Exploring the distinction between taste and aesthetics in art, emphasizing personal preference versus objective analysis.
Key Takeaways
- Taste is subjective and shaped by personal experiences and cultural background.
- Aesthetics involves objective qualities of art that can be critically analyzed.
- Art criticism separates personal taste from aesthetic evaluation.
- Understanding the difference between taste and aesthetics enriches art appreciation.
- Personal preferences should be seen as opinions, not definitive judgments on art quality.
What the video covers
- The video discusses the concept of taste as a person's liking or dislike influenced by cultural context, values, and life experiences.
- Taste is subjective and develops over time, with no absolute good or bad preferences.
- Aesthetics refers to the qualities of art that can be objectively analyzed, such as composition, technique, and presentation.
- Art critics focus on aesthetics rather than personal taste when evaluating artworks.
- The presenter uses a food metaphor to illustrate the difference: aesthetics relates to ingredients and presentation, while taste relates to flavor and personal opinion.
- The divide between taste and aesthetics is important for understanding how art is appreciated and critiqued.
- Personal opinions on art are valid but separate from critical analysis based on aesthetics.
- Examples include comparing classical and abstract paintings, both aesthetically valid but subject to differing tastes.
- The video encourages viewers to recognize the distinction and appreciate art beyond subjective preferences.
- The presenter aims to focus on aesthetics in future art discussions while acknowledging personal taste.
Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown
Speaker A
Black coffee. Good morning. This is Sarah, and welcome back to the Function of Art vlog. Today, I'm gonna talk a little bit more about aesthetics, particularly having to do with the whole idea of taste. So, aesthetics as they pertain to the concept of taste. But first, I'm going to read the definition of taste to you so that I can establish a little bit more of a baseline. The first entry for taste, of course, has to do with the actual process of tasting something, which is one of your five senses, right? That is not what we're discussing today. We're talking about the second entry, which is a person's liking for particular—it says flavors, but it appends that by saying it's a person's tendency to like or dislike certain things. The definition appends this even further and says that it's the ability to discern what is of good quality or of a high aesthetic standard. This has mainly to do with matters of personal preference, interest, and of course, judgment. Okay, so the important thing to note about taste is that there isn't really any such thing as good or bad preference. A person's taste is based on a lot of different factors: values, cultural context, life experiences, things that you're exposed to versus things that you're not, and your taste kind of develops throughout your life. So, when somebody says they have good or bad taste, it's really a matter of developed taste or mature taste and less experienced taste. So, I will go as far as to say that. So, when art critics critically analyze a work of art, they discuss all aspects of that work of art regarding what it is and how it was made, but they leave out anything that is subjective or based on preference, such as taste. However, when we critically analyze a work of art, we still talk about aesthetics. So, where most people will commingle the concept of aesthetics and taste, there really is a rift between the two, and I want to help define where that separation lies. To do this, I'm going to use the metaphor of food because we're talking about taste, and that just makes sense. During food competitions, particularly on reality TV, all of the chefs are making a plate to present to the judges, and the judges can all pretty much unanimously agree at the point when all the different plates are presented that everything they're looking at is food. So, before they even taste the food and put the first bite into their mouth, there's a lot of things that they can discuss. They can talk about the ingredients that were chosen. They can talk about the method in which it was prepared. They can even talk about the presentation on the plate. All of these things fit into the same category as the discussion of aesthetics. When it comes to visual things like dirt, that moment when you put that first bite into your mouth to assess its flavor, it becomes a matter of taste, and that's when you cross that great divide between taste and aesthetics. From here on out, it becomes more of a negotiation of personal opinion. As people, we do and we don't like certain things. I might hate celery, and you might love celery, and neither one of us is right or wrong. It's just a matter of opinion. You and I could both look at two paintings. One of them could be a Rococo oil painting that was made with classical standards of beauty in mind, and it could be put next to another canvas that has strong hash marks that go in certain directions and are fairly non-objective and abstract. And we can both look at those two canvases, and we can agree that both of them were made with aesthetics in mind, but you might like one versus the other, and I might have a different opinion. This matter of taste is the thing that we don't necessarily bring to the table when we talk about what art is and what it embodies and where its merit lies. When I discuss art, I'm going to try and stay in the category of aesthetics, which is on one side of that great divide between aesthetics and taste. I will probably still give my personal opinion about how I feel about things, but that's less important than what those things are. As a matter of fact, I don't know. You can't really nail anything into the ground solidly enough if the ground is made of soot, and opinions are soot. So, we're kind of nailing that in stone, and those are facts. Facts are stone. I'm gonna get back to work. I'm gonna go watch Insight, hopefully land on Mars, which is very important, and I'm gonna finish my coffee. So, until my next installment of the Function of Art, keep making awesome stuff out there, and thank you for watching.
Speaker A
the concept of taste but first I'm going to read the definition of taste to you so that I can establish a little bit more of a baseline the first entry for taste of course has to do with the
Speaker A
actual process of tasting something which is one of your five senses right that is not what we're discussing today we're talking about the second entry which is a person's liking for particular it says flavors but um it appends that by saying it's a person's
Speaker A
tendency to like or dislike certain things the definition appends this even further and says that it's the ability to discern what is of good quality or of a high aesthetic standard this has mainly to do with matters of personal
Speaker A
preference interest and of course judgment okay so the important thing to note about taste is that there isn't really any such thing as good or bad preference a person's taste is based on a lot of different factors values
Speaker A
cultural context life experiences things that you're exposed to versus things that you're not and your taste kind of develops throughout your life so when somebody says they have good or bad taste it's really a matter of developed taste or mature taste and less
Speaker A
experienced taste so I will go as far as to save that so when art critics critically analyze a work of art they discuss all aspects of that work of art regarding what it is and how it was made
Speaker A
but they leave out anything that is subjective or based on preference such as taste however when we critically analyze a work of art we still talk about aesthetics so where most people will commingle the concept of aesthetics and taste there really is a rift between
Speaker A
the two and I want to help define we that separation lies to do this I'm going to use the metaphor of food because we're talking about taste and that just makes sense during food competitions particularly on reality TV
Speaker A
all of the chefs are making a plate to present to the judges and the judges can all pretty much unanimously agree at the point when all the different plates are presented that everything they're looking at is food so before they even
Speaker A
taste the food and put the first bite into their mouth there's a lot of things that they can discuss they can talk about the ingredients that were chosen they can talk about the method in which it was prepared they can even talk about
Speaker A
the presentation on the plate all of these things fit into the same category as the discussion of aesthetics when it comes to visual things like dirt that moment when you put that first bite into your mouth to assess its flavor it
Speaker A
becomes a matter of taste and that's when you cross that Great Divide between taste and aesthetics from here on out it becomes more of a negotiation of personal opinion as people we do and we don't like certain things I might hate
Speaker A
celery and you might love celery and neither one of us is right or wrong it's just a matter of opinion you and I could both look at two paintings one of them could be a row Coco oil painting that
Speaker A
was made with classical standards of beauty in mind and it could be put next to another canvas that has strong hash marks that go in certain directions and are fairly non objective and abstract and we can both look at those two
Speaker A
canvases and we can agree that both of them were made with aesthetics in mind but you might like one versus the other and I might have a different opinion this matter of taste is the thing that we don't necessarily bring to the table
Speaker A
when we talk about what art is and what it embodies and where its merit lies when I discuss art I'm going to try and stay in the category of aesthetics which is on one side of that great divide
Speaker A
between aesthetics and taste I will probably still give my personal opinion about how I feel about things but that's less important than what those things are as a matter of fact I don't know you can't really nail anything into the ground solidly enough
Speaker A
if the ground is made of soot and opinions are soot so we're kind of nail that in stone and those are facts facts are stone I'm gonna get back to work I'm gonna go watch in sight hopefully land on Mars
Speaker A
which is very important and I'm gonna finish my coffee so until my next installment of the function of art keep making awesome stuff out there and thank you for watching
Topics:artaestheticstasteart criticismpersonal preferencesubjectivityobjective analysisart appreciationcultural contextFunction of Art











