Tribunal audio analysis reveals use of live ammunition disguised as rubber bullets in the killing of two Palestinian teens in 2014.
Key Takeaways
- Live ammunition was used despite official claims of only rubber bullets being fired.
- Audio forensic analysis can reveal critical evidence about the nature of gunfire in conflict incidents.
- Use of rubber bullet adapters to disguise live fire is a documented tactic.
- There is a lack of thorough investigations into Palestinian deaths, contributing to impunity.
- Visual and audio evidence combined provide a strong case against official narratives.
Summary
- On May 15, 2014, two unarmed Palestinian teenagers, Nadeem Nawara and Muhammad Abu Daher, were fatally shot in Betunia, West Bank.
- An audio forensic expert analyzed gunshot sounds recorded by news crews to determine the type of ammunition used.
- The Israeli Defense Forces claimed only rubber-coated steel bullets were fired, but evidence showed live rounds were used.
- The fatal shots had sonic signatures inconsistent with rubber bullets and typical M16 live rounds, indicating use of a silencer or adapter.
- A rubber bullet adapter was allegedly used to disguise live fire, a tactic supported by testimonies from Israeli military blogs.
- The tribunal examined visual and audio evidence, including photographs capturing rubber bullets in mid-flight and sound visualizations.
- Objections and denials arose during the tribunal, highlighting disputes over evidence and witness testimonies.
- The case suggests a pattern of similar killings and cover-ups involving Israeli soldiers using live ammunition while claiming rubber bullets.
- The families of the victims withheld autopsy evidence, considering the case clear based on audio and visual proof.
- The tribunal underscores issues of accountability and transparency in investigations of Palestinian deaths in conflict zones.











