How artificial intelligence is reshaping college for st… — Transcript

Explores how generative AI is transforming college education, challenging academic integrity, and prompting new policies and teaching methods.

Key Takeaways

Generative AI is reshaping college education by changing how students complete assignments.
Academic institutions must develop clear policies to manage AI use and uphold integrity.
AI detection tools are imperfect and can lead to false accusations, complicating enforcement.
Embracing AI as a tool can enhance learning and better prepare students for future careers.
Ongoing experimentation and policy development are crucial as AI technology evolves.

Summary

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT have become widely used by college students, with 86% reportedly using them for schoolwork.
Professors notice a shift in student writing style, often detecting AI-generated content that is polished but impersonal.
Universities are struggling to create policies to manage AI use, balancing innovation with academic integrity.
Detection software is used by some professors but is time-consuming and not always reliable, leading to false accusations.
Some students face serious consequences from AI detection tools, including failing grades or disciplinary actions.
Certain educators advocate for embracing AI as a learning aid to enhance understanding and prepare students for changing job markets.
Ohio State University has launched an AI fluency initiative requiring all undergraduates to learn and use AI tools responsibly.
The debate centers on how to integrate AI ethically into education while preserving the value of human learning and creativity.
Faculty express concerns about losing insight into student learning when AI-generated work replaces original writing.
The evolving landscape demands new frameworks and rules to guide AI use in academic settings.

Full Transcript — Download SRT & Markdown

Speaker A

AMNA NAWAZ: This year's senior class at universities across the country is the first to have spent nearly its entire college career in the age of generative A.I., a type of artificial intelligence that can create new content like text and images.

Speaker A

As the technology improves, it's harder to distinguish from human work, and it's shaking academia to its core with some very big questions.

Speaker A

Special correspondent Fred de Sam Lazaro has the story for our series Rethinking College.

Speaker A

MEGAN FRITTS, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Arkansas, Little Rock: And the principle of humanity says, treat all people as ends in themselves, never merely as means.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: About two years ago, Megan Fritts, a philosophy professor at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, began spotting something unusual about her students' writing.

Speaker A

MEGAN FRITTS: You suddenly get an essay or a test answer, some kind of assignment from a student whose normal writing you're familiar with, and you get something back that sort of sounds like an official business document or a piece

Speaker A

of technical writing, writing that sounds very highly polished, but very impersonal.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: Impersonal because it likely wasn't written by a person.

Speaker A

This was the beginning of a turning point for higher ed, as generative A.I. had swept through not only her campus, but college campuses across the country.

Speaker A

A survey last year found that 86 percent of college students are now using A.I. tools like ChatGPT, Claude A.I., and Google Gemini for school work. The reason generative A.I. has spread so quickly on college campuses is not hard to understand. It's transformed tests that used

Speaker A

to take hours, even days of writing and revision into something that can be done in mere minutes.

Speaker A

For example, I can ask ChatGPT, write me a 1,000-word essay on the topic of "Is it OK to lie?" And using a massive amount of data, it predicts and generates sentences on this topic instantly.

Speaker A

Fritts says the impact has been deeply disruptive.

Speaker A

MEGAN FRITTS: If I'm reading the writings of ChatGPT, instead of my students, I have lost the very best tool that I have to see if I am being effective in my capacity as an instructor or not.

Speaker A

BRIAN BERRY, Vice Provost, University of Arkansas, Little Rock: We really need a framework in which people can use these things and innovate while minimizing the risk.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: University policymakers have scrambled to stay ahead.

Speaker A

BRIAN BERRY: I think the realization over the past year-and-a-half is the technology is outpacing our ability to detect it.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: Vice provost of research Brian Berry leads one of U.A. Little Rock's committees tasked with creating clear campus-wide policies on A.I.

Speaker A

BRIAN BERRY: I think it really comes down to us helping students understand what's at risk, helping them understand that, if they use A.I. in the right way, it's literally the most powerful tool that they have ever been able to use, and it will make huge

Speaker A

differences. But if they use it in the wrong way, it could short-circuit their learning process.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: The university is finalizing a policy that lets professors determine what A.I.

Speaker A

use is acceptable in their classrooms, as long as they clearly outline it in their syllabus.

Speaker A

But, for Fritts, who has a strict no-A.I. policy, identifying it has been complicated and time-consuming.

Speaker A

MEGAN FRITTS: So, Phrasly is one of the softwares that I use. If I suspect A.I. use, then the first thing I do is I do use detection softwares. I actually use eight different detection softwares.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: If her suspicion is confirmed, she does meet with the student.

Speaker A

MEGAN FRITTS: And if they can talk about the thing that they wrote about, then great, but a lot of times they can't.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: It sounds like it's tedious and a lot more work for professors like yourself.

Speaker A

MEGAN FRITTS: It certainly cuts into my life quite a bit. It at least has sometimes made teaching feel like policing.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: And these detection methods are not foolproof. Students online say that they're caught in the middle.

Speaker A

WOMAN: I have been falsely accused by my university of using A.I. to write a paper.

Speaker A

WOMAN: My final paper got detected as 60 percent A.I.

Speaker A

ASHLEY DUNN, Recent Graduate, Louisiana State University: We might be about to find out if I'm going to falsely get kicked out of college for...

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: Ashley Dunn was a senior at Louisiana State University when she was accused of using A.I. to write a short essay for a British literature class after a detection tool flagged her writing last year.

Speaker A

ASHLEY DUNN: And I was like, am I going to fail this class? Am I going to get a zero?

Speaker A

Every college takes plagiarism and that kind of thing very seriously. So I was just freaking out.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: After communicating with her professor, Dunn says she was eventually given an A for the assignment, but the response to her on TikTok proves that this is a widespread issue.

Speaker A

ASHLEY DUNN: A lot of people ended up making responses to my video pretty much saying that they had gone through the same thing, but that they didn't really get as lucky, that they ended up either getting zeros or failing the class.

Speaker A

Some people recently have been making videos about, oh, my professor said that my essay was A.I. because I used an em dash. But that's just a regular way of writing, especially for a college level.

Speaker A

LORI KENDALL, Professor, The Ohio State University: You're going to be asked to go out and venture into gen A.I.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: Not all schools are anti-A.I. Some are actually looking for ways to embrace it.

Speaker A

Lori Kendall teaches an entrepreneurship class in the Fisher College of Business at The Ohio State University.

Speaker A

LORI KENDALL: When gen A.I. came out, I and every other instructor did, oh, great, now what? Do we allow A.I.? Do we not allow A.I.? And the reality is, you know what, they're going to use it anyway.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: She now encourages her students to use A.I. to critically examine their original work and as a learning aid.

Speaker A

RACHEL GERVAIS, Undergraduate Student, The Ohio State University: A lot of people might use A.I. just to get assignments done, plagiarism, but I like to use A.I. just for a deeper understanding.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: Rachel Gervais is a first-year student majoring in air transportation.

Speaker A

RACHEL GERVAIS: I will oftentimes use A.I. to create questions regarding this topic, so I not only get a better understanding of the actual material, but I also can test and see what I need to maybe focus on even more.

Speaker A

LORI KENDALL: If you don't use A.I. or the next technology that comes along to be more effective, you're not going to be competitive in the job market. The job market's changing right underneath your feet.

Speaker A

RAVI BELLAMKONDA, Executive Vice President and Provost, The Ohio State University: As the chief academic officer, I get to decide on academic integrity issues, honor code and violations.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: Ravi Bellamkonda is executive vice president and provost at Ohio State University. He says he was struck by one alleged violation last year, a student accused of using A.I. It was a case of cheating, he says, but it made him think.

Speaker A

RAVI BELLAMKONDA: What if there exists a technology that indeed lets our students produce work of very high quality? Shouldn't we investigate this a little further?

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: Bellamkonda spearheaded Ohio State's new A.I. fluency initiative, which requires all undergraduate students across academic disciplines learn and use A.I. tools.

Speaker A

RAVI BELLAMKONDA: The trick is to figure out, like any human interaction with technology, what can be off-loaded to technology and what do we need to add the value to? Ohio State wants to be at the front of that creation of those rules.

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: That's prompted experimentation across the disciplines, like music professor Tina Tallon's A.I. and music class, which ex

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: But, inevitably, these tools also bring major disruption to academia and to the jobs students hope to someday fill.

Speaker A

RAVI BELLAMKONDA: How do we go through a transformative moment like this with the disruptions that it is going to cause, and yet do this in a way that ultimately is additive to us as a society, that it improves our lot as human beings?

Speaker A

FRED DE SAM LAZARO: A question without a clear answer, he says, but one that students should help tackle.

Speaker A

For the "PBS News Hour," I'm Fred de Sam Lazaro in Columbus, Ohio.

Topics:generative AIcollege educationacademic integrityChatGPTAI detectionhigher education policyAI fluencystudent learningAI in classroomsacademic cheating

Frequently Asked Questions

How prevalent is the use of generative AI among college students?

A survey found that 86% of college students are using generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude AI, and Google Gemini for their schoolwork.

What challenges do professors face with AI-generated student work?

Professors find AI-generated writing to be highly polished but impersonal, making it difficult to assess student learning. Detecting AI use is time-consuming and detection tools are not always reliable.

How are universities responding to the rise of AI in education?

Universities are creating policies that allow professors to set AI use rules in their classrooms. Some, like Ohio State University, are embracing AI by requiring students to learn and use AI tools responsibly.

Get More with the Söz AI App

Transcribe recordings, audio files, and YouTube videos — with AI summaries, speaker detection, and unlimited transcriptions.

App Store Google Play

Or transcribe another YouTube video here →