'Horrifying for survivors': Epstein survivors’ attorney slams sloppy files release

the imbalance, Michael, is horrifying.

And thanks for having me with you.

but that's exactly how so many of the survivors feel.

They feel that this is been incompetent.

They feel that this has been intentional.

And they feel this has been intimidating.

And all those things have been just horrifying to so many of the survivors.

And it doesn't make any sense.

It is not that difficult to redact documents.

If we just step back a minute and think about how is that

How is that done?

You take, let's say, two or three attorneys, and obviously you have to have multiple attorneys because there's so many pages.

You give them clear instructions on what to redact.

And that those clear instructions should have been developed with the survivors, the survivors attorneys.

They were not.

But even so, you give them clear instructions on what to redact.

And then they redact.

The individuals get redacted, the names, the identifying information.

And then you have a supervisor, at least one supervisor, and perhaps two, go over the documents again and double check.

But clearly that was not done.

And it's it's a simple thing to do.

Some of the big news this week is the Clintons

coming in for depositions.

The President of the United States had what I would call an interesting reaction to that news.

Take a listen to what he had to say.

Mr President

today

we heard that the Clintons set deposition dates to testify before the House oversight committee.

Any reaction to that related to the Epstein question?

I think it's a shame.

I'll be honest.

I always liked him.

Her, yeah.

She's a very capable woman.

She was better in debating than some of the other people.

I will tell you that.

She was smarter.

Smart woman.

I hate to say it in many ways.

It's interesting, it's a level of empathy rarely expressed by this president.

And I wonder if it had anything to do with what Democrats on Capitol Hill are saying.

Which is that this effectively sets a precedent.

You have Ted Lou saying, we're absolutely going to have Donald Trump testify under oath.

You have Maxwell Frost saying, it does set a precedent, and we will follow it.

Donald Trump, all of his kids, everybody.

Do you think we ever see that day, Jennifer?

I don't think we'll see that day in the near future.

I've hoped to see that day.

But I really doubt that it will be very soon.

I think that the Trump administration has so much power over whether or not he would testify.

I think that would that's highly unlikely.

But certainly it's a good precedent to set for everyone.

Because this is what the survivors want.

They want the truth.

And the truth comes out when everyone is is investigated.

Everyone gets a chance and everyone is pushed and pressed to give the facts.

What they know and what they don't know.

You know, in the

I I think the facts are very important.

And yesterday at the White House, we've played some sound from the

from the president talking about this investigation.

Alicia just played the sound talking about the Clintons.

And you know, he attacked Caitlyn Collins, a journalist from CNN.

yesterday for asking what justice looks like for survivors.

And he didn't seem interested in the justice detailing what that would be.

He's not saying move on because the survivors have gotten justice.

And I I want to highlight Virginia Juffrey's family.

This was today

about the release of

some documents from the Epstein files.

We would like to note that in the new Epstein files that the DOJ released last week, there is a sworn deposition from Virginia made in a lawsuit.

DOJ did not redact the names of most of the abusers Virginia named, and we wish to make sure that this is known.

We are hopeful that more of her abusers' names will be released in future Epstein files from the DOJ and/or Epstein's estate.

From the family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre.

Why don't we know more of the names of the men

and women that participated in the abuse and trafficking of these girls?

what I've seen so far in the documents are the FD 302s.

And those are the interview notes between the FBI interviewing, when I say a survivor or a witness.

And those FD 302s that I've seen are completely blocked out.

So the information would be in there.

That's where it likely would be, they would talk about who they met with, who they had some kind of interactions with.

But those it's blank.

There's page after page of blank.

But certainly in the news, there's been enough information about specific names.

So I just I guess I really don't get it.

That how can you say that there's no one to look at here?

When also what's missing, it seems to be missing in the files are any effort to follow up.

Okay, you have Virginia Giuffre's clip and portion of her testimony.

Which I'm really glad you showed.

Those are names.

What did they do with those names?

Did they meet with them?

Did they get a deposition from them?

Did they get documents from them?

What did they do?

It doesn't look like they did anything.

Which just seems like what they did with Maria Farmer in 1996.

When she reported, she reported Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to the FBI in 1996.

And it looks like nothing was done there either.