, well, so I ended up meeting with him and I was like, I want to be clear.
Speaker A
I don't really care if you're a dick or not. Um, I do care if people describe you as a dick. Um, and I want to like the purpose of this meeting is to decrease likelihood that everyone talks to me about you again in a negative
Speaker A
context." Cool. Great. So that was the you know, agenda. It's like, "All right so in order for that to occur, um, let's talk about the things that when you do them, people don't like them and they call you a dick." So, it's like when you
Speaker A
interrupt people during a meeting, they they think you're a dick and they call you a dick later. Uh when you tell someone how to do their job, uh they call you a dick and you try and force your agenda, whatever. It was two or
Speaker A
three examples. And he was like, "So that's all I have to do." He's like "Yep, that's all you have to do." He's like, "But what if uh you know, I present this thing and then they they don't execute on it." I was like "Then
Speaker A
that's not on you. That's on the manager and I'll talk to the manager and make sure that they're executing, but that's not on you. That's not your role." And so, um, once that got clear, all of a sudden, he just stopped doing the three
Speaker A
things that everyone the three behaviors that people then laded up to saying "He's a dick." And then they stopped calling him a dick. And then everyone's like, "Oh, he's like night and day totally different." But it was just like
Speaker A
no one's specific with their language. And so, no one knows what anyone's talking about. And I think the vast majority of people don't communicate well with one another because both people are saying words that neither person understands, and no one's
Speaker A
defining. And that's why most people can't communicate at all. And that's why most people are dissatisfied with their life. That's why they can't manage the relationships cuz they like both people get upset. No one knows how to communicate and then that's it. They
Speaker A
just like they want the other person to guess what behavior they don't like. And so it's like even if I said, "Oh, you know, John's lazy." You have to think and this is why most people don't do is
Speaker A
because it takes work. You have to think, "Okay, I think John's lazy. Why do I think John's lazy? What what occurred? What did I observe that then made me think that?" Now, you might find out it's like, "You know what? He's
Speaker A
actually just slow to respond." Okay. Is there anything else? There was one meeting he came ill prepared. Is there anything else? No, I think that was actually it. Okay. So, when I go to John, instead of being like, "Hey
Speaker A
you're lazy." I'm going to say, "Hey, I need you to speed up your responses to under five minutes and when you come to a meeting, have your notes ahead of time. Just send them to me." All of a
Speaker A
sudden, John's not lazy anymore, but it's because it was this very micro thing that we then ladder up to this amorphous term that no one can understand. And so, this is this has been uh a huge area of interest for me
Speaker A
um in defining reality. And I think that honestly, it's helped me navigate reality really well.
Speaker A
um and make higher quality decisions. If someone reads his book, how would it be actionable for them to get those ideas across with somebody else who hasn't read the book and they would have to define the terms? They have to define
Speaker A
the terms. That's it's it's it's getting a a complicated word and then simplifying it into the lay well they're not they're currently not communicating with that person.
Speaker A
So like how would they talk to somebody who hasn't read the book the way they always do which is nothing which the thing is is the point that you hit on underpins the fact that most people can't communicate well at all. Right.
Speaker A
And so if a lot of people want to be different than they are and I am, you know, first in line on that. There are many things that I I've wanted to be different about myself for a very long
Speaker A
period of time. And this book and these ideas have been the culmination of trying to change these things about myself. I would say, I want to be more authentic. And I'm like, well, what's authenticity? How do I be more
Speaker A
authentic? What do I do? Well, it's like, okay, well, authenticity is how you behave when there's no risk of punishment. And so if there's no risk of punishment, how you behave basically if you're alone and no one can find out
Speaker A
about what you do, that's you authentically. Now the problem is that in society, we also have rules that govern other people's uh behavior right? Which means that the only truly authentic person is someone who behaves the exact same way alone as they do in
Speaker A
public, which will probably have something to do with your preferences. And so can you be truly authentic? Only in that subset of people who act with complete freedom and when they act with complete freedom, act within the rules
Speaker A
of the law. anyone else who has any inclinations to do anything that's outside of society's preferences or the rules that govern um how we interact with each other uh or the laws right has to by their very definition not be
Speaker A
authentic or be less than 100% authentic and I see many of these traits as not binaries are you authentic or not authentic but how authentic are you and also in the setting and if it's like man this sounds like it's a little bit more
Speaker A
complex it's like yeah welcome to reality so how have you been holding yourself back in terms of authenticity well it's also the question of uh Is being 100% authentic something that is I should be? I mean, realistically probably not, right? And so again, but
Speaker A
but but the thing is once we define the term, we actually can have a discussion about it because now we're all talking the same language and it's much more productive. And it's also way less charged from a like if we had never
Speaker A
defined the term, then you would have maybe been like, "What do you mean like you don't think you're authentic?" I'd be like, "Well, not 100% of the time." It's like "Wait, so you're lying to people, right?" It's like we
Speaker A
don't attack each other like well no I I act differently in priv naked like if I walk walk around naked in public that would probably be but I'm being a little bit inauthentic right now I'm wearing clothing I
Speaker A
normally wouldn't wear clothing right you know what I'm saying like and so again that what it does is it adds nuance but BF Skinner who's a famous behavioral scientist said um if many variables exist many variables must be
Speaker A
studied and so a lot of people want a very neat box with clean lines and say like this is the way it is. And um I don't think reality is that way. Like it's not is this person honest or
Speaker A
dishonest, it's how honest are they? How loyal are they? I'm curious. You take a blank slate person. They read and apply everything that you write in this book.
Speaker A
What does their life look like a year down the road, 5 years down the road?
Speaker A
Great question. So it's the book will by no means be a here is how to live life because that assumes that I know and that I think they should do something. I think it's more if you want these
Speaker A
things, these are the recipes for achieving them. So if you want to be perceived as patient, figure out things to do in the meantime. If you want to be perceived as authentic, behave more in a way that you were that you do in private
Speaker A
and public. If you want to um you know be perceived as more courageous, then decrease the time between uh when you perceive something as risky and when you take action on it. Like all of a sudden it's like, oh, so I want these traits.
Speaker A
And so this would in my opinion be the first way that at least the first place I've seen where there's like a recipe like do this. How would you explain it to a child who doesn't know what the
Speaker A
words mean? And I think that's what allows well I mean it's it's what allowed me it's what has allowed me to exhibit more traits um that I that I wanted to have versus traits that I didn't want to have. And until I had
Speaker A
that I just was like why do people describe me this way? is cuz I couldn't break down what I had to change, but what I did um to change basically reality. You're in a great position to talk about it, too. It's interesting
Speaker A
because I've you've mentioned this years ago that you had an issue. I think it was with anger and you also had the patience thing. Yeah. But it does appear as though you've made pretty significant strides in applying corrective behavior.
Speaker A
Yeah. To those. More on patience, less on anger, but better. And And how does anger affect negatively maybe your business or your life? Like what have you noticed?
Speaker A
Um, okay. Well, I'd say that the negative effects of anger for me have probably just come in in almost entirely from the way that people treat me, not in terms of negative outcomes business-wise. I think the reason that I
Speaker A
still have anger is because it has served me. So, I think we repeat things that have served us in the past. And so I think one of the reasons that people misunderstand why they do things is because people ask the question, what
Speaker A
triggered that? You heard that? It's like, oh, something triggered this behavior. But it's not about what happened before. It's about what happened after the last time you did it.
Speaker A
So, I'll give you I'll give you a real example. So, if Ila gets upset, and this is something that I've I've really actively worked a lot on. If Ila gets upset and she gets like she cries if we're having some, you know
Speaker A
whatever. I had a tendency um to try and comfort comfort for a short period and then if that didn't work, I would get angry. When I would get angry, she would get scared. When she would get scared she would stop crying. And so when I got
Speaker A
angry, she stopped crying. And so I learned that if I got angry, I got my wife to stop crying. And so it was a very reinforced I only figured that out later. And so it's a very reinforcing thing. It's
Speaker A
like, oh, if I can I this gets Ila to stop crying, right? Um and so to the same degree. So I've been rewarded in that setting, but obviously she's like longterm it derods, you know? So then I have to work on that, right? Um if I
Speaker A
value the relationship, which I do. Um but the same context with uh my team right? If I am quick to anger or be cold or sharp with someone, and it doesn't even have to happen often, like if you
Speaker A
do it once or twice, or even if you do it in front of somebody, not directed towards them, they're like, "Well, I never want because modeling is a great way that people learn. If someone shows up late and I yell at that person, then
Speaker A
that everyone else is still afraid of me and doesn't want to show up late either right?" And so what happens is the flow of communication from other people to me slows down because they're afraid of getting punished by me. And so I see
Speaker A
that as not positive for the business is me not having the information. Now how do I cover for that? Well, I have somebody like Ila who always gets all the information and that's why she's CEO and doesn't have direct reports and so
Speaker A
we've been able to man manage that um within the business operationally. But in terms of me personally like I want to be better about that. And so that's like an example of something that I'm working on. What's interesting is I I kind of
Speaker A
have a similar thing in terms of like if I if someone's emotional to me. I have very very little patience unfortunately for it and it's one of my shortcomings.
Speaker A
Since you fixed that, how have you noticed fixed you know? Sure. Okay. Since you uh try to improve upon that how have you noticed that that change in in real observable ways? Well, I mean Leila has now also because she
Speaker A
understands how this stuff works, too cuz we talk about all the time, like she has tried to reinforce whenever I'm not angry and she's upset. And so, either in the moment or immediately afterward she's like, "Thank you for not getting
Speaker A
upset and thank you for being there for me and thank you for just hugging me and, you know, just waiting it out essentially." Um, and so I just have to remember that when I'm in those settings and the more time she reinforces it, the
Speaker A
less strong the other reinforcer is, the stronger the the the new one is. A lot of this stuff has has come from suffering. Like being like, why can't I be this way? Like I want to be this way
Speaker A
and I can't. Like why can't I? And it's like cuz I don't know how. Why don't I know how? Because I have no words that described how to do it well. So how do I change this in reality? And so it's been
Speaker A
it's been the result of of of a lot of seeking and a lot of pain. And that's so I don't I don't see it as logical. I see this as just descriptive like this is this is how it works. But but you're
Speaker A
able to to to assign a new timeline in terms of when you learn something to to to a longer period of time rather than most people which assess things over a shorter period of time for example like you know when you would get angry at Ila
Speaker A
like she would quiet and you're like okay like this works but then you're able to then see way deeper into the future and then make decisions based off of that even that this isn't going to work long term. Yeah. Well, yeah, I'll
Speaker A
get feedback and I mean to be fair, I'll get feedback immediately afterwards where you know she might not be happy. I got to you know what I mean? And so um I think like it comes down to what are the
Speaker A
things that we want to change and then how do we change them and ideally we want to have some sort of reward cycle as fast as possible with that new behavior and that's I think that's how fundamentally you can change what you do
Speaker A
which then letters up to who you are. Moving on from that, in terms of acquisition.com, how has your criteria changed for businesses over the last two years? Um, it's just much bigger. It's just the businesses have to be a lot
Speaker A
bigger. Um, they have to be billion-dollar opportunities now. Um when I first started, I think honestly when I first started the goal was like $50 million opportunities and then it became like $250 million opportunities and so it's almost like 5xed actually
Speaker A
like every every like 18 months or so it's almost 5xed. So, how does it work exactly? A company reaches out to you and they say, "Hey, we want they'll go through acquisition.com on the site and then and what do they do? They submit
Speaker A
their info that they want money or they want to sell or what is it?" So, we have we have um we basically have three kind of places that someone can go. So, for like seed capital, SAS, you know
Speaker A
software type startups, we have ACQ Ventures, which is our venture arm. And so those are typically like smaller checks that are between like 50 and a million dollars like check sizes. And so we do, you know, a lot of those deals.
Speaker A
We do probably like a couple deals three, four deals a month sometimes. Um like December did four. I think we did four in January. Like we we do a decent amount of deal volume there. And those deals are much more like meet the
Speaker A
founder, understand the idea, cool, we can we can just deploy. Um we have uh the private equity side, which is kind of like the the big big the big boy side. Um, and those businesses like if we're going to do a deal, they're all
Speaker A
bespoke based on, you know, the valuation of the business, where we think the business can go, what our value ad is.
Speaker A
Um, and typically in that side, it's like right now we're 40% SAS, 40% um uh, B2B services, and then 20% consumer services. And we're shifting over time towards just a blend of SAS and professional services. That just tends
Speaker A
to be where we just do really well. And so that's on the private equity side.
Speaker A
And then um we have the advisory division which we started in January of last year which is uh companies that are like not really portfolio ready. And so that's kind of like that you know 1 million 10 million 30 million sometimes
Speaker A
uh dollar per year business where uh it's like they need to change a couple of things. And the reason that happened was for the three years prior to January of last year, um, we, you know, we'd look at a business, we'd do four, five
Speaker A
six, you know, diligence calls, get to understand the business. And a lot of times, like 90 times out of 91, we'd be like, "Not a fit for us or not fit for us right now. Maybe change these two
Speaker A
things, move this metric up, and when you do, like, call us back." And what ended up happening is a lot of founders were like, "This was more valuable than anything I've ever had to go through and thanks for doing it for free." And
Speaker A
for me it was like it was actually super expensive cuz I'm doing that 90 times times however many calls lots of companies. And I was like I wonder if we could do this in a way that we could
Speaker A
charge to do the same basically assessment of a business and say here's all the things that we would do. Here's how we change it. And so then we you know we we we wanted to see if people were interested in it. So January I was
Speaker A
like hey if anyone wants to come out to headquarters you can meet my portfolio team. We'll kind of assess the business and be like these are the blockages to either making it more valuable or scaling it. And so it's like you'll meet
Speaker A
with my head of marketing. He'll be like okay change this on your web page.
Speaker A
Change this on your ads. change this whatever we meet my head of sales if sales is constraint these are these are the things that we do and um people have really really really liked it so it's been exceptional um and I think the
Speaker A
reason that it works so well is that there's kind of what I was alluding to at the beginning is that there's just not a lot of help at that$1 to$100 million range um and I think we can provide that and so how do you make
Speaker A
money from that are you taking distributions from the company or have you sold some No it's just we sell it as an advisory service it's just a service for acquisition company oh overall We have distributions that come from the
Speaker A
private equity side. Um the venture checks obviously I'm not going to see anything for that for 10 years. And then um services just normal business. Why don't you have a website or a place where where people could see the
Speaker A
companies that you've invested in? It's a good question. It's something that I've gone really back and forth on. The main reason is like when I sold Gym Launch um I sold Prestige Labs which was a sister company that did supplements
Speaker A
and sold through the distribution base. And I remember in the diligence meetings uh for that it was like a huge point of contention that I had a 10,000 person Instagram following at the time and they were like are all the sales coming from
Speaker A
your Instagram? And the business is doing like 20 million a year just the just the supplement side. And I was like no it's not coming. They're like well this could be this could be an issue for us if like we can't have complete
Speaker A
control of the Instagram and how do we know you're going to keep promoting it?
Speaker A
I was like my Instagram is not driving like 10,000 people does not make 20 million. like I promise you. And uh seeing how sensitive they were to kind of like keyman risk around, you know, an acquisition, I was like, "Okay, uh if I
Speaker A
do deals and I grow my brand, uh I don't want people to know what the companies are because I'm going to have to go like I'm going to write a check, but then if I publicly associate with it, then I'm
Speaker A
going to have to go with the deal later." So like for example, school that was purposely, you know, like a brand association plus money obviously that went into it. Um but I know that I'm in that I'm in that for the long haul. You
Speaker A
know what I mean? Like I'm going to be with school for many, many years. And so my keyman risk is something that I'm willing to basically deal with. Whereas if I buy a, you know, an HVAC business I publicly associate with it. Um, a
Speaker A
potential acquirer will want me to sign other non-competes. I'll have to have some provisions around uh promotion and I just didn't want to do that. I have gone back and forth on it though to be really like I've gone back and forth. It
Speaker A
seems to me like there would be a net benefit on that. Reminds me I've gone back and forth. I have gone back and forth like a Shark Tank business where it's like as seen on Shark Tank is pretty big. And you could argue that the
Speaker A
business you bring to that will drive up the valuation to a point where even without you, it's still higher than if you were never involved. Agreed. So then the next thing that goes is if I have all of these different things that I'm
Speaker A
like pseudo promoting, then it almost feels like I'm shilling a lot of things. No. And so that's been that's been where I've been. I would just as a viewer of you, not that anyone like not that I would question your credibility, but I
Speaker A
think that it would it would bring a lot more clarity where I could actually back and forth on it. I mean, I've gone back and I think it would attract a lot more businesses where you could say, "Hey
Speaker A
when you started with Acquisition.com you were valued at this much. Your revenue was this much and now look at you." Here's the other thing. I think it would help you negotiate better terms saying that you're going to be on this
Speaker A
website where it's even 100 companies and I think it's important you put them all in the same place so that it's not like you're promoting this or promoting that or you you should never talk about these businesses unless in a podcast
Speaker A
setting where you're giving an example. the other the other and yeah, I mean I've been very I've been torn on it. I was like, you know what I mean? Like I've been very like uh because of all the reasons I just said, but the other
Speaker A
one is kind of like the um the compliance thing that I just said right? Like if if a company could you imag like a company does something stupid and companies do stupid things.
Speaker A
Even if I wrote a venture check to a business and then and a company does something I'm an owner and any any you know reporter or you know clout seeeking YouTuber would then be like Hermosi is saying doing this and it's just like how
Speaker A
is it different from Y Combinator where they're very public or a lot of these like even some of these private equity funds are just like that's their value prop though. YC's value prop is Harvard's value prop is like the the
Speaker A
main thing they get as Yeah. But there are plenty that go through Y Combinator that just turn out to be, you know Yeah. maybe not the best. Yeah. But I think it's Well, Y Combinator is kind of unique in that like I mean to be fair if
Speaker A
if a if a Harvard grad does something bad, Harvard takes a hit. Um but is a law of large it's going to work both ways. I think I think it's going to hurt you if a business does something that reflects on you. And if
Speaker A
you do something, it reflects on all the businesses. I think it goes both ways. I think the net benefit is like a 51 to a 49 like 49% down to 51% like I have I have gone back and forth to the two
Speaker A
where I've been like I'm I'm going to make all of our stuff public. Um I think we are make I think the ACQ ventures if I'm not mistaken I think our ventures things are public um so it's really just
Speaker A
the private equity side. What about school? What was your mindset behind that? School is an interesting one. So um you know for me to again this is like you know using brand to promote something right um you know it' been
Speaker A
four years that I've been making content and really never promoted anything and when I look at my audience uh I make business content almost exclusively but still like 60s something% of my audience is people who want to start a business
Speaker A
not people who have a business and I think that's just the nature of just humans like there's way more people who don't have businesses than people who do you know 9% of business n 9% of people own businesses and 91 don't. And so if
Speaker A
we're at 30% or 33% people who are in my audience uh own businesses were three or four times represented um on like over represented by business owners because I make business content. Anyways, to the to to answer the question, I was like
Speaker A
is there something that I can do with this larger audience that can help them get started in a scalable way um that would provide value to everybody? And so I, you know, I I got approached by a gazillion companies probably like you
Speaker A
do, uh, over the years, uh, for for the audience and the access and the distribution that we have. And, um school was a company that I had been following since 2018. So, I've known Sam for a long time. And, um, I just kept
Speaker A
watching it and it just kept getting better and better and better and the it's just like all I heard was good. It was just all good word of mouth because I'm so concerned with my reputation too that I'm like if I if I promote anything
Speaker A
and it's not awesome, you know what I mean? Like I could take a hit. And so that company was just compounding month over month over month just on word of mouth. It had zero marketing whatsoever.
Speaker A
It had amazing um uh customer retention in terms of people who started communities and also member retention.
Speaker A
People are in communities. So it's like people are in there getting good experience. People who are starting communities are getting good experience.
Speaker A
And I think that there's a big movement in general like meta towards uh communities overall. And so I thought like from a macro perspective, I think it's a good it was it was well well timed and well placed. And then beyond
Speaker A
that, from a long-term strategic perspective, like it has network effects built in. And so even in an AI world like I think it will it will do it will do great. Um and so for all those reasons, uh it was also something that
Speaker A
would work for people who were just getting started. And so that's why I um I invested in school and then I promoted it. So I thought it it would help the the 60some percent that didn't have businesses get started. And also for the
Speaker A
30 something% of people who had businesses who wanted to start you like have a place that's not like an email list for all their people to to house I saw it as a much better option than like a discord or do you worry when it comes
Speaker A
to school the one thing that I've seen in terms of a bit of a complaint? Sure.
Speaker A
Seems to be that there is at some level this like MLM aspect to it where I've seen schools that people promote that teach you how to make money on school.
Speaker A
Yeah. So like a school for school. I think that's just going to happen no matter what. Like there's there's YouTube channels about how to make YouTube channels. There's like if there's anything that someone has figured out to generate a living, then
Speaker A
there's going to be people who sell how to do that thing. And so I think if we chunk up a level, the question is, is there something wrong with that, right?
Speaker A
And then number two, the MLM component. So I can break that into two parts. The MLM thing is just like we have a referral commission, which is like not a very uncommon strategy. And the internet Yeah. Yeah. The internet doesn't really
Speaker A
deal with nuance, but it's not like it's multi level. An MLM has multiple levels.
Speaker A
This has one. You refer a friend, you get a percentage. Like anything, like if I refer you business, you probably give me 20%. So like, you know, whatever. Um, but yeah that's just cuz the internet doesn't deal with nuance. So that's the the not
Speaker A
MLM, the single SLM, the single level marketing that exists there. Uh, in terms of what um what people do with their community, we're we're pro free speech, anti-censorship, like if it's legal, you can you can have a community
Speaker A
about it. You know, if you want to have a community about painting, have a community about painting. You want community about Facebook ads, have community about Facebook ads. You want community about finding the perfect cologne for you, you can have that. You
Speaker A
want to have one about painting model cars, you can do that. You want to have about how making sick beats, I'm just naming all just off the top of my head all different communities. Then if you want to have one on how to make a school
Speaker A
community profitable, have like we're not going to say like you can't start a community about that. Like how could we do that? We have millions. We have tens of millions of users. Tens of millions.
Speaker A
It's very big. It's much bigger than people think it is. And so like either you have to start saying making this rule and that rule and then you get down the the whole rule strap or you just say
Speaker A
like you can make community about whatever you want as long as it's legal. And that's that's how that's where where you decided to draw the line. Should we create a community about how to podcast or just podcast it? You could. I'm sure
Speaker A
it crush. You think it would crush what? Yeah. I don't and I we've been thinking about making making content like talking about production equipment though researching a podcast about how to podcast. But then you have to ask is
Speaker A
there anything wrong with loves it? Right. Exactly. And that's a great question is what's and and so what and what's wrong with it? I'm going to out myself right here. I think there's nothing inherently wrong with an MLM.
Speaker A
However, they're used in really inappropriate ways a lot of the time. But inherently nothing wrong with just an affiliate program. I feel where it goes wrong is people are deceptive about maybe the practices or or the buying I've studied this deception. It's so
Speaker A
much it's like I can I can say it very succinctly. The problem is that the promise doesn't match the deliverable.
Speaker A
Okay, that's it. It's false expectations. That's it. Fundamentally the vast majority of people who advertise, especially in the information space, do not advertise compliantly. And so, as a result, they make promises they can't keep. And so, people get false uh
Speaker A
false expectations. stepping say, do I think there's anything inherently wrong about saying like I learned how to do this? I put I put tons of hours into compiling all this stuff and if you like me and you like my style of teaching
Speaker A
you can buy it from me in this video course and I know you used to have one.
Speaker A
Like the the question is I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with education or even profiting from education. Colleges do it. Why why can colleges do it and get give people zero ROI? And no one says college is a scam.
Speaker A
Well, some people do, but the vast majority of people still think college is not a scam. It's simply because they don't promise anything. That's it.
Speaker A
That's fun. Like it just comes down to that. If you just don't promise anything, then you're kind of in the clear. If you're like, "Hey, I put together a course on how I, you know how I succeeded as a as a realtor. I
Speaker A
make no promises to whether I'm going to follow it or it's going to be perfect for you. I just share the stuff that worked for me. If you want to go check it out, it's whatever. It's over here.
Speaker A
You can go check it out and buy it." I don't think anyone's like, "Screw this guy." Now, some people will be because that's the internet, but like anybody what I would consider to be reasonable. No. And I think to, you
Speaker A
know, to a large degree, like we can't listen to everyone because you will have people who are just upset about you not sharing your stuff as people who are upset with you sharing it. And so, might as well upset the people who don't pay
Speaker A
you. Vegas Matt also put it really well because he was involved in one before.
Speaker A
You know who Vegas Matt is? He's a YouTuber here in Las Vegas, massive YouTube channel on gambling. But but he said that MLMs are effectively better because the money actually goes to the people that are closing the sale rather
Speaker A
than giving it to advertisers that are just going to inundate people. Oh yeah. They just take that I mean from a business model perspective you take your advertising you basically take your entire allowable cost to acquire a customer and say instead of giving that
Speaker A
to anything I will just give that all to my sales team and then I will incentivize them to recruit other salespeople so that we can have a continued distributed base so that instead of having a sales manager who's
Speaker A
getting paid a base salary and a a small percentage of everyone's sales it's just like it's all performance and having the multi-level structure allows you to recruit teams just like you would in a business wait all businesses are
Speaker A
pyramids are all businesses pyramid schemes like you know come on uh like it's Illuminati uh you know we just say things but no I don't think there's anything inherent I think the where people get in trouble is making
Speaker A
deceptive claims and making false promises or promises that they know to not be true and the associations so basically MLM has a bad brand has a bad brand there's enough negative associations that people who might be otherwise really good MLMs
Speaker A
still take the heat for the bad ones people who sell information and education will take the heat for all the people who sell the bad ones. And so that's the that's the rub. I don't think there's anything wrong with selling
Speaker A
education. It is interesting how deeply rooted that hatred is for a lot of people. It is like the most sensitive topic for a lot of people. I'm curious are there any business models that you kind of secretly hate because but
Speaker A
they're highly profitable. Maybe because they're like intellectually lazy or like just uh morally lazy maybe too. Um no you'd say anything. I I very much stand from the position like if it's legal then you know do if someone is willing
Speaker A
to exchange money like again capitalism based on voluntary exchange between two parties and both parties make the exchange voluntarily because they both believe they'll be better off now the belief part is where deceptive components come come into play right but
Speaker A
inherently I don't have an issue with someone making like I don't claim to have a moral superiority that my way of making money is better than someone else's way of making money now my business might perceived as more
Speaker A
valuable to an investor, which is a different thing. So, if you're like, are there business models that make cash flow but don't have inherent value?
Speaker A
Yeah, there's tons of do I just see it as different and that's fine. So, if someone were to take school as an example and just copy it and do their own thing, why do you think that business would fail? Network effects, we
Speaker A
already have tens of millions of users. It's very hard to do. And what if that also the details? Why doesn't someone just copy Facebook? It's like they could just copy it. Exactly. It's like, yeah people aren't there. What if there's
Speaker A
another influencer who's backing like school2.0.com? Let's just say they it's it's also easier said than done, you know, to copy. Um like it's there's a lot of details on how it's programmed and how it works and what content gets
Speaker A
surfaced and what algorithms run. Like there's a lot of details in the business that make it and it's it's it's the product is so detail driven. It's all the tiny things. It's not like you could copy the colors and the layout and there
Speaker A
have already been plenty of people who've done that, but they don't go anywhere. And so, um, but we could say that about any business. Yeah. What do you think is the best business right now? Because it seems like from my
Speaker A
perspective, just on a high level, the subscription model is doing really well charging one price for the year or like break it down monthly.
Speaker A
That seems to be the new thing. So, like what's from your perspective, what changes is that in like the digital creator space? Generally, but but every every business has gone to now the subscription model. Like I'm paying more. I remember when I used to be able
Speaker A
to buy Adobe Photoshop for like a hundred bucks and now it's like 30 bucks a month or like $40 a month for the same thing. Yeah. Is it a ripoff or if we're willing to pay for it? It's just
Speaker A
inappropriately priced. I'm extremely willing to pay for it. Oh yeah. If anything, it's a good deal. Shout out to Adobe.
Speaker A
We'll be an affiliate. I would love that, man. I would be shilling Adobe all the time.
Speaker A
Maybe you should reach out. I feel like you push it so hard. Yeah. And it's a great It's not expensive. It's incredibly anyone with half a brain would want to buy. Link down below. Get 15 bucks off. But you know, before you
Speaker A
go into that, I will say the biggest benefit or the the best business that gets [ __ ] on all the time, YouTube Premium. People hate spending money for YouTube because it should be free. I love YouTube Premium. Love it. I think
Speaker A
it's worth every penny. People just think they just project their own shs of like why they they should I shouldn't like what you should that that YouTube should pay all the servers and all the compute that they have and all the
Speaker A
workers that work at YouTube should just be free. Like it's just it's just this demand of the universe that like everything has to be given to me. Uh or else or else I'll be upset. Okay. We make more money if
Speaker A
people watch the ads versus getting YouTube Premium and watching the video without the ads. I think the ads pay more all things considered. claims that the premium views are worth more, which which I would believe cuz if they're
Speaker A
paying 15 bucks a month, then you just kind of have to Okay, but then you just kind of have to do some simple math and they need to watch like a million videos in a month. I don't know the breakdown
Speaker A
on that. So, I will answer the question that you originally asked, which is why is the subscription economy like doing and I'll just only answer specific to kind of creators cuz I have a ton of uh obviously with school and then I am
Speaker A
being one myself. Um, I actually just think that there's never been more creators and at the same time there's never been less trust and so people don't trust other people as much and so people are consuming significantly more
Speaker A
content prior to making a purchase and the purchase they make in general the first purchases are lower lower ticket on average. So maybe 10 years ago um people would immediately like see one video, hop on the phone and pay $5,000
Speaker A
for something or $10,000 for something. And that's just it's it's significantly less likely now and they're far more likely to buy grab a book or grab a you know a $29 thing um that they can try and see if the if the quality of the
Speaker A
product is or the quality of the community the quality of the subscription is what they what they deem it's it's it's supposed to be worth and then they're willing to you know pay them for more expensive things. So I
Speaker A
think that what is more publicly seen is the subscriptions. I still think many of these businesses that that do bigger profit numbers tend to also still have backends that are more premiumly priced either in terms of services or products
Speaker A
or whatever. Um, but the thing that is advertised on the front end for the vast majority of people kind of like you have your top of funnel shorts and then you have your longs and then that converts into your kind of like low ticket and
Speaker A
then that go ladders up into the you know 5% of those people or 10% or whatever percentage ascend into you know a higher level. In terms of hiring people, how do you spot an A player? Um I will say that I have yet to have an A
Speaker A
player that I don't know is an A player within the first week or two. So, what are the signs? Mhm. What are the signs?
Speaker A
They immediat So, like support, right? They decrease the likelihood of failure. So, they are taking things off my plate really quickly. Um, and they're proactive in terms of their uh decision decision-m and the actions that they take. A lot of a lot of it is really
Speaker A
just a tremendous amount of activity. High activity, high alignment. If you have both those things, you have somebody who's moving a lot of things in the right direction. And ideally, you get a lot of attention back. And so
Speaker A
like, if my life gets worse when someone starts, that's a bad sign. And if my life doesn't change when they start that's also not that good of a sign either. Now, of course, there's a little bit of onboarding. You're going to have
Speaker A
some of that. That's sure. But, like, by and large, I want to see some dramatic changes in how my time is getting allocated from bringing somebody in especially if they're taking things off my plate. But, I think that works at all
Speaker A
levels. And what's one of the things that you still insist on doing personally, even though you could outsource it? Well, all the books. Um, I write all the books. I write all my emails. I write I mean I I do all the
Speaker A
recording. Um, tweets. All the tweets are mine. Uh, all the tweets are mine. Honestly, every every piece of written word that comes out of acquisition.com um is me. And that is a huge amount of work. And so, uh, it's either me because
Speaker A
they took it as a transcription from a video that I talked uh or I wrote it.
Speaker A
There's there's there's only one exception. um to that. But LinkedIn same thing. Facebook, same thing. It's it's all tweets are actually my we were talking about this earlier, but tweets are my is my biggest secret weapon for how I create so much content. It's
Speaker A
everything. It's the it's the wellspring. So I the tweets are my stream of consciousness uh in real time.
Speaker A
And then those tweets become tweet reels. They become shorts. If they're high performing, I'll just say them. Um many of those shorts put together become longs. that'll be, you know, business advice or brutally honest, you know advice I wish I had had. Things like
Speaker A
that. It's just 20, 30 tweets put together, um, with a little bit more anecdote.
Speaker A
Um, LinkedIn posts are multiple tweets along the same thing put together. Facebook, same thing. So like Tik Tok same thing. Like everything actually and my emails are high performing tweet concepts that then get repurposed into email. So everything stems from like
Speaker A
that one stream of consciousness. And I think like as a creator, you have to find whatever that that lowest friction method is for you. I always used to email myself like ideas, quotes lessons, thoughts, and I used to use
Speaker A
that as my method for making podcasts. And then I just had this like duh realization of like instead of just like emailing myself, I could just email the world via tweet and I would just like tweet them. And it also made me a much
Speaker A
better writer because you have to be so concise with your language. Um that I think has actually improved my writing from the book's perspective. Have you said anything that's recently gotten backlash? I think I had a a LinkedIn
Speaker A
post that got taken a little bit out of context. So those I have somebody who writes my LinkedIn, but it's my it's my words, but he took it from like a podcast like this and just took it there
Speaker A
and then just took an image and put it together. Um, and it was it was basically like, hey, for 10 years, uh, I didn't like go to football games. I didn't play fantasy. I didn't go out.
Speaker A
Um, and I like skipped friends weddings. Like do whatever it takes to get where you want to go, right? And the amount of people that were like, so two two different big backlashes. So backlash one was just like this guy's hustle
Speaker A
porn. Like all he wants to do is tell people to sacrifice. And I'll I'll address that in a second. And then the other was like, what kind of life would you like? I would never skip a friend's wedding. Like this guy's priorities are
Speaker A
all out of whack or whatever. And so both of them come down I think kind of like the do you do you have an issue with somebody's business is like do I have an issue with how someone lives
Speaker A
their life? No. Like different different destinations. Like there's a there's a guy um who like is probably a lifestyle entrepreneur and likes to like talk [ __ ] about my stuff and like I make in like a week what he's made makes in a year and
Speaker A
he's a big you know whatever and and all I can think of when I say is like we have different goals dude like we have different goals like I don't like of course like it's like looking at professional bodybuilder like
Speaker A
and he's like well I trained twice a day and I weigh all my food and like I get massages and I do stretching and it takes me about five or six hours a day to do, you know, all the bodybuilding
Speaker A
stuff that I do. And then some CrossFitter is like, "That's ridiculous. I only work out three days a week. This guy is trying to give you bodybuilding porn." It's like, bro, he's way bigger than you and he has different goals than
Speaker A
you do. And so, um, it's just this whole idea of like should I of like they shouldn't do that, they should do it my way, which fundamentally just is like I have my life is based on my preferences
Speaker A
and their life is based on theirs. Duh. And so, um, if you want to go to your friend's weddings, by all means go to your friends's weddings. I don't care.
Speaker A
You know what I mean? Like, if you want to have a dog, have a dog. Like, I I share the things and like I the one line that I I repeat over and again is is like my life is a documentary, not a
Speaker A
sermon. I'm not telling people to do things the way I do them. I just share what has worked for me and if it works for you, great. And if it doesn't, I love you. I love you all the same. Where
Speaker A
I see a lot of the backlash is just because it comes off as dogma for everybody. But if you added the stipulation of like to those that want to build a successful business, but that's also not necessarily like you
Speaker A
don't need to cater to the people that aren't going to listen long disclosures at the end of every one of your posts.
Speaker A
It's like I can't if I put all the disclosures in my tweets, I wouldn't have tweets. I would just have disclosures. So it's one I think I think NAL said something about this but basically it's like for a post to get reach it will
Speaker A
have to have some sort of level of polarity and to have a level of polarity you have to remove context and so it's basically like you can have complete context and no one can see it or you can
Speaker A
be willing to stand on one line of gray and say now for me if if more people were willing to delay gratification a little longer um because they saw some of my stuff rather than take immediate reward I can live with that. It's
Speaker A
interesting. Every time we talk to you you're you always say, "Oh, yeah. I recently did this. I recently evolved this. I've since developed this." You always have something that you have just done. Most of the time, oddly enough
Speaker A
it's not even adding things. It's eliminating things. Usually words or Yeah. making your criteria more strict.
Speaker A
What's something right now that you're currently working on and maybe you don't have full clarity of it, but you're seeking clarity? Well, I mean, how I'm going to launch my next book, um, is something that I'm thinking about just
Speaker A
from a timing perspective. So, that's something I'm I'm thinking about. Um, a lot, honestly, a lot of my attention goes towards what I'm going to try not to do. And so, it's a it's an an accurate observation. Um, because I
Speaker A
mean, if you listen to you listen to all the greats, you listen to Jobs, you listen to Basos, you listen to listen to Elon, uh, entrepreneurial greats, it's like they all talk about focus because it's so hard to do. It's so hard because
Speaker A
the bigger you get, the more the more juicy and tanalyzing the opportunities become, right? And it's like and you have to just be like, "Nope, we're just going to keep doing this this thing that I know all the pains of and like we're
Speaker A
just going to confront the issues we have and we're going to work through them one at a time when it's like, oh but there's this amazing thing that could be fast and easy and it's like it's just fast and easy because I don't
Speaker A
know enough about it and I just have to and like I've just been burned enough times jumping over that bridge to know that like the grass is greener. I just don't know enough." And the fact that I think it's attractive means I don't know
Speaker A
enough. And so, uh, 2024 was the first time in my life where I've not had FOMO.
Speaker A
And that was a first my whole career where I I didn't have a moment where I was like, I should be doing that instead of this. And I've been doing this, you know, I've been the entrepreneur game for a minute. And that was uh it was
Speaker A
only like I realized it in retrospect. I was like, that was an accomplishment. That was a huge win for me cuz I've always had that like like a buddy of mine, close friend of mine did like $50 million in net earnings in Q4 just from
Speaker A
trading crypto. No employees. Like just just traded crypto, made 50 million in profit. And I I remember thinking in that moment I was like, "Good for you man." Like no idea how you do it. Don't want to know. I'm going to keep doing my
Speaker A
thing. But like at so many other points in my career, I would have been like "Oh my god, teach me what you're like, I want to learn what you're like." And I would completely take my eye off the
Speaker A
ball. And the thing is is like I've I think I've gotten this um a snowball that's finally started to roll. And I say this now hopefully, knock on wood like it'll stay that way that um I'll manifest it. uh teaching. I'm I hope
Speaker A
that I can stick I can stick with stick with it and because I've continued to get rewarded for sticking with it and uh it's been the hard like acquisition.com by by duration is the hardest single business that I've the longest duration
Speaker A
that I've only done one thing. Um so that's been pretty cool. Besides besides Jack's mom. Okay, we're cutting that.
Speaker A
Yeah. Why? She was amazing. She didn't tell you. Um no, she told me all about it actually. I think uh Did she tell you to call me dad? I think you are.
Speaker A
I think I'm entitled to some Am I in the will? You took that like a champ. So once you hit a billy in your laugh starts turning into a Bezos laugh. That's great. Gosh that completely threw me out. I had
Speaker A
something I had a missile in a cannon. That's also what she said. Yeah. All right. That was snowball. Snowball is rolling up. I hope that I can stay focused for an extended period of time.
Speaker A
Yeah, that sounds like something that Graham and I need to hear. Exactly. Because we're so focused on making the content and fortunately like like most of our revenue comes from the sponsors and so we're able to travel around the
Speaker A
world. We're able to spend money on the flights and the accommodations and the crazy dripping, the crazy $15. We're able to to do what we do because of because of the sponsors and and and right now it's enough, but we
Speaker A
want to always be improving. And so now we're thinking like, well, what if we created a product or a service and we're always having discussions about how we can do that. But I at some point I always wonder like like if we just focus
Speaker A
on making better content, then we get better like higher paying sponsors. Same sponsors. We love the sponsor. higher paying sponsors because we're getting more views and it's like a cycle because of that. But but part of me also wonders
Speaker A
like should we focus our efforts in something else? My my thought with that is that I am happy also doing what we're doing now and I kind of worry that like we're good at this thing and if we take
Speaker A
our eye off the prize we we don't but if we take the eye off what we're good at now are we just adding more onto the plate where we don't need to or we have a really great balance and a great life
Speaker A
and things are going well and if we're just trying to create something for the sake of creating something then maybe it won't be perfectly terrific. But right now, if we're just focusing on making the best content for you guys, watching
Speaker A
then hopefully it's a pretty good product. Well, I have so many thoughts on this. Um, do we have five minutes because I think I have a a very indepth answer for this. So, so basically, I see this as a spectrum. So, it's a continuum
Speaker A
that exists for, and this is specific for creators in terms of how to monetize. And so, it's it's basically a spectrum that has risk and capital and effort kind of on either side. So like low risk, low capital effort. Um high
Speaker A
risk, high high capital, high effort. So on the all the way on the left, you have sponsorships, right? Which is what what you're doing now. Cool. You make money from doing the same thing. One degree to the right of that would be like an
Speaker A
affiliate relationship. Like Adobe says "Hey, we'll give you 20% of all of them lifetime." It's like, "Okay, cool.
Speaker A
Adobe, hit them up." You have an affiliate relationship. The next is when it starts to get a little bit you have you have your your uh your your your drop ship, right? Your white label. you find somebody who just
Speaker A
puts and you did this with a coffee I think back in the day, right? Like you have that kind of middle ground. So somebody else can manage everything. I'm just going to promote it, but I'm going to own the brand. And that's that's
Speaker A
that. Um the next degree here is where you have uh you find an existing business where you can negotiate some percentage of equity in the business and ideally distributions and or royalties.
Speaker A
Um which I I'm a big advocate for creators to do both. Um because you have costs associated with running the business, running your business, your side of the marketing, right? And the business makes money because it's monetizing with whatever traffic you're
Speaker A
sending, but you need to keep advertising. And so having some either you know, profit share or some royalty on topline or some sort of some sort of cash flow still needs to come back cuz not all companies sell. Actually, the
Speaker A
vast majority don't sell. And so I think it it it balances some of the risk for a creator. But that would be a minority deal, especially with a company or a product that you really like. And so if
Speaker A
Adobe were smaller and would give you a percentage of you know the company that would be one where it's like and ideally this is I mean this this is me turning the tables and speaking to you as an
Speaker A
investor. Um it's the best is when you can write a check too because then it's like there's no expectations. I'm going to promote this because I believe in it and because I want it to grow and I want
Speaker A
to get a good a crazy return on the money that I put into it. And so you'll have some blend that's gonna that of that deal, but usually for minority stake and maybe some performance tanches that kick in based on, you know, how
Speaker A
well you do it. Uh, and then the the the final one, the final frontier is where you actually like do everything yourself. Like the whole the whole thing soup to nuts is like you're starting a business. Um, that's, you know, uh
Speaker A
Jimmy with Fastables, right? Like he's really just starting a chocolate thing and finding cocoa nibs in Africa and doing all this stuff, right? And so the upside is typically higher on this side lower on this side in terms of the
Speaker A
enterprise value of, you know, what you're promoting. Um, but so is the risk and the difficulty. And the idea that I think a lot of people miss out on is like it's so much about the partners that you're bringing in on the side that
Speaker A
they have to like in my opinion for a true partnership to work, they have to be able to be successful without you.
Speaker A
And if they're already growing, they're already successful. This is like school like school's school's going to be successful either way. I just want to pull the future towards us faster. Um you need a partner who who is as good as
Speaker A
you are or better. Ideally, just amazing at that thing and you're amazing at this thing and then it's like the sum of the parts is what is where the magic happens. But those are basic that's basically the continuum. But if you're
Speaker A
going to do anything to the right of the right of center there and you're not just like I'm either sponsoring or doing an affiliate deal. I think you can do like I think the the the best deals is
Speaker A
kind of like the school deal where you you put cash in you you you you know buy a big stake you also promote like those are deals where it's like I think again in terms of behavior what is this going
Speaker A
to change about what I do and I would like to do deals that change as little or nothing about what I do if I'm always going to make content anyways and I'm already getting two-thirds of people who want to start a business then I don't
Speaker A
need to change anything now it's still high leverage because I just point them in a direction I'm like hey I vetted this I think it's awesome I think it's a really good product check it out and it's free trial. If you don't like it
Speaker A
cancel. Right. Um that that is basically my and I I would use that if I were you guys as my decision-m variable, which is you both accurately said it. We're really good at this thing and the more we do this
Speaker A
thing, the better we get at it. We get more views. We get the sponsorship continue to grow. Fine. We can do some of these other deals as long as it changes nothing about what we do. And so I think that's and that's the frame that
Speaker A
you have to enter those conversations with, which is like I'm already sponsoring. So, me slotting your product in, which I also happen to own a piece of and get some kickback on, it doesn't change anything about what we do, but
Speaker A
then that gives you some long-term upside. Um, and maybe a higher distribution. This would be really interesting. How about this for anybody watching? If you have a business that you think would align with what we're doing and you want the distribution, I'd
Speaker A
be really interested to see who reaches out from this. That's a great idea. And also Adobe. And also if you guys Yeah, if you guys would be interested if we were to create because Graham and I have thought about this and
Speaker A
we've helped a lot of people just in consulting uh with content specifically podcasting. If you guys think that there would be demand for that. So that's something that you'd want to see if we went all the way in depth
Speaker A
pre-production production post-production, research, etc. Let me know. I'd be open to that, too. Yeah, I tried something on my own. I'll just talk about it briefly. Uh I put a little feeler out there for like a networking community and I was shocked. We got
Speaker A
thousands of people who reached out who said I just want to be a part of a network of like other entrepreneurs community on school perhaps. No. So we started at the very top of the list um people who made more than 10 million a
Speaker A
year and I just didn't even think of I just wanted to go and talk to these people. I probably talked to like 20 people. It's it's it's the least scalable thing I could possibly do because I'm like talking onetoone with
Speaker A
certain people it's not okay it not when people don't go up I see that focus in his eye don't go up against that so far we got a group of like a dozen people who are doing over 10 who are doing over
Speaker A
10 million a year and it's it's just the coolest group of like it it's something magic when you're when you have a small community like that versus something that's too big but I say when it's it's not scalable in the sense that once you
Speaker A
get it seems like from I've spoken with quite a few people on this once you get more than like 30 or 40 you start to lose that one-on-one connection that made it special in the beginning. It's really about subgroups. So, if you look
Speaker A
at like is it scalable at the current model? No, but our community is scalable for sure. So, if you look at um well you look at Y Combinator, they have a much larger community than that. It's really cool. If you look at uh Vist not
Speaker A
Vista, uh Vistage, which is a community model. If you look at uh YPO, if you're familiar with them, young professionals organization, they run they're they're national and they have chapters and but they keep the forums to like eight
Speaker A
people. And so that's that's how they keep the to the you have access to the whole network because you're like "Oh I'm also a YPO person. I got I got vetted. I you know, I'm above a certain level." So you have that kind of cred
Speaker A
but like the the actual super close-knit group is is like eight people and they meet in person. And so that's why I think there like I think for sure there's there's demand for something like that because people want all
Speaker A
successful people want to be around other successful people because it's really lonely. That was the one thing I was surprised about when when I was speaking with all of those people. Only one of them said that their goal was to
Speaker A
make more money. Only one. And that meant that maybe 30 people said, "I don't care about making more money. All I care about is meeting other people who share the similar problems that that I've gone through." And most of most of
Speaker A
the problems are pretty service level. It seems like and it's like tax planning, estate planning, raising a family, random business issues that come up init. But I was shocked how common everybody all this commonalities between every human problems have existed for
Speaker A
human lifetimes. So So I thought that was interesting. Yeah. What is your experience of loneliness?
Speaker A
Um I I really like being alone. So, I don't get super lonely to be super like candid with you. Um, I think that there are experiences that feel isolating where you're like, "No one else is dealing with this." But usually
Speaker A
isolation is kind of like shame. It only exists in the dark. Like, if you go out and say like, "Hey, I'm dealing with this thing with my marriage. I'm dealing with this thing with my weight. I'm dealing with this thing in business."
Speaker A
Like, there's a zillion other people who are dealing with that. My mom used to say this thing that I really liked a lot. The news is always the same. It's just the names change. And I just thought that was actually like pretty
Speaker A
profound. It's like if you look at the headlines of the news, it's like, you know, banks default, interest rates up housing crisis, like it's like those headlines have existed for a very long time. We just change it's just we just
Speaker A
change who's involved. And even even the bad ones like girl gets abducted, like just change the names, but it's the same stuff, humans doing human things. And so, um, I think that context, but it's still it's one thing to know that
Speaker A
hypothetically, another when you meet somebody who's going through the exact same thing. And I think that makes people feel um less isolated. But spending time alone for me personally is like one of the most I like I like being
Speaker A
alone. Are there different tiers to wealth that you've noticed like for people that go from zero to 100, 100 to a million? What are those tiers and when do you see diminishing returns? I think Felix Dennis has a book called like it's
Speaker A
like how to be rich. I I think it's how to be I'll teach you to be rich or how to be rich something like that. Anyways it's funny, but like the first chapter he breaks down like 11 levels of wealth
Speaker A
and he says basically after $400 million liquid. He's like that's when you're truly wealthy and he's he was you know he was worth that much money. He's like at that point it's like you can really do whatever you want. I do think that
Speaker A
the jumps are much smaller in the beginning in terms of what makes a really big difference. I think going from anything to about six figures a year is a material change. Um, I think going from like, you know, even 10,000 a
Speaker A
month to 20,000 a month is a significant change. Going from there to about 40 or 50 is another change. And if we think of like how we're defining the change, it's usually like what are the variables that affect someone's daily living. So, it's
Speaker A
going to be where they live, um, the you know, the schools that their kids can go to, the vacations they can take where they can stay, uh, the food they eat, the clothes they wear, like those are all, but almost all of those are
Speaker A
affected mostly. I would say like up to kind of like that 1% earning level which is about $500,000 a year. Now you can live a baller lifestyle 500 but not really save anything. And so if you're a responsible saver, it really depends on
Speaker A
your saving. Um I'm actually a lot like Graham, believe it or not, even though I I I spend money because Leila spends money, but like by percentage of income I spend a very small percentage of my income. Um and so it really just depends
Speaker A
on your appetite for saving versus spending. Uh and I think that's entirely personal because it's really just a question of risk. Like how much risk am I willing to take on? But um beyond that there's that's just a ratio. But after
Speaker A
that it's like you know you're you have nicer and nicer houses. You go on nicer and nicer vacations. You travel private.
Speaker A
You know maybe that's at a couple million bucks a year. You start traveling private. After that again it's like it's just like you're buying boats and you're buying houses. Like there's there you can't at a certain point you really
Speaker A
can't consume any more of it. Um I will say this is that I do think that and this is controversial. Um, but I do think that money um because you know they they had a study it's like up to
Speaker A
$70,000 a year um and now like inflation adjusted probably closer to 100. I actually think it it continues to go up beyond that. But I think the problem is that people have a skill deficiency in terms of how to spend money. I think
Speaker A
most people know how to spend money effectively up to $100,000 a year in terms of how to make their life better but they don't know how to spend it above that in terms of like things that improve their lives. Like I think but I
Speaker A
think it's a learnable skill. I think you can get better at spending money uh to make your life better. And so for me things that make my life better are going to be things that buy me time back. Um things that basically are all
Speaker A
the annoyances and frustrations in my life. If I can pay to make those go away, those are things that net enhance.
Speaker A
Um and then long-term in terms of purpose, it's like if you find something meaningful, you can actually devote real resources and make a change or an impact, which I think is, you know, you should see the updated study on that.
Speaker A
That whole $75,000 thing. No, it was that was done in a in in a different country with so they they did one they did one recently uh well within the last 10 years of the United States and they
Speaker A
found that I think it was about $150,000 was where you get peak dollar to value ratio it continues up just diminishing returns but diminishing returns and they found that it the diminishing returns really stopped about $650,000 about top 1% they found that
Speaker A
over a million dollar a year you have lower quality of life and I'm guessing it's because you have more problems, career issues, uh or maybe friends are not friends with you or you have fake people manage money which is
Speaker A
another like a whole another thing but it was really yeah 650 700 grand and then it just kind of tapers after that I would that seems super super believable but like after you know five or $10 million a year in income like but the
Speaker A
next strata is like I don't know 25 maybe 30 40 million a year in income like where you can do like even you know crazier things I guess but at a certain point when you can buy the hotels you
Speaker A
stay at it's like like whatever. I don't know. I don't have a need for Omega yacht. I think Leila wants one though.
Speaker A
You should buy a hotel. Don't say it too loud. Alex, thank you again for coming on the podcast. It's always great to see you.
Speaker A
Yeah, this is your fifth time on. Believe it. Is it really? It is. Yeah.
Speaker A
We've had no other guest if we count the you and Ila. The duo show. Okay. The duo show. That's fair. Yeah. Yeah. Well that's cool. Maybe in a year, guys.
Speaker A
You'll see him back on. Hopefully. And we'll see what he's eliminated from his life one year from now. I've eliminated happiness from my life. I've just seen it as a distraction. Just don't don't eliminate podcasts. That just for us.
Speaker A
Stop doing podcasts. You don't do many to be honest with you. But no, you guys you guys we always have uh good conversations. I'm glad we got to where where we did. And um I only took it cuz
Speaker A
your mom um told me that it would be a lot a little bit of debt.
Speaker A
Yeah, I have a big debt to pay off there. All right, guys. Thank you so much for watching. Till next time. And thank you to the sponsors, Adobe. Thank you, sponsors. You know what to do.
Speaker A
Until next time. See you.
Topics:Alex Hormozientrepreneurshipmillionaire strategybusiness growthsupply-demandTikTok ShopAI opportunitiespersistenceaction over manifestationstartup success
