Speaker A
Good evening. My name is Josh Baer, and I am a recovering former dollar risk turned art advisor turned art market journalist who publishes something called The Baer Facts. When I speak to an audience before I get started with what I have to say, I like to get a sense of who's in the room so I can try to adjust my issues to you. How many people in this room are artists? Okay. By the way, there are more artists in America than lawyers. It's an interesting census statistic. How many are dealers? Okay. How many are collectors? Okay. How many people here are art advisors? For Tiger Woods? No? Okay. So that wasn't everybody raising their hand, but it gives me a sense of this. So each year, I tend to do a David Letterman type approach of 10 things about something. So this year, it's 10 things about buying art. And the first thing that some of you might notice is that a really traditional talk like this would probably say 10 things about collecting art, and I want to have a little sense that that's a little bit of a different take that I'm taking because everybody sort of is conceiving themselves as maybe collecting. So keep in mind I'm talking about buying art. And those of you who have heard me speak before know that I like to make a point right off the bat that we tend to think about or talk or be asked about the art market as if it was one thing, and there is no such thing as the art market. There are many art markets. There's probably one art market for each artist. There's certainly an art market you might generalize about Chinese contemporary art, but does that have anything to do with the market for WPA art? So when people ask about the art market, I think what they really are skinning saying is, what about the things I'm interested in? What about if I'm an artist? What about the market for my work from a gallerist? How am I doing? If I'm a collector, what about the things that are comparable to what I'm doing? So I really like to shy away in some ways from these what could be overgeneralizations because it's really specifics that matter completely in either looking at a work of art or which artist or which magazine or which museum to deal with. So that's a point I always like to start with. And mind you, at the end of my 10 or 11 things, I'm going to open the floor for questions, so hopefully there will be some. Issue number two is that not all artworks have the same value. You might have an exhibition that has ten works that are the same size, the same year, but obviously by the same artist, and the galleries are offering X dollars for each one. So the assumption is that they all have the same financial value, but they don't because as soon as the show is over, some of them are probably or may be worth more, and some of them may be worth less. The gallery always has to price them exactly the same, so they're never making a distinction that, well, all the four-footers, this one is more in a primary exhibition because it's better. So keep that in mind when you're looking at a show and you're looking at the price. That one of the key elements is sort of hasn't happened yet as to what something might be worth. Now, another thing that I like to think about is that it's probably a dealer that most of you have heard about named Larry Gagosian, and he told me something interesting once because I was talking and said something about, oh, this client of yours. He said, I don't have clients, I have customers. And I thought that was an interesting comment that I don't think any other dealer down in this fair or any of the fairs would be willing to use that term, and yet he's thinking in that way, and I think I know it just resonated quite a bit to me. Galleries tend to also overuse and advisers and say, so and so is my client. It's like they own them. And now in some narrow circumstances, there are relationships where a collector works only with one person, but what you need to know in this rule things about buying art is that you have the ability and should be able to shop or buy anywhere. You're not tied down now to any one region, one dealer. Certainly, there are advantages for becoming a better customer at the same store. It's like going to the same restaurant over and over. You'll get a better table, you'll get better service if you tip well, you do well. And then the art game is played that way, but you're a customer, and you should be able to shop wherever you want. Now, the flip side of that is there are some rules, and my colleague who spoke before said when asked about selling art, there are some rules about how you should sell art that are a little different than how you should buy art, notably that it's considered good form, too, if you're trying to sell something, to offer it back to the person who sold it to you in the first place. But as a buyer, you should be able to buy from London or New York or anybody, and you should make use of that. Now, another point I'd like to make about buying art is we have two markets that are described as the primary market, which is an artist who's generally a living artist who is represented by a gallery. It comes from the studio or it comes directly from that artist who's being paid. That being the primary market. And the secondary market meaning a work that's already been sold at least once and it's back for sale for its second, third, fiftieth time. And art markets are not that efficient, so the primary market and the secondary market value of things are rarely, if ever, the same. So in a climate like we had through September 2008, for successful artists, the secondary market price was generally higher than the primary market price. Galleries were still pretending that they were doing a good job keeping the price down to only three hundred thousand or only thirty thousand or only three million, and the secondary market existed for people who couldn't get those works, and they'd be willing to pay more at auction, at other private dealers, from people who bought it. So there was, they weren't equal. Now we have a recession, which maybe is winding down a little bit, but now the secondary market can often be less expensive than the primary market. The galleries are still insisting on holding to their price points because either they think it's bad form to lower their prices, which I disagree, or the artists are insisting that because they're so much a better artist that their work should be more expensive. So that gives an opportunity for people to buy works for less money elsewhere. So those things are always in flux, and there's never a stasis except maybe in the print market where you have every object, it's always the same. So if you have a hundred Warhol prints, they will be the same price everywhere because everybody knows that you can go check things out elsewhere. But so I would say the print and sometimes photography market is an exception, but there's not a balance there, and balance sort of flipped in the last year and a half. Now, how do we know these things? Well, on the one hand, information is sort of not just in argument and everywhere. It's this killer thing that we think we know things because we read about it on the internet. So first of all, if it's on the internet, it must be true, which may or may not be the case. And the other thing is I like to always say that we're over-informed but we're undereducated. So the information that you might be getting about, and now we're talking about buying art or comparable prices for things, so people use databases to look at artworks, and it doesn't take into account quality differentials, condition, condition of artworks being different. So saying that the last Frank Stella sold for X makes you understand the price of this Frank Stella is a little bit misleading. And people who have made their living analyzing data tend to overuse the statistics a little bit. So that extra information, I think, is actually not—it gets in the way quite a bit of people convincing themselves that they know more than they might, which makes me think you kn—